「then」の検索結果

Flip a problem, goal, or decision 180 degrees to find what forward thinking misses. Asks what would guarantee failure, then works backward to what must be avoided or changed. Load when the user says "invert this", "flip this problem", "what would guarantee failure", "think backward", "reverse engineer the goal", "think about it backwards", or when deep-thinking diagnoses an inversion frame. Also triggers on "what's the opposite of success here", "how would we sabotage this". Two methods: Failure Inversion and Opposite Goal. Max 2 clarifying questions before inverting. Always returns forward actions. For broader analysis, deep-thinking calls this.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a rough idea into a fully approved design before any code is written. Load when the user wants to brainstorm, explore ideas, design a feature, think through approaches, plan a new capability, or figure out what to build. Also triggers on "let's think through", "help me design", "explore options", "what's the best approach for", "I have an idea for", "before we build", or any request to design something before implementation. Enforces a hard gate: no code, no implementation until user approves a design. For executable feature specs (FRs, NFRs, ACs as Given/When/Then), route to `feature-spec` instead — brainstorming owns approach and architecture, not machine-readable requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write the executable feature specification — the WHAT and WHY artifact that agents and reviewers treat as source of truth. Owns both /specify and /clarify modes. Load when the user asks to write a feature spec, write a specification, write an executable spec, define functional requirements, capture acceptance criteria as Given/When/Then, or when the spec-driven-development orchestrator routes here. Also triggers on "feature spec", "executable spec", "/specify", "/clarify", "write the spec for this feature", "specification for", "spec-driven", "machine-readable spec". Output: docs/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>-feature-spec.md. Hard gate: cannot Approve while [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate one or more thinking frameworks to work through any problem, decision, document, or idea rigorously. Diagnoses which frameworks fit — inversion, pre-mortem, assumption-mapping, socratic, adversarial-hat — then guides the user through them in the right sequence. Load when the user asks for deep thinking, says "help me think through this properly", "apply your best thinking frameworks", "I need to think carefully before deciding", or "what thinking tools should I use here". Also the entry point for any complex problem where the right framework is unclear. Covers product decisions, engineering tradeoffs, personal decisions, strategy, creative challenges — any domain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a structured retrospective after development-phase runs of your product's agents — interview the owner in plain language about what went well and poorly, draft ranked improvement hypotheses, then design and run small n=1/n=2 experiments with pre-declared success criteria, guardrails, stop conditions, and a cost/ROI kill-switch. Load when the user says how did that run go, retro this run, the agent output was bad, what should we improve, draft hypotheses, run a small experiment, or after repeated dev runs of an agentic system produce uneven quality. Priority: output quality over performance over cost, each with diminishing-returns stops. NOT a product A/B test (experimentation), NOT coding-agent harness repair (harness-evolution), NOT production-scale learning (runtime-learning-loop).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set a deliberate visual direction before any UI is built — the single biggest lever against generic AI output. Derives a posture from product-soul/PRD/specs, scores a curated archetype palette, then generates 2-3 GENUINELY DISTINCT directions and compares them side-by-side before committing to one. Load when the user asks to pick an aesthetic, choose a design direction, decide what a UI should feel like, explore visual options, says "what should this look like", "make it feel like [Linear/Apple/ Duolingo]", "give me design directions", "explore some looks", or when frontend-design routes here. Replaces design-archetype. Sub-skill of frontend-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sync the live ~/.claude global config (settings.json, CLAUDE.md, statusline.ts, own skills, skills.sh lock file) into this git backup repo, then commit. Allowlist-based so credentials, history, and project transcripts are never copied. Use when the user says "sync my claude config", "back up .claude", "update the .claude repo", or runs "/sync-claude".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit UI, docs, or prose for AI-generated tells in design and copy, then fix approved findings. Use when the user says de-slop, slop check, "looks AI-generated", or wants copy humanized.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement several variations of a design directly inside the running app, on the real page/route, with a live switcher to toggle between them in the browser, then recommend one and fold the winner into the real code. Variants are real implementations judged against real data, layout, and density (not an isolated mockup). Use this skill whenever the user wants to try design options live in the app, prototype changes directly on a real page, add a variant switcher, compare layouts in-context, asks to "build a few versions of this page", "try variants on the real screen", "switch between designs in the app", "implement this with a toggle", or says "real-prototype this". For a safe standalone .html copy that never touches the app, use the prototype skill instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create atomic git commits with terse Conventional Commits messages, then push to remote. Subject ≤50 chars, body only when "why" isn't obvious. Never force pushes. Use when the user says "commit and push", "commit & push", "/commit-push", or asks to stage, commit, and push in one flow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploy applications and websites to Vercel. Use this skill when the user requests deployment actions such as "Deploy my app", "Deploy this to production", "Create a preview deployment", "Deploy and give me the link", or "Push this live". No authentication required - returns preview URL and claimable deployment link.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate coding tasks to OpenCode CLI agent for feature implementation, refactoring, PR review, and long-running autonomous sessions. Requires the opencode CLI installed and authenticated.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose Sentry issues without copy-pasting stack traces. Uses the Composio CLI to pull issue details, events, breadcrumbs, and suspect commits, then maps the frames to local source so the agent can propose a fix directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect GitHub PR checks with gh, pull failing GitHub Actions logs, summarize failure context, then create a fix plan and implement after user approval. Use when a user asks to debug or fix failing PR CI/CD checks on GitHub Actions and wants a plan + code changes; for external checks (e.g., Buildkite), only report the details URL and mark them out of scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help address review/issue comments on the open GitHub PR for the current branch using gh CLI; verify gh auth first and prompt the user to authenticate if not logged in.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

These are instructions for creating design philosophies - aesthetic movements that are then EXPRESSED VISUALLY. Output only .md files, .pdf files, and .png files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill ensures all code follows security best practices and identifies potential vulnerabilities. Use when implementing authentication or authorization, handling user input or file uploads, or creating new API endpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in secure backend coding practices specializing in input validation, authentication, and API security. Use PROACTIVELY for backend security implementations or security code reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Authenticate Java applications with Azure services using Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure Communication Services common utilities for Java. Use when working with CommunicationTokenCredential, user identifiers, token refresh, or shared authentication across ACS services.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure Identity SDK for .NET. Authentication library for Azure SDK clients using Microsoft Entra ID. Use for DefaultAzureCredential, managed identity, service principals, and developer credentials.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Authenticate to Azure services with various credential types.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure Identity SDK for Python authentication. Use for DefaultAzureCredential, managed identity, service principals, and token caching.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build secure, scalable authentication and authorization systems using industry-standard patterns and modern best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。