「exe」の検索結果

Use when implementing delays that must survive process restarts (e.g., 24-hour cart abandonment, scheduled follow-ups), waiting for human approval or external events with timeouts (review gates, webhook callbacks, async API completion), polling external services without losing state on crashes, calling other functions and awaiting their results, memoizing expensive operations so they don't re-run on retry, or running async work in parallel inside a workflow. Covers Inngest step methods: step.run, step.sleep, step.waitForEvent, step.waitForSignal, step.sendEvent, step.invoke, step.ai, plus patterns for loops and parallel execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adding durable execution to a TypeScript project — building retry-safe webhook handlers, background jobs that survive crashes, scheduled tasks, or long-running workflows that outlive a single request. Covers Inngest SDK installation, client config, environment variables, serve endpoints (Next.js, Express, Hono, Fastify), connect-as-worker mode, and the local dev server.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Appwrite Rust SDK skill. Use when building server-side Rust applications with Appwrite. Covers async client setup with API keys, user management, TablesDB database/table/row operations, file storage, function executions, permissions, queries, and error handling. Uses the crates.io `appwrite` package and Tokio.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate a local skill with the terum-skills CLI — hygiene, trigger evals and execution cases against a baseline, billed to the user's own Claude Code — after confirming the cost, and show the result as a Markdown board. Use when the user asks to eval, test, score or benchmark a skill, or to see whether an edit made it better.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute git commits using the Conventional Commits specification. Use this skill whenever the user says "commit", "git commit", "/commit", "stage and commit", "make a commit", "save my changes", or asks to commit specific files or all changes. Also triggers on phrases like "push my changes" (commit first), "commit everything", "commit with message X", or whenever git diff/status suggests uncommitted work the user wants to save. Handles auto-staging, diff analysis, message generation, breaking change detection, batch splitting of unrelated changes, safe pushes, and pre-commit hook failures gracefully. Always use this skill rather than ad-hoc git commit commands.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute an approved plan from .agents/plans/Plan.md in a fresh session. Use when handed an approved plan to implement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Derived from Andrej Karpathy's observations. Use ALWAYS when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code. Covers assumption surfacing, simplicity, surgical edits, and goal-driven execution with verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pitfalls, examples, and edge cases for workers executing a Surogates subagent task. Loaded automatically when the dispatcher spawns a session bound to a Task (Session.task_id is set).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The Arbor research-coordinator protocol: the OBSERVE -> IDEATE -> SELECT -> DISPATCH -> DECIDE cycle over a durable Idea Tree. Preloaded automatically on /auto-research sessions. The coordinator never edits code or runs commands — executors do that in isolated worktrees; the coordinator steers the tree with idea_tree / dispatch_experiments / merge_experiment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate stuck runs and execution failures by tracing Symphony agent-provider logs with issue/session identifiers; use when runs stall, retry repeatedly, or fail unexpectedly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate stuck runs and execution failures by tracing Symphony and Codex logs with issue/session identifiers; use when runs stall, retry repeatedly, or fail unexpectedly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Entry point for rafter. Invoke when a sub-skill is unclear, or when the task needs `rafter run` (remote SAST+SCA), `rafter secrets` (local secrets-only), `rafter audit`, policy checks, or command-risk evaluation. Scope by security surface, not task label: engage when the diff touches auth, credentials/secrets/tokens, untrusted input, SQL, shell/exec, file paths, deserialization, crypto, network endpoints, data deletion, or dependencies; for research/experimental/local-only code with none of that, a quick surface check is enough. When such surface IS present and no rafter skill or CLI call has been made, invoke this before handing the task off — an un-evaluated "done" on genuine security surface is not done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assume the role of Galyarder CEO (Chief Executive Officer). Apex Instance of the Intelligence Layer protocol. Deconstruct intent into departmental mandates, optimize strategic direction, and audit operational bandwidth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

INCIDENT MODE: Bypass standard PRD/Planning phase for emergency hotfixes. Requires immediate execution, a post-mortem ticket, and a patch release note.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes structured recovery from a ransomware incident following NIST and CISA frameworks, including environment isolation, forensic evidence preservation, clean infrastructure rebuild, prioritized system restoration from verified backups, credential reset, and validation against re-infection. Covers Active Directory recovery, database restoration, and application stack rebuild in dependency order. Activates for requests involving ransomware recovery, post-encryption restoration, or disaster recovery from ransomware.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the founder needs a single orchestrator to route work across multiple departments, synthesize specialist output, or translate an ambiguous business request into a concrete execution path.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maps observed adversary behaviors, security alerts, and detection rules to MITRE ATT&CK techniques and sub-techniques to quantify detection coverage and guide control prioritization. Use when building an ATT&CK-based coverage heatmap, tagging SIEM alerts with technique IDs, aligning security controls to adversary playbooks, or reporting threat exposure to executives. Activates for requests involving ATT&CK Navigator, Sigma rules, MITRE D3FEND, or coverage gap analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Develops comprehensive threat actor profiles for APT groups, criminal organizations, and hacktivist collectives by aggregating TTP documentation, historical campaign data, tooling fingerprints, and attribution indicators from multiple intelligence sources. Use when briefing executives on sector-specific threats, updating threat model assumptions, or prioritizing defensive controls against specific adversaries. Activates for requests involving MITRE ATT&CK Groups, Mandiant APT profiles, CrowdStrike adversary naming, or sector-specific threat briefings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when leadership needs a board or investor deck structure assembled from product, growth, finance, and execution updates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured guide for setting up A/B tests with mandatory gates for hypothesis, metrics, and execution readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Red team engagement planning is the foundational phase that defines scope, objectives, rules of engagement (ROE), threat model selection, and operational timelines before any offensive testing begins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a plan, feature, or launch needs an explicit adversarial pass to find weak assumptions, abuse cases, or strategic blind spots before execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when existing copy needs tightening for clarity, accuracy, tone consistency, or executive readability without changing the underlying message.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。