「code analysis」の検索結果

Dose-response modeling — EC50 estimation, curve fitting, synergy analysis, and benchmark-dose methods.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Electronic health record analysis — phenotyping, missingness, bias, and observational study design with EHR data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DNA methylation analysis — array and bisulfite-seq processing, DMP/DMR calling, and epigenetic clocks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ChIP-seq analysis — peak calling, differential binding, motif discovery, and QC with phantom-peak metrics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structural and functional brain connectivity — tractography, functional networks, and graph-theoretic analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform business analysis — requirements gathering, process mapping, gap analysis, and stakeholder-ready documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs static analysis of binary code using radare2 and Ghidra — function enumeration, cross-reference tracing, decompilation, and control flow graphs without executing the binary. Use when disassembling or decompiling code, mapping functions, tracing data flow, or building hypotheses before dynamic verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Four-phase skill for planning and executing large-scale codebase migrations using full-context AI analysis. Produces an impact map, ordered batch plan, subagent execution protocol, and cross-codebase validation pass. Optimized for Fable 5's 1M-token context window.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ESLint is the standard linting tool for JavaScript and TypeScript projects. It statically analyzes your code to find problems, enforce coding conventions, and catch bugs before they reach production. ESLint 9 introduced the flat config format, replacing the legacy `.eslintrc` system with a simpler, more composable `eslint.config.js` file. With a rich plugin ecosystem covering React, TypeScript, accessibility, and import ordering, ESLint is the backbone of code quality in modern web development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strategic planning consultant that produces decision-complete work plans through Socratic interview, codebase exploration, Metis gap analysis, and optional Momus high-accuracy review. MUST USE when the task has 5+ steps, scope is ambiguous, multiple modules are involved, or the user asks for a plan. Triggers: plan this, create a work plan, interview me, start planning, prometheustic, plan mode, help me plan this, break this down.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analysis of Competing Hypotheses. Operationalizes Richards Heuer's CIA-tradition technique for systematically narrowing among multiple hypotheses against evidence. Builds an explicit hypothesis-vs-evidence matrix and focuses on disconfirmation rather than confirmation — the central insight: hypotheses cannot be proven, only disconfirmed; the surviving hypothesis is the one with the least disconfirming evidence. Spawns parallel hypothesizers (in isolation, across hypothesis-generation angles) and parallel evidence-gatherers (across evidence classes), then synthesizes into a matrix, diagnosticity analysis, sensitivity analysis, and falsification milestones. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate code context for coding tasks. Run before code changes, bug fixes, or refactoring to get execution paths, key files, symbols, tests, and snippets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research process for comparing frontier harnesses (Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw, autoresearch, Prime Agent) with the original/upstream implementation and performing GAP analysis before feature implementation. Triggered by "research" ("리서치"), "gap", "frontier", "harness", "case study" ("사례 조사"), "pattern exploration" ("패턴 탐색"), "comparative analysis" ("비교 분석") keywords.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover and run the linters and format checks relevant to changed code. Use after code edits or when the user asks for lint, formatting, or static-analysis validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatic quality control, linting, and static analysis after code modifications. Triggers on: lint, format, check, validate, types, static analysis. NOT for full build verification (see mk:verify); NOT for test coverage (see mk:testing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when answering factual or explanatory questions about the current project — codebase, architecture, conventions, workflows, constraints — with minimal cited evidence. Triggers on "how does X work here", "what does X mean", "why is X structured this way", "is this claim true in the repo", "explain X with sources". NOT for brainstorming or comparing approaches (mk:brainstorming), trade-off decisions (mk:party), debugging/root cause (mk:investigate), code review (mk:review), plans (mk:plan-creator), security audits (mk:cso), visual explanations/diagrams (mk:preview --explain), test-coverage gaps (mk:nyquist), library docs (mk:docs-finder), or workflow navigation (mk:help).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a project has no docs/ directory or needs initial documentation generated from codebase analysis. Triggers on "init docs", "create documentation", "generate docs", "docs init", or when docs/ is empty. Do NOT use for updating existing docs (use mk:document-release).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level compiler design covering lexical analysis, parsing, semantic analysis, intermediate representations, optimization passes, and code generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

General code quality review — project guideline compliance, bug detection, code quality analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

General code quality review — project guideline compliance, bug detection, code quality analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep multi-pass codebase audit — orchestrates project-analysis-core plus the framework-specific project-analysis-*; explicit request only. Single-pass scan → project-analyzer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when picking which analysis or project-analysis-* skill fits a request — routes by scope, framework, and symptom — even if the user just says 'analyze this' or 'dig into the codebase'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GEO-first SEO analysis tool. Optimizes websites for AI-powered search engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews) while maintaining traditional SEO foundations. Performs full GEO audits, citability scoring, AI crawler analysis, llms.txt generation, brand mention scanning, platform-specific optimization, schema markup, technical SEO, content quality (E-E-A-T), and client-ready GEO report generation. Use when user says "geo", "seo", "audit", "AI search", "AI visibility", "optimize", "citability", "llms.txt", "schema", "brand mentions", "GEO report", or any URL for analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects and prevents code injection attacks targeting serverless functions (AWS Lambda, Azure Functions, Google Cloud Functions) through event source poisoning, malicious layer injection, runtime command execution, and IAM privilege escalation via function modification. The analyst combines static analysis of function code, CloudTrail event correlation, runtime behavior monitoring, and IAM policy auditing to identify injection vectors across the expanded serverless attack surface including API Gateway, S3, SQS, DynamoDB Streams, and CloudWatch event triggers. Activates for requests involving Lambda security assessment, serverless injection detection, function event poisoning analysis, or serverless privilege escalation investigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。