5,027 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Multi-source research with citations using You.com. Use for questions that need several sources compared and synthesized, such as library or framework comparisons, tool and vendor evaluations, market research, or deep-dive reports. Routes between a cost-conscious agentic search loop and the one-shot `you-research` MCP tool.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit the decisions in .ank/ against the current code and report what no longer holds. Use when asked whether ADRs, specs, or tasks are still accurate, after a milestone, or when the corpus and the code seem to disagree.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a Cynical Review and produce a findings report. Use when the user requests a critical review of something
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Walk every branching path and boundary condition in content, report only unhandled edge cases. Orthogonal to adversarial review - method-driven not attitude-driven. Use when you need exhaustive edge-case analysis of code, specs, or diffs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct technical research on technologies and architecture. Use when the user says they would like to do or produce a technical research report
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a Python solution against a markdown spec, run it, and report bugs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Post-deploy monitoring. Use when verifying a deployed app is healthy after deploy or launch — auto-fires from launch/deploy. Checks HTTP status, response times, error detection, and smoke test report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate and parse office documents — PDF, DOCX, XLSX, PPTX, CSV. Use when creating reports, exporting tabular data, or processing uploaded office files. NOT for project documentation (use docs).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Playwright browser automation. Navigates URLs, takes screenshots, checks accessibility tree, interacts with UI elements, and reports findings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when receiving external input that needs structured intake before action — PR review feedback, code review comments, OR issue tracker items (bug reports, feature requests). PR Review Mode (default) verifies suggestions before implementing. Issue Triage Mode classifies issues into a state machine (ready-for-agent / ready-for-human / needs-info / wontfix) and emits AGENT-BRIEFs for AFK execution. Prevents blind implementation, enforces verification-first discipline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured incident response. Use when user reports an outage, production error, or says 'incident', 'something is down', 'users are affected'. Triage severity, contain blast radius, root-cause, document timeline, generate postmortem.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit designs against 19 rules across Figma files and code (HTML/CSS/React/Vue/Tailwind). Auto-detects framework and design system (MUI, Chakra, shadcn/ui, Ant Design, Radix, Bootstrap). Runs code superpowers across all 19 categories: aria, focus, contrast, tokens, responsive, motion, forms, navigation, spacing, states, microcopy, elevation, iconography/SVG. Flags color blindness risk. Audits dark patterns, ethical design, Nielsen's heuristics. Outputs before/after diffs, developer handoff reports, wireframe-to-spec. English and Korean. Triggers on: check my design, review my UI, audit my layout, is this accessible, design review, color contrast, WCAG, a11y, pixel perfect, Figma audit, CSS check, dark patterns, is this GDPR compliant, is this manipulative, is my form accessible, is my dark mode correct, wireframe to spec, heuristic review, Nielsen audit, usability heuristics, 디자인 검토, 접근성 확인, 색상 대비, 다크 패턴, 와이어프레임 스펙.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prioritize drug targets from a ranked gene list (e.g., scRNA-seq DE output) by orchestrating parallel API queries against UniProt, OpenTargets (with integrated DepMap CRISPR essentiality + gnomAD constraint), PubMed, the Human Protein Atlas (HPA), and ChEMBL tool compounds, then re-ranking by a composite score combining protein localization, druggability, disease genetics, tissue specificity (safety), focus-cell-type expression, CRISPR essentiality, LoF safety constraint, and research maturity. Use whenever the user wants to filter, triage, prioritize, or "do due diligence" on a list of candidate genes for drug discovery, especially after a DE / DEG analysis when they say things like "which of these should I follow up on", "filter for druggable targets", "make a target dossier", "rank these for tractability", "annotate these genes for druggability", or "build a target report". Trigger even when the user says just "filter these candidate genes" or hands over a CSV from a DE pipeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when a user needs to inspect, score, repair, or regression-test academic paper formatting in DOCX files, especially thesis, journal, or conference documents with a separate format specification. The skill guides Codex through local-first document handling, rule extraction, formatting repair, report review, and contribution-safe validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates ambient context artifacts (CLAUDE.md, memory, local skills, settings hooks) for compatibility with swarm governance. Returns a classified report so users can address interference before launching a team.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reconstruct an open-source project's growth channels, key content, and stage-by-stage attribution from GitHub history and public web evidence. Use this skill when asked to research GitHub star growth, identify launch and amplification channels, explain viral milestones, find representative posts or videos, compare Product Hunt/Show HN/Reddit/KOL impact, or produce an evidence-backed OSS growth attribution report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants web research: gathering cited, multi-angle evidence on a specific question. Triggers on: "research X for me", "do web research on", "look up sources for", "find citations for", "gather evidence on", "what does the web say about X". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), local file search, LLM-as-judge evaluation, or paywalled/auth-gated scraping. Produces a written plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mandatory verification steps for all code reviews to reduce false positives. Load this skill before reporting ANY code review findings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants a cited, structured read of local documents and project knowledge. Triggers on: "analyze these docs", "scan my project for context", "read the docs folder", "summarize what's in .beagle/concepts/", "extract context from docs/", "what's in this folder", "go read everything in X and tell me what's there". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), web research (use web-research), LLM-as-judge evaluation (use llm-judge), or document editing (use humanize-beagle). Produces a written scan plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reference for the diagnostics pipeline (ripdpi-monitor-engine/ripdpi-diagnostics-* and core/diagnostics). Use when changing ScanRequest/ScanReport, ProbeTask families, probe scheduling, the catalog, or the wire contract. Techniques: desync-engine.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Query Codex banked reset credits from the local Codex Desktop login state and report available reset count plus expiration times. Use when the user asks to check Codex reset credits, reset opportunities, reset chances, reset count, rate-limit reset credits, or expiration times; also use when the user provides a codex-reset-credits-skill or codex-reset-credits runbook link and asks Codex to query the result directly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit project health across 7 dimensions (documentation, test coverage, security, code quality, dependencies, database, build/deploy) producing a scored report with prioritized fixes. Use for periodic checkups, before releases, or when the user runs /project-health-check.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Act as an end-to-end data scientist: turn business questions into defensible analysis, validated models, and decision-ready reports. Use whenever the user asks to analyze, explore, or profile a dataset or CSV/Parquet/Excel file; asks what drives a metric or why a number changed ("why did churn go up?"); wants to test whether a difference is real (A/B tests, experiments, "is this significant?", "how many samples do I need?"); wants a predictive model (churn, forecast, scoring, segmentation, classification, regression); asks to review an existing analysis, notebook, or model for flaws; or needs results written up for decision-makers. Triggers in any language ("phân tích dữ liệu", "xây model dự đoán", "kiểm định A/B"), even when they never say "data science" or "statistics".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose problems before solving them: turn "X is broken and we don't know why" into a precise problem statement, verified root causes, solutions traced to those causes, and a rollout plan. Use whenever the user reports something failing, breaking, slowing, or recurring without a known cause: "sales dropped and we don't know why", "this keeps happening", "why does X keep failing", "find the root cause", "run a post-mortem", "5 whys"; Vietnamese "sao cứ bị vậy hoài", "tìm nguyên nhân gốc", "X đang hỏng mà không rõ vì sao". Trigger even when the user asks for solutions directly: "give me ideas to fix falling sales" is a diagnosis request. Not for open-ended ideation when nothing is broken (brainstorm-coach), understanding user needs (design-thinking), or company-level strategic bets (strategy-board).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。