「fact」の検索結果

Generate beautiful, on-brand HTML artifacts — reports, diagrams, diff reviews, slide decks, plans, recaps, dashboards. Loads on creation intents ("create a plan", "make me an implementation plan", "generate a diagram", "build a slide deck", "draft a recap", "visualize this", "render this as HTML", "make me a status update") and exploration intents ("show me three layouts", "explore document shapes", "compare visual treatments", "explore a new design system", "compare replacement brand directions") and iteration intents ("make this beautiful", "polish this report", "make this less generic", "design this", "theme this", "use my brand", "iterate on this design", "review this artifact", "make this bolder", "make this quieter", "simplify this design", "animate this", "improve the look of", "give this a refresh"). Captures brand from the user's codebase, asking, or live site, then applies it to every artifact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinate multi-agent work through durable artifacts in git instead of chat. Use this whenever a task involves sending a message to another agent, agent mailboxes or handoffs, claiming work from a shared queue, notifying another agent or crew (OpenClaw, Grok Bot, Claude Code, Codex, Gas Town/Gas City workers) that work is ready, or whenever the user mentions the artifact bus, message bus, agent mail, beads mail, doorbells, or pings between agents — even if they don't say "bus" explicitly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, write, and maintain automated tests in any language, with worked examples in Python and JavaScript/TypeScript. Use this skill whenever the user wants to write or plan tests, apply TDD (red-green-refactor), structure unit tests with arrange-act-assert and given-when-then naming, choose between fakes, stubs, and mocks, set up dependency injection for testability, build integration tests with testcontainers, database seeding, or transaction rollback, write Playwright or Cypress end-to-end tests, use property-based testing with Hypothesis or fast-check, create pytest fixtures or factory_boy factories, review coverage or mutation testing, or triage flaky tests in CI. Also trigger for "test pyramid", "test trophy", "test isolation", "mocking", "snapshot tests", "golden files", "parametrized tests", "make the tests pass".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user says 'refactor this', 'rename class', or 'move method'. Safely refactors code in any language — finds all callers, updates downstream dependencies, verifies via quality tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orientação especializada para fine-tuning de LLMs com LLaMA-Factory - WebUI sem código, 100+ modelos, QLoRA 2/3/4/5/6/8-bit, suporte multimodal

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploy Cisco Duo multi-factor authentication across enterprise applications, VPN, RDP, and SSH access points. This skill covers Duo integration methods, adaptive authentication policies, device trust

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parses and analyzes the Windows Amcache.hve registry hive to extract evidence of program execution, application installation, and driver loading for digital forensics investigations. Uses Eric Zimmerman's AmcacheParser and Timeline Explorer for artifact extraction, SHA-1 hash correlation with threat intel, and timeline reconstruction. Activates for requests involving Amcache forensics, program execution evidence, Windows artifact analysis, or application compatibility cache investigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Examine Linux system artifacts including auth logs, cron jobs, shell history, and system configuration to uncover evidence of compromise or unauthorized activity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refactor Swift code toward declarative functional programming with immutability, value types, pure functions, transformations, and closure-based APIs. Use when asked for functional refactoring or `/refactor:functional`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refactor a class toward the Single Responsibility Principle by identifying responsibilities, grouping cohesive behavior, and extracting focused classes. Use when the user says `/srp`, asks for SRP refactoring, or runs `/refactor:srp`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan a refactor as a sequence of tiny safe commits via interview and codebase exploration. Use when restructuring working code, or when the user says 'plan a refactor'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Récupérer les preuves d'un courrier envoyé via l'API Merci Facteur avec getProof — preuve de dépôt, avis de réception signé, preuve de téléchargement d'un recommandé électronique. Utiliser quand il s'agit de récupérer, télécharger, archiver ou afficher un AR, une preuve de dépôt ou un justificatif d'envoi, ou de savoir si un recommandé a été distribué.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Envoyer un vrai courrier papier — lettre PDF, carte illustrée (carte postale, carte pliée, carte carrée, carte géante), suivi, recommandé avec accusé de réception, recommandé électronique eIDAS — depuis une application, via l'API Merci Facteur. Utiliser dès qu'il s'agit d'envoyer, poster, imprimer ou expédier du courrier physique depuis du code, d'envoyer une carte depuis une application, de brancher un envoi postal sur un événement, un formulaire, un cron ou un webhook, ou de déboguer un appel sendCourrier. Couvre le contrat exact, les pièges de nommage qui font échouer l'appel, l'idempotence et le comportement en cas d'échec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Annuler un envoi de courrier papier déjà validé via l'API Merci Facteur (deleteEnvoi). Utiliser quand il s'agit d'annuler, supprimer, stopper, rappeler ou rembourser un courrier envoyé par erreur, d'implémenter une fenêtre d'annulation dans une application, ou de comprendre pourquoi une annulation n'a été que partielle. Couvre le contrat deleteEnvoi, l'irréversibilité de l'opération et les quatre issues possibles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the FAA Human Factors Design Standard (HF-STD-001B, 2016) — the FAA's consolidated human-factors / human-systems-integration design criteria for systems it manages, operates, or maintains. Use for requirement-level design rules on: general human-factors design principles; automation and function allocation; designing equipment for maintenance; displays, controls, and visual indicators; alarms, audio, and voice communications; the computer-human interface (information presentation, coding, interaction styles, windows, dialogue); keyboards, input devices, and workstation/workplace ergonomics; system security, personnel safety, environment, anthropometry, and user documentation; plus intended-use and tailoring guidance. It is a quantified, source-attributed synthesis (heavily citing MIL-STD-1472G, MIL-HDBK-759C, DOD-HFDG-ATCCS, NUREG-0700, NASA-STD-3000, ANSI, OSHA, ISO 9241). Complements nasa-hsi as a parallel HSI tradition from the civil-aviation domain. Scope limits: it is design criteria, NOT an HSI lifecycle/process model (use nasa-hsi, nasa-npr-7123, or dau-se-guidebook for process); it does NOT reproduce the third-party standards it cites; it is FAA-acquisition-oriented (ATC, towers, TRACONs, airway facilities), not a general consumer-UX guide; and it is thin on modern touchscreen/mobile, web, and AI-driven interface patterns and on quantitative human-reliability analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ローカルの差分・ファイルを対象に、機能要件とは別のリファクタリング提案を出す。レビューの完了阻害判定とは分け、保守性の改善候補を必要な場合だけ扱う。ユーザーが /refactor-advisor と入力したら使う。

Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state manag

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

リファクタリングを「更新されたチームの理解と、コードが表現する過去の理解の差分同期」と捉え、今回得た新知識（要求・ドメイン知識・制約）が naming と responsibility へ反映されているか、boundary が現在の understanding を表現しているか、diff の削除行やコメントに現れる過去の design history と constraint を失っていないかを diff-time で確認する。Knowledge Delta の signal は diff（追加/削除された hunk・コメント・ADR 参照）を一次情報とし、PR 本文が供給されるときは補助に用い、不確実なら question に留める。ドメイン用語の一貫性は ubiquitous-language-naming、集約/コンテキスト境界の設計判断は bounded-context-language、投機的抽象化・caller special-case は altitude-generalization、スコープ逸脱/前提破壊は fix-scope-integrity、振る舞い変更と構造変更の分離は behavior-structure-separation、完了主張の反証は refactor-claim-audit へ委譲する

リファクタリング（構造変更）と機能変更（behavior change）が同一 diff に混在していないかを識別し、structural change に対する external behavior preservation の証拠（テスト・型・静的解析）が揃っているかを diff-time で確認する。証拠不足のときは Characterization Test 追加を促すか question とする。DTO/公開 API の破壊的変更検出は api-compatibility、完了主張の反証や抽出リファクタの性能特性退行は refactor-claim-audit、新知識の命名・責務・境界への反映は knowledge-to-code-alignment、投機的抽象化・スコープ逸脱は altitude-generalization / fix-scope-integrity へ委譲する

敵対的分析手法を統合したレビューの entry skill。認知バイアス対策の3手法 （Pre-mortem / War Game / Logic Torturing）と、宣言・主張と実態の乖離を突く claim-vs-actual 検出3パターン（Self-Contradiction / Refactor-Claim Audit / Cross-File Leakage）へルーティングし、通常のレビューでは見えない設計の盲点・ 防御の穴・論理の弱点・宣言と実装のズレを可視化する。

TidyFactor Design track — code-native UI design lifecycle engine (Figma alternative). Supports all 7 stages of UI design (Discovery, Foundation, Architecture, Components, Motion, Quality, Delivery) with zero per-page CSS/JS and zero build step. Pluggable CSS foundations (Native, Tailwind utility-first, daisyUI, Hybrid, shadcn, Pico, Bootstrap, Alpine) and full Arabic/RTL support (El Messiri/Tajawal, never Amiri above 24px). Trigger on commands "study", "brief", "init", "brand", "typography", "school", "tokens", "palette", "assets", "layout", "nav-footer", "components", "page", "dashboard", "motion", "states", "flow", "i18n", "perf", "audit", "clone", "retrofit", "handoff", "deploy", or requests like "build a design system", "UI design lifecycle", "prototype this website", "Figma alternative", "نموذج أولي تفاعلي", "صمّم لوحة تحكم".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are a code refactoring expert specializing in clean code principles, SOLID design patterns, and modern software engineering best practices. Analyze and refactor the provided code to improve its...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when running the dev Grafana stack and/or the Playwright e2e suite against a *packaged* plugin zip (a release/RC artifact like `hydrolix-hydrolix-datasource-<ver>.zip`) rather than the working-tree `dist/`. Unpacks the package into a timestamped `dist_<timestamp>/dist` sandbox alongside copies of the compose artifacts, so the run is reproducible and the folder stays available to experiment with afterwards. Delegates stack bring-up to `stack-run` (frozen mode: read-only mount + `DEV=false` so the mage-watcher can't rebuild the packaged Go binary), verifies signature/version, runs the suite, and treats cleanup as optional — the sandbox is deleted only with the user's approval. Apply whenever the task is "test this plugin package / zip" or "run e2e against the built artifact".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply Gang of Four design patterns to solve architectural problems in TypeScript. Use when refactoring code architecture, implementing extensible systems, decoupling components, or following SOLID principles. Covers all 22 GoF patterns: Creational (Factory Method, Abstract Factory, Builder, Prototype, Singleton), Structural (Adapter, Bridge, Composite, Decorator, Facade, Flyweight, Proxy), and Behavioral (Chain of Responsibility, Command, Iterator, Mediator, Memento, Observer, State, Strategy, Template Method, Visitor).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。