「verify」の検索結果

Before any PR that touches frontend, run the app and visually verify PT/EN pages on mobile and desktop. Use when finishing UI work or opening a frontend PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-PR verification for VenTu — tests, data validation, static build, and e2e for the touched surface. Use before opening any PR. For visual UI checks also load ventu-verify-ui.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Self-review, audit, or verify CS/AI/ML paper drafts as a critical peer reviewer. Three-round review (evidence→argument→style) with Verification Status and debt tracking. Use when: reviewing a paper draft before submission, checking evidence compliance of claims, simulating peer reviewer feedback, verifying citation closure and evidence debts, performing cross-section consistency checks. Triggers on: 审修, self review, 自查, verification, revise, 修订, check draft, 审稿, evidence compliance, peer review, 论文审查, draft audit, 验证论文, 检查引用, cross-section review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conventional Commits 形式で git コミットを作成する。staged 差分から type/scope を推定し、breaking change やシークレット混入 (.env 等) を検出。pre-commit フックを必ず通す (`--no-verify` 不可)。「コミットして」「git commit」「変更を記録して」などで使用。

実装タスクの規律を担保する開発ワークフロー手順 （explore → plan → implement → verify → commit）。 非自明な実装・バグ修正・リファクタリング（プロダクトコードを書く/変更するタスク全般）に 着手するときは必ず使う。Plan Mode 等で探索・計画が済んでいる場合も、 implement 以降（テスト戦略 → 検証 → コミット）の規律として適用する。 新規プロダクト開発と既存プロダクト改修で手順が分岐する。

開発修正・機能実装後の動作確認→スクショ撮影→テストチェックリスト→修正報告書（md+PDF）作成の一連のワークフロー。 Use when: 「動作確認して」「スクショ撮って」「テスト結果まとめて」「修正報告書作って」「確認してPDFで送って」等の依頼。 開発作業後のブラウザ確認、スクリーンショット収集、テスト結果の文書化、PDF報告書生成に使用。 Don't use when: コードの実装のみ（動作確認・報告書が不要な場合）。デザインレビュー（実装の動作確認ではない場合）。

Verify completion and success claims with fresh evidence. Use before claiming a task is complete, a fix works, tests pass, or a feature is ready for GO.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Start the Openrind Desktop dev stack via Docker and verify real user flows via Chrome MCP. Triggers when user mentions: - "dev-up.sh" - "docker dev stack" - "verify in chrome mcp" - "test the real flow"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover, build, verify, and optionally export (HTML, optional PDF) the evidence manifest of one SDD Composy task in evidence_required, routing it toward review_required. Use when acceptance evidence must be assembled or checked — 'juntar as evidências da task', 'gerar o relatório de evidências', 'verify the evidence manifest'. Do NOT use to run tests (sdd-qa), review code (sdd-review), or inspect the trace (sdd-trace).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarially verify an implementation against its objective, acceptance criteria, definition of done, and prohibitions using fresh evidence. Use for completion gates, release readiness, or independent verification after implementation and review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write comprehensive end-to-end tests that verify complete user workflows, integration between components, and system behavior from user perspective using Playwright, Cypress, or similar frameworks. Use when testing user flows, verifying feature integration, testing across real browsers, ensuring UI interactions work correctly, validating form submissions end-to-end, testing authentication flows, catching regressions, automating QA processes, testing API integrations, or building confidence in production deployments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate any URL, interact with elements, verify page state, diff before/after actions, take annotated screenshots, check responsive layouts, test forms and uploads, handle dialogs, and assert element states. ~100ms per command. Use when you need to test a feature, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with evidence. Use when asked to "open in browser", "test the site", "take a screenshot", or "dogfood this". (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Critically audit agent skills and remove content that is outdated, disproven, model-specific, or based on poorly cited sources. Load when improve-skills runs its per-skill cycle, when the user asks to prune skills, remove outdated techniques, check if skills are still valid, verify citations in skills, audit skill sources, or update skills for a new model release. Also triggers on "are these skills still valid", "check for obsolete techniques", "verify skill citations", or "update skills for GPT-5/Claude 4/Gemini 2". Runs before split-skill and compress-skill — removing bad content first means the remaining content is worth preserving.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to verify that a driver's medical certificate was issued by a certified examiner on the FMCSA National Registry. Covers the search process, what to verify, and how to handle examiner removal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "PR を出す前に確認して", "check if this branch is ready to merge", "run pre-PR checks", "PRを作る前にチェックして", or wants to verify a branch before opening a pull request. Executes verification commands, validates Conventional Commits format, and confirms documentation is updated, then reports whether gh pr create is safe to run.

This skill should be used when the user asks to "sandboxの互換性をチェックして", "sandbox設定を確認して", "このプロジェクトでsandboxが使えるか調べて", "sandboxでコマンドが失敗する", "check sandbox compatibility", "verify sandbox settings", "sandbox is blocking my commands", or wants to ensure their development workflow works within Claude Code's sandbox restrictions — either proactively before starting work or reactively after encountering sandbox-related failures.

This skill should be used when the user wants to "test a claim against data", "validate an empirical hypothesis", "refine a model/theory with evidence", "characterize a pattern and verify it", "演繹と帰納で検証", "仮説をデータで検証して更新", "実例と反例で確かめる", "弁証法ループ", "主張を現物で裏取り", "傾向分析を検証して精緻化", or mentions iteratively updating a hypothesis by deriving predictions and testing them against a real corpus. NOTE: Use this for VALIDATING/REFINING an empirical claim or model against real data through a derive→test→update loop. Use strong-inference for debugging an UNKNOWN cause, and devils-advocate for adversarially stress-testing a DESIGN proposal.

Use when GitHub may have shipped a GraphQL schema update affecting timeline event unions (PullRequestTimelineItems / IssueTimelineItems), when the gh-timeline dispatcher fallback is hitting more than expected, before a gh-timeline release, or when the user requests phrases like "verify timeline coverage", "audit gh-timeline schema", "check for new timeline events", "GitHub schema changed". Walks through schema diff → patch → test update → live verification → optional fixture refresh, marking each spot where a human decision is required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify implementation matches change artifacts. Use when the user wants to validate that implementation is complete, correct, and coherent before archiving.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review and verify unverified wiki pages — "review unverified pages", "verify wiki content", verification pass, after a major ingest cycle, before content release. The gate that turns AI-generated knowledge into trusted knowledge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Store, verify, and manage AI data on the Ethereum blockchain (Base network) using the ERCData standard. Use when an agent needs to store data fingerprints on-chain, verify data integrity, create audit trails, manage access control for private data, or interact with the ERCData smart contract. Supports public and private storage, EIP-712 verification, snapshots, and batch operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OpenClawの変更内容に合うテストやチェックを選び、失敗原因を調べるスキル。ローカル検証から環境依存の確認、リリース検証の担当手順への振り分けまで扱います。

• ソース変更に合う検証を選びたいとき
• 不具合の再現と修正確認
• CIの失敗原因を調べたいとき

OpenClawのプラグインを公開前に検証し、導入・削除、設定修復、起動、SDK互換性や配布パッケージの動作を確認して、結果と未検証項目を整理するスキル。

• 公開前に同梱プラグインの導入・削除を確かめたいとき
• ベータ版をクリーンな環境で検証したいとき
• 設定修復とgateway起動を確認したいとき