2,576 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Prompt engineering frameworks for building, testing, versioning, and evaluating prompts: chain-of-thought, few-shot, regression testing, and rubrics. Use when designing production prompts, running A/B tests, or building prompt libraries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Technical leadership guidance for engineering teams, architecture decisions, and technology strategy. Use when assessing technical debt, scaling engineering teams, evaluating technologies, or making architecture decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Engineer growth systems: PLG motions, referrals, viral and retention loops. "design a referral program"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ComfyUI prompt engineering knowledge covering CLIP text encoding syntax, weight modifiers, model-specific prompting strategies, and best practices
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to plan, evaluate, or build a free tool for marketing purposes — lead generation, SEO value, or brand awareness. Also use when the user mentions "engineering as marketing," "free tool," "marketing tool," "calculator," "generator," "interactive tool," "lead gen tool," "build a tool for leads," or "free resource." This skill bridges engineering and marketing — useful for founders and technical marketers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reverse-engineer successful affiliate strategies from competitors. Use this skill when the user asks about spying on competitors, researching what other affiliates promote, analyzing competitor affiliate sites, understanding how top affiliates in a niche make money, or says "what programs does X promote", "how does [site] make money", "what affiliate strategy does this site use", "spy on competitor affiliates", "reverse engineer affiliate site", "copy what works in my niche", "who are the top affiliates in X niche", "what content gets traffic in my niche", "competitor affiliate analysis".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reverse-engineer raw materials (Sparse idea, Dense idea, experimental log) from an existing AI research paper to build a benchmark case for evaluating paper-writing pipelines. Replicates the PaperWritingBench dataset construction procedure from arXiv:2604.05018 §3 / App. C. TRIGGER when the user asks to "build a benchmark case from this paper", "reverse-engineer raw materials", or "evaluate my pipeline against PaperWritingBench".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One-shot efficiency audit of a file, diff, or whole repo across BOTH axes at once: over-engineered code (reinvented stdlib, needless abstractions, speculative config) AND bloated prose (verbose comments, padded docstrings, redundant doc sections). Neither a pure code-minimizer nor a pure prose compressor does both in one pass. That's the point. Ranked report, biggest saving first; changes nothing. Use when the user says "chisle audit", "/chisle-audit", "audit this for bloat", "what can I cut", "review this PR for over-engineering and verbosity".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hire one of the eight open source AI Employees (GTM Engineer, SEO/AEO, Web Dev, Social Media, Ad Manager, Sales, Customer Satisfaction, Chief of Staff) into a local folder, prove it runs, and hand over its install prompt. Also answers which one to hire first, how a hired employee runs on a schedule, how to direct it, how it improves from corrections, and how to upgrade it. Use when the user says hire an employee, install an AI employee, set up the GTM Engineer, names one of the eight, or asks how AI Employees work. It copies files and runs self tests only. It registers no schedule and sends nothing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides reverse engineering techniques. Use when the main job is to understand how a compiled, obfuscated, packed, or virtualized target works before exploiting or solving it, including binaries, APKs, WASM, firmware, custom VMs, bytecode, malware-like loaders, and anti-debug or anti-analysis logic. Do not use it when the vulnerability is already understood and the remaining task is exploitation; use pwn instead. Do not use it for pure web workflows, log or disk forensics, or standalone crypto problems unless reversing the implementation is the real blocker.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Your software-engineering brain trust. Named personas across 11 cells covering cloud architecture, reliability/SRE/observability, data and storage, security, FinOps, languages and runtimes, systems programming, web and frontend…
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Growth engineering - PLG, referral, viral loops, onboarding optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reverse-engineer and clone a website in one shot — extracts assets, CSS, and content section-by-section and proactively dispatches parallel builder agents in worktrees as it goes. Use this whenever the user wants to clone, replicate, rebuild, reverse-engineer, or copy any website. Also triggers on phrases like "make a copy of this site", "rebuild this page", "pixel-perfect clone". Provide the target URL as an argument.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Engineer effective LLM prompts using zero-shot, few-shot, chain-of-thought, and structured output techniques. Use when building LLM applications requiring reliable outputs, implementing RAG systems, creating AI agents, or optimizing prompt quality and cost. Covers OpenAI, Anthropic, and open-source models with multi-language examples (Python/TypeScript).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ALWAYS USE for test work that requires changes: write, add, generate, repair, or strengthen tests for existing code in xUnit, MSTest, NUnit, pytest, Vitest/Jest, Go, or another framework. Includes regression cases, failing or flaky tests, coverage-driven additions, and audit-then-fix requests. Focused work stays direct; broad or multi-stage work invokes test-engineer. DO NOT USE for only running tests, analysis-only audits, framework/platform migrations, a test blocked on a missing production seam (testability-obstacle), or MSTest API/configuration corrections that do not design new cases (writing-mstest-tests). Within an active test-engineer pipeline, reuse supplied guidance and do not re-enter this skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze user-provided reference images and reverse-engineer high-fidelity AI image-generation prompts. Use when the user asks to recreate, imitate, reverse-engineer, or extract prompts from photographs, illustrations, 3D renders, products, characters, landscapes, typography, logos, posters, or other visual references. Do not use for requests that only require OCR or an ordinary image description.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that expose, exchange, store, process, export, or port data across users, businesses, connected products, cloud providers, APIs, event streams, AI data pipelines, data spaces, or SaaS platforms and need EU Data Act engineering controls. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java platform for EU Data Act controls; Design data access and portability evidence; Add data-sharing request workflows, export formats, interoperability, metadata, audit logs, cloud-switching support, non-personal data safeguards, or trade-secret handoffs; Assess Data Act engineering readiness before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement and audit privacy controls in product and infrastructure — GDPR, CCPA / CPRA, LGPD, PIPEDA. Covers data minimization, lawful basis, consent management, data subject access requests (DSARs — access, deletion, portability), data processing agreements, DPIA / TIA, breach notification timing, data classification, and the technical implementation of 'right to be forgotten' across backups, caches, analytics, and third parties. Use when the user mentions 'GDPR,' 'CCPA,' 'CPRA,' 'data privacy,' 'privacy engineering,' 'data subject access request,' 'DSAR,' 'right to deletion,' 'right to be forgotten,' 'data portability,' 'consent management,' 'cookie consent,' 'data minimization,' 'DPIA,' 'data protection impact assessment,' 'breach notification,' 'BAA,' 'DPA,' 'data processing agreement,' 'sub-processor,' 'cross-border data transfer,' 'SCCs,' or needs to implement or review privacy controls.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit iOS and Android mobile applications against OWASP MASVS / MASTG — insecure storage, weak crypto, certificate pinning, deeplinks, IPC, jailbreak/root detection, reverse-engineering resistance. Use when the user mentions 'mobile security,' 'iOS security,' 'Android security,' 'mobile audit,' 'mobile pentest,' 'MASVS,' 'MASTG,' 'certificate pinning,' 'jailbreak detection,' 'root detection,' 'deeplink,' 'URL scheme,' 'app transport security,' 'keychain,' 'keystore,' 'mobile reverse engineering,' or has a mobile app to review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Engineer and audit SIEM detection rules — log source coverage, Sigma / KQL / SPL / Elastic query authoring, MITRE ATT&CK mapping, false-positive tuning, and detection-as-code workflows. Use when the user mentions 'SIEM,' 'detection engineering,' 'detection rules,' 'Sigma,' 'KQL,' 'SPL,' 'Splunk,' 'Sentinel,' 'Elastic,' 'Wazuh,' 'Chronicle,' 'detection-as-code,' 'MITRE ATT&CK mapping,' 'log coverage,' 'alert tuning,' 'use case development,' or needs help building or improving security detections.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates entire engineering proof chain. Verifies architecture, backend maps, backend code, standardization, frontend types, infrastructure topology all compose correctly. This is the final DEPLOYMENT GATE - deployment blocked if proof chain invalid. Use when engineering thread completes all actions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master advanced prompt engineering techniques to maximize LLM performance, reliability, and controllability in production. Use when optimizing prompts, improving LLM outputs, or designing production prompt templates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deliberate-choice procedure for a medium-to-high-stakes engineering fork — when the first plausible solution (the instinct, the default next-token pull) would be costly to get wrong. Fires AUTONOMOUSLY: invoke proactively whenever a fork fits, never wait to be asked — mechanical triggers include a fix failing for the 2nd-3rd time, adding a dependency, schema/migration design, deleting or deprecating things others depend on, changing a public API, choosing an architecture or stack. Refuse the premature collapse: hold real options open (urge · contrarian · synthesis · out-of-box · intuitive dots · precedent · first-principles), ground each branch in at least one fact from outside the model (codebase, docs, benchmark, spike), future-model consequences (blast radius, reversibility, maintenance, pre-mortem), collapse by deliberate choice, then try to refute the winner before acting. Log the decision and rejected branches in docs/decision_logs/. Not for routine calls — a decision worth more than one forward pass.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Record a hard-won engineering lesson after a bug or mistake is resolved. Use when a bug resisted ATLAS until Boss's guidance cracked it, or when a long debugging hunt ended in an aha moment worth never relearning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。