「fix」の検索結果

Customize how a built-in unikit skill behaves in this specific project by writing workflow overrides into its skill-context file. These are per-skill workflow rules (e.g. "/unikit-review should also flag TODO comments", "/unikit-implement should run tests after each task"), not coding conventions. Use when the user wants to change, customize, or override how a particular unikit skill works in this project — "customize the review skill", "make /unikit-fix always add logging here", "the implement skill should do X differently", "add a skill rule for /unikit-commit". Use "validate" to find stale overrides against updated base skills. For a general coding convention (not tied to one skill) use /unikit-rules; to derive rules from past mistakes use /unikit-evolve.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Qualitative quality review of game design documents — answers "is this design good, and does it follow best practices?" — across all three GDD axes: systems, flows, and content types. Fans out adversarial lenses (completeness, clarity, pillar alignment, systems-math, fantasy-delivery, feasibility, scope) plus domain lenses that check it against the game-design rules, each prompted to find problems rather than validate; produces a severity-graded verdict and a two-bucket report (apply-ready fixes vs research), handed to /unikit-gd-apply or /unikit-gd-explore in one move. Scope is inferred: a named system, flow, or content type reviews that document; "all" runs a cross-document review. Use when the user wants a critique, quality judgment, or rules check of the design, e.g. "review the combat GDD", "review the onboarding flow". This is the subjective quality pass — for a mechanical consistency check (numbers, terms, IDs, references matching the registry) use /unikit-gd-verify.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Archive completed plans. Moves finished folder plans from .unikit/code/plans/<folder>/ to .unikit/code/archive/plans/<folder>/, so plan lookup and the plan lists stop offering them; an unfinished plan moves only when the user picks it, and is marked as unfinished. Lists every plan with its created and last-change dates; plans can be picked by number or by date. Never deletes, renames or commits. Use when user says "archive plans", "archive completed", "archive old plans", "clean up plans", or "show archived plans". Not for .unikit/code/PLAN.md or FIX_PLAN.md; to check that a plan is really done use /unikit-verify, to commit the move use /unikit-commit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Initialize the UniKit framework in a project. Scans the current project to detect the engine and real tech stack, then generates the base framework documents that give AI agents context about the project — the resolved project description, the architecture doc, AGENTS.md, and the user-editable .unikit/config.yaml. This is the one-time, whole-project setup run before any other unikit skill. Use whenever the user wants to initialize, set up, or onboard the framework, e.g. "initialize unikit", "init the framework", "set up unikit", "set up the project", "configure AI context", "scan my project and set it up", "bootstrap the project". It also actualizes the config of a project already set up — say "update the config", "add missing settings", "actualize configuration", "fix my config".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mechanical consistency check for game design — answers "is the design consistent with itself?" — plus changed-scope impact analysis across all three GDD axes: systems, flows, and content types. Offline and deterministic: greps the facts registry against the documents (numbers, terms, IDs, duplicate & dangling references, roster↔disk, map freshness, Depends 3-way, status/version, AC presence, placeholder leaks, flow & content schema), and from a git diff computes which dependent systems, flows, and content a change affects. Scope is inferred: a named document checks that document; an unverified diff triggers a changed-scope pass; otherwise everything. Use when the user wants a consistency or impact check, e.g. "verify the design", "what did this change affect", "find broken references in the design". Conflicts triage into four tracks; the entailed fixes hand off to /unikit-gd-apply in one pass. This is the mechanical pass — for a subjective "is this design good" quality critique use /unikit-gd-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proactive bug-hunting workflow. Assesses codebase risk through complexity, coverage, and structural analysis, then spawns focused investigators that write reproducing tests to validate suspected bugs. Thoroughness over speed. Advisory only — produces findings and proposes tickets; does not implement fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mechanical documentation hygiene. Spawns a doc-maintainer agent to audit all project documentation and fix correctness, completeness, freshness, and consistency issues autonomously within its authority. Surfaces anything requiring user judgment for approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Accessibility audit. Dispatches an accessibility auditor to identify WCAG conformance gaps, prioritize by user impact, and recommend fixes. Advisory only — no changes made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous bug-elimination loop. Iteratively invokes /bug-hunt and /implement-batch until findings converge below an operator-specified severity floor. At termination, runs /review-test scoped to the run's new reproducing tests and fixes quality issues above the floor. Auto-approves /bug-hunt and /review-test ticket proposals; pulls the andon cord on contested findings, repeated implementation failure, hard-cap exhaustion, or breaking-change proposals. Optional /refactor finisher.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Exploratory workflow for understanding problem spaces and drafting feature proposals, refactorings, or complex bug-fixes. Creates detailed tickets in your issue tracker without doing implementation work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checks and fixes Chinese copywriting with autocorrect-backed workflows for text and single-file Markdown/TXT inputs. Use when user asks to normalize Chinese punctuation, spacing, or full-width/half-width usage. Also triggers for "校对", "检查排版", "中英文空格", "全角半角". Does not rewrite document structure, product claims, or UI messaging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review and resolve PR issues with Qodo - get AI-powered code review issues and fix them interactively (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The idle work loop - enumerate open issues and triage rows, classify fixable vs blocked, pick by value-vs-budget, dispatch. Standing user directive; invoke whenever otherwise idle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect and install the Spec Kit `specify` CLI that every other speckit skill depends on. USE FOR: checking whether `specify` is installed/on PATH, installing it when missing, fixing "command not found: specify", confirming the CLI is new enough (>= 0.11). DO NOT USE FOR: upgrading an already-installed CLI to a newer release (use speckit-self) or verifying project tools (use speckit-check).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Vitest fast unit testing framework powered by Vite with Jest-compatible API. Use when writing tests, mocking, configuring coverage, or working with test filtering and fixtures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-first automation inventory and overlap audit workflow for ECC. Use when the user wants to know which jobs, hooks, connectors, MCP servers, or wrappers are live, broken, redundant, or missing before fixing anything.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only when writing/updating/fixing C++ tests, configuring GoogleTest/CTest, diagnosing failing or flaky tests, or adding coverage/sanitizers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Survey a codebase's animation and motion code as a senior motion advisor, then produce a prioritized audit and self-contained implementation plans for other agents (or cheaper models) to execute. Read-only on source code — it plans improvements, it does not apply them. Use when the user asks to "improve the animations", "audit the motion", "make this app feel better", or wants a roadmap of animation fixes rather than a review of a single diff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

UI/UX design intelligence for web, mobile, and desktop. This skill should be used when designing, building, reviewing, or fixing interfaces, including pages, components, design systems, accessibility, interaction, responsive layout, typography, color, charts, and stack-specific UI implementation. Searchable local data: 79 searchable styles (50 active), 192 product palettes and reasoning profiles, 74 font pairings, 119 UX guidelines, 105 icons, 17 GSAP presets, 25 chart types, and 22 stacks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Try to break a piece of UI by feeding it worst-case data — long names, unbreakable emails, one-letter names, missing fields, huge counts, zero items, long labels, non-Latin text, emoji, extreme numbers — then render it behind a "Demo data / Worst case" toggle and report everything that broke, with the fix for each. Use when the user asks to stress-test, break, or find edge cases in a component or screen, or to "try the worst case". For visual design critique use emil-design-eng; for motion use review-animations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search a codebase or UI for places that don't animate but should, and reject everything that shouldn't. Read-only; it proposes motion with exact values, it does not implement it. Use when the user asks "what could be animated here?" or wants to "make this feel more alive". For fixing existing animations, use improve-animations or review-animations instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full-stack diagnostic for agent and LLM applications. Audits the 12-layer agent stack for wrapper regression, memory pollution, tool discipline failures, hidden repair loops, and rendering corruption. Produces severity-ranked findings with code-first fixes. Essential for developers building agent applications, autonomous loops, or any LLM-powered feature.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Make a web app feel native on a phone — the small CSS and meta-tag fixes that separate "a website in a browser" from something that feels installed. Covers sticky hover states, tap highlight flashes, the 100vh bug, inputs that zoom the page, laggy taps, pull-to-refresh hijacking scroll, content under the notch, long-press selecting button text, carousels that scroll the wrong way, mismatched status bars, and the rule that you test on real hardware. Use when a web app is being built for or reviewed on mobile, when something "works in Chrome but feels wrong on my phone", when building a PWA, a bottom sheet, a carousel, a full-screen layout, or any touch interaction. For motion itself use animate; for React Native use animate-expo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's comprehensive "Signs of AI writing" guide. Detects and fixes patterns including: inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary words, passive voice, negative parallelisms, and filler phrases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。