Fetch Google review ratings and review counts for businesses via DataForSEO API. Use when the user asks to check Google reviews, get review counts, compare business ratings, audit Google Maps presence, or analyze competitor reviews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OpenClaudia/openclaudia-skills☆ 7152026年10月11日 更新
Compose and Compose Multiplatform expert for UI development across Android, Desktop, iOS, and Web. Use whenever the user mentions Compose APIs (@Composable, remember, LaunchedEffect, NavHost, MaterialTheme, LazyColumn, Modifier, recomposition), Compose Multiplatform (commonMain, expect/actual, Res.*, ComposeUIViewController, UIKitView, ComposeViewport), Android TV (tv-material, D-pad, focus, Carousel), Material 3 motion, atomic design systems, design-to-code workflows, Paging 3, or navigation. Activates Review Mode on GitHub PR URLs and review phrases ("review this PR", "what's wrong with this"). Auto-detects Compose projects on session_start. Backed by actual androidx/androidx and JetBrains/compose-multiplatform-core source receipts. See "## When this skill applies" in SKILL.md for the full trigger surface.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
aldefy/compose-skill☆ 5962026年7月23日 更新
Implement ViewBinding, RecyclerView, and XML layouts correctly on Android. Use when changing XML view binding or RecyclerView behavior, including its item animations and layout managers; defer standalone animation or layout-manager questions unrelated to RecyclerView.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard☆ 5752026年10月12日 更新
Mines a pull request's review threads for lessons that generalize beyond that PR, reconstructs each against the actual code before deciding, checks whether it is already codified, and routes the genuinely-new, durable ones into Infrahub's internal documentation — `dev/knowledge/`, `dev/guides/`, `dev/guidelines/`, the `AGENTS.md` files, and `.agents/rules/` — proposing edits first and applying only with the user's approval. TRIGGER when: the user wants to turn PR review feedback into durable conventions, guidelines, or rules; capture recurring reviewer comments as internal documentation; or check whether review lessons are reflected in the knowledge/guides/guidelines/AGENTS.md/rules layer. DO NOT TRIGGER when: sweeping a feature's changes for documentation coverage across all layers → use `audit-docs`; extracting knowledge from completed spec directories → `speckit-opsmill-extract`; only replying to or resolving review threads → normal git/gh flow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
opsmill/infrahub☆ 5372026年10月14日 更新
Implement the Model-View-ViewModel pattern in .NET applications with proper separation of concerns, data binding, commands, and testable ViewModels using MVVM Toolkit. USE FOR: implementing UI separation with Model-View-ViewModel; using MVVM Toolkit (CommunityToolkit.Mvvm) for ViewModels; designing testable UI architecture. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
managedcode/dotnet-skills☆ 4862026年10月13日 更新
Previews and exports documents stored in Volcengine TOS: generate PDF/PNG/JPG previews, read page counts, resolve HTML preview URLs, and batch-export PDF pages as images. Use this skill when the user needs to convert or preview office documents (Word, Excel, PPT, PDF), export specific pages as images, get document page counts, or generate HTML preview links — even if they don't explicitly mention 'doc-preview' or 'document conversion'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
bytedance/agentkit-samples☆ 4712026年10月12日 更新
Designs customer interviews and turns the transcripts into decisions. Produces an interview guide plus a synthesis (forces of progress, jobs, pathways, opportunities) you can paste into a doc. Use for 'customer interviews', 'discovery calls', 'JTBD', 'switch interview', 'who should I talk to', 'how many interviews', 'synthesize these transcripts', or 'why do customers churn/buy'. Draws on 140 Lenny's Podcast guests incl. Teresa Torres, Bob Moesta and Judd Antin.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
menkesu/awesome-pm-skills☆ 4422026年10月6日 更新
Pull request lifecycle: commit, codex review, sync, review, fix, status, cleanup, and PR mining. Use when user wants to commit changes, get a second-opinion code review from Codex, push changes, create a PR, check PR status, fix review comments, clean up branches after merge, or mine tribal knowledge from PR reviews. Use for "commit my changes", "codex review", "push my changes", "create a PR", "pr status", "fix PR comments", "clean up branches", "mine PRs", or "address feedback".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
notque/vexjoy-agent☆ 4412026年10月13日 更新
Iterative worker-reviewer cycle that spawns a critic subagent to score work 1-10 and provide actionable feedback, then revises until a quality gate is met. Use when implementing features, writing specs, reviewing existing code, or completing any task where quality matters more than speed. Trigger phrases: "use review-loop", "polish this", "iterate on this", "/review-loop", "review with feedback loop".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
aiskillstore/marketplace☆ 4322026年10月13日 更新
Run an independent peer review via Claude. Use when the user asks to "peer review", "peer review my code", "peer review my plan", "get a second opinion", or "independent review".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
tobihagemann/turbo☆ 4092026年10月13日 更新
Run an independent peer review via Codex. Use when the user asks to "peer review", "peer review my code", "peer review my plan", "get a second opinion", or "independent review".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
tobihagemann/turbo☆ 4092026年10月13日 更新
Posts review findings from a JSON file as inline comments on a GitHub Pull Request, attaching each comment to its file and line. Use when you have a list/JSON of review findings (each with a file path, line number, and a message such as summary/failure_scenario) and want them published on a PR as inline review comments. Triggers include "post these review comments on the PR", "associate comments to files in the PR", "publish review findings to PR
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit☆ 3572026年9月10日 更新
Run a full pull request review and post review comments directly to the current branch's GitHub PR. Requires the gh CLI to be installed and a PR to already exist for the current branch. Use when you want review feedback posted to GitHub as PR comments. For local code review without posting to GitHub, use code-review instead. Does not write or update PR descriptions — use update-pr-description for that.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
testdouble/han☆ 2832026年10月1日 更新
Build work collaboratively in reviewable pieces, handing each piece back for review before starting the next, so the person stays in the lead and steers while the work happens instead of reviewing a finished result. Use when someone says to pair with them on something, asks to collaborate rather than direct, wants to review as it goes, or wants to guide the work piece by piece — on code, on a design decision, or on writing. For a test-first build it runs tdd, for restructuring it runs refactor, for an interface contract it runs design-an-api, and for plan work it runs iterative-plan-review or plan-implementation, each collaboratively; invoke any of those directly instead to run it straight through without pausing. Does not pace someone through code that already exists and builds nothing — use code-walkthrough. Does not explain, summarize, or research something instead of producing it — use code-overview or research.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
testdouble/han☆ 2832026年10月1日 更新
Generate a PR description from the current branch's changes against a GitHub PR, using the gh CLI. Use when writing, drafting, or updating pull request descriptions, PR summaries, or PR bodies. Does not review code or post review comments — use code-review for local review or post-code-review-to-pr for posting a review to GitHub.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
testdouble/han☆ 2832026年10月1日 更新
Run the end-to-end viewer smoke test (`tests/viewer_smoke.sh`). Spawns `rezolus view` in upload-only, file, A/B, and proxy modes, exercises the API endpoints, and verifies experiment attach/detach. Use after any change touching `src/viewer/` or before opening a viewer-related PR.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
iopsystems/rezolus☆ 2752026年10月14日 更新
Fix HTTP 500 / ClickHouse "column not found" errors when filtering by a MATERIALIZED column through a VIEW that doesn't expose it. Use when: (1) a WHERE clause references alias.column on a view but the column is MATERIALIZED on the underlying table, (2) the query works on the raw table but fails through the view, (3) adding a new filter param to an API causes 500 even though the column exists in the base table. Fix by using a subquery against the base table instead of referencing the column directly on the view. Applies to ClickHouse views over tables with MATERIALIZED or ALIAS columns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
divinevideo/divine-mobile☆ 2662026年10月14日 更新
Perform a structured code review by composing validation checklists from relevant atoms based on what code changed. Loads atoms conditionally -- clean-code always, architecture/DDD/security/tests only when the delta touches their domain. Produces a severity-ordered report with specific locations and fixes. Use when the user asks to 'review this', 'code review', 'quality check', 'validate the code', 'check my code', 'review the delta', or 'review this PR'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
techygarg/lattice☆ 1992026年10月10日 更新
Deep behavioral audit of a Lattice skill — proposes 3 review personas relevant to the skill, runs independent scenario analysis from each persona's perspective, then merges only the high-confidence, practical findings into a severity-ordered gap report with proposed fixes. Structural validation (conventions, cross-references) is skill-validate's job — this skill finds gaps that would realistically surface when someone actually uses the skill: missing scenario handling, ambiguous instructions, silent failure cases, and behavioral inconsistencies. Filters out theoretical edge cases, low-likelihood speculation, and findings owned by other skills. Use after writing or significantly changing any skill, or when the user says 'review this skill', 'deep review', 'does this skill work', 'find gaps in this skill', 'stress test this skill', 'review from different angles', or 'skill review'. Standalone — does not call other skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
techygarg/lattice☆ 1992026年10月10日 更新
Avalonia ViewModels with Zafiro workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Optimal ViewModel and Wizard creation patterns for Avalonia using Zafiro and ReactiveUI and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skills☆ 1602026年7月8日 更新
Web 线上展览开发 (虚拟展厅) (Web 线上展览 / 虚拟展厅开发 (从业者/工程视角) — 用 web 技术开发线上展览、虚拟展厅、云展会、数字展馆,覆盖 3D 空间、全景漫游、WebXR、文博数字化、营销云展厅、3D 商品展示等形态。覆盖: (a) 技术栈 — 3D web(Three.js / React Three Fiber / Babylon.js / Google model-viewer / WebGL / WebGPU)、全景(Pannellum / Marzipano / Photo Sphere Viewer / krpano / 720云)、WebXR(WebXR Device API / A-Frame)、资产管线(glTF·GLB / Draco / Meshopt / KTX2 纹理压缩 / gltf-transform / LOD); (b) 自研 vs SaaS 平台选型(国内: 众趣 / 酷雷曼 / 比目鱼 / 会鸽 / 3DVista; 海外: Matterport / Kuula / Artsteps / Spatial); (c) 性能优化(大场景加载 / 模型轻量化 / draw call / 移动端 / 首屏 / 显存)——web 3D 第一性难题; (d) 策展与导览(动线设计 / 热点 hotspot / 语音讲解 / 交互); (e) 文博数字化(IIIF / 数字孪生 / 高清文物) 与 会展·电商商业化(营销云展厅 / 数据埋点 / 线索转化); (f) 部署(CDN / 流式加载 / 跨端兼容 / WebGL 降级)。学派分歧: 自研 Three.js vs SaaS 平台、真 3D 重场景 vs 720 全景轻量、WebGL vs WebGPU、文博考据派 vs 营销转化派、沉浸优先 vs 加载优先。不含: 线下展陈 / 展台搭建、原生 VR App(非 web)、通用 3D 游戏开发、纯 3D 建模教程。) Master OS — automated mastery of Web 线上展览 / 虚拟展厅开发 (从业者/工程视角) — 用 web 技术开发线上展览、虚拟展厅、云展会、数字展馆,覆盖 3D 空间、全景漫游、WebXR、文博数字化、营销云展厅、3D 商品展示等形态。覆盖: (a) 技术栈 — 3D web(Three.js / React Three Fiber / Babylon.js / Google model-viewer / WebGL / WebGPU)、全景(Pannellum / Marzipano / Photo Sphere Viewer / krpano / 720云)、WebXR(WebXR Device API / A-Frame)、资产管线(glTF·GLB / Draco / Meshopt / KTX2 纹理压缩 / gltf-transform / LOD); (b) 自研 vs SaaS 平台选型(国内: 众趣 / 酷雷曼 / 比目鱼 / 会鸽 / 3DVista; 海外: Matterport / Kuula / Artsteps / Spatial); (c) 性能优化(大场景加载 / 模型轻量化 / draw call / 移动端 / 首屏 / 显存)——web 3D 第一性难题; (d) 策展与导览(动线设计 / 热点 hotspot / 语音讲解 / 交互); (e) 文博数字化(IIIF / 数字孪生 / 高清文物) 与 会展·电商商业化(营销云展厅 / 数据埋点 / 线索转化); (f) 部署(CDN / 流式加载 / 跨端兼容 / WebGL 降级)。学派分歧: 自研 Three.js vs SaaS 平台、真 3D 重场景 vs 720 全景轻量、WebGL vs WebGPU、文博考据派 vs 营销转化派、沉浸优先 vs 加载优先。不含: 线下展陈 / 展台搭建、原生 VR App(非 web)、通用 3D 游戏开发、纯 3D 建模教程。: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on Web 线上展览 / 虚拟展厅开发 (从业者/工程视角) — 用 web 技术开发线上展览、虚拟展厅、云展会、数字展馆,覆盖 3D 空间、全景漫游、WebXR、文博数字化、营销云展厅、3D 商品展示等形态。覆盖: (a) 技术栈 — 3D web(Three.js / React Three Fiber / Babylon.js / Google model-viewer / WebGL / WebGPU)、全景(Pannellum / Marzipano / Photo Sphere Viewer / krpano / 720云)、WebXR(WebXR Device API / A-Frame)、资产管线(glTF·GLB / Draco / Meshopt / KTX2 纹理压缩 / gltf-transform / LOD); (b) 自研 vs SaaS 平台选型(国内: 众趣 / 酷雷曼 / 比目鱼 / 会鸽 / 3DVista; 海外: Matterport / Kuula / Artsteps / Spatial); (c) 性能优化(大场景加载 / 模型轻量化 / draw call / 移动端 / 首屏 / 显存)——web 3D 第一性难题; (d) 策展与导览(动线设计 / 热点 hotspot / 语音讲解 / 交互); (e) 文博数字化(IIIF / 数字孪生 / 高清文物) 与 会展·电商商业化(营销云展厅 / 数据埋点 / 线索转化); (f) 部署(CDN / 流式加载 / 跨端兼容 / WebGL 降级)。学派分歧: 自研 Three.js vs SaaS 平台、真 3D 重场景 vs 720 全景轻量、WebGL vs WebGPU、文博考据派 vs 营销转化派、沉浸优先 vs 加载优先。不含: 线下展陈 / 展台搭建、原生 VR App(非 web)、通用 3D 游戏开发、纯 3D 建模教程。 problems and wants industry-grade thinking, tool selection, or workflow guidance. 触发词:「线上展览」「虚拟展厅」「web 线上展览」「云展厅」「数字展馆」
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
swaylq/master-skill☆ 1552026年9月6日 更新
Review code changes for correctness, security, performance, and code quality. Use when the user asks to review a diff, review code changes, review commits, or perform a code review. Input can be: (1) a text diff pasted directly, (2) one or more git commit hashes to extract the diff from, or (3) a git range like abc123..def456. The user may also provide task description or requirements that motivated the change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
EliasOulkadi/shokunin☆ 1142026年10月5日 更新
Code review focused exclusively on over-engineering. Finds what to delete: reinvented standard library, unneeded dependencies, speculative abstractions, dead flexibility. One line per finding: location, what to cut, what replaces it. Use when the user says "review for over-engineering", "what can we delete", "is this over-engineered", "simplify review", or invokes /ponytail-review. Complements correctness-focused review, this one only hunts complexity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles☆ 902026年9月24日 更新
Reviews Phoenix LiveView code for lifecycle patterns, assigns/streams usage, components, and security. Use when reviewing LiveView modules, .heex templates, or LiveComponents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
existential-birds/beagle☆ 822026年9月16日 更新