「coverage」の検索結果

When the user wants help with public relations, earned media, press coverage, journalist outreach, or media strategy (not pull requests). Also use when the user mentions 'PR,' 'press,' 'press release,' 'media outreach,' 'pitch a journalist,' 'get featured,' 'media list,' 'media kit,' 'press kit,' 'newsjacking,' 'news hijack,' 'HARO,' 'Qwoted,' 'Featured,' 'reporter request,' 'tech press,' 'TechCrunch,' 'thought leadership placement,' 'op-ed,' 'guest article,' 'press contacts,' 'podcast prep,' 'podcast guest,' 'prep me for this podcast,' 'how do I get press,' 'PR crisis,' 'crisis communications,' 'respond to backlash,' 'we got hacked,' 'data breach statement,' or 'holding statement.' Also covers crisis response when something goes wrong. For startup/SaaS/AI directory submissions, see directory-submissions. For product launches, see launch. For social-media engagement, see social. For cold-email outreach to prospects, see cold-email.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add end-to-end and API tests for features that already work, following the project's existing test harness. Use when the user asks for e2e tests, API tests, or automated coverage of an existing feature, or says "create qa automated tests for [feature]". Not for unit tests on work in flight, which the build writes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory, coverage-bounded integrity checks, two-stage peer review, and auditable quality-assurance artifacts. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow, 연구부터 논문까지, 연구 주제 설정부터 논문 완성까지, 논문 전체 워크플로, flujo de trabajo académico, investigación a artículo, flujo completo de artículo, pipeline de investigación completa, publicación de investigación, flujo de trabajo completo del artículo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tracks physical units and propagates measurement uncertainty in scientific calculations using pint and uncertainties. Use for unit conversion and dimensional checking, GUM uncertainty budgets, Type A and Type B evaluation, coverage factors and expanded uncertainty, Monte Carlo propagation, significant-figure and plus-minus reporting, error propagation through curve fits, CODATA constants, auditing Python code for stripped units or broken uncertainty propagation, and order-of-magnitude plausibility checks using dimensionless groups (Reynolds, Peclet, Damkohler, Knudsen, Biot, Womersley), characteristic scales such as diffusion time or Debye length, and observed magnitude ranges. Trigger on "is this number physically reasonable", "sanity check these units", "what regime is this flow in", or a result that looks off by orders of magnitude.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts, revises, and audits scientific manuscripts or reports with explicit evidence provenance, reporting-guideline coverage, authorship accountability, confidentiality controls, and local consistency checks. Use for manuscript sections, references, declarations, tables, figures, or submission preparation when scientific accuracy and traceability matter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs genomic interval overlap, nearest, merge, coverage, complement and subtraction on Polars DataFrames, and reads or writes BED, VCF, BCF, BAM, CRAM, GFF, GTF, FASTA and FASTQ data. Use for coordinate-aware genomic joins, read-depth analysis, lazy bioinformatics I/O, SQL queries or migration from bioframe.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides Python/HTSlib workflows for genomic files. Used when reading, querying, filtering, or writing SAM/BAM/CRAM, VCF/BCF, FASTA/FASTQ, or tabix data with pysam, including pileup, coverage, indexing, and CRAM references.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts systematic, scoping, and narrative literature reviews using PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, and other appropriate sources. Use for research synthesis, reproducible literature searches, screening, citation checking, or preparing Markdown and PDF reviews. Tracks search coverage, records versus studies, and evidence limitations; supports meta-analysis planning but does not supply a meta-analysis engine.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Supports Gtars for local genomic interval models and set algebra, overlaps and counts, consensus and coverage, tokenization, fragment processing, and refget/BEDbase planning across Python, Rust, and the CLI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a reverse-skill case package for scope readiness, Evidence to Finding to Path traceability, work item coverage, timeline references, and optional artifact hash integrity before report handoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a multi-stage OpenMAIC course series around a small concept spine whose ideas return repeatedly at higher levels of complexity, abstraction, relationship density, representation, transfer distance, or boundary awareness. Use when the user explicitly wants a Bruner-style spiral curriculum, progressive conceptual revisits, or a series organized by how understanding develops rather than by a linear topic list. Do not use for a single standalone stage or a series that only needs sequential coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates an integration testing plan for .NET data access artifacts during Oracle-to-PostgreSQL database migrations. Analyzes a single project to identify repositories, DAOs, and service layers that interact with the database, then produces a structured testing plan. Use when planning integration test coverage for a migrated project, identifying which data access methods need tests, or preparing for Oracle-to-PostgreSQL migration validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Launch new products from idea to first customers. Use when launching products, finding early adopters, building launch week playbooks, diagnosing why adoption stalls, or learning that press coverage does not equal growth. Includes the three-layer diagnosis, the 2-week experiment cycle, and the launch that got 50K impressions and 12 signups.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft concise morning meeting notes summarizing overnight developments, trade ideas, and key events for coverage stocks. Designed for the 7am morning meeting format — tight, opinionated, actionable. Triggers on "morning note", "morning meeting", "what happened overnight", "trade idea", "morning call prep", or "daily note".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and maintain a calendar of upcoming catalysts across a coverage universe — earnings dates, conferences, product launches, regulatory decisions, and macro events. Helps prioritize attention and position ahead of events. Triggers on "catalyst calendar", "upcoming events", "what's coming up", "earnings calendar", "event calendar", or "catalyst tracker".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create institutional-quality equity research initiation reports through a 5-task workflow. Tasks must be executed individually with verified prerequisites - (1) company research, (2) financial modeling, (3) valuation analysis, (4) chart generation, (5) final report assembly. Each task produces specific deliverables (markdown docs, Excel models, charts, or DOCX reports). Tasks 3-5 have dependencies on earlier tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create professional equity research earnings update reports (8-12 pages, 3,000-5,000 words) analyzing quarterly results for companies already under coverage. Fast-turnaround format focusing on beat/miss analysis, key metrics, updated estimates, and revised thesis. Includes 1-3 summary tables and 8-12 charts. Use when user requests "earnings update", "quarterly update", "earnings analysis", "Q1/Q2/Q3/Q4 results", or post-earnings report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A short self-bias checklist to run at the START of any investment research task (stock screen / sector study / company deep-dive). Four biases that systematically warp AI research — leader-bias (only big caps), English-bias (miss JP/KR/TW players), narrative-bias (chase concept labels), confirmation-bias (only bullish evidence) — plus recency-bias. Load this first, then research with the corrections in mind. Not a workflow, just a 60-second attitude reset that materially improves coverage and honesty.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Paid capability marketplace for global multi-asset data; use it when free Vibe-Trading sources lack coverage, depth, or provider quality, and keep free sources as the default for routine OHLCV.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect process injection techniques (T1055) - including DLL injection, process hollowing, and APC injection - by analyzing Sysmon Event IDs 1, 7, 8, 10, and 25 for cross-process memory operations, remote thread creation, and anomalous DLL loads. Use when hunting defense-evasion activity that hides code inside legitimate processes, investigating an EDR alert on suspicious cross-process access, or validating Sysmon coverage for injection detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect Pass-the-Hash (T1550.002) attacks by analyzing NTLM authentication patterns, flagging Type 3 logons using NTLM where Kerberos would be expected, and correlating with credential-dumping indicators. Use when threat hunting for lateral movement via stolen NTLM hashes, triaging EDR/SIEM alerts on suspicious NTLM logons, scoping compromise during incident response, or validating detection coverage in a purple team exercise.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect abuse of elevation control mechanisms (T1548), including Windows UAC bypass via auto-elevating binaries like fodhelper.exe and Linux sudo/setuid/setgid exploitation, by monitoring registry changes, integrity-level transitions, and parent-child process relationships via Sysmon and Windows Security events. Use when hunting privilege-escalation activity or validating elevation-abuse detection coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect privilege escalation attempts across Windows and Linux, including access token manipulation, UAC bypass, unquoted service path abuse, kernel exploits, and sudo/doas abuse. Use when threat hunting for T1068-style privilege escalation, triaging EDR/SIEM alerts on suspicious privilege changes, scoping compromise during incident response, or validating detection coverage in a purple team exercise.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect Kerberos Pass-the-Ticket (PtT) attacks by analyzing Windows Event IDs 4768, 4769, and 4771 for anomalous ticket usage patterns, with detection queries for Splunk and Elastic SIEM. Use when investigating incidents involving stolen or replayed Kerberos tickets, building detection rules or threat hunting queries for ticket abuse, or validating SOC monitoring coverage for credential-theft attack techniques.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。