「evaluate」の検索結果

Fine-tune models on Microsoft Foundry using SFT (supervised), DPO (preference), or RFT (reinforcement with graders). Covers dataset preparation, training job submission, deployment, and evaluation. USE FOR: fine-tune, SFT, DPO, RFT, training data, grader, distillation, fine-tuned model, training job, large file upload, calibrate grader, deploy fine-tuned model, evaluate fine-tuned model. DO NOT USE FOR: general model deployment without fine-tuning (use deploy-model), agent creation (use agents), prompt optimization without training (use prompt-optimizer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides evaluation of RAG pipeline retrieval and generation quality. Use when evaluating a retrieval-augmented generation system, measuring retrieval quality, assessing generation faithfulness or relevance, generating synthetic QA pairs for retrieval testing, or optimizing chunking strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess physical and transition climate risk for a site, product, or portfolio with scenario-based structure. Use when asked to run a climate risk assessment, evaluate physical or transition risk, prepare TCFD/ESRS-style climate risk analysis, or assess how climate scenarios affect an asset or business. Produces a hazard-exposure-vulnerability matrix across 2030/2040/2050 horizons and labelled scenarios, with financial-impact ranges, confidence levels, and adaptation options.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design an evaluation plan for an LLM or AI feature before shipping it. Use when asked how to evaluate a prompt/model/agent, set up an eval harness, define quality metrics for an AI feature, or build a regression gate. Produces an eval plan — task definition, datasets, metrics & rubrics, baselines, automated + human evals, a pass bar, and a regression gate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate performance fairly when output is AI-assisted — what still measures the human, what now measures the tooling, and how to run the review conversation. Use when reviewing someone whose work is heavily AI-assisted, when output volume stopped meaning anything, when calibrating a team with uneven AI adoption, or when writing review criteria for the AI era. Produces review guidance: a what-measures-whom analysis, rewritten criteria, calibration rules for mixed-adoption teams, and conversation scripts. For the general review document use performance-review; for redesigning the role itself use role-redesign-for-ai.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether AI agents can actually use your product — docs, APIs, onboarding, errors, and discoverability, evaluated from a non-human user's perspective. Use when asked if a product is agent-ready, to audit a site or API for AI usability, to prepare for agentic traffic, or when agents keep failing against your product. Produces a scored readiness report with per-surface findings and a prioritised fix list. For optimising a single article for AI citation use aeo-optimizer; for designing the MCP server itself use mcp-server-spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run evaluations on Agent Skills to measure their effectiveness. USE FOR: "run skill evals", "evaluate my skill", "test skill quality", "check skill triggers", "skill compliance check", "measure skill performance", "run evals on [skill-name]", "grade skill execution". DO NOT USE FOR: writing skills (use skill-authoring), improving frontmatter (use sensei), or general testing unrelated to skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help users evaluate new opportunities, manage professional identity shifts, and transition into roles that maximize both impact and personal fulfillment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help users identify sources of durable competitive power, evaluate market threats, and design products that are uniquely differentiated rather than just better versions of existing tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to create, write, update, amend, supersede, or evaluate an ADR, architecture decision record, durable architecture decision, decision log, or baseline sync after architecture-changing work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate system boundaries and architectural tradeoffs. Use for architecture decisions, design reviews, and ADRs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates LLMs across 60+ academic benchmarks (MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, HellaSwag). Use when benchmarking model quality, comparing models, reporting academic results, or tracking training progress. Industry standard used by EleutherAI, HuggingFace, and major labs. Supports HuggingFace, vLLM, APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add a new deterministic scoring check in src/scoring/checks/ that evaluates config quality. Follows the Check[] return pattern, uses point constants from src/scoring/constants.ts, and integrates via filterChecksForTarget() in src/scoring/index.ts. Use when user says 'add scoring check', 'new check', 'modify scoring criteria', or works in src/scoring/checks/. Do NOT use for display changes or refactoring scoring logic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate URLs and tools — check vault coverage, assess relevance, recommend save or skip

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

WCAG 2.2 Accessibility Audit skill that systematically evaluates web pages against 8 core Success Criteria (1.1.1, 1.4.3, 1.4.11, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.4.3, 2.4.7, 4.1.2) using accessibility tree inspection and visual analysis. Use this skill when you need to perform accessibility testing/auditing on a live webpage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to understand how American Anthropologist (AA) evaluates a manuscript — editorial screening, anonymous peer review under an ethics of care, the four-field editorial board, decision categories, and how section choice shapes the path. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use to understand how Agricultural Systems (AgSy) evaluates a manuscript — single-anonymized peer review with a minimum of two reviewers and an editor decision, desk screening for fit and systems content, what reviewers weigh, and the rapid-review track for Perspectives. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when strengthening the reproducibility of an ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) paper or preparing for the ACM MM Reproducibility track and ACM artifact badging — capturing environments, media/data access, seeds, and multimodal pipelines so an independent reviewer can rebuild results and reach Artifacts Evaluated or Results Reproduced badges.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to understand how Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) evaluates a manuscript — triage by the joint Editors-in-Chief, double-anonymized review by interdisciplinary referees, the meaning of each decision type, and how to read the editor's letter. Explains the process; it does not draft the revision response (aos-rebuttal).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with the Associate Editor and Editor of an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review — scope alignment after a proposal is invited, what review-article referees evaluate, and revision expectations. Plans the interaction; it does not run the portal preflight (amann-submission) or draft the response letter (amann-revision).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and evaluate creators, influencers, affiliates, and UGC partners using audience fit, content fit, authentic product adjacency, engagement quality, public contactability, commerce signals, and brand-safety evidence—not follower count alone.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate whether a creator, influencer, or brand account reaches the right audience using public profile, aggregate demographic, geography, language, content, comment, and commerce signals. Use for creator comparisons, sponsorship fit, market fit, and audience-quality research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research a company's ideal customer profiles and build detailed synthetic buyer personas. Identifies 4-6 distinct buyer segments through web research, then creates rich, realistic personas with demographics, motivations, skepticism profiles, decision criteria, and language patterns. Use when you need to understand who your buyers are at a deep level — their motivations, objections, and how they evaluate solutions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end leadership change signal composite. Takes any set of companies, detects recent leadership changes (new VP+, C-suite hires and promotions), evaluates relevance to your product, and drafts personalized outreach. Uses Apollo People Search (free) for fast detection + Apollo Enrichment (1 credit/person) for employment history, start dates, LinkedIn URLs, and verified emails.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。