「core」の検索結果

Assigns isolate identity at the right resolution for the question -- ANI / Mash species triage, 7-locus MLST historical comparability, cgMLST / wgMLST outbreak resolution (chewBBACA, BIGSdb, Ridom SeqSphere, EnteroBase HierCC), in-silico serotyping (SISTR, SeqSero2 for Salmonella; SerotypeFinder for E. coli; Kaptive K/O for Klebsiella; SeroBA for pneumococcus; spa + SCCmec for S. aureus), and lineage callers (TB-Profiler / Mykrobe Coll-Napier barcode for MTBC, Pangolin + Nextclade for SARS-CoV-2, PopPUNK GPSC for S. pneumoniae). Use when typing bacterial isolates for surveillance or outbreak investigation, choosing between cgMLST allele distance and core-SNP distance for cluster definition, harmonising calls across schemas / database versions (chewBBACA vs Ridom vs EnteroBase), assigning MTBC lineage with the Napier 2020 90-SNP barcode, calling Salmonella serovar via SISTR with monophasic Typhimurium awareness, running Pangolin UShER mode with explicit pangolin-data version pinning, or selecting a typing resolution to match the surveillance question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes CRISPR drug-modifier (chemogenomic) screens with drugZ (Li & Hart 2019 Genome Med), a bidirectional Z-score method that identifies synthetic-lethal sensitizing genes and resistance-conferring suppressor genes from vehicle vs drug comparisons. Covers vehicle-anchored design (not Day-0), the bidirectional Z math giving 2-3x sensitivity over MAGeCK / STARS / edgeR / RIGER on drug screens, per-gene sumZ and normZ, synth (sensitizer) vs supp (suppressor) FDR, multi-dose handling, integration with control sgRNAs, and comparison with MAGeCK MLE with dose covariate. Use when running a drug-modifier CRISPR screen, identifying sensitizing or resistance genes for a drug candidate, choosing drugZ vs MAGeCK MLE for chemogenomic analysis, troubleshooting low-effect drug screens where MAGeCK lacks sensitivity, or designing a drug-screen layout (vehicle vs drug arms).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify recurrent and driver copy number alterations across a tumor cohort with GISTIC2 (G-score, Ziggurat deconstruction, focal vs broad/arm-level analysis, q-values from permutation) and quantify copy-number signatures with the Steele 2022 COSMIC framework and the Drews 2022 CINSignatures framework. Covers driver-gene localization from recurrence peaks, distinguishing focal drivers from arm-level passengers, and the caller-sensitivity caveats of copy-number signatures. Use when finding recurrently amplified or deleted regions in a cohort, localizing driver genes, separating focal from broad events, running GISTIC2, or extracting copy-number mutational signatures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies essential genes from CRISPR-Cas9 fitness screens using BAGEL2 (Kim & Hart 2021 Genome Med), a Bayesian classifier scoring per-gene Bayes Factors via log-likelihood ratios over per-sgRNA fold changes, calibrated against CEGv2 core-essentials (Hart 2017 G3, ~684 genes) and NEGv1 non-essentials (Hart 2014, ~927 genes). Covers the fc + bf + pr workflow, the linear-extrapolation improvement over BAGEL1 truncation, multi-target off-target correction, tumor-suppressor sensitivity (BAGEL2 detects enrichment), and BF-to-FDR calibration (BF >6 ≈ FDR 0.05 from Hart 2017). Use when classifying essential vs non-essential genes, calibrating BAGEL2 thresholds against PR curves, identifying tumor suppressors alongside essentials, comparing BAGEL2 hits to MAGeCK / drugZ, or generating publication-quality essentiality calls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plot per-group distributions of continuous data using boxplots, violins, beeswarms, quasirandom jitter, and raincloud plots with sample-size honesty (Weissgerber 2015), KDE-bandwidth awareness, and N-aware encoding choices. Use when comparing distributions across a small number of groups — expression per cluster, biomarker per arm, scores per condition — and the bar-of-mean default is misleading.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and analyzes combinatorial CRISPR screens covering paired-Cas9 (Big Papi, Najm 2018), enhanced AsCas12a multiplex (enCas12a, DeWeirdt 2021), in4mer 4-guide-array Cas12a (Esmaeili Anvar N et al 2024 Nat Commun 15:3577) and the Inzolia paralog-pair library, paralog-buffering detection (Dede 2020 Genome Biol; Thompson 2021 Cell Reports 36:109597), genetic-interaction (GI) scoring as observed_double_LFC minus expected_additive_double_LFC, synthetic-lethal and synthetic-rescue interaction interpretation, the half-of-essentiality buffered by paralogs phenomenon, multiplex screen statistical analysis with MAGeCK MLE interaction terms, and the relationship to single-cell combinatorial Perturb-seq. Use when designing a paralog or pathway-pair screen, choosing between paired-Cas9 (Big Papi) and Cas12a multiplex (Inzolia), interpreting genetic interaction scores, identifying synthetic-lethal targets for drug development, or scaling beyond single-gene CRISPR screens.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Queries PharmGKB / CPIC / DPWG for drug-gene interactions; calls CYP2D6/CYP2C9/CYP2C19/DPYD/TPMT/NUDT15/UGT1A1/SLCO1B1 star alleles and phenotype with PharmCAT, Cyrius (CYP2D6 structural variants), Aldy, Stargazer; applies Caudle 2020 activity-score translation. Use when implementing pharmacogenomic-guided prescribing, applying CPIC vs DPWG guidance, screening HLA risk alleles for ICI / antiepileptics / abacavir, or interpreting compound TPMT+NUDT15 thiopurine risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Annotate copy number variant segments with overlapping genes, dosage-sensitivity scores, cancer driver databases, population frequencies, and clinical-variant content. Covers bedtools/pybedtools interval intersection, AnnotSV comprehensive annotation and ranking, ClinGen haploinsufficiency/triplosensitivity scoring, gnomAD-SV/DGV frequency filtering, COSMIC Cancer Gene Census, and ClinVar overlap. Use when interpreting which genes a CNV affects, distinguishing the driver gene of a focal event from passengers, filtering against population CNVs, separating whole-gene from partial-gene overlap, or preparing CNVs for clinical classification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Constructs and validates polygenic risk scores using LDpred2-auto, SBayesRC, MegaPRS, PRS-CS, PROSPER, MUSSEL, BridgePRS, JointPRS, PRSmix, or PGS Catalog Calculator with ancestry-aware reference panels (HapMap3, UKB-LD), Pejaver-style calibration, and PRS-RS reporting standards. Use when computing PRS for cohorts, applying Whiffin-style absolute-risk transformation, assessing cross-ancestry portability (Martin 2017 / Ding 2023 continuous ancestry), or auditing PRS manuscripts against the 22-item PRS-RS reviewer checklist.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect horizontal gene transfer (HGT / LGT) using compositional methods (GC%, codon usage, tetranucleotide z-scores via SIGI-HMM, AlienHunter, IslandViewer 4, IslandPath-DIMOB), phylogenetic-incongruence methods (AvP, HGTphyloDetect, ALE / GeneRax / AleRax reconciliation, RANGER-DTL), and BLAST-distribution methods (HGTector v2, DarkHorse, Alien Index). Use when screening prokaryote genomes for genomic islands and HGT events, distinguishing HGT from incomplete lineage sorting / differential gene loss / hybridization, mapping donor lineages via phylogenetic placement, separating eukaryotic HGT from contamination, ruling out gBGC as a false signal, or quantifying DTL rates with ALE/GeneRax on bacterial trees.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs ML-based protein-ligand pose prediction and scoring using DiffDock-L (diffusion-based), Boltz-1 / Boltz-2 (foundation model with affinity), Chai-1, AlphaFold3 ligand, EquiBind, TANKBind, NeuralPLexer, and hybrid workflows (DiffDock pose + GNINA rescore + PoseBusters QC). Explicit handling of when ML beats classical docking, when classical beats ML, the PB-invalid pose problem, and rescoring as the standard production hybrid. Use when modern docking is needed: foundation-model ligand-pose prediction, AI rescoring of classical poses, or scaffold-hopping in cross-docking scenarios.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trains and applies base-resolution deep learning models on ChIP-seq / ChIP-nexus / CUT&RUN data. Uses BPNet (Avsec 2021 Nat Genet 53:354; soft motif syntax from ChIP-nexus), chromBPNet (Pampari A et al 2025 Nat Genet; bias-factorized base-resolution profiles), EnFormer (Avsec 2021 Nat Methods 18:1196; 196 kb input, ~100 kb effective receptive field), DeepSEA (Zhou 2015; multi-task CNN), and JASPAR 2026 deep-learning collection (1259 BPNet ChIP models). Performs in silico mutagenesis for variant-effect prediction, DeepLIFT/Grad attribution, and TF-MoDISco motif discovery from attribution scores. Use when predicting variant effects on TF binding, discovering soft motif syntax / cooperativity, integrating ChIP-seq with sequence-only predictions, or applying precomputed JASPAR Deep Learning models to new variants.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies super-enhancers from H3K27ac, MED1, or BRD4 ChIP-seq using ROSE, ROSE2, LILY, HOMER -style super, and ENCODE dELS cross-referencing. Handles peak stitching parameters, ranking choices, hockey-stick inflection, marker choice (H3K27ac vs MED1/BRD4), and cross-condition comparison with spike-in normalization. Constructs core regulatory circuitry (Saint-Andre 2016) from SE-encoded TFs. Use when identifying cell-identity / cancer-associated regulatory domains, comparing super-enhancers between conditions, identifying master transcription factor networks, or predicting BET-inhibitor responsiveness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discovers de novo motifs and tests known motif enrichment in ChIP-seq, ATAC-seq, or other peak sequences using HOMER, MEME-ChIP (STREME, CentriMo, TOMTOM, FIMO), monaLisa, and AME. Handles background selection (GC-matched, dinucleotide-shuffled, Markov order-2, peak-flanks), motif databases (JASPAR 2024 CORE PWMs, JASPAR 2026 deep-learning collection, HOCOMOCO v12, HOMER built-in), centrally-enriched motif testing, and differential motif analysis. Use when identifying TF binding motifs in peaks, testing for known TF enrichment, scanning for motif instances, comparing motif content between conditions, or interpreting motifs from deep learning models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads, validates, and prepares CDISC SDTM and ADaM clinical trial data for analysis. Covers SDTM domain joins (DM, AE, EX, VS, LB, DS), ADaM architecture (ADSL, BDS, OCCDS, ADTTE) with traceability, treatment-emergent AE conventions, baseline derivation, SUPPQUAL/NSV handling, Define-XML 2.1, and Pinnacle 21 / CORE validation. Use when working with clinical trial datasets in CDISC SDTM/ADaM format, preparing analysis-ready data, or validating for regulatory submission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs alchemical free-energy calculations including relative binding free energy (RBFE / FEP+) and absolute binding free energy (ABFE) via OpenFE, FEP+, GROMACS, AMBER pmemd, and OpenMM with explicit lambda window scheduling, soft-core potentials, REST2 enhanced sampling, MBAR/BAR analysis, and cycle closure validation. Compares ML alternatives (Boltz-2 affinity, DeepDock). Use when ranking analogs by binding affinity beyond docking accuracy, performing prospective lead optimization, or validating SAR predictions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Predicts whether a DNA variant alters mRNA splicing using sequence-based deep-learning tools — SpliceAI (10kb context dilated CNN, clinical default), Pangolin (multi-tissue), MMSplice (modular per-region CNN with calibrated ΔPSI), SpliceTransformer/TrASPr (tissue-aware transformers), SpliceVault (empirical 300K-RNA lookup of likely mis-splicing outcomes), CADD-Splice (composite score). Applies the ClinGen SVI 2023 framework for ACMG/AMP variant interpretation (PVS1, PP3, BP4 evidence codes), HGVS splicing nomenclature (c.123+1G>A, c.123-3T>G, r.spl?), extended-window scoring for deep-intronic pseudoexons, tissue-specific predictions, branchpoint variant detection (BPHunter, LaBranchoR), and splice-switching ASO design. Use when interpreting splice impact of clinical variants, prioritizing VUS, identifying deep-intronic pathogenic variants, or designing ASOs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze TF motif accessibility variability across samples or single cells using chromVAR. Use when identifying TF motifs whose accessibility correlates with conditions, computing per-sample motif z-scores after matched background correction, comparing to ArchR / Signac equivalents, or distinguishing motif-accessibility signal from per-site footprinting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calculate alignment statistics including sequence identity, conservation scores, substitution matrices, and similarity metrics. Use when comparing alignment quality, measuring sequence divergence, and analyzing evolutionary patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Align protein structures using Foldseek 3Di, TM-align, US-align, DALI, or Foldmason for structural MSA. Predict, score, and superpose backbone coordinates when sequence identity is below the twilight zone or remote-homology detection is required. Use when sequence MSA fails (<25% identity), when the dark proteome is the target, when AlphaFoldDB / ESM Atlas search is needed, or when structural superposition is the goal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes alternative splicing at single-cell resolution. The first decision is library chemistry — 10X 3' is fundamentally limited (RT primes from poly-A, R2 falls in 3' UTR, <0.1 junction read per cell per AS event). Plate-based full-length methods (Smart-seq3, FLASH-seq, VASA-seq, STORM-seq) and single-cell long-read (MAS-Iso-seq, scISOr-Seq2) are the chemistries that give per-cell isoform structure. Tools include MARVEL (R, Smart-seq integrated), BRIE2 (Bayesian PSI with regulatory features and ELBO_gain test), scQuint (junction-cluster, plate-based; not for 10X), SpliZ (annotation-free Z-score), Psix (graph-smoothness regulated AS), and Sierra (alternative polyadenylation, often confused with AS). Use when analyzing isoform usage in scRNA-seq, identifying cell-type-specific splicing, or determining whether scRNA-seq chemistry supports splicing analysis at all.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add MAUI DevFlow to a .NET MAUI project with agent package references, MauiProgram.cs registration, Blazor WebView support, GTK variants, Central Package Management guidance, and verification commands. USE FOR: first-time DevFlow setup, reviewing what files to edit, choosing DevFlow packages, or continuing after `maui devflow init` installs skills. DO NOT USE FOR: troubleshooting an already-integrated app that cannot connect, iterative app debugging, UI inspection, or generic MAUI build failures (use maui-devflow-debug). INVOKES: maui devflow CLI and dotnet CLI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run build, deploy, inspect, and fix loops for .NET MAUI apps that already have MAUI DevFlow integrated. USE FOR: launching MAUI apps, selecting devices or emulators, waiting for or recovering agent connections, broker/port/adb connectivity issues, visual tree inspection, screenshots, UI interaction, Blazor WebView CDP debugging, reading DevFlow logs, and iterative app debugging. DO NOT USE FOR: first-time DevFlow package setup (use maui-devflow-onboard), or generic desktop automation unrelated to MAUI. INVOKES: maui devflow CLI, dotnet CLI, Android adb/android tools, and Apple simctl tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user asks how to design or improve a Preventive Maintenance (PM) program for a fleet — mileage vs time intervals, A/B/C/D inspection levels, ATA standards, common PM tasks, scheduling software, cost tracking, and how PM affects roadside inspections + CSA scores. Reference ATA Equipment Maintenance Council standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。