「exploit」の検索結果

Look up Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) with severity scores, affected software, exploitability status, and remediation guidance. Essential for security research, vulnerability management, and patch prioritization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search NCBI databases using Biopython Bio.Entrez (ESearch, EInfo, EGQuery, ESpell). Use when finding records by keyword, building reproducible field-qualified queries, navigating the Entrez Query Translator, exploiting the history server for large result sets, handling retmax caps, or interpreting weekly index lag. Covers PubMed, Nucleotide, Protein, Gene, SRA, GEO, Assembly, Taxonomy, ClinVar, dbSNP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security audit of a codebase — web apps, APIs, services, CLI tools, libraries, daemons, and more. Use when asked to find security bugs, do a security review, audit for vulnerabilities, or pen-test the code. Focuses on exploitable issues with real impact, not theoretical concerns or industry-standard behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routes reverse engineering, exploitation, penetration testing, malware, mobile, firmware, browser automation, documentation, and security tasks to the appropriate specialist skill. Use when a task spans modules or the correct reverse-skill entrypoint is unclear.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security forensics for git repos, AI skills, and MCP servers. Audits dependencies, detects prompt injection, credential theft, runtime dynamism, manifest drift, known CVEs, CISA KEV (actively exploited) vulns, and 2026 attack patterns. Not for fixing vulnerabilities or pentesting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writing, exploit; assemble raw material into a journey of beats, grounding each term before a beat leans on it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writing, exploit: shape raw material into an article, paragraph by paragraph.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AWS Penetration Testing workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Provide comprehensive techniques for penetration testing AWS cloud environments. Covers IAM enumeration, privilege escalation, SSRF to metadata endpoint, S3 bucket exploitation, Lambda code extraction, and persistence techniques for red team operations and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AWS Penetration Testing workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Provide comprehensive techniques for penetration testing AWS cloud environments. Covers IAM enumeration, privilege escalation, SSRF to metadata endpoint, S3 bucket exploitation, Lambda code extraction, and persistence techniques for red team operations and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

API Fuzzing for Bug Bounty workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Provide comprehensive techniques for testing REST, SOAP, and GraphQL APIs during bug bounty hunting and penetration testing engagements. Covers vulnerability discovery, authentication bypass, IDOR exploitation, and API-specific attack vectors and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

API Fuzzing for Bug Bounty workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Provide comprehensive techniques for testing REST, SOAP, and GraphQL APIs during bug bounty hunting and penetration testing engagements. Covers vulnerability discovery, authentication bypass, IDOR exploitation, and API-specific attack vectors and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the reasoning of David Silver, lead researcher on AlphaGo and AlphaZero at DeepMind, to problems of AI design, reinforcement learning, and open-ended discovery. Use this skill whenever you are designing AI systems, evaluating learning algorithms, balancing exploration vs. exploitation, choosing research problems, or discussing how to break past human performance ceilings. Reach for this whenever the user asks about self-play, Monte-Carlo Tree Search, tabula rasa learning, AGI, or moving from human-curated data to autonomous experience. It helps shift the focus from hardcoding human knowledge to building systems that learn for themselves.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the diff changes a GitHub Actions workflow, a reusable action, a Dockerfile or compose file, Terraform/HCL, Kubernetes manifests or Helm values, or a cloud OIDC trust policy - judged only where concretely exploitable

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you have a candidate security finding and before it goes in a comment - restate it, prove reachability, impact and a concrete exploit, apply triage dismissals, then the self-refute pass naming attacker and victim

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit the game for security vulnerabilities: save tampering, cheat vectors, network exploits, data exposure, and input validation gaps. Produces a prioritised security report with remediation guidance. Run before any public release or multiplayer launch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzing code statically for security flaws: hardcoded secrets, SQL injection, input validation, security headers, dependency CVEs. Not for runtime exploit checks (Probe) or code review (Judge).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-driven dynamic security fuzzing, exploit generation (XSS, SQLi, SSRF, Prompt Injection), and automated patch remediation / Fuzzing keamanan dinamis berbasis AI, eksploitasi, dan remediasi otomatis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Vocabulary learning strategies and retention science for any language -- frequency-based word selection, spaced repetition systems (Ebbinghaus forgetting curve, Leitner system, SM-2 algorithm), cognate exploitation, word family networks, context-based learning, collocations, depth of word knowledge (form, meaning, use), reading progression from controlled to authentic texts, and productive vs. receptive vocabulary thresholds. Use when building vocabulary plans, optimizing review schedules, selecting learning materials, or diagnosing vocabulary gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic departures from rational choice theory and their implications for economic analysis and policy. Covers cognitive heuristics (anchoring, availability, representativeness), biases (loss aversion, status quo, overconfidence), prospect theory (reference dependence, probability weighting, diminishing sensitivity), nudge theory and choice architecture, and the integration of psychological findings into economic models. Use when analyzing decision-making under uncertainty, evaluating policy interventions that exploit behavioral patterns, or assessing where standard rational-agent models break down.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for Deepline GTM work that searches, enriches, scores, collects signals, or automates a workflow: find companies or people, enrich a CSV, find emails or LinkedIn, compare providers, build a waterfall, create a webhook or cron, or write a Play. For live information work, run a small heterogeneous experiment, exploit the observed winner, and reopen misses. Skip pure copywriting and non-GTM research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security audit and code review checklist. Covers 30+ vulnerability types with real-world exploit cases (2021-2026) and EVMbench Code4rena patterns. Use when conducting security audits, code reviews, or pre-deployment security assessments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use after an Anabasis v2 comparison, checkpoint or system change, and before any sentence claims that a harness, a model or a patch improved something. States what one reading may be said to show: the identities it was made under, the counts kept apart, whether it was repeated, which part of a harness it belongs to, whether a mechanism was live in the run, and whether the measurement is valid as distinct from whether it was exploited. Ends in one fixed report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Default entrypoint and master ctf-sandbox-orchestrator workflow for CTF, exploit, reverse engineering, DFIR, pwnable, crypto, stego, mobile, AI-agent, cloud, container, Active Directory, Windows-host, and identity challenges. Use first when the user presents challenge infrastructure, binaries, prompts, hosts, or identities that should be treated as sandbox-internal by default and Codex needs to choose, route, and load the right downstream analysis path with concise evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute comprehensive client-side injection vulnerability assessments on web applications to identify XSS and HTML injection flaws, demonstrate exploitation techniques for session hijacking and credential theft, and validate input sanitization and output encoding mechanisms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。