「decision」の検索結果

Expert database architect specializing in data layer design from scratch, technology selection, schema modeling, and scalable database architectures. Masters SQL/NoSQL/TimeSeries database selection, normalization strategies, migration planning, and performance-first design. Handles both greenfield architectures and re-architecture of existing systems. Use PROACTIVELY for database architecture, technology selection, or data modeling decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master software architect specializing in modern architecture patterns, clean architecture, microservices, event-driven systems, and DDD. Reviews system designs and code changes for architectural integrity, scalability, and maintainability. Use PROACTIVELY for architectural decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for Private and Internal member testing strategies. Use when you need to test private or internal members, configure InternalsVisibleTo, or evaluate testability design. Covers design-first thinking, reflection testing, strategy pattern refactoring, AbstractLogger pattern, and decision frameworks. Keywords: private method testing, internal testing, InternalsVisibleTo, reflection testing, GetMethod BindingFlags, Meziantou.MSBuild.InternalsVisibleTo, testability design, strategy pattern refactoring, testability

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decides how to test .NET code. Unit vs integration vs E2E decision tree, test doubles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Selects a .NET UI framework. Decision tree across Blazor, MAUI, Uno, WinUI, WPF, WinForms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Chooses inter-service protocols. REST vs gRPC vs SignalR vs SSE decision matrix, tradeoffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Chooses documentation tooling. Starlight, Docusaurus, DocFX decision tree, migration paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Chooses a data access approach. EF Core vs Dapper vs ADO.NET decision matrix, tradeoffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use FIRST when someone asks for a new feature or a change to an existing one — before any schema, code or test. Works out what is actually being asked for, whether to build it or integrate a third party (Trustpilot, Stripe, Calendly and the like), where the data lives, who may do what, and what happens when the vendor is down. Produces a decision, then hands to feature-schema.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ingest external plans with conflict detection against project decisions before writing anything.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract decisions, lessons, patterns, and surprises from completed phase artifacts

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates and selects Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) products based on organizational requirements including feed integration capability, STIX/TAXII support, workflow automation, analyst interface, and total cost of ownership. Use when conducting a TIP procurement, migrating between TIP solutions, or assessing whether the current TIP meets program maturity requirements. Activates for requests involving ThreatConnect, MISP, OpenCTI, Anomali, EclecticIQ, or TIP procurement decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a structured SOC incident response playbook for ransomware attacks covering detection, containment, eradication, and recovery phases with specific SIEM queries, isolation procedures, and decision trees. Use when SOC teams need formalized response procedures for ransomware incidents aligned to NIST SP 800-61 and MITRE ATT&CK ransomware techniques.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and documents structured incident response playbooks that define step-by-step procedures for specific incident types aligned with NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks. Covers playbook structure, decision trees, escalation criteria, RACI matrices, and integration with SOAR platforms. Activates for requests involving IR playbook creation, incident response procedure documentation, response runbook development, or SOAR playbook design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes indicators of compromise (IOCs) including IP addresses, domains, file hashes, URLs, and email artifacts to determine maliciousness confidence, campaign attribution, and blocking priority. Use when triaging IOCs from phishing emails, security alerts, or external threat feeds; enriching raw IOCs with multi-source intelligence; or making block/monitor/whitelist decisions. Activates for requests involving VirusTotal, AbuseIPDB, MalwareBazaar, MISP, or IOC enrichment pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a new Architecture Decision Record (ADR) for a proposed feature or design change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AEM Cloud Service expert skill for Sling ResourceChangeListener. Covers the lightweight listener + JobConsumer pattern, migration from javax.jcr.observation.EventListener and resource-topic OSGi EventHandler, ResourceChangeListener vs ExternalResourceChangeListener decision, OSGi filter configuration, review checklist, troubleshooting (silent failures, hot-path blocking, missing service-user mapping), and common pitfalls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[BETA] AEM Cloud Service expert skill — migrate javax.inject.@Inject fields in Sling Model (@Model) classes to injector-specific annotations (@ValueMapValue / @OSGiService / @SlingObject). Self-discoverable (scan for @Model classes with field-level @Inject); the replacement is chosen deterministically from each field's declared type. Use for "fix @Inject in HeroModel.java", "modernize my Sling Models", or when scanning an AEM project for @Inject misuse. Detailed decision table, companion-annotation handling, import management, and file-level skip policy are in recipe.md. This skill is in beta. Verify all outputs before applying them to production projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Survey available blocks from local AEM Edge Delivery Services project and Block Collection to understand the block palette available for authoring. Returns block inventory with purposes to inform content modeling decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research one bounded mature-project/prior-art question when the user explicitly asks how established projects handle it or ROSE names a decision-shaping prior-art gap; do not trigger automatically for IDEATE, DEFINE, BUILD, implementation, local review, or every design choice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structure source-grounded consulting-style analysis for strategy, market, product, operations, or decision memos. Use for MECE problem framing, hypotheses, options, tradeoffs, executive recommendations, or "consulting analysis" requests; do not use for legal/financial advice, implementation, data computation, chart rendering, or unsourced business claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or update source-grounded documentation when the user explicitly asks for docs/ADR/onboarding material, a public contract change requires docs, or an accepted hard-to-reverse decision meets the ADR gate; do not trigger for every feature, architecture discussion, implementation, review, or SHIP request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, edit, fix, or explain Mermaid diagrams for relationships, decision branches, interactions, lifecycles, and data models; also use when the parent selects a diagram to materially clarify an explanation. Do not trigger for simple status, one fact, short lists, quantitative charts, or marketing slides.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill encodes Emil Kowalski's philosophy on UI polish, component design, animation decisions, and the invisible details that make software feel great.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。