3,723 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Investigates distributed application performance using PostHog APM (OpenTelemetry span) data via MCP. Use when the user asks about service traces, slow HTTP/database spans, error spans, trace IDs, or span attributes — not AI observability traces or product logs. Uses posthog:query-apm-spans, posthog:apm-trace-get, posthog:apm-services-list, posthog:apm-attributes-list, and posthog:apm-attribute-values-list.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a loose idea into a sequenced map of investigation tickets, then drive them to resolution one at a time.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ABSOLUTE MUST to debug and inspect LLM/AI agent traces using PostHog's MCP tools. Use when the user pastes a trace or session URL (e.g. /ai-observability/traces/<id> or /ai-observability/sessions/<id>), asks to debug a trace, figure out what went wrong, check if an agent used a tool correctly, verify context/files were surfaced, inspect subagent behavior, investigate LLM decisions, or analyze token usage and costs. Also use when raw SQL/HogQL against `events.properties.$ai_input` / `$ai_output_choices` returns empty — message content lives only on the dedicated `posthog.ai_events` table.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up an LLM-judge evaluation that extracts canonical use cases for a PostHog feature at scale and streams the results to a Slack channel as a live feed. Use when someone wants to understand how users are actually using a specific AI/LLM-powered feature in production — what they're investigating, what questions they're trying to answer, and what patterns surface — without manually reading hundreds of traces. Assumes the feature emits `$ai_generation` and `$ai_evaluation` events with `$session_id` linkage to the trigger user's recording (the standard setup post the session-summary linkage PRs).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate LLM spend in PostHog — total cost over time, cost by model, provider, user, trace, or custom dimension, token and cache-hit economics, and cost regressions. Use when the user asks "how much are we spending on LLMs?", "which model / user / feature is most expensive?", "why did cost spike?", wants to build a cost dashboard or alert, or pastes a trace URL and asks about its cost.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate AI observability clusters — understand usage patterns in AI/LLM traffic, compare cluster behavior, compute cost/latency metrics, and drill into individual traces within clusters.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate AI observability evaluations of both types — `hog` (deterministic code-based) and `llm_judge` (LLM-prompt-based). Find existing evaluations, inspect their configuration, run them against specific generations, query individual pass/fail results, and generate AI-powered summaries of patterns across many runs. Use when the user asks to debug why an evaluation is failing, surface common failure modes, compare results across filters, dry-run a Hog evaluator, prototype a new LLM-judge prompt, or manage the evaluation lifecycle (create, update, enable/disable, delete).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recall project-first and global-supplement ChatCrystal memories before substantive implementation, refactoring, migration, configuration, investigation, or optimization work. Use when the task is non-trivial, has repository or project context, and prior fixes, decisions, pitfalls, or reusable patterns may change the approach.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a seam goes, make code more testable or AI-navigable, or when another skill needs the deep-module vocabulary.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Launch multiple explore subagents in parallel to investigate architecture, data models, auth, APIs, and deployment. Synthesize into an onboarding document.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses what a page's heatmap is telling you and recommends concrete changes. Pulls click / rageclick / scroll-depth data for a URL, names the hot elements by cross-referencing autocapture events on the same page, and can create a saved heatmap the user opens in PostHog, then summarizes the behavior and proposes improvements. TRIGGER when: user asks what a heatmap shows, why people aren't clicking something, where users rage-click, how far they scroll, what to change on a page based on heatmap/click data, or to 'analyze/assess/review the heatmap' for a URL. DO NOT TRIGGER when: the user only wants to create a saved heatmap screenshot with no analysis (use heatmaps-saved-create directly), or is asking about session replay in general (use investigating-replay).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
IBM quantum computing framework. Use when targeting IBM Quantum hardware, working with Qiskit Runtime for production workloads, or needing IBM optimization tools. Best for IBM hardware execution, quantum error mitigation, and enterprise quantum computing. For Google hardware use cirq; for gradient-based quantum ML use pennylane; for open quantum system simulations use qutip.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Package agent-generated scientific code, figures, tables, data, logs, and conclusions into a navigable workspace result with stable paths and a concise manifest. Use near the end of computational tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate LLM outputs using frontier models as judges. Use for pairwise model comparison, quality scoring with custom rubrics, and automated evaluation pipelines. Covers position bias mitigation, statistical significance, and generating preference data for DPO/RLHF.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GPCR receptor pharmacology — agonist/antagonist/inverse-agonist/biased-agonist classification, GPCRdb structural data, receptor-ligand binding analysis, antibody-target interface (SAbDab). Use for GPCR drug discovery, biased-agonism analysis, receptor subtype selectivity questions, and orthosteric vs allosteric pocket characterization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive drug profiling — mechanism, primary/secondary targets, drug interactions, clinical-trial status, adverse events (FAERS), pharmacogenomics, and approval history. Use for full drug investigation reports, 'tell me about drug X' queries, and assembling drug profiles for clinicians, researchers, or regulatory work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drug safety and adverse event analysis — FAERS spontaneous-report mining, FDA black-box warnings, signal detection (PRR, ROR, IC), risk factors by demographic/comorbidity, and label change tracking. Use for post-market safety surveillance, AE signal investigation, drug-AE association strength scoring, and pharmacovigilance reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds and applies 3D pharmacophore models using RDKit Pharm3D, the apo2ph4 receptor-based workflow (Heider et al 2022/2023 J Chem Inf Model 63:147-158), Pharmer / Pharmit (search), and PharmacoForge (diffusion-based generation, Flynn et al 2025 Front Bioinform), covering ligand-based pharmacophore (from active set alignment) and receptor-based pharmacophore (from binding pocket geometry). Explicit handling of feature types, geometric tolerances, partial matching, and pharmacophore-based virtual screening. Use when identifying scaffold-hopping candidates, building shape-and-feature search queries, or transferring SAR across chemotypes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates docked / generated protein-ligand poses using PoseBusters physical-validity tests, strain energy quantification, geometric checks (planarity, vdW overlap, bond/angle distortion), and pose-energy reasonableness. Filters AI-docking outputs (DiffDock, EquiBind, NeuralPLexer) where ~50% of poses fail physical-validity tests. Use when QC-ing docking results, comparing classical vs ML docking outputs, or filtering pose lists before SAR analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs PROTACs, molecular glues, and bivalent degraders with explicit handling of E3 ligase choice (VHL, CRBN, IAP, MDM2, KEAP1), linker design (length, composition, rigidity), ternary complex prediction (PRosettaC, DeepTernary, AlphaFold3 with constraints), cooperativity (alpha), DC50 / Dmax characterization, hook effect, and prediction-experiment reconciliation. Use when designing targeted protein degraders, planning linker SAR, predicting ternary complex stability, or building generative degrader workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs structure-based virtual screening using AutoDock Vina, SMINA, GNINA (CNN scoring), and DiffDock-L hybrid workflows with explicit choice rules across rigid vs flexible docking, cross-docking vs self-docking, binding-site detection (P2Rank, fpocket), receptor preparation (PDB2PQR, PROPKA), ligand preparation (meeko, OpenBabel), and ultralarge-library screening (ZINC22, Enamine REAL). Use when screening chemical libraries against a protein target to find candidate binders, ranking docking poses, or selecting a docking workflow for a specific scenario.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates 3D conformer ensembles using RDKit ETKDGv3 with knowledge-enhanced distance geometry, MMFF94/UFF force-field optimization, CREST + GFN2-xTB semi-empirical refinement, and macrocycle-aware torsion preferences. Provides explicit decision rules for single vs ensemble conformer use, RMSD pruning, energy windows, conformer count, and force-field choice. Use when preparing 3D ligands for docking, generating descriptor input for 3D QSAR, or sampling macrocycle/peptide conformational ensembles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hybrid ML + physics binding affinity prediction. Empirical scoring, MM/GBSA rescoring, multi-method consensus, and batch virtual screening for protein-ligand complexes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Publication-quality molecular visualization. 2D structure drawings (PNG/SVG), molecule grids with property annotations, scaffold highlighting, protein-ligand interaction diagrams, and interactive 3D views.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。