「find」の検索結果

Suede-owned recovery discipline for recurring charges billed outside Amazon: App Store, Google Play, PayPal, direct-bill streaming, gyms, news, and SaaS. Use when the user wants to find, audit, cancel, or dispute a subscription they may have forgotten, is being charged for twice, or no longer uses. Every cancellation and dispute requires the user to name the service first. Never enters payment credentials and never promises a refund. Requires Claude in Chrome for browser actions. NOT FOR: Amazon returns, restocking fees, or Amazon-billed Prime Video Channels, Audible, Kindle Unlimited, or Prime (use amazon-returns-recovery); merchant-side dunning and cancel-flow design (use suede-churn-prevention).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and synthesize research papers, whitepapers, PDFs, technical reports, and academic sources with Firecrawl Research, using semantic paper search, related-paper expansion, and in-body verification over Firecrawl's paper index — largely biomedical and life-science literature from PubMed, bioRxiv, and medRxiv, plus arXiv preprints in CS, physics, and math. Use when the user wants a literature review, systematic review, survey of studies, paper summary, research landscape, or sourced synthesis from scholarly and industry publications, including clinical, drug, gene, disease, epidemiology, and public-health topics. Prefer this over a general web-research workflow whenever the evidence base is published papers rather than web pages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find a direct path to structured data through ready-made workflows, data APIs, and indexes. Follow the search skill to discover and inspect tools, then the scrape skill to execute them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate structured lead lists from prospect databases and web directories with Firecrawl browser. Use for finding prospects by role, company type, industry, stage, location, technologies, or other criteria and exporting CRM-ready JSON or CSV.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover and list a site's URLs, with search filtering. Use for "map the site" or "find the URL for" requests — when the user knows the site but not the exact page, or wants site structure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research products across the web with Firecrawl and produce a shopping recommendation or cart-ready summary. Use when the user wants to compare products, find the best option, evaluate reviews, respect budget/preferences, or shop with a saved browser session.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform QA testing on running web applications using cmux_browser. Covers functional testing, accessibility auditing, edge case testing, and structured reporting with evidence. **Triggers — use this skill when:** - User says "test this", "QA this", "QA this PR", "check the app" - User says "run QA", "verify the build", "test the UI" - User asks to "check if it works", "validate the feature" - User says "acceptance testing", "smoke test", "regression test" - User asks to "find bugs", "test for bugs", "break it" - User wants to "check accessibility", "run axe", "a11y audit" **Covers:** Any web application accessible via HTTP. Uses cmux_browser (Playwright under the hood) for all browser interactions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically fix skill problems (safe preview first). Also use with --prune to find and remove broken symlinks, empty directories, and orphaned skills. Trigger with '/janitor-fix'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find new skills on GitHub or check a specific skill before installing. Use when the user wants to search for skills, evaluate a skill URL, check overlap and security risk before installing, or compare a local skill against alternatives. Trigger with '/janitor-discover'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full health check of all your skills in one report. Use when the user wants to check for errors, find duplicates, detect broken skills, or get a complete overview of skill health. Pass --brief for inventory only. Trigger with '/janitor-report'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch up-to-date documentation for any library, framework, API, or service into context. Use when the user wants to look up API references, check function signatures or required fields, find feature-specific docs, or verify how an external tool actually works. Triggers for queries about third-party libraries like Stripe, SQLAlchemy, Tailwind, FastAPI, shadcn, Drizzle, Hono, Better Auth — any time the answer lives in official docs rather than in the project codebase. Use this instead of guessing from trained knowledge, which is stale.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The single config quality skill. Two modes: (1) Default — review/wire pending self-improvement proposals. (2) Audit — analyzes skills, rules, CLAUDE.md, project refs, hooks, and agents against the actual codebase to find inaccuracies, trigger overlaps, stale references, and weak rules, then fixes them. Trigger on 'self-evolve', 'evolve', 'config health check', 'audit config', 'check claude setup', 'apply this rule', 'reorganize rules', 'ok' (when proposals are pending). NOT for improving individual skills (use skill-creator), diagnosing code bugs (use diagnose), or fixing broken code (use fix).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever the user wants to create, read, edit, or manipulate Word documents (.docx files). Triggers include: any mention of "Word doc", "word document", ".docx", or requests to produce professional documents with formatting like tables of contents, headings, page numbers, or letterheads. Also use when extracting or reorganizing content from .docx files, inserting or replacing images in documents, performing find-and-replace in Word files, working with tracked changes or comments, or converting content into a polished Word document. If the user asks for a "report", "memo", "letter", "template", or similar deliverable as a Word or .docx file, use this skill. Do NOT use for PDFs, spreadsheets, Google Docs, or general coding tasks unrelated to document generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to fix open failing reviews, invokes $roborev-fix, or provides job IDs; do not use when the user only pastes review findings with no request to discover or close reviews

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to fix open failing reviews, invokes /roborev-fix, or provides job IDs; do not use when the user only pastes review findings with no request to discover or close reviews

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a read-only, defect-first review of a specified code change and return every actionable finding. Use when another agent delegates review of uncommitted changes, a base-branch diff, a commit, or custom review instructions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design efficient early signals to validate assumptions. Find the fastest way to learn if you're right.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before writing any new function, helper, component or module - find what the repository, the standard library and the installed dependencies already provide, and use an established library instead of hand-rolled code for a non-trivial problem

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when semgrep, osv-scanner, github-security or snyk MCP tools appear in your tool list - what each server is for, how to call it safely, what data leaves the machine, and how its findings are triaged

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a candidate finding falls into a noisy category - the do-not-report list, the precedents that settle recurring edge cases, and the narrow exceptions where an excluded category still counts

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a design task asks you to compare a built screen with its approved design - screenshots at 1440, 768 and 375 attached to the task, Blocker/High/Medium/Nitpick triage, evidence per finding, problems not prescriptions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when your context carries "The approved design this task builds" - comparing the running UI with the approved hand-off and mockup at each width and state, evidence screenshots attached to the task, Blocker/High/Medium/Nitpick findings and which of them fail the round

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you have a candidate security finding and before it goes in a comment - restate it as a crossed boundary, prove reachability, impact and a concrete exploit, apply triage dismissals, route out-of-repository facts to needs-validation, keep the effect no stronger than the trace, then the self-refute and verifier passes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adding character/enemy/game-flow states or NPC behaviour - explicit transition tables instead of flag soup, hierarchical and pushdown machines, behaviour trees per engine, navmesh pathfinding, AI tick budgets, and table-driven tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。