Use when drafting, reviewing, or revising Xiaohongshu/Douyin/social-platform Chinese text so it has real internet-native judgment instead of README tone, technical-briefing tone, or mechanical meme-word stuffing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
4,062 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when drafting, reviewing, or revising Xiaohongshu/Douyin/social-platform Chinese text so it has real internet-native judgment instead of README tone, technical-briefing tone, or mechanical meme-word stuffing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GStack canary method for staged release thinking, smoke gates, rollout checks, and rollback signals before or after deployment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GStack land-and-deploy method for explicit landing and deployment workflows with tests, release notes, rollout gates, and rollback planning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GStack deployment setup method for planning environment, config, secrets, build, deploy, and verification gates before release operations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when splitting content work between a raw drafting model/window, an editor-in-chief, and the user's final taste review. It keeps prompts loose enough for judgment while preserving facts, account boundaries, and publish gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GStack guard method for strengthening scope boundaries, forbidden actions, stop conditions, and validation gates for an agent or workstream.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GStack unfreeze method for safely resuming a previously frozen task with explicit resume criteria, allowed changes, and verification gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GStack investigation method for bugs, incidents, failing tests, regressions, and unclear behavior where evidence and root cause should precede fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Project-orientation workflow (/orient): installs predicate's enforcement into a target project, maps its structure and goal, and authors the persistent conditioning layer (AGENTS.md goal-hierarchy) so every subsequent walk is anchored and gated. Trigger when: - Onboarding a new project into predicate for the first time. - Refreshing an existing project's AGENTS.md hierarchy against the current state of the repository (re-run = refresh). - Prompt contains: /orient, orient workflow, onboard project, project orientation, AGENTS.md hierarchy, persistent conditioning layer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guidelines and strategies for constructing meaningful test suites, property-based tests, metamorphic relations, and fuzzing harnesses. Trigger when: - Designing verification bounds, writing tests, creating test invariants, or implementing validation gates. - Prompt contains: testing, test design, property-based testing, PBT, metamorphic testing, fuzzing, integration tests, E2E.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Before creating a GitHub issue or epic, search for an existing related one and force a reuse / replace / new decision — so the issue-first flow can't silently mint a duplicate. The create-time half of the dedup gate (the pickup-time half is /issue-sanity-check). Use whenever you're about to open an issue/epic, or run /issue-dedup. Backed by a hard PreToolUse hook on issue_write create.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The router for how a change legally happens in this repo — which sign-off gate fires for which kind of change, what counts as approval, how the packages-edit guard works, and how work is allowed to reach main. Use when starting ANY change and unsure which rules apply, when an Edit to packages/* gets BLOCKED, when a pipeline issue sits on status:blocked and you need to know what unblocks it, or when asked "do I need sign-off for this", "how do I get this merged", "can I deploy this", "who approves X", "why won't my approval label/reaction do anything".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the "get dependencies current" flow for this monorepo — sweep for available updates, triage into safe / deliberate / wait buckets, bump the pnpm catalog, and prove it with the typecheck + e2e gate. Use when asked to "update dependencies", "are we on the latest", "do the quarterly sweep", "bump deps", or when the recurring sweep ticket comes due. We run NO update bot on purpose (#141) — this skill IS the update process.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A pessimistic go/no-go the moment you pick up a GitHub issue — read it skeptically and hunt for reasons NOT to do it (already done? obsolete? duplicate? premise wrong? cheaper way? net-negative?), returning proceed / reshape / drop with one-line evidence. The pickup-time half of the dedup gate (the create-time half is /issue-dedup). Use as step 1 of the Task Execution Workflow, or run /issue-sanity-check
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verified lookup pack for crouton's schema→CRUD generation domain — the fieldsFile JSON format, the complete field-type catalog with aliases, the naming contract, the exact artifact list one generate run produces, the seed/default-layout pipeline, dialect defaults, and rollback semantics. Use when writing or reviewing a collection schema, when asking "what field types exist / what does `crouton config` actually generate / where did this file name come from / why did I get a pg schema", when a generated file's name or path doesn't match the docs, or when removing/regenerating a collection. Trigger phrases — "what field types are supported", "schema JSON format", "what files does crouton generate", "naming convention for collections", "rollback a collection", "dialect default". The generation WORKFLOW (steps + sign-off gates) lives in the `crouton` skill — this is the reference it doesn't carry.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
How to actually run every kind of test in nuxt-crouton (unit/e2e/typecheck/lint, verified commands) plus the HONEST coverage picture — which packages have real tests vs zero, the dormant skipped/todo cases behind three mocking walls, and what CI truly gates vs what CLAUDE.md claims. Use when asked "how do I run the tests", "is X covered by tests", "what does CI actually check", "why is this suite skipped", "where do I add a test", or before trusting a green build as evidence that something works.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a proven POC into a real, crouton-native, documented package(s) + a consuming app — the deliberate "step back and rebuild" checkpoint. SPEC-DRIVEN — the POC discovers a behaviour spec (captured at each sign-off), graduation freezes it as authoritative, the app is rebuilt the crouton way to satisfy it, and nothing is done until it's checked + signed off against two gates (experience + crouton-conformance). Use when a `pocs/*` app is proven and "done", or asked to "graduate this poc", "make it a real app", "extract the package".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drives the Phase 4-5 dev pipeline state machine with sub-agent reviews and bounded autoresearch gates. Use when running /pipeline or executing an approved plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Author a complete both-seats coaching lesson for a BBA-NATIVE bidding scenario and produce all served artifacts in one consistent pass: curate the pool → tokenized coaching-curated/<scn>.pbn → gated promote to served coaching/<scn>.pbn → resolve to South=student coaching-non-rotated/<scn>.pbn (bridge-classroom) → update both toc.json files. Invoke as `/coach-lesson <Scenario>` (e.g. `/coach-lesson Fourth_Suit_Forcing`). Use ONLY for conventions BBA bids natively (its bba/<scn>.pbn [Auction] is the answer key — Basics, New_Minor_Forcing, Fourth_Suit_Forcing). For conventions BBA CANNOT bid (Spiral Raises), use the py/spiral_auction.py substitution path instead — not this skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Process the batch of incoming Bridge Classroom feedback. Pull open `classroom-feedback` issues from the PBS repo, cluster them by defect class, verify each against the actual board, and fix at the right altitude — patch a single board, or (when a class recurs) build a gate, sweep the whole corpus, and regenerate/drop collectively. Engine bugs route to the Classroom repo; bridge-judgment calls go to Rick. Nothing leaves the machine without David's OK. Invoke as `/issue` (optionally with an issue number or scenario to restrict the run).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate, introduce, or refactor persistence abstractions when direct Eloquent is insufficient. Use for repository requests, complex aggregate reconstruction, or multiple persistence implementations; reject CRUD wrappers without a concrete benefit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when structuring a multi-session learning roadmap with milestones, gates, and pacing calibrated to learner level and goal.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build an evidence-backed working model of an existing codebase. Use when you must orient in a large or unfamiliar repository; explain architecture or a subsystem; trace a request, runtime, control, or data flow for a concrete question or bug; analyze a branch, commit, diff, or pull request for behavioral impact and blast radius; or assess AI-generated or changed code against requirements, contracts, invariants, tests, and runtime evidence. Default to read-only investigation. Do not trigger only because a coding task touches an existing repository; use when understanding or verification is the requested outcome or a substantial prerequisite.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Control the user's existing Safari 26 tabs through a persistent JavaScript REPL with a Playwright-style browser API. Use when a task must inspect, navigate, click, fill, select, or verify a page in Safari while preserving the user's current logins and browser state.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。