「bugs」の検索結果

Survey any codebase as a senior advisor and produce prioritized, self-contained implementation plans for OTHER models/agents to execute. Strictly read-only on source code — never implements, fixes, or refactors anything itself. Use when asked to audit a codebase, find improvement opportunities (bugs, security, performance, test coverage, tech debt, migrations, DX), suggest features or where to take the project next (roadmap, product direction), or generate handoff plans for another agent to implement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EXPERIMENTAL — mutation testing with muter to measure whether tests actually assert anything: mutants that survive reveal assertion-free coverage. Advisory report only, never a merge gate. Use on engine/logic targets when coverage numbers look good but bugs still slip through.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SwiftUI navigation architecture patterns including NavigationStack, NavigationSplitView, TabView, programmatic navigation, and custom transitions. Use when reviewing or building navigation, fixing navigation bugs, or architecting app flow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SwiftUI framework skills — data flow (identity, Observation, state ownership), layout & containers (Layout protocol, lazy-stack performance), AlarmKit, 3D charts, rich text editing, customizable toolbars, and WebKit embedding. Use for SwiftUI state/rendering bugs, custom layouts, scroll performance, or these feature areas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatic code quality and best practices analysis. Use proactively when files are modified, saved, or committed. Analyzes code style, patterns, potential bugs, and security basics. Triggers on file changes, git diff, code edits, quality mentions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Point Aeon at a service's /feedback endpoint - pull what agents reported (bugs, missing features), triage and cluster it, then build the best accepted request as a PR for a human to approve.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate at every layer data passes through to make bugs impossible

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically trace bugs backward through call stack to find original trigger

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep bug analysis to break the fix-forget-repeat cycle. Analyzes root cause category, why fixes failed, prevention mechanisms, and captures knowledge into specs. Use after fixing a bug to prevent the same class of bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review local code changes for bugs, regressions, missing tests, and pragmatic improvements. Use when the user asks to review the current changes from `git status`, or to review a specific backlog task by id such as `task-65` or `TASK-65`. Also trigger when the user says things like "review", "review current changes", "check my changes", "look over the diff", or "review task-42".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review uncommitted code changes to find unreasonable design, unfinished requirements, potential bugs, missed reuse opportunities, and optimization opportunities. Use when the user asks for a review of pending, uncommitted, or unpublished code changes and expects both findings and concrete improvements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffolds a structured investigation in scratch/ for empirical research and documentation. Use when the user says "start an investigation" or wants to: trace code paths or data flow ("trace from X to Y", "what touches X", "follow the wiring"), document system architecture comprehensively ("document how the system works", "archeology"), investigate bugs ("figure out why X happens"), explore technical feasibility ("can we do X?"), or explore design options ("explore the API", "gather context", "design alternatives"). Creates dated folder with README. NOT for simple code questions or single-file searches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs feature-scoped mutation testing to validate test suite quality. Use after implementation to verify tests catch real bugs (kill rate >= 80%).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically explore and test a web application to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to "dogfood", "QA", "exploratory test", "find issues", "bug hunt", "test this app/site/platform", or review the quality of a web application. Produces a structured report with full reproduction evidence -- step-by-step screenshots, repro videos, and detailed repro steps for every issue -- so findings can be handed directly to the responsible teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use after a phase's code is written, or when the user asks to review changed files for bugs, security issues, or quality. Spawns the gsd-code-reviewer agent at quick, standard, or deep depth and writes the phase REVIEW.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use after every code change, after writing tests, or before marking a task complete, and when the user says verify, quality gate, or audit code. Runs a 7-category mechanical check for TDZ, import, dead code, and mock leakage bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test-driven development with red-green-refactor loop. Use when user wants to build features or fix bugs using TDD, mentions "red-green-refactor", wants integration tests, or asks for test-first development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage issues through a state machine driven by triage roles. Use when user wants to create an issue, triage issues, review incoming bugs or feature requests, prepare issues for an AFK agent, or manage issue workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Reproduce → minimise → hypothesise → instrument → fix → regression-test. Use when user says "diagnose this" / "debug this", reports a bug, says something is broken/throwing/failing, or describes a performance regression.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drives iOS/Android mobile devices via Appium MCP. Runs a preflight, picks local emulator/simulator/USB or a device cloud, captures screenshots/page source into a named evidence dir. Use for verifying mobile bugs, E2E tests, and navigating real device clouds (LambdaTest/BrowserStack).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure Maven, Gradle, and static analysis for Java projects. Use for Java-only build and quality tooling such as Spotless, Checkstyle, SpotBugs, SonarLint, JDK versions, and Java service Dockerfiles; defer Kotlin, Android, Flutter, and GitHub Actions-specific configuration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture solved problems as searchable solution docs. Use after fixing bugs, when "that worked", or after successful /skill:phx-review or /skill:phx-investigate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate Elixir/Phoenix bugs root-cause first. Reproduce failures, cite evidence, and use optional native DeepSeek Harness subagents only when useful.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture solved problems as searchable solution docs. Use after fixing bugs, when "that worked", or after successful /phx-review or /phx-investigate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。