1,927 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Python resilience patterns including automatic retries, exponential backoff, timeouts, and fault-tolerant decorators. Use when adding retry logic, implementing timeouts, building fault-tolerant services, or handling transient failures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convert evaluation traces and production logs into SFT examples and preference pairs. Use when graded traces or failure examples exist and need to become training data, when applying rejection sampling to model outputs, or when building DPO pairs from passing and failing runs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when debugging active macOS connectivity failures, when an API or MCP service times out or disconnects, when DNS resolution is failing or inconsistent, or when video calls or other interactive traffic show packet loss or latency. Isolate local-LAN, DNS, upstream-path, and remote-service/application fault domains with built-in, non-destructive tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Preflight and diagnose the ten known failure modes for ML training on NVIDIA DGX Spark. Use when a training run on DGX Spark fails to start, OOMs below the 128GB limit, slows down mid-run, or before any multi-hour training job on GB10.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test Temporal workflows with pytest, time-skipping, and mocking strategies. Covers unit testing, integration testing, replay testing, and local development setup. Use when implementing Temporal workflow tests or debugging test failures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mistake-proof code so misuse cannot be expressed, rather than warning against it. Use when designing an interface, schema, or state machine and the user wants it hard to get wrong ("make invalid states unrepresentable", "so callers cannot screw it up", "type-safe API", "pit of success"); when auditing existing code for footguns ("what could bite us here", "what is easy to misuse", "poka-yoke this repo", "review this diff for ways to get it wrong"); or when a bug has recurred and the fix must close the class rather than the case ("make sure this never happens again", "this is the third time"). Especially for money, auth, permissions, deletion, migrations, and pipelines where failure is silent. Classifies every finding by what happens when the mistake occurs and how the device notices, which is what keeps it from collapsing into generic code review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify an MCP server before release by exercising a real protocol session, comparing runtime capabilities with source and documentation, testing failure paths, and recording reproducible evidence. Use when shipping or reviewing an MCP server, tool, resource, prompt, catalog, or install path.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pro+ subscription required. Tenant-wide Power Automate monitoring using the FlowStudio MCP cached store: failure rates, run-health trends, maker/app inventory, inactive owners, and compliance/health reports. Use only for aggregated tenant views. For one environment, one flow, run control, or root-cause debugging, use flowstudio-power-automate-mcp, flowstudio-power-automate-debug, or the server monitor-flow bundle. Requires FlowStudio for Teams or MCP Pro+.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Retrieve and apply OpenViking Experience memories through the Agent runtime's generic OpenViking search and read tools. Use before or during executable, multi-step, or tool-based work such as coding, file or data changes, configuration, deployment, workflow execution, and failure recovery when prior operational guidance could improve reliability. Do not use for casual chat or simple factual questions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Solve competition math problems (IMO, Putnam, USAMO, AIME) with adversarial verification that catches the errors self-verification misses. Activates when asked to 'solve this IMO problem', 'prove this olympiad inequality', 'verify this competition proof', 'find a counterexample', 'is this proof correct', or for any problem with 'IMO', 'Putnam', 'USAMO', 'olympiad', or 'competition math' in it. Uses pure reasoning (no tools) — then a fresh-context adversarial verifier attacks the proof using specific failure patterns, not generic 'check logic'. Outputs calibrated confidence — will say 'no confident solution' rather than bluff. If LaTeX is available, produces a clean PDF after verification passes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate consistently failing SGLang CI tests by extracting the failure signature from scheduled or rerun workflows, bisecting the passing/failing commit window, checking runner or hardware specificity, and optionally reproducing on a remote GPU host.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Start and persistently pursue a goal to babysit an SGLang pull request until selected GitHub Actions workflows pass on the latest PR head. Use when asked to monitor, babysit, retry, or fix PR CI for lint.yml, pr-test.yml, pr-test-extra.yml, AMD, or other named workflows; classify failures as PR-related versus flaky or infrastructural, auto-fix and push only small clean fixes, rerun failed jobs only up to 10 times, and ignore unselected workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Replay-first debug flow for SGLang serving problems. Use when a live or recent server shows health-check failures, latency or throughput regressions, queue growth, timeouts, distributed stalls, crash dumps, wrong outputs after deploys, or PD/EP/HiCache issues, and the job is to turn the problem into a replay plus the right next debug tool.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide to SGLang CI workflow orchestration — stage ordering, fail-fast, gating, partitioning, execution modes, and debugging CI failures. Use when modifying CI workflows, adding stages, debugging CI pipeline issues, or understanding how tests are dispatched and gated across stages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Named investor reasoning frameworks packaged as reusable analytical lenses — 12 lenses (deep value, quality franchise, inversion, scuttlebutt growth, GARP, cycle positioning, debt cycle, forensic short, cost drag, right-business, weak-system contrarian, three questions) that stack on top of evidence already gathered, each with ordered priority signals, hard disqualifiers, and documented failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect RDP brute force attacks by parsing Windows Security Event Logs (EVTX files, via python-evtx) for failed logon patterns (Event ID 4625, Logon Type 10/3), correlating with successful logons (Event ID 4624), and analyzing NLA failures and source IP frequency. Use when investigating exposed RDP endpoints, building SIEM detection rules for credential guessing, or confirming whether a compromised account followed a brute-force pattern.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous agents are AI systems that can independently decompose goals, plan actions, execute tools, and self-correct without constant human guidance. The challenge isn't making them capable - it's making them reliable. Every extra decision multiplies failure probability. This skill covers agent loops (ReAct, Plan-Execute), goal decomposition, reflection patterns, and production reliability. Key insight: compounding error rates kill autonomous agents. A 95% success rate per step drops to 60% b
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Skill validation framework PLUS daily test-suite health and regression intelligence. Validates skill conformance (frontmatter, manifest coverage, resolver coverage). Runs the project test suite in tiered phases (unit / evals / integration / system health), classifies failures, and produces a regression-aware report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate and auto-repair YAML frontmatter on brain pages. Catches malformed pages before they enter the brain (missing closing ---, nested quotes, slug mismatches, null bytes, empty frontmatter, YAML parse failures), explains files sync holds instead of importing, and drives the previewed `gbrain repair frontmatter` fix. Wraps the `gbrain frontmatter` CLI for agent-driven workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reference skill for Zoom authentication. Use after routing to an auth workflow when choosing app credentials, grant types, scopes, token refresh behavior, or debugging Zoom OAuth failures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement Zoom authentication correctly. Use when setting up app credentials, choosing an OAuth grant, requesting scopes, handling token refresh, or debugging auth failures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debug a broken Zoom integration by isolating the failure point and routing into the right Zoom references. Use when auth, API, webhook, SDK, or MCP behavior is failing and you need a ranked hypothesis list plus verification steps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use early when debugging a medium or hard bug, especially when tests alone may not reveal the real runtime failure. Trigger this before extended TDD iteration when a bug involves runtime state, ordering, persistence, streaming, concurrency, UI/manual reproduction, external services, or when a red or newly passing test may not model the real issue. Skip only when the root cause is already directly proven by a stack trace or deterministic test that exercises the real runtime path.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Classify a bounded batch of stale PR CI failures and choose the safest response.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。