「analysis」の検索結果

Analyze website traffic, global rank, engagement metrics, and traffic sources for any domain. Use this skill to evaluate affiliate program websites, compare competitor traffic, assess advertiser strength, or understand where an audience comes from. Triggers on: "analyze traffic for [domain]", "how much traffic does [site] get", "compare traffic between [site A] and [site B]", "is [program] worth promoting based on traffic", "traffic analysis", "website analytics for [domain]", "where does [site] get traffic", "check if [advertiser] is legit", "evaluate [program] website health", "SimilarWeb analysis", "traffic sources for [domain]", "how popular is [site]", "website rank", "domain authority check", "compare affiliate program websites".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reverse-engineer successful affiliate strategies from competitors. Use this skill when the user asks about spying on competitors, researching what other affiliates promote, analyzing competitor affiliate sites, understanding how top affiliates in a niche make money, or says "what programs does X promote", "how does [site] make money", "what affiliate strategy does this site use", "spy on competitor affiliates", "reverse engineer affiliate site", "copy what works in my niche", "who are the top affiliates in X niche", "what content gets traffic in my niche", "competitor affiliate analysis".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides multi-school trading Q&A, chart/OHLCV analysis, annotation, and fresh-market workflows covering ICT/SMC, ChanLun, Wyckoff, Price Action, Order Flow, VSA, and Elliott Wave. Use for trading concepts; capability-discovery questions about available analysis lenses, Schools, models, modes, or data sources; attached charts; pasted OHLCV; chart annotation; or asset-plus-timeframe requests across crypto, stocks, or forex. Defaults unselected market analysis to strict ICT/SMC, honors explicit School/source selectors, and fails closed when no native analyzer exists. Phase 1 comparison is Q&A-only; fetch fresh Mobius Quant API data only after the capability gate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Semgrep static analysis across a codebase, optionally using Semgrep Pro for cross-file taint analysis. Use when Semgrep or a static-analysis scan is requested; use security-review for a manual audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct multi-round deep research on any GitHub Repo. Use when users request comprehensive analysis, timeline reconstruction, competitive analysis, or in-depth investigation of GitHub. Produces structured markdown reports with executive summaries, chronological timelines, metrics analysis, and Mermaid diagrams. Triggers on Github repository URL or open source projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate MSBuild binary logs (binlogs) for build diagnostics and analysis. USE FOR: adding /bl:{} to any dotnet build, test, pack, publish, or restore command to capture a full build execution trace, prerequisite for binlog-failure-analysis and build-perf-diagnostics skills, enabling post-build investigation of errors or performance. Requires MSBuild 17.8+ / .NET 8 SDK+ for {} placeholder; PowerShell must quote the complete switch as '-bl:{}'. DO NOT USE FOR: non-MSBuild build systems (npm, Maven, CMake), analyzing an existing binlog (use binlog-failure-analysis instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pseudo-mutation analysis ONLY: answer whether tests would catch a bug if production code changed, which meaningful changes would still pass, or which caller-visible mutations existing assertions would miss; verify candidates when requested, then optionally close verified gaps. Includes explicit read-only per-test composition for grading. Activate for behavioral blind spots tied to production behavior. Polyglot. DO NOT USE FOR: suite taxonomy, metadata, or distribution reports (test-tagging); .NET line-vs-branch or Cobertura interpretation, arithmetic, plateaus, project-wide coverage gaps, or coverage-backed test/CRAP priorities (coverage-analysis; use native coverage tooling outside .NET); named-target CRAP (crap-score); new suites (code-testing); assertion/smell audits; or mutation tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the open-source CodeQL ecosystem for .NET security analysis. Use when a repo needs CodeQL query packs, CLI-based analysis on open source codebases, or GitHub Action setup with explicit licensing caveats. USE FOR: the repo uses or wants CodeQL for .NET security analysis; GitHub code scanning is part of the CI plan. DO NOT USE FOR: teams that need a tool with no private-repo licensing caveat. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a test file or suite; produce a severity-ranked diagnostic report. ALWAYS USE for tests that verify nothing, missing/tautological assertions, swallowed/broad exceptions, flaky/order-dependent tests, duplication, or magic values. Polyglot. DO NOT USE for direct edits: writing-mstest-tests owns supplied MSTest assertions/attributes/lifecycle; code-testing owns new tests. Exclude running tests, migration, assertion metrics (assertion-quality), raw .NET coverage collection (run-tests), non-.NET coverage collection/analysis (native tooling), project-wide .NET coverage/CRAP (coverage-analysis), named-target .NET CRAP (crap-score), behavioral/pseudo-mutation gaps (test-gap-analysis), test-mix/ happy-vs-error classification and trait distributions (test-tagging), or the testsmells.org catalog (test-smell-detection).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activation requires either supplied .NET coverage reports/percentages/line, branch, or condition metrics, or an explicit request to collect .NET coverage for analysis. USE FOR: interpreting that evidence, including Cobertura data, partial conditions, plateaus, target arithmetic, project-wide coverage-backed CRAP, and coverage-backed refactoring safety. Analyze supplied reports directly without rerunning tests or installing tools. DO NOT USE FOR: requests with neither coverage evidence nor explicit coverage-collection intent, including hypothetical change-survival questions (use test-gap-analysis); CRAP or refactoring safety for one named target (use crap-score); or requests owned by test-tagging, find-untested-sources, test-anti-patterns, run-tests, or code-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Binary analysis, assembly interpretation, disassembly, decompilation, firmware RE, and protocol reverse engineering

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Network traffic analysis, PCAP parsing, IDS/IPS rule creation, firewall configuration auditing, and network anomaly detection

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-analysis learning and process improvement. Use when completing major analysis projects, documenting lessons learned, or improving team analytical practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-delivery quality assurance for analysis work. Use when reviewing analysis before sharing with stakeholders, checking for completeness, validating assumptions, or ensuring clarity of recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured requirements elicitation for analysis requests. Use when scoping new analysis projects, clarifying ambiguous business questions, or documenting analysis acceptance criteria with stakeholders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to refactor Java code based on trusted profiling analysis findings — including reviewing repository-owned or maintainer-sanitized docs/profiling-problem-analysis and docs/profiling-solutions files, identifying specific performance bottlenecks, and implementing targeted code changes to address CPU, memory, or threading issues. This should trigger for requests such as Refactor the code with profiling; Apply profiling; Optimize hot path; Reduce allocations found in profiling; Fix CPU bottlenecks from profiling analysis. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate complex, long-running tasks to Manus AI agent for autonomous execution. Use when user says 'use manus', 'delegate to manus', 'send to manus', 'have manus do', 'ask manus', 'check manus sessions', or when tasks require deep web research, market analysis, product comparisons, stock analysis, competitive research, document generation, data analysis, or multi-step workflows that benefit from autonomous agent execution with parallel processing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when ready to document findings, generate a report, or summarize binary analysis results. Compiles analysis findings into structured reports - correlates facts from triage/static/dynamic phases, validates hypotheses, generates documentation with evidence chains. Keywords - "summarize findings", "generate report", "document analysis", "what did we find", "write up results", "export findings"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger for: OT project description, OTA scope, Research OT under 10 U.S.C. 4021, Prototype OT under 10 U.S.C. 4022, follow-on production scope under 10 U.S.C. 4022(f), milestone-based project scope, prototype objective, phase or go/no-go structure, BAA white-paper conversion, SOO conversion, transition planning, or scope reduction before OT cost analysis. Produce a milestone-based .docx plus a separate chat-only handoff to OT Cost Analysis. Use TRL only when the project supports it. Never place cost estimates, funding profiles, contribution calculations, prices, or skill-routing content in the document. Do NOT use for a FAR SOW/PWS, OT cost analysis, IGCE, agreement terms and conditions, or an Agreements Officer's authority, participant-status, successful-completion, or follow-on determination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger for: Other Transaction or OT should-cost, cost estimate, cost-share analysis, milestone pricing, funding profile, proposed-price comparison, prototype price analysis, research OT budget, production follow-on OT estimate, or OT price-reasonableness support under 10 U.S.C. 4021 or 4022. Build auditable milestone-based .xlsx workbooks using BLS OEWS wages, CALC+ positioning, GSA Per Diem, materials, cost sharing, and agreement-specific fees. Use for pre-solicitation budgets and proposal comparisons. Do NOT use for FAR-based IGCEs, OT project descriptions, grants, or an Agreements Officer's determination. Requires the bls-oews, gsa-calc, and, when travel applies, gsa-perdiem MCP servers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger for: FFP IGCE, firm-fixed-price estimate, FFP cost model, proposed FFP rate validation, wrap-rate analysis, Agency BPA rate comparison, price-reasonableness memo, or fair-and-reasonable analysis. Build auditable Firm-Fixed-Price federal estimates using BLS OEWS wages, layered fringe/overhead/G&A/profit, GSA CALC+ positioning, and GSA Per Diem travel. Use for FFP-by-period, FFP-by-deliverable, SOW/PWS decomposition, implied-multiplier analysis, and fixed-price scenario comparisons. Do NOT use for Labor Hour, T&M, or cost-reimbursement IGCEs (use IGCE Builder LH/T&M or IGCE Builder CR). Do NOT use for grant budgets. Requires the bls-oews, gsa-calc, and gsa-perdiem MCP servers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze disk images, file systems, and memory captures for digital evidence recovery in forensic investigations and CTF challenges. Use when the user mentions 'disk forensics,' 'forensic analysis,' 'disk image,' 'file carving,' 'deleted files,' 'evidence recovery,' 'timeline analysis,' 'memory forensics,' 'volatility,' 'autopsy,' 'sleuthkit,' 'plaso,' 'log2timeline,' 'artifact analysis,' 'chain of custody,' or needs to examine a forensic image.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive performance analysis, bottleneck detection, and optimization recommendations for Claude Flow swarms

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query and analyze scholarly literature using the OpenAlex database. This skill should be used when searching for academic papers, analyzing research trends, finding works by authors or institutions, tracking citations, discovering open access publications, or conducting bibliometric analysis across 240M+ scholarly works. Use for literature searches, research output analysis, citation analysis, and academic database queries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。