「fact」の検索結果

Semantic code understanding with IDE-like symbol operations. Use when: (1) Large codebase analysis (>50 files), (2) Symbol-level operations (find, rename, refactor), (3) Cross-file reference tracking, (4) Project memory and session persistence, (5) Multi-language semantic navigation. Triggers: "find symbol", "rename function", "find references", "symbol overview", "project memory". IMPORTANT: Prioritize Serena's symbolic tools over file-based grep/read for code exploration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enhanced web search and real-time content retrieval via Grok API with forced tool routing. Use when: (1) Web search / information retrieval / fact-checking, (2) Webpage content extraction / URL parsing, (3) Breaking knowledge cutoff limits for current information, (4) Real-time news and technical documentation, (5) Multi-source information aggregation. Triggers: "search for", "find information about", "latest news", "current", "fetch webpage", "get content from URL". IMPORTANT: This skill REPLACES built-in WebSearch/WebFetch with Grok Search tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retrieve any YYLO Ledger Record by ID, discover PDRs and artifacts, and manage tasks and dependencies. Use for unknown record types, universal get/search, task operations, and source-of-truth boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies Anthropic's official brand colors and typography to any sort of artifact that may benefit from having Anthropic's look-and-feel. Use it when brand colors or style guidelines, visual formatting, or company design standards apply.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage Alibaba Cloud Container Registry (ACR) Enterprise Edition using the @alicloud/cr20181201 TypeScript SDK. Use when working with container image registries on Alibaba Cloud, including instance management, namespaces, image repositories, image tags, build rules, image synchronization, security scanning, delivery chains, Helm charts, artifact lifecycle, and event notifications. Covers all 115 APIs of the CR 20181201 version.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test-driven development for Spring Boot using JUnit 5, Mockito, MockMvc, Testcontainers, and JaCoCo. Use when adding features, fixing bugs, or refactoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when writing new features, fixing bugs, or refactoring code. Enforces test-driven development with 80%+ coverage including unit, integration, and E2E tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Codified expertise for quality control, non-conformance investigation, root cause analysis, corrective action, and supplier quality management in regulated manufacturing. Informed by quality engineers with 15+ years experience across FDA, IATF 16949, and AS9100 environments. Includes NCR lifecycle management, CAPA systems, SPC interpretation, and audit methodology. Use when investigating non-conformances, performing root cause analysis, managing CAPAs, interpreting SPC data, or handling supplier quality issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze raw prompts, identify intent and gaps, match ECC components (skills/commands/agents/hooks), and output a ready-to-paste optimized prompt. Advisory role only — never executes the task itself. TRIGGER when: user says "optimize prompt", "improve my prompt", "how to write a prompt for", "help me prompt", "rewrite this prompt", or explicitly asks to enhance prompt quality. Also triggers on Chinese equivalents: "优化prompt", "改进prompt", "怎么写prompt", "帮我优化这个指令". DO NOT TRIGGER when: user wants the task executed directly, or says "just do it" / "直接做". DO NOT TRIGGER when user says "优化代码", "优化性能", "optimize performance", "optimize this code" — those are refactoring/performance tasks, not prompt optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Playwright E2E testing patterns, Page Object Model, configuration, CI/CD integration, artifact management, and flaky test strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Django testing strategies with pytest-django, TDD methodology, factory_boy, mocking, coverage, and testing Django REST Framework APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

C++ coding standards based on the C++ Core Guidelines (isocpp.github.io). Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring C++ code to enforce modern, safe, and idiomatic practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trace every user-facing button/touchpoint through its full state change sequence to find bugs where functions individually work but cancel each other out, produce wrong final state, or leave the UI in an inconsistent state. Use when: systematic debugging found no bugs but users report broken buttons, or after any major refactor touching shared state stores.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds distinctive frontend UI with SvelteKit/Bun/Hono. Triggers on: web pages, dashboards, landing pages, apps, artifacts, styling, theming, fonts, animations, charts, dark/light modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect AI/LLM-generated text patterns in research writing. Use when: (1) Reviewing manuscript drafts before submission, (2) Pre-commit validation of documentation, (3) Quality assurance checks on research artifacts, (4) Ensuring natural academic writing style, (5) Tracking writing authenticity over time. Analyzes grammar perfection, sentence uniformity, paragraph structure, word frequency (AI-typical words like 'delve', 'leverage', 'robust'), punctuation patterns, and transition word overuse.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides the "how-to" for workflow / task execution orchestration. Defines methods for planning multi-phase task/workflows, implementing them through agent delegation, and managing artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide creation of focused single-purpose agents following the One Agent One Prompt One Purpose principle. Use when designing new agents, refactoring general agents into specialists, or optimizing agent context for a single task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Memory is the cornerstone of intelligent agents. Without it, every interaction starts from zero. This skill covers the architecture of agent memory: short-term (context window), long-term (vector stores), and the cognitive architectures that organize them. Key insight: Memory isn't just storage - it's retrieval. A million stored facts mean nothing if you can't find the right one. Chunking, embedding, and retrieval strategies determine whether your agent remembers or forgets. The field is fragm

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repurpose off-platform content into a native YouTube surface. Take a blog, X thread, LinkedIn post, or newsletter and turn it into a community post or poll, or a video brief (title, spoken hook, description with chapters). Leads with the payoff, converts listicles into chapters, strips off-platform artifacts, publishes via Publora on approval. Not for a fresh community post (use yt-community-post-writer), not for a hook script (use yt-hook-scripter).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test an uncertain Anabasis v2 path at the smallest real layer that can decide it, before a paid round is asked to: one fact from a log or a dry run, a walk of one value across the layers a change touches, a replay of every recorded log through this tree's readers, a whole round rehearsed on a seeded copy of a campaign with a script in each model seat (`bun run runs seed`, `bun run runs rehearse`), or one live seat from a seed. Use when the operator asks whether a change will work in the real system, to simulate or rehearse a round, to stand again in a position a past run stood in, what a campaign of a given size can read, or what a kill or a stop leaves behind. Not for reading a finished run (whole-run-investigation) or starting a paid one (run-management).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decompose work into stages with physical artifacts and acceptance checklists. Gap detector. Use when opening a WP ≥3h (open-loop/problem-framing) or on explicit request to break into stages. Executes R29 Decomposer role.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post a sitrep (situation report) for a live incident, in its incident channel: a short fixed-layout update for people who haven't read the whole channel — the current picture and what moved since the previous update. Use on "sitrep", "status update", "where are we", "what's the latest", "catch me up", "summarize the incident so far", when asked to keep posting on a schedule ("post a sitrep every hour until resolved"), or when the oncall memory sets an update cadence for this severity and the incident owner asks Claude to keep it. Reads the channel, alert thread and findings posted, re-reads the one key signal, and writes: status line, TL;DR, impact, what changed since the last sitrep, what's in progress and who has it, what's needed, when the next update comes, one chart. Facts come only from what people said or Claude read first-hand; cause and recovery time are never guessed. Fits one phone screen. Not investigation (`incident-investigate`) or the write-up afterwards (`incident-postmortem`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when verifying information (fact, number, quote, event, statement) against authoritative primary sources, or cross-checking a number via one-level metric decomposition (Z = P × Q). Triggers: "verify X", "is this true", "find the original source", "where is this number from", "two sources disagree", "is it true X never did Y". Covers five scenarios: (1) basic truthfulness check, (2) completeness / out-of-context quoting, (3) one-level reasoning verification, (4) negative-statement handling, (5) multi-source conflict side-by-side output. Dig into whitelisted primary sources only (user-supplied files, official websites & databases, authoritative industry sources); cited reports / charts / datasets must be downloaded and read locally to count as verified — if download is blocked, hand the link to the user. If nothing can be found, plainly state "cannot verify" rather than guessing, patching, or citing secondary paraphrases. Always reply in the user's question language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent adversarial code review. Spawns three reviewer subagents (Auditor, Adversary, Pragmatist) on a single model, runs a cross-examination round, then deterministically synthesizes a single ranked report. Use this for non-trivial PRs, security-sensitive changes, refactors that touch many files, or any change where one perspective has obvious blind spots. Trigger phrases include "adverse review", "adversarial review", "multi-perspective review", "review my changes from multiple angles", "panel review". NOT suitable for trivial diffs (typos, dependency bumps, formatting).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。