Run Phase 1a (behavioral specification) and Phase 1b (verification architecture) for the active VCSDD feature. Invokes vcsdd-builder to write EARS-format requirements and purity boundary analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
477 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Run Phase 1a (behavioral specification) and Phase 1b (verification architecture) for the active VCSDD feature. Invokes vcsdd-builder to write EARS-format requirements and purity boundary analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Agent invocation syntax and boundary rules
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and audit PFC 5.0 asphalt dynamic loading and stress-wave studies with damping, timestep, rate, dispersion, source direction, boundary reflection, histories, and wheel-load handoff checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Select, probe, calibrate, and audit the Burger viscoelastic contact model for PFC 5.0 asphalt-mixture cases, including Maxwell-Kelvin parameter roles, units, temperature/rate dependence, PFC5 cmat assignment, timestep checks, creep/recovery validation, and PFC5-only syntax boundary checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare and validate portable CAD, polyline, node-element, clump, and boundary geometry contracts for PFC 5.0 asphalt models without bundling opaque legacy executables.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate and fix bugs, failing tests, regressions, build failures, or unexpected behavior using boundary localization, evidence, and bounded hypotheses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Define a Lean Six Sigma improvement project using DMAIC, problem framing, baseline measures, root-cause hypotheses, CTQs, and control planning. Use when an existing process is underperforming and the team needs a charter, SIPOC, baseline, and improvement path. Do not use for brand-new process design or vague complaints with no process boundary.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract sensitive training data and internal capabilities from AI models through repeated programmatic querying. Use this skill when testing LLMs and ML models for data privacy leaks, intellectual property exposure, or unintended memorization. Covers membership inference, prompt extraction, training data reconstruction, and API boundary testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Authentication bypass testing playbook. Use when assessing login flows, password reset logic, account recovery, MFA bypass, token predictability, brute-force resistance, and session boundary flaws.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
API authentication and JWT abuse playbook. Use when testing bearer tokens, API keys, claim trust, header spoofing, rate limits, and API auth boundary weaknesses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test AI agent systems for tool abuse, unauthorized actions, privilege escalation through tool chaining, and safety bypass via agentic workflows. Use this skill when assessing autonomous AI agents that use tool-calling (function calling, plugins, actions) to interact with external systems. Covers multi-step attack chains, implicit trust exploitation, and capability boundary testing for AI agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematically extract hidden system prompts, core directives, and invisible context intentionally concealed within Large Language Model (LLM) applications. This skill utilizes targeted linguistic engineering and boundary manipulation to bypass prompt opacity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Curate, review, or repair ai-gene-review ModuleReview YAML documents under modules/, including pathway/module boundary setting, parts and variant modeling, annoton-level molecular functions, representative UniProt/PTN grounding, module deep-research provenance, validation, rendering, and project batch updates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing or reviewing a public API, exported function signature, module boundary, exported type/interface, or any contract other code depends on
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Backend code review patterns. Use when reviewing API routes, database operations, auth middleware, and server utilities. Covers injection, boundary validation, authorization coverage, secret/PII exposure, error leakage, and query patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete methodology for computing publication-quality cumulative abnormal returns with proper event-study test statistics, matching the robustness of Kaspereit's eventstudy2 for Stata. Covers dateline construction, event-date mapping, estimation and event windows, thin-trading adjustment, OLS with Theil prediction error correction, abnormal return computation, CAR/CAAR/AAR accumulation, boundary contamination guards, and common tests such as Patell, BMP, Kolari-Pynnonen, generalized sign, Wilcoxon, and GRANK-T. Use when the user mentions abnormal returns, event windows, market-model regressions, CARs, CAAR, AAR, eventstudy2, thin trading, trade-to-trade returns, or event-study test statistics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full-lifecycle Web E2E Testing, QA/QC analysis, and Playwright test automation. Generates business test matrices (happy path, negative, boundary, RBAC, API/network failure simulation), implements resilient Page Object Model tests, and produces structured QA bug reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing, implementing, or reviewing frontend-to-backend API integration, typed API clients, REST/tRPC/OpenAPI client choices, auth refresh, API error mapping, upload flows, SSE/WebSocket/polling choices, CORS-facing frontend behavior, or cross-boundary loading/error states. Do not use for backend-only service architecture or TanStack Query cache policy alone; Chinese triggers include API integration, front-end and back-end joint debugging, typed API client, Interface error handling, SSE, WebSocket.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an executive administrative assistant — triaging a stacked calendar against competing priorities, deciding what reaches an executive versus what gets redirected, reconciling a multi-city travel itinerary or expense report, drafting on an executive's behalf within a delegated-authority boundary, or handling a scheduling conflict across time zones.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Boilermaker — qualifying or selecting a welding procedure for a pressure-boundary repair, deciding whether a defect is a code "repair" or an "alteration" under the National Board Inspection Code, sizing a tube-to-drum rolled joint expansion, reading radiographic or ultrasonic weld inspection results against acceptance criteria, or setting a post-repair hydrostatic test pressure and hold time.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an audiovisual equipment installer/repairer — diagnosing an EDID or HDCP handshake failure between a source and a display, sizing a display's screen size and brightness for a room's viewing distance and ambient light, specifying an HDMI/HDBaseT/AVoIP signal run against its rated distance ceiling, designing conference-room speaker placement and acoustics, or drawing the install-vs-programming boundary with a control-system (Crestron/Extron/AMX) integrator.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate architecture and module boundaries for volatility-based decomposition using Juval Lowy's framework (from "Righting Software", building on Parnas 1972). Use when reviewing module splits, service boundaries, new abstractions, or any decomposition decision. Trigger on phrases like "where should this boundary be", "how to split this", "module boundaries", "encapsulate change", "volatility", or references to Lowy, Parnas, or "Righting Software". Complements /hickey (interleaved concerns) with a different lens (change encapsulation).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Atomic, semantic-boundary git commit workflow
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Strategic roadmap management for GitHub repositories. Syncs ROADMAP.md with GitHub Issues and labels, bootstraps roadmap files from scratch, runs brainstorming sessions with boundary checking, and provides quick status summaries. Use when managing project planning, syncing roadmap state, or exploring feature ideas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。