「what」の検索結果

Group controls with Gestalt principles so users see what belongs together. Use when laying out components, navigation, toolbars, forms or dashboards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Show where the user is and what their actions affect — breadcrumbs, regions, scope labels. Use when designing deep navigation or multi-section layouts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sticky headers, bottom toolbars, floating action buttons and pinned table headers. Use when deciding what stays on screen while the user scrolls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Size, colour, weight and position mark what matters most. Use when designing button groups, CTAs, cards, dashboards or any layout with a primary action.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mobile, tablet and desktop are different paradigms, not one layout scaled. Use when designing responsive layouts or deciding what each breakpoint shows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mine past agent sessions for working prompts, decisions, and patterns. Use when "what did I ask?", "find that prompt", session archaeology, or agent history.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map a trending TikTok sound or format to your niche so the ride is authentic, not cringe. Runs a fit check (does it match your niche, is it still early, what is the native joke), then scripts the twist that makes the trend yours: the recognizable beat plus a niche-specific turn. Covers sound timing, the trend lifecycle, and when to skip a trend entirely. Use to ride a trend without looking late or forced. Not for a from-scratch hook (use tt-hook-scripter) or a posting plan (use tt-content-planner).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read your TikTok niche and audience from real data. Scan a hashtag for top videos with plays, likes, and comments, see which hooks and sounds are working, pull a profile's videos (yours or a competitor's), and read the commenters on a video (TikTok hides likers, so commenters are the signal). Powered by Apify, no login. Triggers on "what is trending on TikTok", "analyze this hashtag", "competitor videos", "read my comments", "which sounds are working". Not for writing a script (use tt-hook-scripter).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts a systematic related-work / literature-survey / state-of-the-art review for a research question by defining survey dimensions, searching each axis, building a taxonomy of prior work, identifying the gap, and producing a positioning narrative for a paper's Related Work section. Goes beyond a flat paper list to deliver structured analysis. Use when the user is starting a new research project and needs to map the landscape, asks "what's been done on X?" or "how does my idea compare to existing work?", needs to write or revise a Related Work / Background / Prior Art section, wants to identify a research gap or position their contribution, or asks to build a taxonomy of approaches in a research area.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages a Zotero academic reference library through both the local API (localhost:23119, read-only) and the Web API (api.zotero.org, read-write), using a structured collection hierarchy (Inbox / Active Projects / Background / Reading Queue / Archive / Meta) plus project, status, priority, and type tags. Handles adding papers with full metadata, deduplication, attaching provenance notes, moving items between collections, updating tags after reading, listing the prioritized reading queue, and setting up the literature scaffold for a new project. Use when the user asks to add / save / file / organize a paper in Zotero, check / list / clean up the reading queue, move papers between collections, tag papers for a project, query their library ("what do I have on X?"), or set up Zotero for a new research project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How nutrition science becomes dietary guidance, and how industry, agriculture, and politics shape that process. Covers the US Dietary Guidelines cycle, food labeling, WIC and SNAP, commodity subsidies, and the documented history of industry influence on research and recommendations. Use when a question asks why a guideline says what it says, how a recommendation got written, or whether an industry-funded study should be trusted.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Methods for assessing what people actually eat — 24-hour recall, food frequency questionnaires, diet diaries, biomarkers, duplicate-plate studies, and controlled feeding. Covers the relative strengths and biases of each instrument, how to choose among them for a given question, and how to interpret results in the presence of measurement error. Use when a user wants to estimate population-level intake, individual-level intake, or evaluate the plausibility of a dietary claim that depends on how intake was measured.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The pedagogy of feeding — how to talk about food with children, what the Division of Responsibility model says, age-appropriate autonomy in eating, how to handle picky eating without creating disordered eating, and how to teach nutrition concepts to learners at different levels without either moralizing or oversimplifying. Use when a question is about raising, teaching, or advising a child or learner on eating, or when planning curriculum or parent guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Biochemical metabolism of macronutrients and key micronutrients — digestion, absorption, transport, utilization, and excretion — with emphasis on the pathways that matter for dietary-guideline debates (insulin response, lipoprotein metabolism, one-carbon metabolism, iron homeostasis). Use when a question asks what happens biochemically to a food after it is eaten, or when a claim about "metabolic effect" needs to be tested against mechanism.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The logical structure of mathematical proof -- how first-order logic, natural deduction, and semantic reasoning combine to produce rigorous mathematical arguments. Covers the logical skeleton of direct proof, contraposition, contradiction, cases, and induction; the role of definitions, lemmas, and theorems; how informal mathematical prose maps to formal deductive structure; and the difference between proof-as-object and proof-as-activity. Use when the question is "why is this a valid proof?" rather than "what proof technique applies?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Understanding how algorithmic systems shape what users see, know, and do -- from recommendation feeds to search ranking to credit scoring to hiring software. Covers the mechanics of recommendation systems, algorithmic bias and its sources, personalization's effects on information diets, opacity and accountability, AI limitations (hallucination, confident wrongness), and the human-in-the-loop question. Use when a learner needs to think critically about why particular content reached them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Understanding how digital systems actually work -- hardware, operating systems, networks, and information representation -- at a depth sufficient to reason about them rather than just use them. Covers CPU/RAM/storage/GPU roles, what an OS does, how packets travel the internet, and how computers represent numbers, text, images, and sound as binary. Use when a learner needs to build a mental model of computing rather than memorize menu paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform a user's builder vision into a complete, executable GSD mission package. Use this skill whenever a user has described what they want to BUILD (a product, tool, feature, system, educational pack, or ecosystem component) and wants it structured for GSD execution. Triggers include: 'structure this for GSD', 'make this into a milestone', 'turn this vision into a mission', 'package this up for Claude Code', 'create the mission files', 'I want to hand this to GSD', 'make me a mission package', or any request to decompose a described system into wave-based executable tasks. Also trigger when the user has a vision doc already written and needs mission decomposition. Prefer this skill over generic document creation whenever the GSD ecosystem is mentioned alongside building something.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GSD tutorial, command reference, and workflow explainer. Explains what a GSD workflow command does before you run it. Activates when user is new to GSD, asks about commands, wants to understand workflows, or mentions preview.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Traces decisions and requirements through GSD artifacts. Use when user asks "why did we...", "what happened to...", or mentions decision history.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run this appropriateness check the moment you are about to integrate a retrieved long-term memory — a Grove content-addressed hit, a chroma/pgvector neighbour, a memory-consolidation digest, or a MEMORY.md line — into a response, especially anything touching private origins, Fox Companies IP, credentials, or Center Camp / consent-governed content. It answers a question intent-router never asks: not WHAT to fetch or HOW, but WHETHER a correctly-retrieved item should reach output. Relevance is not appropriateness — a perfect similarity match can still be a boundary violation. Default is FAIL-CLOSED: if in-context authorization is uncertain, the memory may inform behaviour but must not be surfaced. Backed by RBI-Eval (arxiv 2606.06055v1). Triggers on surfacing recalled sensitive memory into a response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Project state awareness and session recovery for GSD-managed projects. Use this skill whenever: starting a new work session, resuming after a break, the user asks "where did we leave off" or "what's the current state", before making substantial code changes (to check for existing plans), the user seems disoriented about project status, or when something seems off and STATE.md might have relevant context. Also activates when the user references .planning/ files, milestones, phases, or project progress.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks "what should I work on", mentions GSD phases, ROADMAP, or .planning/ artifacts. Routes to the correct GSD command for the current project state.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce animated source control visualizations using Gource. This skill handles installation of Gource and ffmpeg, detection of repository metrics, preset-based configuration, single and multi-repo log generation, ffmpeg video encoding pipeline, headless rendering for server environments, caption generation from git tags, GitHub avatar resolution, and GSD output delivery. Use this skill whenever the user wants to visualize repository history, create a code evolution video, see project timeline animations, generate Gource videos, combine multiple repos into one visualization, or produce any kind of source control visualization. Also trigger when the user mentions "Gource", "repo visualization", "code history video", "project evolution animation", or asks to "show me what we built".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。