「fact」の検索結果

Execute large-scale automated code transformations safely and idempotently. Use when renaming symbols across a codebase, migrating API call-sites, enforcing new patterns at scale, or applying structural edits to many files at once. Triggers on: 'codemod', 'mass rename', 'migrate all usages', 'transform codebase', 'apply pattern at scale', AST-based refactoring, or any task requiring consistent edits across 10 or more files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review test effectiveness against authoritative contracts, relevant fault detection, refactor tolerance, boundary fidelity, isolation, and diagnostic value. Use when auditing test quality, reviewing coverage gaps, improving regression protection, or assessing tests after a change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for architecture review, dependency graphs, coupling analysis, or circular dependency detection. Establishes project module namespaces and traces imports plus Claude plugin hook, skill, script, PEP 723, and MCP boundaries. Emits partitioned Mermaid graphs with cycle, coupling, and ownership signals; verifies contract and consequence before assigning severity. Registers diagrams as codebase-analysis artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quantitative cost measurement for technical research — token injection costs, payload sizes, context window consumption, and file-level counts from actual repo files. Use when a technical-researcher orchestrator needs the cost dimension of adding or changing something: how many tokens will it inject, how big are the artifacts, what is the context window impact? This is NOT blast-radius analysis (which files break) — it covers size, tokens, and performance cost only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Which agent a dh workflow dispatches, and the artifact consumer invariant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews skill, agent, and plugin artifacts against their intended consumer's schema and runtime contract. Loaded by dh:code-reviewer for SKILL.md, agent definitions, or plugin manifests; checks discovery, frontmatter, triggers, tools, context cost, bundled references, and caller handoffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verifies claims in backlog items, skill documentation, or plugin content against primary sources using web lookups. Spawns parallel verification agents that must use WebFetch/WebSearch/gh — training data recall is explicitly rejected as evidence. Produces VERIFIED/REFUTED/INCONCLUSIVE verdicts with citations. Use when items are marked UNVERIFIED or when verifying tool API claims, CLI flags, or documented software behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transforms validated /linear-walkthrough artifacts into one presentation-ready deck outline per major codebase component. Use when the user asks to create a presentation, prepare a walkthrough deck, build an onboarding deck, produce an architecture review deck, or summarize a codebase for a technical audience. Requires walkthrough directory output -- reads unified walkthrough, per-section files, validation reports, coverage maps, entry points, and open questions -- then orchestrates four parallel agent phases to produce slide outlines with speaker notes, evidence references, and suggested visuals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activates Standard of Excellence enforcement for the current session. Load before starting any task to apply completion standards: finish the whole thing, fix the root cause, ship the complete working result. Blocks partial solutions, workarounds, deferred threads, and invented content limits when the permanent solve is within reach. Triggers: 'do the whole thing', 'boil the ocean', 'standard of excellence', 'finish it completely', before starting any implementation, refactoring, or multi-step task where partial output is a risk. Does NOT apply to: read-only queries, one-line typo fixes, pure knowledge questions, or single-output summarize requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a structured, end-to-end linear walkthrough of an unfamiliar codebase by orchestrating parallel subagents across four phases — discovery, tracing, validation, and synthesis. Use when onboarding to a new repository, understanding execution paths from entry points, generating navigable codebase documentation, or needing fact-checked coverage of architecture, deployment, testing, and operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze git repository history to produce a codebase risk profile before code review. Probes repo size, runs 7 parallel git analysis pipelines (hotspots, bug magnets, bus factor, contributor momentum, firefighting frequency, newly added files), cross-references hotspots with bug magnets to identify high-risk files with primary owner annotation, and writes walkthrough/recon-report.md. Use before code review to prioritize reviewer attention, at the start of linear-walkthrough Phase 1 Discovery to weight file coverage, or when onboarding to an unfamiliar codebase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a theory into falsifiable, pre-registerable hypotheses, covering the DGP and DAG, identification, SATE versus PATE, counterfactual and directional framing, named estimands, justified SESOIs, the choice among NHST, equivalence, interval, and minimum-effect tests, scope conditions, and primary, secondary, and exploratory tiers. Use when the user asks to turn a research question or theory into hypotheses, whether a prediction is falsifiable, what the estimand is, or how to predict a null. Framing goes to narrative-building, the plan to pre-registration-writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checks whether each claim in a manuscript is supported by the source it cites, reading the project's per-source Markdown knowledge base. Flags contradicted, unsupported, overclaimed, out-of-scope, and misattributed claims with verbatim source quotes. Runs citation-check first, and stops at a pre-flight gate when the knowledge base is missing, incomplete, or holds unconverted PDFs. Use to verify that a draft's claims match the sources it cites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OCRs scanned or image-only corpora with vision-language models in four phases. Triage inventories the scans, identifies script and language, and shortlists models by script, hardware, and data constraints. Evaluate selects a system by measured CER or WER against ground truth, using born-digital twins, a second reader, and decision rules set in advance. Run builds the production pipeline. Clean removes model artifacts, audits what every cleaning rule deletes, corrects with rule-based and LLM passes, and records provenance. Use when choosing an OCR model for a corpus, measuring OCR accuracy, transcribing scans at scale, or correcting raw OCR. Born-digital documents with text layers go to doc-to-markdown; runs on Leiden's ALICE cluster add vlm-ocr-alice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a deliberative two-model committee of GPT-6 Astra and Claude Opus under a selectable chair, Fable by default, with `/model-committee-astra`, `/model-committee-opus`, and `/model-committee-sol` selecting the others. Use when a consequential decision has several defensible options and two model families should propose, critique, revise, and cross-rank them against a predeclared rubric before converging, as in research design, interpretation, architecture, manuscript strategy, or evaluation design. Not for factual lookups, independent-coder reliability, brainstorming, routine implementation, or final professional judgment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs conjoint and factorial-vignette experiments, covering attribute architecture and randomization restrictions, effective-N power, treatment realism, the choice among AMCE, marginal-mean, and AMIE estimands, forced-choice versus rating designs, and PAP tiers. Use when the user is planning a conjoint, drafting or critiquing an attribute table, asking how many respondents or tasks are needed, whether to report AMCEs or marginal means, or how to test interactions. Reviewing an existing design goes to conjoint-diagnostics, cleaning the export to conjoint-cleaning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run one consequential, contestable decision through a deliberative committee of GPT-6 Astra and Claude Opus, chaired by fable (default), astra, opus, or sol. Not for factual lookups, brainstorming, routine implementation, independent-coder reliability, or final professional judgment. Use when several options are defensible and the two model families should propose, critique, revise, and cross-rank under a predeclared rubric.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs conjoint and factorial-vignette experiments: attributes and restrictions, effective-N power, estimand choice among AMCE, marginal means, and AMIE, forced choice versus rating, and PAP tiers. Use when planning a conjoint, critiquing an attribute table, sizing respondents and tasks, or testing interactions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OCR scanned or image-only corpora with vision-language models in four phases: `triage` inventories the scans, identifies script and language, and shortlists models by script, hardware, and data constraints; `evaluate` picks a system by measured CER/WER against ground truth, using born-digital twins, a second reader, and decision rules set in advance; `run` builds the production pipeline; and `clean` removes model artifacts, audits what every cleaning rule deletes, corrects with rule-based and LLM passes, and records provenance. Born-digital documents with a text layer go to $doc-to-markdown; runs on Leiden's ALICE cluster add $vlm-ocr-alice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, create, inspect, update, attach, detach, preview, execute, and verify reusable Vapi Structured Outputs through public API or Server SDK workflows. Use for post-call extraction, typed call artifacts, AI-versus-regex extraction, JSON Schema design, backfilling existing calls, or retrieving structured results programmatically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate an actionable, dependency-ordered tasks.md for the feature based on available design artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert existing tasks into actionable, dependency-ordered GitHub issues for the feature based on available design artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute the implementation planning workflow using the plan template to generate design artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。