992 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Full website SEO audit with parallel subagent delegation. Crawls up to 500 pages, detects business type, delegates to 10 specialists (7 core + 3 conditional), generates health score. Use when user says audit, full SEO check, analyze my site, or website health check.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full website SEO audit with parallel subagent delegation. Crawls up to 500 pages, detects business type, delegates to up to 15 specialists (8 always + 7 conditional), generates health score. Use when user says audit, full SEO check, analyze my site, or website health check.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply integrations to existing projects with tanstack add, including add-on id resolution, dependency chains, option prompts, and .cta.json project metadata preconditions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and iterate custom add-ons/templates with tanstack add-on init, add-on compile, add-on dev, and tanstack create --dev-watch, including sync loop preconditions, watch-path validation, and project metadata constraints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Shared loop-engineering reference for COG skills - the agent loop, deterministic verifiers, termination conditions, in-loop context management, and named patterns. Invoke when designing or debugging a skill that iterates (search-verify-retry, scan-until-dry, fetch-retry-gate).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when responding to an American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) conditional-accept decision — addressing the editor's letter within the short window, usually without a second referee round. Drafts a concise, decisive response and revision plan; it does not redo the analysis (see aeri-robustness / aeri-identification).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding which aeri-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing work on a short-format manuscript from topic selection through the conditional-accept response for an American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when calibrating expectations for the fast, decisive American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) review process — conditional-accept-or-reject decisions, the single-round model, and pre-empting the objections a short paper cannot afford. Explains the process and stress-tests the paper; it does not write the response letter (see aeri-rebuttal).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building the theoretical engine for an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript — mechanisms, process vs. variance logic, constructs, and boundary conditions. Builds the argument; it does not select methods or run analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when an American Economic Journal: Applied Economics (AEJ: Applied) decision letter arrives (R&R or conditional accept) and a response-to-referees letter plus a revision plan must be drafted. Plans and structures the response; it does not run the new analysis (aeja-identification / aeja-robustness) or the submission preflight.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building the actual theory for an Academy of Management Review (AMR) manuscript — turning a positioned puzzle into defined constructs, explicit relationships, propositions, and boundary conditions. Constructs the theory; it does NOT stress-test the argument's logic (that is amr-data-analysis) or design any data collection (AMR has none).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when choosing and applying a theory-construction method for an Academy of Management Review (AMR) manuscript — building constructs, defining their domain, specifying relationships, articulating the underlying logic/mechanisms, and setting boundary conditions. This is the THEORY-CONSTRUCTION craft, NOT empirical method; AMR publishes no datasets, no measures, and no statistical tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) revise-and-resubmit arrives — planning revisions that may include recoding field data, new experimental conditions, or deepened theorizing, and drafting the point-by-point response to an interdisciplinary reviewer panel. Drafts the response; it does not run new analysis (aos-data-analysis) or the final preflight (aos-submission).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates and inspects Fabric Activator (Reflex) alerts: rules, their data sources, conditions, and the Teams or email action they fire, plus decoding an existing ReflexEntities definition. Choose it whenever someone wants to be told, or something done, when values cross a threshold. The pipeline delivering those values is eventstream-cli.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Get current weather and forecasts using free APIs (no API key required). Use when asked about weather, temperature, forecasts, or climate conditions for any location.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guidelines for making .NET libraries and applications trimming-safe and Native AOT compatible. Covers the trimming/AOT model, the MSBuild properties that enable analysis (IsTrimmable, IsAotCompatible, PublishTrimmed, PublishAot), the trimming attributes (RequiresUnreferencedCode, RequiresDynamicCode, DynamicallyAccessedMembers, UnconditionalSuppressMessage), IL2xxx/IL3xxx warning codes, and a pattern playbook: source generators and UnsafeAccessor, generated-interception diagnostic suppressors, intentional runtime scanning boundaries, trimming-safe islands and feature switches, migration analyzers, and temporary warning-approval baselines. Use when introducing trimming/AOT support, resolving IL2xxx/IL3xxx warnings, or making reflection-heavy code trimming-safe in C# / .NET codebases. For System.Text.Json AOT scenarios, see also the serialization skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user asks to summarize, or asks why Simulink Coverage objectives are missing, unsatisfied, or uncovered on a coverage result they already have — why specific decision, condition, MCDC, relational-boundary, or saturation/overflow outcomes weren't exercised, whether uncovered logic is dead code, or how to close the gap (a test, a coverage filter, or a design change). It reads an existing cvdata, .cvt file, sim-with-coverage output, or Simulink Test result; it never runs cvsim to collect coverage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tests whether two genomic interval sets overlap (colocalize) more than expected by chance using a permutation test against a structured-genome null model. Covers bedtools fisher (analytic 2x2 screen), bedtools shuffle + jaccard permutation, GAT (isochore/GC-conditioned simulation with FDR), regioneR (flexible permutation, randomizeRegions vs circularRandomizeRegions, localZScore), LOLA (universe-relative Fisher against a region database), and GREAT/rGREAT (regulatory-domain binomial + hypergeometric for ontology-from-regions). Stresses the universe/background choice, matched background, blacklist exclusion, and multiple-testing control. Use when asking whether peaks/regions are enriched at enhancers/TFBS/features, scoring region-set colocalization or region-set enrichment, comparing CNV/SV concordance, or turning an overlap count into a defensible p-value.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Calls significant loops from protein-directed and targeted 3C assays (HiChIP, PLAC-seq, Capture Hi-C/PCHi-C, ChIA-PET) where the contact background is peak-anchored and coverage-biased, so generic Hi-C loop callers (cooltools dots, Juicer HiCCUPS) use the wrong null. Covers FitHiChIP (config-driven coverage+distance-decay spline regression, peak-to-peak vs peak-to-all foreground, loose vs stringent background, coverage vs ICE bias), MAPS (positive Poisson regression on bias factors for PLAC-seq/HiChIP), hichipper (restriction-site-distance bias model + library QC), CHiCAGO (Delaporte two-component Brownian+technical background for asymmetric bait x other-end Capture Hi-C), the with/without separate-ChIP anchor decision, and differential loops via diffloop. Use when calling loops from HiChIP/PLAC-seq/Capture Hi-C, choosing FitHiChIP/MAPS/CHiCAGO, picking peak-to-all vs peak-to-peak, setting the loop FDR, supplying ChIP peaks as anchors, QCing a HiChIP library, or comparing loops between conditions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare cell-type composition and spatial features across conditions in IMC/MIBI cohorts with the patient as the experimental unit, covering pseudoreplication, per-patient aggregation, mixed models, compositional (Dirichlet/scCODA) differential abundance, diffcyt, per-image-to-patient spatial differential testing (SpaceANOVA), batch covariates, and FDR. Use when testing whether a cell type or spatial niche differs between groups, avoiding cell-level pseudoreplication, choosing a differential-abundance method, or correctly powering an IMC cohort comparison.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates, normalizes, and converts bedGraph signal tracks (4-column chrom/start/end/value, 0-based half-open) with bedtools genomecov, deepTools bamCoverage/bamCompare/bigwigCompare, bedtools unionbedg, and UCSC bedGraphToBigWig. Covers why a raw coverage bedGraph is not comparable across samples until normalized, the CPM/RPKM/BPM/RPGC normalization menu and the conserved-total assumption that makes them wrong under a global perturbation, the strict sorted-non-overlapping-chrom.sizes bedGraphToBigWig contract that silently corrupts a bigWig, effective-genome-size selection, and bin-size aliasing. Use when building or normalizing a coverage/signal track from a BAM, comparing tracks across samples or conditions, converting bedGraph to a browser-ready bigWig, or diagnosing a track that looks plausible but reports wrong heights.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assign cell types from marker expression in IMC/MIBI data using clustering (PhenoGraph/FlowSOM/Leiden/Pixie), marker-based probabilistic classifiers (Astir), or image-context CNNs (CellSighter), covering the double-positive segmentation artifact, lineage-vs-state markers, the two spillover types, and why a "cell type" in imaging is conditioned on a segmentation guess. Use when phenotyping segmented IMC cells, choosing clustering vs classification, diagnosing implausible double-positive populations, separating lineage from functional markers, or transferring labels across a cohort.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects focal chromatin loops (point interactions / corner-dots) in balanced Hi-C and Micro-C contact maps and aggregates/validates a loop set. Covers de-novo calling with cooltools dots (HiCCUPS-style 4-background local enrichment with lambda-chunked FDR), chromosight (template-correlation), and Mustache (scale-space blob detection); aggregate peak analysis (APA) via cooltools pileup for confirmation; the depth/resolution prerequisite (de-novo needs ~5-10kb resolution = hundreds of millions to billions of valid pairs); consensus across callers and convergent-CTCF support as validation; and differential loops via union anchors plus chromosight quantify. Use when calling chromatin loops or dots from a cooler, deciding whether a map is deep enough to call de-novo vs running APA on known CTCF/cohesin anchors, building an aggregate peak pileup, comparing loops across conditions, or validating loop calls. For HiChIP/PLAC-seq/PCHi-C protein-anchored data use FitHiChIP/MAPS, not dots.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compares Hi-C contact maps between conditions across the right scale -- differential bin-pair contacts (multiHiCcompare, diffHic), differential A/B compartments (dcHiC), differential TAD boundaries (delta insulation), and differential loops (diffloop, DiffHiChIP) -- with distance-stratified between-sample normalization, replicate-aware NB-GLM FDR, HiCRep SCC reproducibility gating, and CNV correction for cancer/aneuploid samples. Use when comparing Hi-C between treatment and control, finding differential contacts/compartments/boundaries/loops, normalizing two maps of unequal depth, choosing a replicate-aware test, gating replicates with SCC, or correcting copy-number artifacts before a tumor-vs-normal comparison.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。