4,158 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Creates comprehensive Technical Design Documents (TDD) with mandatory and optional sections through interactive discovery. Use when user asks to "write a design doc", "create a TDD", "technical spec", "architecture document", "RFC", "design proposal", or needs to document a technical decision before implementation. Do NOT use for README files, API docs, or general documentation (use docs-writer instead).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when challenging ideas, plans, decisions, or proposals. Invoke to play devil's advocate, run a pre-mortem, red team, stress test assumptions, audit evidence quality, or find blind spots before committing. Do NOT use for building plans, making decisions, or generating solutions — this skill only challenges and critiques. For a multi-agent panel that challenges and then commits to a verdict, use the-jury.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Feature planning and implementation with 4 adaptive phases (Specify, Design, Tasks, Execute). Auto-sizes depth by complexity. Writes testable requirements in EARS notation, atomic tasks, atomic Conventional Commits, and requirement traceability. Ships deterministic Python validation scripts so structural gates are enforced by code, not memory. Features an independent Verifier (author != verifier, evidence-or-zero), a discrimination sensor, a decision log (STATE.md), a test-coverage matrix, and a self-improving lessons layer. Stack-agnostic and tool-agnostic. Use when (1) planning features, (2) implementing with verification and atomic commits, (3) validating an implementation against a spec. Triggers on "specify feature", "discuss feature", "design", "tasks", "implement", "validate", "verify work", "UAT", "record decision", "pause work", "resume work". Do NOT use for pure architecture decomposition analysis or standalone technical design documents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", or "check my site against best practices". Focuses on visual design and interaction patterns. Do NOT use for performance audits (use core-web-vitals), SEO (use seo), or comprehensive site audits (use web-quality-audit).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write, review, and edit documentation files with consistent structure, tone, and technical accuracy. Use when creating docs, reviewing markdown files, writing READMEs, updating `/docs` directories, or when user says "write documentation", "review this doc", "improve this README", "create a guide", or "edit markdown". Do NOT use for code comments, inline JSDoc, or API reference generation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete Shopify development reference covering Liquid templating, OS 2.0 themes, GraphQL APIs, Hydrogen, Functions, and performance optimization (API v2026-01). Use when working with .liquid files, building Shopify themes or apps, writing GraphQL queries for Shopify, debugging Liquid errors, creating app extensions, migrating from Scripts to Functions, or building headless storefronts. Triggers on "Shopify", "Liquid template", "Hydrogen", "Storefront API", "theme development", "Shopify Functions", "Polaris". Do NOT use for non-Shopify e-commerce platforms.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deploy applications and infrastructure to Cloudflare using Workers, Pages, and related platform services. Use when the user asks to deploy, host, publish, or set up a project on Cloudflare. Do NOT use for deploying to Vercel, Netlify, or Render (use their respective skills).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Groups existing components into logical business domains to plan service-based architecture. Use when asking "which components belong together?", "group these into services", "organize by domain", "component-to-domain mapping", or planning service extraction from an existing codebase. Do NOT use for identifying new domains from scratch (use domain-analysis) or analyzing coupling (use coupling-analysis).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous senior-operator mode for AI agents that resolve tasks end to end without babysitting and never create new problems. The agent verifies every claim against real evidence (web search dated to the current month and year, the codebase, and available tools, MCPs, and CLIs); it never guesses, never fakes confidence, and never claims something is done without proof. It stays silent and keeps working, interrupting the user only on three stops, namely a destructive or irreversible action, a dead-end with no evidence after exhausting sources, or genuine ambiguity that changes the outcome. Output is short, literal, and human. Use when the user says "not-your-babysitter", "nanny mode", "work autonomously", "stop babysitting", or "no hand-holding", or wants an agent that solves problems on its own, especially hands-on engineering and operational tasks. Do not use when the user explicitly wants a tutorial, a verbose walkthrough, or open-ended brainstorming.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maps business domains and suggests service boundaries in any codebase using DDD Strategic Design. Use when asking "what are the domains in this codebase?", "where should I draw service boundaries?", "identify bounded contexts", "classify subdomains", "DDD analysis", or analyzing domain cohesion. Do NOT use for grouping existing components into domains (use domain-identification-grouping) or dependency analysis (use coupling-analysis).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement a work already planned: extracts a checklist, builds it, and proves every check with an independent verifier. Use when the user says "extract a checklist", "build this ticket", "implement this spec", or "tlc-implement". Do NOT use when nobody has decided what to build, or to design the work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects misplaced classes and fixes component hierarchy problems — finds code that should belong inside a component but sits at the root level. Use when asking "clean up component structure", "find orphaned classes", "fix module hierarchy", "flatten nested components", or analyzing why namespaces have misplaced code. Do NOT use for dependency analysis (use coupling-analysis) or domain grouping (use domain-identification-grouping).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a question, decision, plan, tradeoff, or claim needs a rigorous verdict and one perspective is not enough. Spawns a panel of 3 to 5 subagent jurors that form independent blind opinions, deliberate anonymously under an anti-anchoring and anti-sycophancy protocol, and return one committed verdict with confidence, preserved dissent, and a concrete next action. Domain-agnostic across engineering, architecture, data, product, hiring, strategy, vendor choice, build-vs-buy, and research design. Trigger phrases include "convene a jury", "have agents debate and decide", "get a panel to decide", "multi-agent decision", "stress-test this and decide", "monte um juri", "tribunal de agentes", "painel para decidir". Do NOT use to only critique without deciding (use the-fool for that), to build a plan or write the solution itself, or for simple factual lookups.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI frontend specialist and design consultant that guides users through a structured discovery process before generating any code. Collects visual references, design tokens, typography, icons, layout preferences, and brand guidelines to ensure the final output matches the user's vision with high fidelity. Use when the user asks to build, design, create, or improve any frontend interface — websites, landing pages, dashboards, components, apps, emails, forms, modals, or any UI element. Also triggers on "build me a UI", "design a page", "create a component", "improve this layout", "make this look better", "frontend", "interface", "redesign", or when the user provides mockups, screenshots, or design references. Do NOT use for backend logic, API design, database schemas, or non-visual code tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates Cursor-specific AI subagents with isolated context for complex multi-step workflows. Use when creating subagents for Cursor editor specifically, following Cursor's patterns and directories (.cursor/agents/). Triggers on "cursor subagent", "cursor agent". Do NOT use for generic subagent creation outside Cursor (use subagent-creator instead).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Specialist in designing and implementing scalable modular monolith architectures using NestJS with DDD, Clean Architecture, and CQRS patterns. Use when building modular monolith backends, designing bounded contexts, creating domain modules, implementing event-driven module communication, or when user mentions "modular monolith", "bounded contexts", "module boundaries", "DDD", "CQRS", "clean architecture NestJS", or "monolith to microservices". Do NOT use for simple CRUD APIs, frontend work, general NestJS questions without architectural context, or stack-agnostic evolutionary modular monolith design (use evolutionary-modular-architecture).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics. Do NOT use for design review or audit (use web-design-guidelines or web-quality-audit).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage Jira issues via Atlassian MCP — search, create, update, transition status, and handle sprint tasks. Auto-detects workspace configuration. Use when user says "create a Jira ticket", "update my sprint", "check Jira status", "transition this issue", "search Jira", or "move ticket to done". Do NOT use for Confluence pages (use confluence-assistant).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deploy applications to Render by analyzing codebases, generating render.yaml Blueprints, and providing Dashboard deeplinks. Use when the user wants to deploy, host, publish, or set up their application on Render's cloud platform. Do NOT use for deploying to Vercel, Netlify, or Cloudflare (use their respective skills).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
React composition patterns that scale. Use when refactoring components with boolean prop proliferation, building flexible component libraries, or designing reusable APIs. Triggers on tasks involving compound components, render props, context providers, or component architecture. Includes React 19 API changes. Do NOT use for React/Next.js performance optimization (use react-best-practices instead).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns decided work — a PRD, design doc, RFC, or thread — into tasks a builder can act on without guessing. Finds slices that each prove something, grounds them in the code, and writes intent, observable criteria with concrete values, the boundary, what the change disturbs, and only the decisions that are hard to reverse. Walks every surface the work exposes and sweeps the nine unwritten requirements, recording each landing as a criterion already in the source, existing behaviour, n/a, or Unresolved — never as a criterion the walk invented. Defaults to one task per source. Use when the user says "write the task", "cut this PRD into tasks", "turn this design doc into work", or "tlc-plan". Do NOT use for discovery itself or to implement — a one-line ticket is a decision; a blank wish is not.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for creating AI subagents with isolated context for complex multi-step workflows. Use when users want to create a subagent, specialized agent, verifier, debugger, or orchestrator that requires isolated context and deep specialization. Works with any agent that supports subagent delegation. Triggers on "create subagent", "new agent", "specialized assistant", "create verifier". Do NOT use for Cursor-specific subagents (use cursor-subagent-creator instead).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Spec-driven feature work that freezes obligations instead of the plan: one human-reviewed plan with EARS criteria, path, entities, interface and one-way doors, then proof-backed checks, then build, then an independent Verifier. Use when the user says "tlc-spec-lean", "plan feature", "specify feature", "write the checks", "build this plan", or "verify work". Do NOT use for standalone design documents unattached to a feature, architecture decomposition analysis, or work that already has a task list or checklist to execute.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates step-by-step decomposition plans and migration roadmaps for breaking apart monolithic applications. Use when asking "what order should I extract services?", "plan my migration", "create a decomposition roadmap", "prioritize what to split", "monolith to microservices strategy", or tracking decomposition progress. Do NOT use for domain analysis (use domain-analysis) or component sizing (use component-identification-sizing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。