3,993 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Guia completo para usar Claude Code de forma eficaz. Inclui templates de configuração, estratégias de prompting com keywords "Thinking", técnicas de debugging e melhores práticas para interagir com o agente.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks about GitNexus itself — available tools, how to query the knowledge graph, MCP resources, graph schema, or workflow reference. Examples: "What GitNexus tools are available?", "How do I use GitNexus?"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates a new Angular app using the Angular CLI. This skill should be used whenever a user wants to create a new Angular application and contains important guidelines for how to effectively create a modern Angular application.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[General] Use when you need to (re)generate a DERIVED navigation index, cross-capability ERD, or reimplementation guide assembled FROM the canonical Feature Specs under docs/specs/**. Never extracts a separate A-E engineering tree.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Process] Use when the developer wants something explained or taught, or wants to know HOW TO REVIEW a change — by default the current working tasks + changes in context, or whatever the prompt names (a plan, a subsystem, a decision, a concept, a bug). AI derives WHAT to explain from the prompt and ALWAYS delivers a teacher-and-coach review guide, high level first then detail: what was done, a VISUAL MAP (system flowchart, domain ERD, sequence diagrams), the user stories and business rules with their REAL test-case IDs, a REVIEW PATH naming which files to open first and in what order with an exit criterion per stage, the technical concepts needed to follow it, how it works, why THIS solution, every alternative option with pros/cons, the trade-offs accepted, the blast radius, HOW TO TEST AND DEMO the change, the developer's decision levers, and written challenge prompts that provoke the reader to pressure-test the work. Works at ANY scope — from one line of code to the whole project: it SIZES the target into a scope tier, DECOMPOSES a large one into understanding groups, BREAKS the work into tasks before the first deep read, and ACCUMULATES the report group by group on disk so a huge explanation stays complete instead of thinning out. Writes the full report to a single combined markdown file (plans/reports/understand-*.md) that opens with a detailed summary section — or delivers it in full in chat when Step 3 finds no git-ignored directory for it — and always summarizes it in chat. Regardless of coding level. Never interrogates, never quizzes, never blocks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Code Quality] Use when reviewing UI code for accessibility, responsiveness, performance, and UX best practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Quality] Use when setting up an agent quality harness with feedforward guides and feedback sensors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Utilities] Use when you need claudeKit usage guide - just type naturally.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Unity Prefab / Scene / Asset の壊れた参照・Variant override・配線ミスを構造化応答で診断し、 dry-run → confirm 経路で安全に修復するための MCP ツールリファレンス。 Editor Bridge のセットアップ手順もここに含む。 トリガー: .prefab, .unity, .asset, .mat, Prefab, Variant, 配線, 参照, 壊れた参照, broken reference, GUID, fileID, override, パッチ, patch plan, validate refs, validate structure, where-used, inspect variant, inspect wiring, inspect hierarchy, wiring, null参照, null reference, MonoBehaviour, 階層, hierarchy, Transform整合, 孤立, orphan, 重複fileID, duplicate fileID, Editor Bridge, Bridge セットアップ, bridge setup, deploy_bridge, UNITYTOOL_BRIDGE_WATCH_DIR, watch ディレクトリ のいずれかに該当する作業で使用する。
Master orchestration for repository governance, North Star impact, sub-Star boundaries, and repair-first or evidence-first drift checks. Guides an agent through the complete lifecycle of making architectural decisions, documenting them, writing FAQs, and cleaning up stale plans while adhering strictly to repo ethics and brand tone. Use whenever you need to make a structural change, write an ADR, update the doc lattice, or govern repository architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use after PROJECT_GUIDE.md exists, when the user asks if a project is worth their time, should they build vs buy, or invokes project-worth-my-time. Follow-up to explain-new-project—weighs project context (files, git history, chat) to recommend whether to invest in a repo, cherry-pick a feature, park the idea, pass, or use an existing polished product instead. Optionally enriched by a personal-memory MCP (e.g. Pieces) when one is available.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user adds a project to the workspace, opens an unfamiliar repo, asks "what is this project", "explain this codebase", or invokes explain-new-project. Explores a newly opened workspace project and writes a plain-language report for a self-taught, non-technical user—quick start (what it is + how to run) first, then optional depth—and always saves PROJECT_GUIDE.md in the project root.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transforms data into compelling visual narratives by applying narrative structure, annotation techniques, scrollytelling patterns, and honest framing to data journalism, presentations, and infographics. Use when creating data-driven articles or reports, designing infographics with narrative, building scrollytelling experiences, annotating charts to guide interpretation, or when user mentions data storytelling, presentation design, annotated chart, narrative visualization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
医学证据等级排序与编排层 skill - evidence grading orchestrator. 当用户请求"证据等级 / GRADE / 证据排序 / 医学证据评估 / 系统评价排序 / 临床证据排序 / 证据金字塔 / 给 PMID 打分 / Practice Guideline 优先 / Cochrane 优先 / 反向证据交叉验证 / evidence grading / quality of evidence / evidence pyramid / GRADE assessment / Cochrane review ranking / clinical evidence ranking"时,**调用本 skill 进行医学证据自动分级,自动选择最佳信息源**。本 skill 是编排层(L2)·不直接打 NCBI/Europe PMC/ClinicalTrials API,而是编排 6 个底层原子 skill(pubmed-eutils / europepmc-search / clinical-trials-v2 / aact-bulk-trials / bioc-fulltext-fetch / pubtator-entity-search)的召回结果,按证据金字塔(指南 > Meta > RCT > Cohort > Case-Control > Case Report)做 GRADE A/B/C/D 自动评级,自动剔除 editorial/letter/comment。优先使用 BioMCP MCP server 做 fan-out(genomoncology/biomcp);无 BioMCP 时走自建 slow-path 兜底。跨平台无锁(Claude Code / Codex / Gemini CLI)。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phase 4 Turn 1 of disease-market-sizing-orchestration. Generates report HTML with mandatory citation anchors per fact claim. Reads contract + staging + sources/. Every drug/treatment/stat/recommendation MUST carry [pmid:.../guideline:.../nct:...] anchor that resolves to an actual file in sources/. NEVER hardcode drug names or numerical claims. Use AFTER evidence recall (phase 3), BEFORE content-verification-layer (Turn 2).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
UI/UX design intelligence for web, mobile, and desktop. This skill should be used when designing, building, reviewing, or fixing interfaces, including pages, components, design systems, accessibility, interaction, responsive layout, typography, color, charts, and stack-specific UI implementation. Searchable local data: 79 searchable styles (50 active), 192 product palettes and reasoning profiles, 74 font pairings, 119 UX guidelines, 105 icons, 17 GSAP presets, 25 chart types, and 22 stacks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, audit, harden, review, or upgrade MCP servers and MCP Apps with revision-aware protocol profiles, explicit HTTP/deployment boundaries, capability-centered validation, bilingual reporting, and reproducible evidence. Use for MCP server architecture, JSON-RPC or Streamable HTTP bugs, security hardening, protocol-version migration, MCP Apps widget boundaries, review reconciliation, test planning, and public engineering evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Crear, ampliar o actualizar documentación técnica de EMULATORS en formato DOCX usando la plantilla oficial del repositorio, con portada parametrizada, índice, prólogo, capítulos de contenido, anexos, listas de ilustraciones y ecuaciones, marca de agua del autor y pie Página X | Y. Usar cuando Codex deba documentar subsistemas, arquitecturas, dispositivos, modelos, herramientas, compilación, uso, pruebas o cualquier otro aspecto del emulador y el resultado deba conservar la identidad visual de docs/UserGuide.docx.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate Commodore MPS-802 and 1526 serial dot matrix printer behavior in EMULATORS, including SerialPrinterMPS802 classes and their MatrixPrinterEmulation and SerialPrinterPeripheralSimulation hierarchy, IEC/KERNAL-trap printer routing, device numbers, secondary-address functions, PETSCII/character sets, 8x8 glyphs, enhanced width, reverse and paging modes, formatter strings, programmable characters, line/page geometry, PostScript output, and fidelity boundaries. Use when Codex reviews or edits COMMODORE MPS802 printer code, generated printer output, PostScript printer templates, C64/VIC-20/C264 serial-printer behavior, or compares implementation against .codex/docs/MPS802.pdf, the MPS-802 user guide, and 1526/MPS-802/4023 service information.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guidelines and strategies for constructing meaningful test suites, property-based tests, metamorphic relations, and fuzzing harnesses. Trigger when: - Designing verification bounds, writing tests, creating test invariants, or implementing validation gates. - Prompt contains: testing, test design, property-based testing, PBT, metamorphic testing, fuzzing, integration tests, E2E.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rules, conventions, and constraints for formatting git commit messages and committing at logical boundaries. Trigger when: - Drafting, revising, or validating git commit messages. - Pausing at commit boundaries under the CORE or CONTINUE workflows. - Evaluating whether a changeset should be split into multiple commits. - Prompt contains keywords: commit message, git commit, conventional commits, commit hygiene, commit guidelines, logical boundary, spaghetti diff, atomic commit, commit boundary.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Which docs in nuxt-crouton to trust and how to resolve contradictions between them. Use when two docs disagree, when a doc's claim doesn't match the code ("the README says packages/nuxt-crouton but that dir doesn't exist"), when deciding whether a guide/writeup is authoritative before following it, or when asked "is this doc current", "which doc wins", "why does CLAUDE.md say X but the code says Y". Also the reference for the supersession-banner practice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。