Code understanding tool selection. Use when exploring architecture, finding definitions, tracing call chains, assessing blast radius of changes, or debugging code paths in the Genesis codebase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
596 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Code understanding tool selection. Use when exploring architecture, finding definitions, tracing call chains, assessing blast radius of changes, or debugging code paths in the Genesis codebase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user's prompt requires (1) researching a topic across multiple sources, comparing options or alternatives, analyzing trends or history, understanding markets or industries, or reviewing literature or studies and (2) synthesizing that research into a comprehensive, narrative report. If you're planning to search the web or internal knowledge bases, consider using this skill. This skill coordinates research subagents, so use it only when you have a tool for spawning subagents (the Agent or Task tool); otherwise, research the question directly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user wants intellectual understanding — learning how or why something works, not getting a task done or soliciting Claude's judgment. Trigger for: - Explicit learning requests: teach, explain, ELI5, walk me through, quiz me, flashcards, "I'm rusty on"; definitions ("what is X") - Terse concept names implying "help me understand this": "Galois theory," "transformers, from scratch" - Confusion signals: "won't stick," "keep mixing these up," "not getting it" - Learning-path questions: prerequisites, sequencing, what to study before X - Conceptual questions about mechanisms, causes, or dynamics Don't trigger for: - Tasks: coding, writing, calculation, translation, factual lookup, news updates - Personal troubleshooting; resource/textbook recommendations - Claude's evaluative verdict: opinion prompts ("do you think X", "settle this", "honest take", "is X dead / still taken seriously") and interpretive takes ("was X really as harsh as people say")
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The learner teaches the concept to the AI, which plays a curious novice peer and identifies gaps through authentic questions. Use when the learner wants to test their understanding — teaching forces a different kind of organisation than studying.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map a current event below the surface into patterns, structures, and mental models. Use when a class or team needs systemic understanding before action.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create self-explanation prompts that deepen understanding of worked examples, texts, or diagrams. Use when students read material passively without engaging with underlying principles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a RULER emotional literacy sequence for recognising, understanding, labelling, expressing, and regulating emotions. Use when students struggle with emotional regulation, conflict, or anxiety.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Before any explanation or answer, require the learner to produce a free-recall attempt and confidence rating. Use when a student wants help understanding or reviewing a topic — this skill ensures the AI works from what the learner already knows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design metacognitive checkpoints that prevent AI-assisted learning from bypassing genuine understanding. Use when students use AI tools and may overestimate their own comprehension.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a Socratic questioning sequence that develops conceptual understanding through guided inquiry. Use when facilitating philosophical discussions, concept exploration, or critical examination.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a learning sequence teaching prompt quality — comparing vague vs. refined prompts to show why specificity and context transform AI output. Use when students use AI without understanding why output quality varies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design structured perspective-taking activities with anti-projection guardrails. Develops genuine understanding of complexity across history, social sciences, and literature — not performed empathy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synthesise completed KUD charts into a developmental progression matrix and per-competency narrative sections. Use when you need a programme-level view of how knowledge, understanding, and performance develop across bands.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate elaborative interrogation prompts that deepen encoding through targeted why and how questions. Use when students memorise without understanding or need deeper processing of content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a diagnostic hinge question that reveals whether students understand enough to move on. Use when planning key checkpoints mid-lesson during explicit or direct instruction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a teacher think-aloud that models historical thinking strategies with a specific document. Use when planning explicit strategy instruction or when students follow a protocol without understanding the underlying reasoning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Require the learner to explain a concept in their own words before the AI evaluates or extends it. Ensures the AI works from the learner's understanding rather than providing an explanation from scratch.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design deliberately flawed examples that develop error-detection skills and deepen understanding. Use when students make characteristic errors and need practice spotting mistakes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a learning progression showing prerequisite-to-mastery steps for a target skill or understanding. Use when sequencing content, designing diagnostics, or mapping prerequisite gaps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze and extract information from images using multimodal AI recognition. Triggered when users want to analyze, describe, or extract information from an image URL — image recognition, image analysis, image description, visual content understanding, OCR text recognition, or visual Q&A. When a user provides an image URL and asks questions about its visual content, this skill should be triggered even if they do not explicitly say "image recognition."
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Amazon niche market review analysis and consumer sentiment insights. Trigger when the user mentions niche market review analysis, consumer sentiment, user pain points, customer feedback insights, review topic analysis, positive/negative review breakdown, niche market opinion mining, product review sentiment analysis, niche market reviews, consumer sentiment, customer pain points, review topic analysis, positive/negative reviews, opinion mining, Nexscope data. Even if the user does not explicitly mention "niche market reviews", if their need involves analyzing consumer reviews within Amazon niche markets or understanding customer sentiment at the niche market level, this skill should also be triggered.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose problems before solving them: turn "X is broken and we don't know why" into a precise problem statement, verified root causes, solutions traced to those causes, and a rollout plan. Use whenever the user reports something failing, breaking, slowing, or recurring without a known cause: "sales dropped and we don't know why", "this keeps happening", "why does X keep failing", "find the root cause", "run a post-mortem", "5 whys"; Vietnamese "sao cứ bị vậy hoài", "tìm nguyên nhân gốc", "X đang hỏng mà không rõ vì sao". Trigger even when the user asks for solutions directly: "give me ideas to fix falling sales" is a diagnosis request. Not for open-ended ideation when nothing is broken (brainstorm-coach), understanding user needs (design-thinking), or company-level strategic bets (strategy-board).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Socratic questioning partner named Gadfly for deep learning through dialogue. Use this skill when the user wants to learn, understand, or explore a topic through questions rather than explanations. Trigger when the user says "teach me about...", "help me understand...", "I want to learn...", "ask me questions about...", "quiz me", "Socratic method", "Gadfly", or wants to deeply understand something through dialogue rather than passive reading. Also trigger when the user provides a text or document and wants to be questioned about it, or wants to check their own understanding of a concept.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。