「citation」の検索結果

Query pro-workflow wikis via SQLite FTS5 BM25 retrieval. Returns top-K passages with citations. Use when answering a question that any of the user's wikis already covers, when the user says "what does the wiki say about X", "ask wiki", "search wikis", or before drafting a new wiki page (to avoid duplication).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a full AWS Well-Architected Framework review evaluating every framework question across all pillars discovered from the live AWS documentation by analyzing code, IaC, and configurations to produce evidence-backed findings with Eisenhower-prioritized remediation. Supports full reviews (every framework best practice with BP ID citations), quick reviews (question-level), pillar-scoped reviews, score-mode reviews (a maturity scorecard with per-pillar scores and filtered findings), and lens-specific reviews using lenses discovered from the live AWS documentation. Triggers on mentions of Well-Architected review, WA review, WAR, pillar assessment, architecture review across pillars, workload assessment, cloud readiness evaluation, or a Well-Architected score, grade, or scorecard request. Does not apply to single-pillar deep-dives, learning WA concepts, ADRs, or migration readiness assessments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments. Use for authorized review of scientific manuscripts, protocols, preprints, or research proposals; reporting-guideline selection; claim–evidence checks; methods, statistics, reproducibility, ethics, figure/table, and citation critique; or revision-response planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query Google NotebookLM notebooks for source-grounded, citation-backed answers from user-uploaded documents. Manages notebook library, handles Google authentication, and supports smart discovery. Works standalone via /blog notebooklm or internally from blog-write and blog-researcher for source-grounded research context. Falls back gracefully when not configured. Use when user says "notebooklm", "notebook", "query notebook", "ask notebook", "notebook research", "source grounded research", "document query", "notebook library".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full-site blog health assessment scanning all blog files for quality scores, orphan pages, topic cannibalization, stale content, and AI citation readiness. Runs canonical batch analysis before site-wide checks. Produces per-post scores and a prioritized action queue. Use when user says "audit blog", "blog audit", "site audit", "blog health", "audit all posts", "check all blogs".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translate existing blog posts into one or more target languages with SEO-optimized localization. Produces native-quality translations that preserve markdown structure, frontmatter, schema JSON-LD, image and chart embeds, and citation capsules. Localizes keywords, meta tags, numbers, dates, currencies, and quote styles per locale. Flags machine-translation artifacts for review. Run BEFORE blog-localize: this handles language conversion; localize handles cultural adaptation after translation completes. Use when user says "translate blog", "blog translate", "uebersetzen", "traduire", "traducir", "translate post", "blog auf Deutsch", "blog en espanol".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and score blog posts on a 5-category 100-point scoring system covering content quality, SEO optimization, E-E-A-T signals, technical elements, and AI citation readiness. Includes AI content detection (burstiness, phrase flagging, vocabulary diversity). Supports export formats (markdown, JSON, table) and batch analysis with sorting. Generates prioritized recommendations (Critical/High/Medium/Low) with specific fixes. Works with any format (MDX, markdown, HTML, URL). Use when user says "analyze blog", "audit blog", "blog score", "check blog quality", "blog review", "rate this blog", "blog health check".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a blog-level strategy for a niche or business: audience segments, 3-5 content pillars with hub-and-spoke clusters, competitive gaps, measurement plan, and a 90-day roadmap. Use when the user says "blog strategy", "content strategy", "blog positioning", "content pillars", "what should I blog about". Not for a dated publishing schedule (blog-calendar), SERP-validated cluster maps (blog-cluster), or a brief or outline for one post (blog-brief, blog-outline). Makes no promise of rankings or AI citations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a new blog article from scratch for Google rankings and AI citations, then take it through the delivery gates. Generates the full article with template selection, answer-first formatting, Key Takeaways box, sourced statistics, licensed images, built-in SVG charts, optional FAQ and internal linking, in MDX, markdown or HTML. Use when the user asks to write a new blog post or article from a topic or brief ("write a blog post", "draft a new article", "/blog write"). Not for editing an existing post (blog-rewrite), and not for a standalone outline, brief or research request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score one blog post (or a folder of posts) on a 5-category 100-point scale covering content quality, SEO, E-E-A-T, technical elements, and AI citation readiness. Runs the deterministic analyzer first, then adds judgment and prioritized Critical/High/Medium/Low fixes. Advisory style diagnostics never infer authorship or affect the score. Exports markdown, JSON or table; works with MDX, markdown, HTML or a URL. Use when the user asks to analyze, score, rate or check the quality of specific posts ("analyze blog", "blog score", "check blog quality", "rate this post"). For a site-wide health check (orphan pages, cannibalization, stale content, schema across all posts) use blog-audit instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-writing SEO validation with pass/fail checklist covering title tag length and keyword placement, meta description quality, heading hierarchy and keyword density, internal/external link audit with anchor text analysis, canonical URL verification, Open Graph meta tags (og:title, og:description, og:image), Twitter Card validation, structured data presence and validity, URL structure optimization, and image alt text presence. Produces prioritized fix list with specific recommendations. Use for ONE finished post when the user says "seo check", "validate seo", "on-page seo", "title tag check", "link audit". Not for a whole-site audit (blog-audit, claude-seo), AI-citation scoring (blog-geo), schema generation (blog-schema), or the delivery gates (blog_preflight.py).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full-site blog health assessment scanning all blog files for quality scores, orphan pages, topic cannibalization, stale content, and AI citation readiness. Runs canonical batch analysis before site-wide checks. Produces per-post scores and a prioritized action queue. Use when the user asks for a site-wide blog health check across many posts ("blog audit", "blog health", "audit all posts", "site audit of the blog"). For one post, or a quality score with fixes for a few named files, use blog-analyze instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and use a persistent, citation-traceable knowledge wiki from documents, research papers, notes, or project documentation. Use for llmwiki projects, retrieving reusable evidence for an agent task, or compiling a corpus for repeated questions. A one-off file read or live web search does not need a wiki.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build MCP servers using the Leanmcp SDK with decorator-based TypeScript. Use this skill when users ask for "leanmcp", "MCP with decorators", "MCP with authentication", "MCP with elicitation", "MCP with environment injection", or want a simpler, more elegant way to build MCP servers. Leanmcp provides automatic schema generation, dependency injection, authentication, and user input collection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Standards and audits for writing academic papers, especially ML/NLP submissions to NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, EMNLP, NAACL. Covers the author's house prose rules (zero em dashes, zero fluff, every sentence earns its place), verification of hallucinated claims and hallucinated or malformed bibliography entries, the ACL policy on AI writing assistance and what must be disclosed, and best practices for paper structure, experiments, reproducibility checklists, and rebuttals. Use this skill whenever the user is drafting, editing, polishing, restructuring, or reviewing a paper, abstract, intro, related work, rebuttal, or camera-ready; whenever they ask to "clean up" or "tighten" academic writing; whenever citations or a .bib file need checking; and whenever they ask what has to be disclosed about AI assistance. Reach for it even when the user only says "make this section better", "check my references", or "is this ready to submit".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and funding proposals (NSF Project Summary/Description, NIH Specific Aims): preserve scholarly conventions, match claims to evidence (and, for proposals, claims to feasibility), and match the author's own voice. It never changes a number, result, or citation, and it is not for evading AI-use disclosure. Use when editing AI-assisted academic prose or grant proposals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section. Use when the user wants to write blog posts, articles, newsletters, tutorials, case studies, thought leadership pieces, or any long-form content that benefits from research and structured feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates academic reviews for molecules in diseases using PubMed research. Invoke when user needs biomedical literature review with Vancouver citation format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically find references for academic paper Markdown files. Reads full paper text, identifies each knowledge point requiring citation (epidemiological data, mechanism descriptions, existing research conclusions, etc.), searches PubMed for 3-5 most relevant articles per kn...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A multi-stage workflow for writing long-form medical reviews; used when the user needs to build an outline based on PubMed literature, write chapter by chapter, perform supplementary searches, and format citations; input is the review topic and project directory, output is a c...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Collects candidate biomedical literature across multiple databases, adapts search logic by database, preserves source metadata, and organizes results into a structured, screening-ready candidate pool. Always use this skill when a user wants cross-database literature collection, search strategy construction, candidate paper aggregation, or first-pass evidence organization before deduplication, screening, layered reading, or review planning. Requires real and verifiable literature records only. Every formal literature item must include a real link and DOI when available; never fabricate citations, titles, authors, years, journals, abstracts, PMIDs, or DOIs. If a DOI is unavailable or cannot be verified, state that explicitly rather than inventing one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically maps mechanism evidence for a disease from molecules to pathways, cell types, tissues, biological consequences, and clinical phenotypes. Always use this skill when a user needs a layered mechanism evidence chain rather than a flat summary or immediate gap analysis. Formal literature citations must be real and verifiable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ranks papers by evidence family, methodological quality tier, validation depth, and claim discipline; assigns anchor, context-setting, mechanistic support, or caution citation roles; prevents prestige-based or design-label-based ranking errors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive PM interview with expertise-adaptive questioning for requirements elicitation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。