3,600 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Designer's eye plan review — interactive, like CEO and Eng review. Rates each design dimension 0-10, explains what would make it a 10, then fixes the plan to get there. Works in plan mode. For live site visual audits, use /design-review. Use when asked to "review the design plan" or "design critique". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan with UI/UX components that should be reviewed before implementation. (gstack)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Static-to-EDS conversion that preserves the original design while making content authorable in Document Authoring. Two modes — page-level (overlay template with slot markers) and block-level (each section becomes an independent EDS block). Use when converting an AI-generated static HTML page (Stardust, Mobirise, Relume, Lovable, v0, Figma-derived hand-coded, etc.) into an Edge Delivery Services page. Triggers on "convert this page to EDS", "static-to-EDS overlay", "convert to EDS blocks", "next experimentation", "next run", "start run", or when a user provides a source URL and asks to make it editable in DA while keeping the original design intact. Do NOT use for canonical EDS block-rewrite migrations — that's the page-import skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Teaches the AI to design like a high-end agency. Defines the exact fonts, spacing, shadows, card structures, and animations that make a website feel expensive. Blocks all the common defaults that make AI designs look cheap or generic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Forces the laziest solution that actually works, simplest, shortest, most minimal. Channels a senior dev who has seen everything: question whether the task needs to exist at all (YAGNI), reach for the standard library before custom code, native platform features before dependencies, one line before fifty. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra. Use on ANY coding task: writing, adding, refactoring, fixing, reviewing, or designing code, and choosing libraries or dependencies. Also use whenever the user says "ponytail", "be lazy", "lazy mode", "simplest solution", "minimal solution", "yagni", "do less", or "shortest path", or complains about over-engineering, bloat, boilerplate, or unnecessary dependencies. Do NOT use for non-coding requests (general knowledge, prose, translation, summaries, recipes).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate any project, product, or system's claims against its actual implementation — scoring each claim for truth, identifying architectural gaps, assessing competitive positioning, proposing creative solutions, and producing an actionable roadmap. Load when the user asks to evaluate claims, reality-check a project, assess what this project actually does vs what it says, validate product claims, or score a system's credibility. Also triggers on "is this real", "does this work as claimed", "evaluate this project", "assess the gap between claims and reality", "how credible is this", "investor assessment", "score these claims", or "what's real vs marketing".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate 5–10 business idea candidates from a blank page or a founder's domain context — using pain mining, jobs-to-be-done, trend × capability mapping, constraint relaxation, adjacency search, and founder-market-fit prompts. Each candidate is a structured idea card (segment, JTBD, current alternative, why-now, distribution wedge, monetisation, "feels like"). Load when the user asks to generate business ideas, brainstorm startup ideas, find ideas to work on, says "what business should I start", "give me startup ideas", "I don't know what to build", "ideate ventures", "blank-page idea generation", "find me a startup idea", "explore business opportunities". Sub-skill of `venture-exploration`. Hard-bans "Uber for X" / "AI for X" with no specific JTBD, "everyone" segments, and idea cards missing any of the 7 required fields. Does NOT design or evaluate ideas generated — for that use `idea-evaluation`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit, improve, and compress every skill in the repo using live research. Load when the user asks to improve skills, audit the skill library, upgrade existing skills, refresh with new research, do a skill health check, or says "improve all skills", "update the skill library", "skill audit", or "run an improvement pass". Applies live domain research, fixes structural gaps, checks for skill linking opportunities, then rewrites and resizes each skill. Supports TARGETED mode (`TARGET=<skill> [SKIP_RESEARCH=true]`) for single-skill fixes, including learn-from-chat restructure escalations. All skills are in scope including meta skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a structured retrospective after development-phase runs of your product's agents — interview the owner in plain language about what went well and poorly, draft ranked improvement hypotheses, then design and run small n=1/n=2 experiments with pre-declared success criteria, guardrails, stop conditions, and a cost/ROI kill-switch. Load when the user says how did that run go, retro this run, the agent output was bad, what should we improve, draft hypotheses, run a small experiment, or after repeated dev runs of an agentic system produce uneven quality. Priority: output quality over performance over cost, each with diminishing-returns stops. NOT a product A/B test (experimentation), NOT coding-agent harness repair (harness-evolution), NOT production-scale learning (runtime-learning-loop).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Surface every assumption embedded in a plan, strategy, or document, assess how critical and how validated each one is, and identify which ones to test first. Load when the user asks to map assumptions, surface hidden beliefs, find what must be true for this to work, run an assumption audit, or when deep-thinking diagnoses an assumption frame. Also triggers on "what are we assuming", "what must be true for this to work", or "find the untested beliefs". Based on David Bland and Alex Osterwalder's assumption mapping method from Testing Business Ideas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Instrument a shipped product's AI agents with tracing and observability so you can see what they did, why outputs happened, and what each run cost. Plain-language primer plus free-tier-first backend selection (Langfuse, Phoenix, LangSmith, Braintrust) and OpenTelemetry/OpenInference instrumentation. Load when the user asks to add observability, add tracing, instrument my agents, see what my agent is doing in production, set up Langfuse or Phoenix or LangSmith, debug why my agent gave a bad answer, or track LLM cost per request. Also fires when agent-system-architecture or setup-evaluation requires an observability plan for an agent-chain product. NOT for tracing the coding agent itself — that is run-trace. Precondition for runtime-learning-loop.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automate Apollo.io lead generation -- search organizations, discover contacts, enrich prospect data, manage contact stages, and build targeted outreach lists -- using natural language through the Composio MCP integration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user requests to generate, create, or make presentations (PPT/PPTX). Creates visually rich slides by generating images for each slide and composing them into a PowerPoint file.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft, rewrite, or condense emails with target tone, length, and audience; use for cold outreach, replies, status updates, or escalations where clarity and brevity matter.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section. Transforms your writing process from solo effort to collaborative partnership.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI operational modes (brainstorm, implement, debug, review, teach, ship, orchestrate). Use to adapt behavior based on task type.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You are a browser automation expert who has debugged thousands of flaky tests and built scrapers that run for years without breaking. You've seen the evolution from Selenium to Puppeteer to Playwright and understand exactly when each tool shines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a one-line objective into a step-by-step construction plan any coding agent can execute cold. Each step has a self-contained context brief — a fresh agent in a new session can pick up any step without reading prior steps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits GitHub Actions workflows for security vulnerabilities in AI agent integrations including Claude Code Action, Gemini CLI, OpenAI Codex, and GitHub AI Inference. Detects attack vectors where attacker-controlled input reaches. AI agents running in CI/CD pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orders and orients assembled contigs into chromosome-scale scaffolds from long-range linking data, inserting N-gap spacers (adds no sequence). Covers Hi-C/Omni-C scaffolding (YaHS, SALSA2, 3D-DNA/Juicer), Hi-C read-mapping prerequisites (map each end separately, no mate rescue, dedup, enzyme-aware), reading the contact map for misjoins/inversions/false-duplications, manual curation in Juicebox/PretextView (the VGP/DToL standard), reference-guided scaffolding (RagTag) and its karyotype-erasure hazard, genetic-map (ALLMAPS) and Bionano optical-map integration, chimera-breaking before scaffolding, gap-filling, and telomere/contig-vs-scaffold-N50 QC (tidk). Use when turning contigs into chromosomes with Hi-C, integrating a linkage map or optical map, choosing a scaffolder by available linking data, or judging whether a chromosome-scale assembly is trustworthy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Computes and interprets sequencing read depth and coverage over a genome, windows, or target regions with mosdepth (windowed depth, cumulative distribution, --quantize callable BEDs), bedtools genomecov/coverage (bedGraph tracks, per-target stats), samtools depth/coverage (per-base depth, per-contig depth+breadth). Covers the breadth-vs-mean distinction, the cumulative-coverage curve, evenness (CV/Fano/fold-80/Gini), what each tool silently counts (duplicates, secondary/supplementary, MAPQ, read span vs fragment, mate-overlap), the samtools-depth 8000-cap version trap, and the bedtools coverage -a/-b orientation flip. Use when assessing sequencing adequacy, building coverage tracks, computing breadth at a depth threshold, defining callable regions, or QCing target-capture uniformity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Stores and operates on sparse expression matrices for single-cell and large bulk RNA-seq, covering dgCMatrix/dgRMatrix/dgTMatrix when-each-is-fast, the dgCMatrix (CSC, R) <-> CSR (Python) implicit transpose, AnnData (cells-rows) <-> SingleCellExperiment (cells-cols) orientation flip, HDF5/h5ad vs Zarr cloud-native shift, HDF5SummarizedExperiment + DelayedArray for out-of-memory bulk, scanpy backed mode for large h5ad, the ~10-15% density crossover where dense beats sparse, 10X format proliferation (MTX vs CellRanger H5 vs h5ad), the dense-conversion memory blow-up, and Dask + Zarr for consortium-scale matrices. Use when choosing sparse format, working with single-cell-sized matrices, importing/exporting 10X, debugging R/Python interop transposes, processing matrices too large for RAM, or building cloud-native pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes single-cell pooled CRISPR screens (Perturb-seq, CROP-seq, Perturb-CITE-seq, ECCITE-seq, multiome) where each cell carries an sgRNA and a scRNA-seq / surface-protein / chromatin readout. Covers experimental design (direct-capture Perturb-seq Dixit 2016 vs CROP-seq 3'UTR-barcoded Datlinger 2017 vs ECCITE-seq vs Multiome), MOI for sgRNA assignment, escaper-cell filtering (Mixscape, Papalexi 2021), SCEPTRE NB GLM + permutation for low-MOI (Barry 2024 Genome Biol 25:124), the Pertpy framework, factor decomposition, genome-scale Perturb-seq (Replogle 2022 Cell, 2.5M cells), and per-perturbation single-cell DE. Use when running a single-cell CRISPR screen, choosing direct-capture vs CROP-seq architecture, filtering escaper cells, performing single-cell DE, integrating Perturb-seq with pathway analysis, scaling to GW CRISPRi via Replogle protocol, or analyzing multi-omics screens.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cross-method decision tree for calling hits in pooled CRISPR screens. Catalogs statistical models (MAGeCK RRA, MAGeCK MLE, BAGEL2, drugZ, JACKS, Chronos, CERES), experimental designs each is built for, failure modes outside design domain, reconciliation when methods disagree, multiple-testing and effect-size thresholds, the order of operations (count -> QC -> CN-correct -> hit-call -> validate), the second-best-sgRNA conservative rule, and consensus-hit strategy. Use when choosing among MAGeCK / BAGEL2 / drugZ / JACKS / Chronos for a given design, reconciling disagreement across two or three methods on the same screen, deciding whether to require consensus, gating downstream validation by hit-confidence tier, or interpreting unstable hit lists across reruns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identifies differentially bound ChIP-seq regions between conditions using DiffBind, csaw (sliding windows), DESeq2/edgeR/PyDESeq2 on count matrices, NormR (control-aware), or MAnorm2. Distinguishes three distinct normalization problems (composition bias, trended bias, global shifts) and matches each to its appropriate fix including spike-in scaling. Use when comparing ChIP-seq binding between experimental conditions, choosing normalization for global vs local changes, integrating spike-in data, or reconciling DiffBind/DESeq2 disagreement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。