2,655 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Creates safety-bounded draft structures and runs local deterministic checks for clinical case, diagnostic, trial, safety, and aggregate research reports. Use only with synthetic, de-identified, or aggregate inputs and verified source-fact manifests; every output requires qualified review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cuts the next release of Prisma 8: bumps the root package.json version (on the v8 RC line: 8.0.0-rc.N → rc.N+1), propagates it to every workspace package, and opens a PR titled "chore(release): bump to <next-version>". When the maintainer merges the PR, the `Publish to npm` workflow runs automatically and ships the new version to npm under the dist-tag its shape implies (`latest`; RC releases get a pre-release GitHub Release), plus a matching GitHub Release. Also prepares the matching prisma/web docs-site PR from the same release notes, to merge once the release is published. Use when a maintainer asks to "cut the next RC", "cut the next release", "bump to the next version", "open a release PR", or "prepare a publish PR".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run assay on a web page you just wrote or changed. It opens the page in a real browser, drives every control, and reports where the page contradicts itself. Deterministic, no API key, no network.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous agents are AI systems that can independently decompose goals, plan actions, execute tools, and self-correct without constant human guidance. The challenge isn't making them capable - it's making them reliable. Every extra decision multiplies failure probability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reduce time-to-first-API-call (TTFAC) by optimizing every step of the developer onboarding journey. This skill covers authentication simplification, sandbox environments, interactive documentation, and identifying and eliminating common failure points.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The AI native file format. EXIF for AI — stamps every file with trust scores, source provenance, and compliance metadata. Embeds into 20+ formats (DOCX, PDF, images, code). EU AI Act, SOX, HIPAA auditing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Every product will be AI-powered. The question is whether you'll build it right or ship a demo that falls apart in production.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Memory is the cornerstone of intelligent agents. Without it, every interaction starts from zero. This skill covers the architecture of agent memory: short-term (context window), long-term (vector stores), and the cognitive architectures that organize them.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Replace the manual commit-by-commit classification step in `breeze release-management prepare-provider-documentation` with AI-driven classification. For each provider with pending changes, analyze every PR (batched into one sub-agent per provider, not one per PR), pay special attention to potentially breaking changes by inspecting the actual diff, scope multi-provider PRs to the current provider's slice, ask the release manager when uncertain, and apply version bumps + changelog entries. Use during the regular provider release cycle as an alternative to the interactive breeze prompts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Snapshot of a single wallet's token holdings on a specific chain — list of every token currently held with name, symbol, current price, 24h price change, and holding quantity. Use when the user provides an explicit wallet address (or says "my wallet") and wants the current portfolio: "what does 0x... hold", "wallet balance breakdown", "list positions for this address", "what tokens are in this wallet", "show me the holdings of <address>".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decides what information belongs on a resume or CV, what to leave off and in what order, and audits an existing resume against those norms. Covers every section (contact details, photo, summary, experience, education and GPA, skills, languages, references), candidate situations (new grad, career change, gaps, layoffs, veterans, academic, visa and more) and country and industry norms. Use when the user asks "what should I put on my resume", "what should I leave off", "should I include my photo / GPA / date of birth", "how do I show a gap", "summary or objective?", "how long should my CV be", "CV for a job in Dubai / Germany", "I'm moving to another country, what should I change", "what to put on my resume as a veteran" or "audit / review my resume". Works with pasted text or the Reactive Resume MCP server. For rewriting bullets use resume-bullet-writer; for fitting a resume to one job posting use resume-tailor; for building a new resume as JSON use resume-builder.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematically explore and test a web application to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to "dogfood", "QA", "exploratory test", "find issues", "bug hunt", "test this app/site/platform", or review the quality of a web application. Produces a structured report with full reproduction evidence -- step-by-step screenshots, repro videos, and detailed repro steps for every issue -- so findings can be handed directly to the responsible teams.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reverse-engineer a website's internal API by recording browser traffic into a HAR file, then generate a standalone client or CLI that calls the endpoints directly, with no browser needed after the first recording. Use when asked to "derive a client", "build a CLI for <site>", "reverse engineer this site's API", "record network requests", "turn this site into an API", or when the same site will be automated repeatedly and direct HTTP calls would beat driving the browser every time.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hands-on workshop — the learner works through the course instead of watching it, with an exercise or a check every couple of pages, short slides that only set up the next task, guiding narration that asks more than it tells, and a closing page where the pieces come together in one small project. Use when the ask is a workshop, a bootcamp session, 「动手」「实操」「练中学」「边做边学」, or a skill the learner is meant to leave holding; also use when the user names this style. Not for a systematic explanatory course (that is `lecture-style`) and not for occupational procedure training with tools and safety gates (that is `vocational`).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Courses whose content rests on current, external or real-world facts that must be verified against live sources before being taught — recent events, market or policy data, product and version specifics, scientific developments, named cases. Researches the topic first, keeps a claim-to-source ledger, and grounds the outline and every page in what was actually fetched. Use when the request depends on up-to-date or externally checkable facts; not for timeless textbook topics that stand on established knowledge alone.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build the evaluation harness that gates every fine-tuning run — golden sets, per-failure-mode graders, judge calibration, and base-model baselines. Use when starting a fine-tuning effort, when converting traces into an eval set, or when calibrating a judge against human labels.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when maintaining a durable Markdown knowledge store that agents compile from sources, when every number or quote in a wiki page must trace back to an immutable source, or when compiled pages need cheap drift detection against the code they describe. Teaches the raw/wiki/archive layout, per-claim provenance links, and git fingerprints for zero-token staleness checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Visual whiteboard collaboration for Copilot CLI. Creates an interactive whiteboard that opens in your browser — draw, sketch, add sticky notes, then share everything back with Copilot. Copilot sees your drawings and text, and responds with analysis, suggestions, and ideas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plain-English translation layer for non-technical Copilot CLI users. Translates every approval prompt, error message, and technical output into clear, jargon-free English with color-coded risk indicators.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mistake-proof code so misuse cannot be expressed, rather than warning against it. Use when designing an interface, schema, or state machine and the user wants it hard to get wrong ("make invalid states unrepresentable", "so callers cannot screw it up", "type-safe API", "pit of success"); when auditing existing code for footguns ("what could bite us here", "what is easy to misuse", "poka-yoke this repo", "review this diff for ways to get it wrong"); or when a bug has recurred and the fix must close the class rather than the case ("make sure this never happens again", "this is the third time"). Especially for money, auth, permissions, deletion, migrations, and pipelines where failure is silent. Classifies every finding by what happens when the mistake occurs and how the device notices, which is what keeps it from collapsing into generic code review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
All changes to code must follow the guidance documented in the repository. Before any issue is filed, branch is made, commits generated, or pull request (or PR) created, a search must be done to ensure the right steps are followed. Whenever asked to create an issue, commit messages, to push code, or create a PR, use this skill so everything is done correctly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Document analysis with inline source screenshots. When you ask Copilot to analyze a document, Eyeball generates a Word doc where every factual claim includes a highlighted screenshot from the source material so you can verify it with your own eyes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Copilot left 14 review comments on your PR — half are nits. Hours of fix → reply → resolve → re-request, and each round lands MORE comments. This skill runs loop engineering: auto-triggers Copilot Code Review via GraphQL (no @copilot mention), triages every open thread (Copilot, humans, advanced-security) with a fix / decline / escalate rubric, dispatches parallel fix sub-agents that obey the repo build/test/lint conventions, commits per iteration, replies+resolves citing the pushed SHA, then re-triggers until HEAD is reviewed with zero threads awaiting the agent's reply (remaining open threads are explicit hand-offs to the human — escalated declines, design tradeoffs). You merge a clean PR; the bot runs it. Trigger phrases: "address copilot comments", "run a copilot review loop", "fix this PR", "iterate on copilot feedback". Repo-agnostic, gh CLI + PowerShell. Full autopilot needs repo Triage/Write; external PR authors get single-iteration mode plus manual re-trigger (UI 🔄 or substantive-commit push).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cross-session environment retrospective driven by OMC's own instrumentation — trace timelines, friction reports, logs, and plan notepads. Every finding lands on the surface that owns the fix (deterministic check, steering volume, tooling, or information access); nothing is written without user approval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。