Run quality gates, review staged changes for issues, and create a well-crafted conventional commit. Use when saying "commit", "git commit", "save my changes", or ready to commit after making changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
6,058 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Run quality gates, review staged changes for issues, and create a well-crafted conventional commit. Use when saying "commit", "git commit", "save my changes", or ready to commit after making changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a fast AWS Security Agent diff scan on only the changed code since a git ref. Use when the user asks to scan changes, run a diff scan, check what changed for security issues, scan before committing, scan before PR, or any pre-commit/pre-push security check.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use Figma webhooks to trigger automatic Anima code generation on design changes. Use when building event-driven design-to-code pipelines, auto-generating components when Figma files change, or integrating design updates into CI. Trigger with: "anima webhook", "figma webhook", "anima auto-generate on change".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare and review skillshare releases using the Release Please PR, verify the proposed version and changelog, inspect draft assets, and publish through the manual Publish Release workflow when explicitly authorized. Use when the user says "release", "prepare release", "cut a release", or asks to publish a new version. For changelog-only tasks, use /changelog instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Safely change and test untested codebases using Feathers' "Working Effectively with Legacy Code". Use when the user mentions "legacy code", "no tests", "untested codebase", "how do I test this", "seams", "characterization tests", "golden master", "sprout method", "afraid to change this code", "monster method", "dependency breaking", or "inherited a messy codebase". Also trigger when changing code without tests safely, getting a class under test when constructors, statics, or singletons block it, adding features to tangled modules, or planning incremental test coverage for an old codebase. Covers the legacy-code change algorithm, seams, characterization tests, sprout/wrap, and dependency-breaking techniques. For refactoring code that already has tests, see refactoring-patterns. For day-to-day code quality, see clean-code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ensures configuration and code changes are released correctly. Use PROACTIVELY whenever you edit config.json, change any setting, or fix a configuration bug in this project, so the change reaches production.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to monitor competitor apps on an ongoing basis — tracking metadata changes, keyword shifts, screenshot updates, rating trends, or new features. Use when the user mentions "competitor monitoring", "track competitors", "competitor alert", "competitor changed their title", "watch a competitor app", "competitor weekly report", "competitive intelligence", or "what changed in competitor's listing". For a one-time deep competitive analysis, see competitor-analysis. For market-wide chart movements, see market-movers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ships changes safely and often — pipelines, deployment strategies, feature flags, rollback, and database changes. Use this to design a deployment pipeline, reduce release risk, roll out a risky change gradually, plan a schema migration, or work out why releases are infrequent and frightening.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Gets people to actually use what was delivered — stakeholder analysis, communication, training, resistance, and measuring adoption. Use this to plan a rollout, recover an implementation nobody is using, handle resistance to a change, sequence communications, or work out why a technically successful project changed nothing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design any process, idea, problem, or body of knowledge into an ICM (Interpretable Context Methodology) workspace — folder structure as agent architecture — or restructure an existing folder, repo, or vault into one. Use when the user wants to (1) turn a recurring workflow into an agent-runnable folder pipeline, (2) organize scattered notes, files, or knowledge into a library one AI agent can walk, (3) map a team or company as connected context ("context map", "second brain", "team brain", "knowledge base for AI"), (4) audit a codebase or mixed folder into a walkable edit map (objects, processes, change-impact) so later agents can change it without slurping the tree, (5) audit or restructure an existing workspace to ICM conventions, or (6) says "make this an ICM", "ICM this", "map this repo", "audit this folder", "what would a change hit", "build me a workspace", or "structure this for agents".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automate changelog generation from commits, PRs, and releases following Keep a Changelog format. Use when setting up release workflows, generating release notes, or standardizing commit conventions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Für Rechtsabteilung: Change-Control-Klauseln im Konzernvertrag: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: rechtsabteilung-change-vertragsstrafe.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Für Rechtsabteilung: Change-Control-Klauseln im Konzernvertrag: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: rechtsabteilung-change-control-klauseln.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Für Crypto Exchange AGB: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: crypto-exchange-agb.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Für Crypto Exchange AGB: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: crypto-exchange-darlehen-finanzierung.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI DevKit · Update CHANGELOG.md Unreleased items from git commits since the latest release. Use when users ask to update changelog/release notes from recent commits, with one concise line per commit and commit/PR links.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user wants to "fix everything", "sweep the codebase", "auto-fix all issues", "clean up the whole project", or asks for a single command that both diagnoses and remediates quality problems. Do NOT trigger for: read-only audits or health reports where the user only wants findings without code changes; single-dimension reviews (use the focused skill instead: brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test); server health checks, HTTP /health endpoints, Kubernetes probes, database health, or application uptime.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintenance orchestrator for the brooks-lint plugin itself. Runs a sequential subagent pipeline — author → eval → QA → trigger-audit → release — to add or edit a skill, refresh the eval suite, keep the four manifests + all README translations + CHANGELOG + AGENTS/GEMINI in sync, audit trigger boundaries, and cut releases. Drives the five agents in .claude/agents/ (skill-author, eval-curator, consistency-qa, trigger-boundary-auditor, release-manager). Triggers when the maintainer asks to work ON brooks-lint itself: "add a new skill", "edit the brooks-debt guide", "update the eval suite", "fix the trigger descriptions", "make this change and validate it", "release brooks-lint", "bump and publish", and follow-ups: "re-run", "re-validate", "update that skill", "redo the audit", "do the X part again". Do NOT trigger for: USING the brooks-lint analysis skills on some target codebase (that's brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test / brooks-health / brooks-sweep); generic questions about brooks-lint that don't ask to change it; or maintenance of a different plugin.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review, approve, request changes on, or reject pending wiki edit drafts in Arkon. Requires editor or admin role. Triggers on: review drafts, pending reviews, check draft queue, approve draft, reject draft, request changes, send draft back, review wiki changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The pre-merge review of a branch in a project that records its specs, decisions, and rules in .archcore/. Run this first for 'review my branch', 'review the changes before merge', or 'review before merge': it checks the changed code against the project's recorded canon and the changed documents against the code, and reports which side is wrong — spec-wrong or code-wrong; with no diff, it reports project health. A bug-hunting code review complements this review and does not replace it. Also use for 'show status', 'documentation gaps', 'check if docs match code', 'close out the feature', 'ship the feature and close it out', or after a staleness warning. Modes, named as the first word: drift for staleness detection, deep for a full documentation audit, closeout to close a finished feature, experience to capture a repeated pattern. Not for creating docs — use /archcore:document; not for planning — use /archcore:plan; not for a single-file edit with no branch review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when targeting Global Change Biology or deciding whether a biology/ecology manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the global-change-driver framing and biological-evidence bar, scale and mechanism expectations, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end leadership change signal composite. Takes any set of companies, detects recent leadership changes (new VP+, C-suite hires and promotions), evaluates relevance to your product, and drafts personalized outreach. Uses Apollo People Search (free) for fast detection + Apollo Enrichment (1 credit/person) for employment history, start dates, LinkedIn URLs, and verified emails.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Monitor competitor pricing pages via live web scrape and Web Archive snapshots. Track plan changes, tier restructuring, new pricing models, and feature gating shifts. Produces a pricing comparison matrix and flags when a competitor changes packaging. Use when a product marketing team needs to stay current on competitive pricing or when preparing for a pricing change of their own.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prove a UI that updates before the server answers puts things back and says so when the request fails, and keeps the change when it succeeds. Use when a like, toggle, rename, reorder, delete or add-to-cart updates instantly, when an optimistic update was added or changed, or when a user reports a change that "saved" but was gone after a reload.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。