4,790 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Check what's playing on WRHV 88.7 FM (Classical WMHT), fetch recent tracks, build playlist reports, search for pieces, and create or manage Spotify playlists from radio tracks. Triggers on 'Classical 887', 'WRHV', 'what's playing', 'classical radio', 'Hudson Valley radio', 'Spotify playlist from radio'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a repo's test, lint, type-check, static analysis, build, and debug infrastructure for AI coding agents. Generate scored reports and optimized configs for the lint-on-write hook. Triggers on audit tests, test harness, lint setup, check test infrastructure, entering a new repo.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Final quality pass fixing alignment, spacing, consistency, interaction states, and micro-details before shipping. Executes changes (unlike design-audit and design-critique which are report-only). Triggers on polish, finishing touches, final pass, something looks off, pre-launch, good to great.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate design from a UX perspective with Nielsen's heuristics scoring, anti-pattern detection, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Report-only. Triggers on critique, UX review, design feedback, how does this look, evaluate the design, component review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate SEO and LLM-readability claims against live HTML, local fixtures, and generated artifacts. Use this skill when the user asks to prove whether title, meta description, canonical, hreflang, JSON-LD, NewsArticle.image, OpenGraph, Twitter cards, RSS autodiscovery, robots.txt, llms.txt, sitemap, news-sitemap, crawler access, or performance evidence is actually present, and when subjective audits must become timestamped pass/fail reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits Claude Code repositories. Two-phase workflow — Phase 1 sweeps 14 hygiene categories (permissions, hooks, CLAUDE.md bloat, Skills hygiene, process-abstraction, plus structural) and an optional 7-layer leak check. Phase 2 executes [APPROVED] markers from the report file. Use for repo cleanup, pre-distribution sanity, post-feature hygiene, environment audit, process-abstraction discovery. Trigger on "audit my CC repo," "sweep my repository for hygiene," "check this CC environment," "find process abstraction candidates," "review my CLAUDE.md," "clean up my .claude directory," "pre-distribution hygiene check," "find layer leaks in my CC setup." Routes structural findings to rootnode-cc-design REMEDIATE. Composes with rootnode-critic-gate. CC-only — does not scan Claude Projects. Do NOT use for building a Skill (use rootnode-skill-builder), compiling a prompt (use rootnode-prompt-compilation), scoring a single prompt (use rootnode-prompt-validation), or auditing a Project (use rootnode-project-audit).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze and tune a running llama.cpp server for local coding agents: propose config (ctx, prompt cache, MTP), benchmark before/after, report deltas. Use to optimize llama-server for Claude Code or Aider. Don't use for vLLM, ollama, or non-llama.cpp.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The TaskBarHero game updated (new version) and the tbh-meter reader needs re-calibration — symptoms are gold showing 0, stage mode "?", or the live party/XP/stats dropping out (party empty / no live levels / runs degraded) after a patch, or you're prepping a meter release for a new game build. Runs the diagnose→dump→diff→reseed→bump→verify playbook (the fix is usually a reseed, but a build can also change an Obscured encoding with zero offset movement — caught only by the live gate, fixed by a read-strategy change). Use when the game version changed, after a TBH patch, when a player reports gold/stage/party/XP broken following an update, or when asked to re-seed / re-calibrate the reader for a new build.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Timebox and coordinate a live three-lane iOS launch sprint from audience idea to tested SwiftUI app, landing page, ASO copy, screenshots, promo video, and privacy report. Use for a 50-minute talk, demo rehearsal, fallback drill, or any request to finish a tiny local iOS product under a hard deadline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce a visible, evidence-backed privacy and security report for a local iOS app by scanning permission declarations, network code, dependencies, persistence, and risky APIs, while complementing the official Claude Code security-guidance plugin. Use after implementation, in a live security lane, or before claiming that an app is offline and account-free.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Resolve merge and rebase conflicts with safe recovery strategies. Covers identifying conflict sources, reading conflict markers, choosing resolution strategies, and continuing or aborting operations safely. Use when a git merge, rebase, cherry-pick, or stash pop reports conflicts, when a git pull results in conflicting changes, or when you need to safely abort and restart a failed merge or rebase operation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct a peer review of research methodology, experimental design, and manuscript quality. Covers methodology evaluation, statistical appropriateness, reproducibility assessment, bias identification, and constructive feedback. Use when reviewing a manuscript, preprint, or internal research report, evaluating a research proposal or study protocol, assessing evidence quality behind a claim, or reviewing a thesis chapter or dissertation section.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a data analysis for quality, correctness, and reproducibility. Covers data quality assessment, assumption checking, model validation, data leakage detection, and reproducibility verification. Use when reviewing a colleague's analysis before publication, validating an ML pipeline before production deployment, auditing a report for regulatory or business decision-making, or performing a second-analyst review in a regulated environment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a Computer Systems Validation (CSV) assessment following GAMP 5 methodology. Covers user requirements, risk assessment, IQ/OQ/PQ planning, traceability matrix creation, and validation summary reporting. Use when a new computerized system is being introduced in a GxP environment, when an existing validated system is undergoing significant change, when periodic revalidation is required, or when a regulatory inspection demands a validation gap analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement comprehensive model drift monitoring using Evidently AI, statistical tests (PSI, KS), and custom metrics to detect data drift and concept drift in production ML systems. Set up automated alerting and reporting workflows to catch degradation before it impacts business metrics. Use when production models show unexplained performance degradation, when new data distributions differ from training data, when seasonal shifts affect input features, or when regulatory requirements mandate model monitoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement cloud cost optimization strategies for Kubernetes workloads using tools like Kubecost for visibility, right-sizing recommendations, horizontal and vertical pod autoscaling, spot/preemptible instances, and resource quotas. Covers cost allocation, showback reporting, and continuous optimization practices. Use when cloud costs are growing without proportional business value, when resource requests are misaligned with actual usage, when manual scaling leads to over-provisioning, or when implementing showback and chargeback for internal cost accountability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide a person through healing modalities including energy work (reiki, chakra balancing), herbal remedies, basic first aid stabilization, and holistic techniques (breathwork, visualization, body scan). AI coaches the practitioner through assessment triage, modality selection, energetic connection, remedy preparation, and integration. Use when a person describes a physical ailment or injury, reports energetic imbalance (fatigue, emotional stagnation), wants coaching through a holistic breathwork or visualization session, or needs post-meditation integration with directed healing attention.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement policy-as-code enforcement using OPA Gatekeeper or Kyverno to validate and mutate Kubernetes resources according to organizational policies. Covers constraint templates, admission control, audit mode, reporting violations, and integrating with CI/CD pipelines for shift-left policy validation. Use when enforcing resource configuration standards, preventing security misconfigurations such as privileged containers, ensuring compliance before deployment, standardizing naming conventions, or auditing existing cluster resources against policies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establish Service Level Objectives (SLO), Service Level Indicators (SLI), and Service Level Agreements (SLA) with error budget tracking, burn rate alerts, and automated reporting using Prometheus and tools like Sloth or Pyrra. Use when defining reliability targets for customer-facing services, balancing feature velocity against system reliability through error budgets, migrating from arbitrary uptime goals to data-driven metrics, or implementing Site Reliability Engineering practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply the fail-early (fail-fast) pattern to detect and report errors at the earliest possible point. Covers input validation with guard clauses, meaningful error messages, assertion functions, and anti-patterns that silently swallow failures. Primary examples in R with general/polyglot guidance. Use when writing functions that accept external input, adding input validation before CRAN submission, refactoring code that silently produces wrong results, reviewing PRs for error-handling quality, or hardening internal APIs against invalid arguments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coordinate safely with a peer interactive session sharing the same git worktree — check first whether a separate worktree removes the problem, then declare path and branch scope before the first edit, survive a contended index lock, and review the whole branch before opening a PR. Activate when starting work in a repository that may already be occupied, when a git command fails with `index.lock: File exists`, when `guard:snapshot` refuses because a snapshot already exists, or when a commit turns out to contain a file this session never edited. When one session leads and the other supports, divide the labour by shape and re-derive every reported number against a named revision before citing it. Distinct from subagent concurrency: a peer session cannot be bracketed, because no baseline exists from before its edits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Remove dead code, unused imports, fix lint warnings, and normalize formatting across a codebase without changing business logic or architecture. Use when lint warnings have piled up during rapid development, unused imports and variables clutter files, dead code paths were never removed, formatting is inconsistent, or static analysis tools report fixable hygiene issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct a project or sprint retrospective by gathering data from status reports and velocity metrics, structuring what went well and what needs improvement, and generating actionable improvement items with owners and due dates. Use at the end of a sprint, after a project phase or milestone, following a significant incident or success, at a quarterly review of ongoing processes, or before starting a similar project to capture lessons learned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct a GxP audit of computerized systems and processes. Covers audit planning, opening meetings, evidence collection, finding classification (critical/major/minor), CAPA generation, closing meetings, report writing, and follow-up verification. Use for scheduled internal audits, supplier qualification audits, pre-inspection readiness assessments, for-cause audits triggered by deviations or data integrity concerns, or periodic compliance posture reviews of validated systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。