518 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Identify true SEO competitors and quantify the gap, powered by the DataForSEO Labs API. Returns the top 10 competing domains by SERP overlap, with shared and unique keywords, traffic estimates, and a Competitive Score (0-100) showing how dominant the target is in its category.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
60-second SEO snapshot powered by the DataForSEO API. Three parallel calls (DataForSEO Labs domain overview, Backlinks summary, ranked keywords) for core metrics on any domain — total keywords, traffic estimate, backlinks, top rankings — without waiting for a full audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
投行并购 (投行并购 / 交易撮合 (Investment Banking M&A / Dealmaking) — 面向并购顾问、企业融资、卖方/买方交易执行的职业认知操作系统，从业者(分析师 Analyst / 经理 Associate / 副总裁 VP / 董事 Director / 董事总经理 MD / 内部公司发展 Corp Dev / PE 投资人)、想入行者、以及服务这行(法律/会计/估值/咨询)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 投行 M&A 的核心世界观分歧: **价格 vs 价值 (price 是市场愿意付的, value 是内在的, deal 在两者缝隙里成交) ⇄ 确定性 vs 最高价 (certainty of close 对卖方常胜过纸面最高报价) ⇄ 顾问/中介 vs 委托代理 (banker 是 agent, 客户利益 vs 成交费的激励冲突真实存在, 「banker 总想成交」是行业原罪批判)**; 更深层 — 「过程/竞价纪律 (controlled auction 制造竞争张力、信息不对称管理) ⇄ 关系/信任 (relationship banking、长期 coverage、reputational capital)」, 「叙事/包装 (the story, equity story, positioning) ⇄ 数字/尽调 (the numbers, diligence, quality of earnings)」, 「估值的科学外衣 (DCF/comps 的伪精确) ⇄ 谈判的真实定价 (价格由 leverage、竞争、时机决定)」; (b) 估值与分析正典 (最标准化、最易蒸出高质量+CLI 化) — DCF (折现现金流: FCF 预测/WACC 折现率/terminal value 终值/Gordon growth vs exit multiple), Comparable Companies (可比公司/trading comps: EV/EBITDA, EV/Revenue, P/E), Precedent Transactions (先例交易/deal comps: control premium 控制权溢价), LBO (杠杆收购模型: IRR/MOIC/debt schedule/sources & uses), Accretion/Dilution (增厚/摊薄分析: EPS 影响、pro forma), Sum-of-the-Parts (分部估值/SOTP), Football Field (估值区间图), Merger Model (合并模型: synergies 协同/purchase accounting/goodwill), Sensitivity/scenario; (c) 交易流程与产出物 — 卖方流程 (sell-side: teaser 简介 → NDA → CIM/IM 信息备忘录 → management presentation → IOI 意向函 → data room 数据室 → LOI/term sheet → confirmatory diligence → SPA 买卖协议 → signing → closing), 买方流程 (buy-side: thesis/sourcing → outreach → valuation → bid → exclusivity → diligence → financing → close), auction 类型 (broad/targeted/negotiated/preemptive bid); 产出物: pitchbook 推介材料、CIM、fairness opinion 公平意见、board presentation、fee letter、engagement letter; (d) 交易结构与条款 — consideration (cash/stock/mix/earnout 对赌)、deal protections (breakup fee 分手费/go-shop/no-shop/MAC 重大不利变化条款)、representations & warranties 陈述与保证、escrow 托管、working capital adjustment 营运资金调整、reverse termination fee、collar 价格区间、tender offer vs merger、hostile vs friendly、defensive tactics (poison pill 毒丸/white knight 白衣骑士/staggered board); (e) 行业结构与角色 — bulge bracket (高盛/摩根士丹利/JPM/BofA/花旗) vs elite boutique (Centerview/Evercore/Moelis/Lazard/PJT/Perella) vs middle market (Houlihan Lokey/William Blair/Harris Williams) vs regional/independent; analyst→associate→VP→director→MD 晋升金字塔; coverage (行业组) vs product (M&A/ECM/DCM/leveraged finance/restructuring); sponsors group (服务 PE); 买方包括 PE/strategic acquirer/corp dev; (f) 量化指标与节奏 — deal fee (success fee 业内通常约 1-2% 视规模递减/retainer/Lehman formula)、league table 排行榜、pitch→mandate 转化、deal velocity、hours culture (analyst 80-100h/week 文化批判)、bonus/comp 结构、deal sheet (简历上的成交清单); (g) 争议/批判 — fairness opinion 是否橡皮图章 (利益冲突: 出意见的 banker 也收成交费)、estimate 的伪精确 (DCF garbage in garbage out、假设驱动结论)、banker 永远建议成交 (deal 偏见、empire building 助推 CEO 自利并购)、协同效应系统性高估 (大量并购毁灭价值、winner's curse 赢家诅咒)、analyst 血汗工厂文化 (2021 高盛 13 人 deck 事件、过劳死争议)、advisory 价值 vs 中介寻租之争、bulge vs boutique 的利益独立性叙事 (boutique 标榜「无承销利益冲突」)、SPAC 泡沫与 de-SPAC 教训; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — 估值学派 (Aswath Damodaran 估值教父/纽大、Tim Koller McKinsey《Valuation》、McKinsey valuation 体系) vs 公司金融教科书派 (Rosenbaum & Pearl《Investment Banking》行业圣经、Brealey Myers Allen、CFI/WSP/BIWS 培训体系) vs 交易实战派 (Bruce Wasserstein《Big Deal》、Joseph Perella/Felix Rohatyn 老派 dealmaker、现代 boutique 创始人) vs 行为/批判派 (并购毁灭价值的学术证据、Damodaran 对协同/控制权溢价的批判、Matt Levine《Money Stuff》解构华尔街逻辑) vs PE/buy-side 视角 (LBO 数学、value creation 杠杆/运营/multiple expansion)。不含: 二级市场股票交易/卖方研究 (equity research)、零售财富管理/private banking、纯 ECM/IPO 承销执行 (虽相关但聚焦 M&A advisory)、纯 PE 投后运营、量化交易/对冲基金策略、纯公司财务报表会计。) Master OS — automated mastery of 投行并购 / 交易撮合 (Investment Banking M&A / Dealmaking) — 面向并购顾问、企业融资、卖方/买方交易执行的职业认知操作系统，从业者(分析师 Analyst / 经理 Associate / 副总裁 VP / 董事 Director / 董事总经理 MD / 内部公司发展 Corp Dev / PE 投资人)、想入行者、以及服务这行(法律/会计/估值/咨询)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 投行 M&A 的核心世界观分歧: **价格 vs 价值 (price 是市场愿意付的, value 是内在的, deal 在两者缝隙里成交) ⇄ 确定性 vs 最高价 (certainty of close 对卖方常胜过纸面最高报价) ⇄ 顾问/中介 vs 委托代理 (banker 是 agent, 客户利益 vs 成交费的激励冲突真实存在, 「banker 总想成交」是行业原罪批判)**; 更深层 — 「过程/竞价纪律 (controlled auction 制造竞争张力、信息不对称管理) ⇄ 关系/信任 (rela
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find opportunities to add metrics and estimate numbers when exact data unavailable
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate phased implementation roadmaps with Epic/Story/Task breakdown, effort estimates, and validation checkpoints. Use when cto-architect needs to create actionable technical roadmaps from architecture designs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Break complex tasks into 5-15 ordered steps with time estimates. Dependency order first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Forward Deployed Engineer delivery contract for AWS engagements, build-first artifacts, grounded cost estimates, Well-Architected review, evolution roadmap
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run financial calculations and scenario comparisons — tax estimates, loan comparisons, retirement projections, rent vs. buy, investment scenarios, and more. Pure math, no accounts or logins needed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Measures entropy, mutual information, KL/JS, bits-per-byte. Use when picking KL direction, comparing cross-tokenizer perplexity, trusting MI estimates, or semantic-entropy gating.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzing pre-change impact across vertical (dependency chains, files) and horizontal (pattern consistency, naming) dimensions. Use to estimate blast radius before a refactor. No code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a session report with token usage estimates, work summary, and outcomes
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design metacognitive checkpoints that prevent AI-assisted learning from bypassing genuine understanding. Use when students use AI tools and may overestimate their own comprehension.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Shape output for a reader with ADHD. Use this skill whenever responding to ANY user message including coding tasks, debugging, explanations, planning, and casual conversation. Output should lead with concrete next actions, number multi-step work, externalize state across turns, suppress tangents, give specific time estimates, and make wins visible. Trigger even on casual messages and even when the user did not explicitly ask for brevity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Breaks work into ordered tasks. Use when you have a spec or clear requirements and need to break work into implementable tasks. Use when a task feels too large to start, when you need to estimate scope, or when parallel work is possible.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Query TikTok Shop store (seller) details, retrieving a complete store profile by sellerId with total sales, multi-period (1d/7d/30d/90d) sales and GMV, followers, rating, review count, positive feedback rate, delivery rate, response rate, in-store product count, promoting creator count, promotional video count, livestream count, price range, product categories, and estimated listing time. Trigger when users mention TikTok store detail, TikTok seller detail, TikTok store analysis, TikTok store data, TikTok store profile, TikTok Shop store detail, TikTok seller detail, Nexscope store profile. Even if the user does not explicitly mention "Nexscope" or "TikTok", trigger this skill whenever their need involves querying the full detail/profile of a specific TikTok Shop store (with a known sellerId).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Break a complex task into an ordered, dependency-aware task list with estimates and verification steps. Use when a request spans multiple components or days, before starting large features, or when the user runs /plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tax optimization strategies analyzer. Identifies high-impact tax savings across tax-loss harvesting, tax-advantaged accounts (401k, IRA, HSA), Roth conversions, backdoor and mega backdoor Roth, charitable giving, business deductions, capital gains harvesting, state tax minimization, and estate tax planning. Produces FINANCE-TAXES.md with prioritized strategies and estimated annual tax savings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare health insurance plans, estimate total yearly costs, and choose coverage that fits medical usage, prescriptions, and financial risk.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Total-loss determination and settlement pricing. Triggers: "total loss valuation", "claims value", "settlement offer", "salvage estimate", "insurance claim pricing", "total loss threshold", "what's the claim worth", "settlement range", "pre-loss value", "diminished value", "total loss determination", insurance claim vehicle valuation, total-loss determination, settlement pricing, or salvage value estimation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit cloud infrastructure costs and produce a concrete optimization plan with specific changes and estimated savings. Use when asked to "how much is this costing", "reduce cloud spend", "cost optimization", "are we overpaying", "cloud bill", or "budget for this infra".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and implement an AI feature integration — model selection, architecture pattern, system prompt, data flow, error handling, cost estimate. Use when asked to "add AI to this", "LLM integration", "add Claude/GPT", or "AI-powered feature".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan and scope a project — discovery, challenge assumptions, present XS-XXL depth options with token and cost estimates. Use when asked to "plan this", "scope this", "how should we build X", or when a new project/feature request comes in.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Methods for assessing what people actually eat — 24-hour recall, food frequency questionnaires, diet diaries, biomarkers, duplicate-plate studies, and controlled feeding. Covers the relative strengths and biases of each instrument, how to choose among them for a given question, and how to interpret results in the presence of measurement error. Use when a user wants to estimate population-level intake, individual-level intake, or evaluate the plausibility of a dietary claim that depends on how intake was measured.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants a last30days-style pre-research pass in Deepline: discover the critical public, private, CRM, workflow, social, and web data sources for a research/enrichment job; compare provider coverage; estimate Deepline credit cost; recommend the source plan before building or running the workflow; or build custom language/messaging from buyer, competitor, community, and CRM evidence. Triggers: pre-research, source discovery, provider strategy, research data sources, ScrapeCreators, X/Twitter data, Reddit comments, public and private datasets, CRM data, workflow data, custom language, messaging language, pain language.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。