「exec」の検索結果

Select traceable regression coverage from change impact, affected risks, criteria, dependencies, and prior defects rather than execution convenience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user asks for QA planning, execution, review, release assessment, reporting, status, or test-tool recommendations and the correct PWDEV QA workflow must be selected safely.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute explicitly authorized tests and record traceable expected, observed, evidence-bound results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an approved PRD must become an executable roadmap — 'gerar roadmap do PRD', 'quebrar o PRD em épicos e features', 'cadeia de dependências', 'roadmap with dependencies' — Phase/Epic/Feature/Task with explicit dependencies, waves and critical path, validated by a deterministic checker, with an approval gate. Do NOT use for a PRD that is not approved (prd- create/prd-refine first).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Export one validated QA manifest as matching HTML and PDF without executing tests or evidence commands.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a traceable risk-based QA strategy without executing tests or expanding authorization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute an explicitly authorized exploratory charter and record notes, findings, evidence, and follow-up without claiming false coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a full feature action plan (backend + frontend + tests) with the PWDEVIA 7-question method before any code is written — 'planejar a feature X', 'criar plano de feature', 'plan the user CRUD'. Interviews the human (max 2 rounds) and writes .planning/feat/features/{slug}/plan.md. Do NOT use to write code (feat-exec), for small 1–3 file changes (feat-quick), backend-only or UI-only scope (feat-backend / feat-frontend), tests for existing code (feat-test) or code review (feat-review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants tests planned for existing code or a test audit — unit, integration, E2E scenarios exportable to Playwright, playwright-cli UI checks, a coverage matrix — 'criar testes para o UserService', 'plano de testes E2E do login', 'auditar a cobertura'. Writes .planning/feat/features/{slug}/plan.md. Do NOT use for code review (feat-review), for implementing features (feat-feature) or to run an existing plan (feat-exec).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a completed phase diff for high-confidence behavior-preserving simplifications and apply only explicitly approved proposals. Use after execution and before review to reduce duplication, dead code, needless complexity, or avoidable inefficiency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a UI-only action plan — components, pages, composables/hooks, state, forms and their E2E coverage — 'plano de frontend para a tela X', 'plan the settings page'. Writes .planning/feat/features/{slug}/plan.md with E2E scenarios and playwright-cli checks. Do NOT use for API/database work (feat-backend), full features (feat-feature), writing code (feat-exec) or UI review (feat-review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a product requirement, PRD, or executable roadmap is requested, or when an approved requirement needs decomposing into phases, epics, features and tasks

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a backend-only action plan — API endpoints, services, models, migrations, jobs and their tests — 'plano de backend para o endpoint X', 'plan the orders API'. Writes .planning/feat/features/{slug}/plan.md with the PWDEVIA method. Do NOT use for UI work (feat-frontend), full features spanning backend and UI (feat-feature), writing code (feat-exec) or quick 1–3 file fixes (feat-quick).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and execute database migrations, data transformations, and system migrations safely with rollback strategies and data integrity validation. Use when migrating databases, transforming data schemas, moving between database systems, implementing versioned migrations, handling data transformations, ensuring data integrity, or planning zero-downtime migrations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run multiple Reforge-guided section-refactor lanes in parallel, each in its own worktree/branch off origin/main, with a score-blind adversarial review panel gating every commit, one draft PR per section. Use when the user wants to reduce Reforge surface/internal score across several sections at once via architecturally-correct deletions (dead surface, entity-leak removal, cross-section read-splits) — not by relocation, parameter bags, or accessibility-dodging. Wraps the per-lane process in .codex/skills/humans-refactor. Triggers: 'refactor swarm', 'parallel section refactors', 'run reforge refactor on Users/Tickets/...', 'burn down surface score across sections'. Has an intensity dial (light|standard|deep) and a workflow|solo execution mode to trade token burn against autonomy per unit of output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user needs marketing ideas, inspiration, or strategies for their SaaS or software product. Also use when the user asks for 'marketing ideas,' 'growth ideas,' 'how to market,' 'marketing strategies,' 'marketing tactics,' 'ways to promote,' 'ideas to grow,' 'what else can I try,' 'I don't know how to market this,' 'brainstorm marketing,' or 'what marketing should I do.' Use this as a starting point whenever someone is stuck or looking for inspiration on how to grow. For specific channel execution, see the relevant skill (paid-ads, social-content, email-sequence, etc.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Eng manager-mode plan review. Lock in the execution plan — architecture, data flow, diagrams, edge cases, test coverage, performance. Walks through issues interactively with opinionated recommendations. Use when asked to "review the architecture", "engineering review", or "lock in the plan". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan or design doc and is about to start coding — to catch architecture issues before implementation. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "tech review", "technical review", "plan engineering review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute AEM Edge Delivery Services admin operations - list admins, add/remove users, preview, publish, unpublish content, clear cache, sync code, reindex, generate sitemap, manage snapshots, view logs, manage jobs, list sites, configure org/site settings, manage secrets and API keys. Also supports Document Authoring (DA) operations via admin.da.live - list/get/put content, copy, move, delete, versioning, and DA-specific preview/publish. Use for any Edge Delivery Services administrative task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - creates isolated git worktrees with smart directory selection and safety verification

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strict routing mode for prompts prefixed with `(best)`. USE FOR: any turn where the user explicitly wants the safest, smallest-context, highest-discipline execution path. This skill must route into context-budget-guard first, then continue into the task-specific workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate process decomposition and architecture design quality before execution begins. Load when the setup-evaluator agent fires (automatic for agent-chain tasks), or when user says "evaluate this setup", "check the decomposition", "validate the architecture", "is this plan sound", "review the agent design". Catches structural errors, missing knowledge, unrealistic step ordering, and topology mismatches. Does NOT modify — only evaluates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrator for spec-driven development (SDD) — the discipline of writing executable specs before code, with a constitution above them and a hard cross-check gate before implementation. Mirrors GitHub Spec Kit / AWS Kiro slash-command shape. Routes /constitution, /specify, /clarify, /plan, /tasks, /analyze, /implement to the right leaf skill. Load when the user says "spec-driven development", "SDD", "specs-first workflow", "run the spec loop", "/specify a feature", "/plan from this spec", "do spec-driven for this", "GitHub Spec Kit workflow", "Kiro workflow", or invokes any SDD-style slash command. Single entry point for all SDD workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a structured discovery interview and produce a complete, developer-ready Product Requirements Document. Load when the user asks to write a PRD, create product requirements, document a feature, define user stories with acceptance criteria, or turn a rough idea into a formal product requirements document. Also triggers on "document this feature", "write requirements for", "create a one-pager", "turn this into a PRD", "I need a PRD for", or any request to produce a structured product document for stakeholder alignment or engineering handoff. Supports Full PRD, Lean PRD, and One-Pager formats. Note: for executable feature specifications (FRs, NFRs, ACs as Given/When/Then consumable by AI coding agents), route to `feature-spec` instead — PRDs frame the product, feature-specs encode the implementable contract.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route user requests to the right skill, decompose complex work into parallel subagents, and manage project phase transitions. Load when the user asks "what should I do next", "which skill should I use", "orchestrate this", "run the full workflow", "split this into parallel tasks", or when a complex request spans multiple skills. Also triggers on "coordinate agents", "parallel execution", "task decomposition", "agent workflow", "what phase am I in", or when the user gives a broad instruction that requires multiple skills in sequence. This is the project's brain — it decides what runs, when, and whether to parallelise.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。