「closure」の検索結果

Progressive Disclosure skill index — efficient skill loading in 3 layers. Layer 1 (index, ~100 tokens) always loaded. Layer 2 (summary, ~300 tokens) loaded on context need. Layer 3 (full SKILL.md) loaded on execution only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to upload or schedule a TikTok video through Publora, with privacy, comment, duet, stitch and commercial-disclosure settings. Video runs 3 seconds to 10 minutes at 23+ FPS; carousels take up to 35 images. Unaudited apps can publish private videos only. Not for Reels (use instagram-post).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Develop evidence-backed structural and architectural security hardening proposals from vulnerability disclosures, supplied findings, incident or assessment documents, source code, or a completed Codex Security scan. Use when a user asks for systemic improvements, alternatives beyond per-finding patches, before-and-after security architecture views, engineering tradeoff analysis, or an implementation-ready plan for a selected hardening option. Also use automatically after a Codex Security scan with reportable findings when the top-level scan workflow requests final-report hardening guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Nature-style hydrology manuscript reviewer skill for testing streamflow, runoff, groundwater, water storage, drought, flood, hydroclimate and water-resource claims against water-balance closure, hydrologic signatures, model structure and observational constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a KOL roster + subreddit brand-fit analysis into a deployable creator network. Splits creators into KOL (authority) and KOC (grassroots) layers, matches each to a main + secondary subreddits by real gear/shooting-type ∩ community fit, and emits an account×subreddit deployment_matrix (with a ≤3-per-sub ceiling + no-cross-interaction rule) plus per-creator persona_cards. Route A disclosed-compliance baked into every card (FTC disclosure required on any material connection). Consumes reddit-kol-finder's kol_roster.json natively. READ-ONLY, deterministic, no LLM key needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Codex must make a high-quality judgment on any complex problem, not only technical problems. Trigger when a question has high complexity, uncertainty, cost of being wrong, long-term impact, value tradeoffs, possible structural causes, or when the user asks for 全面思考, 深度理解, 系统性分析, 帮我想清楚, 从根上看, 这件事到底怎么看, 方法论, 复杂问题拆解, 系统方案, 架构判断, 策略判断, or 根因分析. Also trigger for project and engineering high-risk scenarios such as multi-module, multi-environment, multi-data-source, multi-state, financial truth, live trading, ledger, revenue, customer assets, order governance, broker interfaces, online availability, major solution selection, and system closure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing, moving or auditing any .md in imp - deciding which file a paragraph belongs in, adding a doc, fixing a stale claim, or when docs_lint.py fails in CI. Covers the four reader layers (L0 README / L1 operators / L2 kernel devs / L3 agents), the HTML-comment metadata header, [PROV:] provenance, the single-source-of-truth map, generated perf blocks, which numbers may appear in prose, plan-doc closure. Triggers on "which doc does this go in", "docs lint failed", "add a doc", "this claim is stale", "update the README", "PROV block", "layer", "STALE.md". Do NOT use for the CHANGELOG or a release body (shipping-prs), or for code-comment accuracy (codebase-audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures ATM offering programs with sales agent selection, volume limitations, and disclosure requirements. Use when establishing ATM programs, managing ongoing equity issuance, or optimizing capital raising timing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt GraphQL-specific vulns — introspection abuse, field-level authorization (IDOR), batched queries for brute force, alias-based rate limit bypass, deep query DoS, mutation injection, schema disclosure, suggestion leakage, CSRF via GET, and CSRF via POST without preflight. Use when a GraphQL endpoint is present.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt full Account Takeover (ATO) by chaining lower-severity findings — IDOR-to-email-disclosure, password-reset-token-theft, OAuth-redirect-uri abuse, response-manipulation, cookie scope, CRLF in Set-Cookie, race-condition on signup. Use when the user wants to escalate small findings to ATO or thinks an ATO path exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, audit, and maintain CLAUDE.md documentation files that configure Claude Code for projects. Use this skill when (1) initializing a new project with Claude Code configuration, (2) reviewing or improving existing CLAUDE.md files, (3) organizing project instructions using progressive disclosure patterns, (4) converting repeated instructions into permanent documentation, or (5) setting up agent_docs/ structures for larger codebases. Handles the WHAT/WHY/HOW framework, conciseness optimization, and file import patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply WIT (Writing Is Thinking) as a human–LLM collaborative scientific reasoning skill for scientific question formulation, finding-driven research planning, next-experiment selection, Results or Discussion review, claim–evidence and reviewer stress tests, manuscript logic audits, deadline closure, and researcher growth. Use when the user invokes WIT or asks for these question-driven scientific reasoning workflows; do not use for generic copyediting, summarization, or literature search alone.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Form a coherent gestalt — the whole that is more than the sum of its parts — from the panoramic perception produced by expand-awareness. Maps tensions and resonances between domains, identifies the emergent figure from the ground of multiple perspectives, tests the candidate whole for premature closure, and articulates the insight in a single sentence no single domain could have produced. Use after expand-awareness has surfaced raw multi-domain perception and before express-insight communicates the result.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Epistemic transparency — acknowledging uncertainty, flagging limitations, avoiding overconfidence, and communicating what is known, unknown, and uncertain with proportional confidence. Maps the HEXACO personality dimension to AI reasoning: truthful calibration of confidence, proactive disclosure of gaps, and resistance to the temptation to appear more certain than warranted. Use before presenting a conclusion, when answering questions where knowledge is partial or inferred, after noticing a temptation to state uncertain information as certain, or when a user is making decisions based on provided information.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Statically enforce a privacy/redaction boundary on an artifact tree before publication, the way an AST checker enforces a code contract. Builds a two-tier gate — a shape-based deny-list (regex over identifier shapes) plus a structure-aware tier that parses JSON/HTML/SVG/Markdown/code and asserts sensitive content cannot appear in meaningful positions — with a strict exit-code contract, label-only output that never echoes the patterns themselves, and false-positive narrowing instead of suppressions. Use when gating a public mirror, a disclosure draft, a wire-capture export, or any artifact that must pass a leak check before it ships, and when a plain line-grep is too coarse to trust.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate current trail conditions including weather, snow line, river crossings, exposure, and trail maintenance status for safety decision-making. Produces a GREEN/YELLOW/RED safety rating with actionable go/no-go recommendations. Use the day before or morning of a planned hike, during tour planning to assess seasonal viability, after unexpected weather changes on a multi-day tour, when reports suggest trail damage or closures, or before committing to an alpine or exposed route.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to batch-close resolved or outdated tracker items. The agent never closes tracker items itself. Not for individual closure or items still under active work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply one governed bounded Proto UI dependency update after pui-deps establishes the exact manifest, lockfile, consumers, compatibility evidence, and rollback boundary. Use for ordinary package or toolchain updates whose intended compatibility is already fixed. Route unresolved public compatibility, security disclosure, publication, release, or provenance exceptions to their dedicated decision path.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Independently attempt to falsify one Proto UI autonomous-maintenance finding in a fresh non-mutating context. Use after pui-observe produced a candidate finding and route the result directly to remediation or closure when authority is clear.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route one eligible transition in Proto UI's governed autonomous-maintenance protocol. Use for maintenance missions, drift discovery, finding verification, accepted remediation, independent maintenance review, run-ledger closure, or residual-risk planning. Do not use for ordinary user-directed development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute governed implementation workflow with work items, RFC/ADR checks, phase gates, testing, and closure. Use when: (1) User invokes /gov, (2) A non-trivial change needs work item tracking, (3) Implementation may require RFC/ADR handling

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a NowStack Mobile iOS app against the App Store Review Guidelines before submission - account deletion, IAP/Restore + no Stripe on iOS, Sign in with Apple parity, permission strings, App Privacy, AI disclosure, export compliance. Use for "ns ios audit" or "will my app pass App Store review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit, finish, or port PCB placement and routing using circuit intent, mechanical constraints, sourcing evidence, native DRC/connectivity, rendered views, and manufacturing feedback. Use before routing, after autorouting, before fabrication release, when adapting a proven board to another connector, enclosure, platform, or regional variant, or when reviewing layers, GND references, power distribution, decoupling, buses, controlled interfaces, RF keepouts, vias, cost-driving features, opens, or DRC findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a report or article needs to be split into individual claims before it is graded, cited or used as evidence — the user asks "what does this report actually claim?", "split this into claims", "separate the facts from the judgements", or another skill needs a claim list. Turns one document into five to twelve atomic claims, each typed (observation, attribution, assessment, actor claim, victim disclosure) and anchored to the verbatim sentence it rests on, so every extraction can be checked against the source. Preserves the source's own hedging. Does not grade. Invoked by /quality-of-information-check; its output feeds /ach, /key-assumptions-check, /intelligence-writing, /writing-assessments and /threat-actor-profiling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。