「dify」の検索結果

Open, create, read, analyze, edit, or validate Excel/spreadsheet files (.xlsx, .xlsm, .csv, .tsv). Use when the user asks to create, build, modify, analyze, read, validate, or format any Excel spreadsheet, financial model, pivot table, or tabular data file. Covers: creating new xlsx from scratch, reading and analyzing existing files, editing existing xlsx with zero format loss, formula recalculation and validation, and applying professional financial formatting standards. Triggers on 'spreadsheet', 'Excel', '.xlsx', '.csv', 'pivot table', 'financial model', 'formula', or any request to produce tabular data in Excel format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Professional DOCX document creation, editing, and formatting using OpenXML SDK (.NET). Three pipelines: (A) create new documents from scratch, (B) fill/edit content in existing documents, (C) apply template formatting with XSD validation gate-check. MUST use this skill whenever the user wants to produce, modify, or format a Word document — including when they say "write a report", "draft a proposal", "make a contract", "fill in this form", "reformat to match this template", or any task whose final output is a .docx file. Even if the user doesn't mention "docx" explicitly, if the task implies a printable/formal document, use this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous experiment loop: hypothesize > modify > test > evaluate > keep/discard > repeat. Run N experiments automatically with measurable metrics. Works for performance optimization, A/B testing, prompt engineering, and any measurable improvement task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, update or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous iteration loop: modify, verify, keep/discard against any metric

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates .NET projects from templates with validated parameters, smart defaults, Central Package Management adaptation, and latest NuGet version resolution. USE FOR: creating new dotnet projects, scaffolding solutions with multiple projects, installing or uninstalling template packages, creating projects that respect Directory.Packages.props (CPM), composing multi-project solutions (API + tests + library), getting latest NuGet package versions in newly created projects. DO NOT USE FOR: finding templates (use template-discovery), producing a detailed side-by-side comparison of templates (use template-comparison), authoring custom templates (use template-authoring), deciding cross-parameter defaults such as which framework to pair with native AOT or whether to keep HTTPS when auth is enabled (use template-smart-defaults), modifying existing projects or adding NuGet packages to existing projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Install a .NET SDK locally for safe preview testing, specific-version pinning, or reproducible team setups — without modifying the system-wide installation. USE FOR: trying .NET previews safely, testing specific SDK versions, installing MAUI or other workloads on a preview, updating or replacing an existing local SDK, creating reproducible team/CI install scripts, configuring global.json paths. DO NOT USE FOR: system-wide SDK installs, .NET hosts older than 10, runtime-only installs, or projects not using SDK-style commands.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, modify, debug, or review Windows Forms applications only when the request contains a concrete Windows Forms marker. USE FOR: WinForms, Windows Forms, System.Windows.Forms, WinForms Form or UserControl designer files (*.Designer.cs or *.Designer.vb), Visual Studio WinForms Designer, TableLayoutPanel, BindingSource, DataGridView, Control.InvokeAsync, component-tray ownership, or custom control serialization. DO NOT USE FOR: WPF or WPF XAML, including Window.InputBindings, KeyBinding, commands, or DataContext; .NET MAUI; Avalonia; or any request where none of the listed Windows Forms markers is present.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and manage Volcengine cloud resources using the Volcengine CLI (`ve` command). Supports all Volcengine services including ECS, VPC, CLB, RDS, Redis, and more. Trigger this skill whenever the user asks to create, query, modify, or delete cloud resources on Volcengine, mentions the `ve` command, says "volcengine CLI", or describes infrastructure tasks such as "create an ECS instance", "set up a VPC", "list security groups", "allocate an EIP". Also trigger when the user encounters errors from `ve` commands and needs troubleshooting help.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-powered intelligent phone calling service to automatically handle restaurant reservation, modification, and cancellation tasks without manual dialing. Use when users want to reserve, modify, or cancel restaurant bookings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building, scaffolding, modifying, debugging, converting, or verifying Apache Flink Agents applications, including Flink Agents YAML, Workflow Agent, ReAct Agent, Actions, Resources, MCP servers, vector stores, runtime skills, Python, or Java. Do not use for ordinary Flink jobs that do not use Flink Agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise products, services, libraries, agents, plugins, connected components, or platform modules that may qualify as products with digital elements and need EU Cyber Resilience Act secure-by-design, vulnerability handling, security update, SBOM, product documentation, or release-readiness controls. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that expose, exchange, store, process, export, or port data across users, businesses, connected products, cloud providers, APIs, event streams, AI data pipelines, data spaces, or SaaS platforms and need EU Data Act engineering controls. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java platform for EU Data Act controls; Design data access and portability evidence; Add data-sharing request workflows, export formats, interoperability, metadata, audit logs, cloud-switching support, non-personal data safeguards, or trade-secret handoffs; Assess Data Act engineering readiness before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that may support intermediary services, hosting services, online platforms, marketplaces, content moderation, recommender systems, advertising delivery, complaint workflows, transparency reporting, or systemic-risk evidence under the EU Digital Services Act. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java online platform for DSA controls; Design notice-and-action or appeal workflows; Add recommender, ad transparency, moderation, audit, researcher access, or privacy-safe observability evidence; Assess online-platform transparency controls before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that process personal data and need GDPR-aware engineering controls. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java service for GDPR privacy controls; Design data-subject rights workflows; Add retention, deletion, pseudonymization, or privacy-safe logging; Assess data transfer, DPIA, breach evidence, or processor/controller boundary concerns before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that use AI, LLMs, AI agents, RAG, tool calling, workflow automation, or model-based decision support and need EU AI Act regulatory awareness. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java AI system for EU AI Act controls; Design governance for an AI agent with enterprise tools; Add human oversight and auditability to LLM workflows; Assess RAG or model-driven decision support before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that may support financial entities, critical ICT services, third-party ICT provider integrations, or operational resilience obligations under DORA. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java platform for DORA ICT risk controls; Design operational resilience evidence for a financial service; Add incident, continuity, backup, recovery, or third-party ICT controls; Assess resilience testing and monitoring before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems from a maintainer-authored or maintainer-sanitized NIS2 engineering evidence inventory. Supports essential or important entities, critical-sector services, managed service providers, supply-chain dependencies, and cybersecurity incident escalation obligations without ingesting raw code, logs, runbooks, tickets, provider documents, or other operational free text. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that use GenAI, LLMs, AI-assisted coding, RAG, AI agents, generated code, generated dependencies, prompt workflows, external model providers, or AI-enabled business logic and need ISO/IEC 42001 AI management system-aware engineering guidance. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that may support EU Digital Markets Act gatekeeper-platform concerns, core platform services, interoperability, business-user data access, consent-dependent data combination, ranking, self-preferencing, advertising transparency, or anti-circumvention controls. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java platform for DMA controls; Design interoperability and business-user data access evidence; Add ranking, consent, preference, or anti-circumvention audit controls; Assess gatekeeper-platform engineering evidence before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise software products, AI-enabled products, RAG assistants, AI agents, generated instructions, related services, automated updates, vulnerability handling, corrective updates, warnings, instructions, or product-safety evidence under Directive (EU) 2024/2853, the EU Product Liability Directive. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems and need a structured, repeatable ISO/IEC 25010:2023 quality-attribute review covering Functional Suitability, Performance Efficiency, Compatibility, Interaction Capability, Reliability, Security, Maintainability, Flexibility, and Safety, producing an engineering review report rather than an interactive ADR discovery. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that may support EU Market Abuse Regulation concerns, market surveillance, suspicious order and transaction reports, insider dealing controls, unlawful disclosure controls, market manipulation detection, inside information disclosure workflows, insider-list evidence, PDMR transaction notifications, alert explainability, model or rule provenance, reviewer decisions, or compliance escalation. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java trading surveillance system for MAR controls; Design suspicious order and transaction monitoring evidence; Add alert explainability and reviewer-decision audit trails; Assess AI-assisted market-abuse detection before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Neutral, framework-agnostic decision tree for project kickoff: "which agent / RAG / LLM framework should I reach for?" Synthesizes the ecosystem sections of 7 landmark-project SOPs (LangGraph, LlamaIndex, DSPy, CrewAI, vLLM, Aider, Dify) into one layered rubric. Core stance: frameworks are LAYERS, not competitors — a real project usually combines DSPy (compile) + LlamaIndex (retrieve) + LangGraph (orchestrate) + vLLM (serve), and you choose ONE per layer, not one to rule all. Use when starting any LLM/agent/RAG project, or whenever the "which framework?" question is asked. Deliberately neutral — unlike vendor docs and the LangChain-biased `framework-selection` on skill.sh, this skill has no horse in the race.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。