994 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Investigates network, streaming and protocol failures with falsification-first layered experiments, the general fallback for unknown root causes. Use for ECONNRESET / RST_STREAM / SSE stalls, CDN/CGNAT timeouts or certificate errors, throughput collapse where everything returns 200 but transfers crawl, or LAN identity/topology mysteries. Not for known Tailscale/TUN/DNS/proxy-path conflicts (use tunnel-doctor).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ships pull requests to open-source projects you don't maintain — CONTRIBUTING compliance, PR-size/scope checks, minimal-diff implementation, AI-disclosure PR descriptions, and rebase or bot-review replies. Use for 提 PR / 上游 PR / 贡献代码, "open a PR", "fix this upstream", "rebase against main", "respond to the bot review". Not for reviewing PRs as maintainer (use github-review-pr) or general GitHub CRUD (use github-ops).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verifies factual claims in documents using web search and official sources, then proposes corrections with user confirmation. Use when the user asks to fact-check, verify information, validate claims, check accuracy, or update outdated information in documents. Supports AI model specs, technical documentation, statistics, and general factual statements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Respond to a brand or executive impersonation incident — deepfaked executives, cloned support lines, fake apps, spoofed domains, or AI-generated scam content wearing your name. Use when a deepfake of a leader is circulating, customers report a fake version of your product or support channel, or to prepare the impersonation playbook before it happens. Produces an incident response: verification protocol, takedown sequencing by platform, customer and public communications, and the hardening plan. For general crisis comms use press-release/pm-crisis skills; for security incidents inside your systems use security-incident-response.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Redesign seat-based pricing for the agent era — when one human runs ten agents, per-seat models collapse. Use when agents are eroding seat counts, when asked to migrate to usage- or outcome-based pricing, to price an agent/API tier, or to defend revenue as customers automate their own usage. Produces a pricing migration plan: the new value metric, fences, agent-tier design, cannibalisation math, and a phased migration for existing customers. For general pricing and packaging strategy use pricing-strategy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review AI-authored code for its characteristic failure modes — plausible-but-wrong logic, hallucinated APIs, over-engineering, dead scaffolding, and silent security shortcuts. Use when reviewing an AI-generated or heavily AI-assisted PR, when AI-written code keeps shipping subtle bugs, or when setting review standards for a team using coding agents. Produces a focused review with AI-specific findings, verification steps per risk class, and a team checklist for AI-authored changes. For general PR review use code-review-checklist — this skill covers what that one assumes a human wouldn't do.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate performance fairly when output is AI-assisted — what still measures the human, what now measures the tooling, and how to run the review conversation. Use when reviewing someone whose work is heavily AI-assisted, when output volume stopped meaning anything, when calibrating a team with uneven AI adoption, or when writing review criteria for the AI era. Produces review guidance: a what-measures-whom analysis, rewritten criteria, calibration rules for mixed-adoption teams, and conversation scripts. For the general review document use performance-review; for redesigning the role itself use role-redesign-for-ai.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run evaluations on Agent Skills to measure their effectiveness. USE FOR: "run skill evals", "evaluate my skill", "test skill quality", "check skill triggers", "skill compliance check", "measure skill performance", "run evals on [skill-name]", "grade skill execution". DO NOT USE FOR: writing skills (use skill-authoring), improving frontmatter (use sensei), or general testing unrelated to skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interactive workflow partner for creating, testing, and improving AI agent skills with waza. USE FOR: run my evals, check my skill, compare models, create eval suite, debug failing tests, is my skill ready, ship readiness, interpret results, improve score. DO NOT USE FOR: general coding, non-skill work, writing skill content (use skill-authoring), improving frontmatter only (use sensei).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create visual concepts, image-generation prompts, and optional AI-generated images for product hero images, marketing creatives, social posts, ads, ecommerce PDP visuals, and general visual design tasks. Use when the user asks for visual strategy, image prompt writing, product/marketing image direction, or direct text-to-image generation. In Codex environments use the built-in imagegen tool; elsewhere use the bundled script backed by the apiz CLI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manipulate PDF files — extract text, count pages, render thumbnails, merge or split documents. Use for PDF-specific operations that don't fit `markdown-converter` (general read) or `pandic-office` (write from markdown).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to create, convert, style, animate, export, share, or deploy HTML slide decks, presentations, pitch decks, talks, or keynotes; including zero-dependency or single-file output, PowerPoint/PPT/PPTX input, PDF export, browser delivery, visual style exploration, or "loopy slides". Not for general web pages or landing pages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coordinate coding agents through AMQ. Use for agent messages, inboxes, receipts, sessions, wake delivery, cross-project routing, managed launches, or AMQ diagnostics. Use amq-spec for collaborative design; do not use this for general message queues or single-agent work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review generated or changed test code against universal testing rules before it ships. Best used reactively after an agent writes, edits, generates, or refactors tests, before presenting, committing, or merging them. Use for pytest (test_*.py, *_test.py), PHPUnit/Pest (*Test.php), Jest/Vitest (*.test.ts, *.spec.js), Go (*_test.go), files under tests/, __tests__/, or spec/, and review requests like 'write tests for X', 'add tests', 'test this', 'review these tests', or PR diffs containing tests. Can also guide test writing when explicitly invoked before the work. This skill is the quality gate that prevents AI-generated test bloat. DO NOT USE for production or implementation code review (use clean-code-guard), CI or test-runner configuration, running or debugging tests, or general architecture discussion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when positioning an American Educational Research Journal (AERJ) manuscript in the literature. AERJ readers span the whole field, so the paper must engage the literatures a general education-research audience expects and speak past its own subfield. Builds the positioning argument; it does not write the literature review for you.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a model — a full theory paper's argument or the structural/conceptual scaffolding behind an empirical AER: Insights short-format manuscript — needs to be made minimal, so it carries the single insight in a few pages. Keeps only what the insight requires; it does not develop a general framework.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when drafting the response letter and revision plan after an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) R&R. Structures the reply to theory referees (correctness, generality, exposition) and editor; it does not re-derive the result (see aejmic-theory-model).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the model setup, equilibrium concept, or proof architecture is the bottleneck for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript — the central skill for a theory-first paper. Builds the model to the AEJ: Micro bar (clean, general, well-motivated result); it does not check whether your theorem is correct.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Estimates Fabric capacity cost before a migration by profiling Spark, SQL, Power BI, and Real-Time workloads, then recommending SKU size and comparing Reserved, Pay-As-You-Go, and Autoscale billing. Use only for capacity sizing and pricing questions, not for general migration or connectivity work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
General-purpose X/Twitter research agent. Searches X for real-time perspectives, dev discussions, product feedback, cultural takes, breaking news, and expert opinions. Works like a web research agent but uses X as the source. Use when: (1) user says "x research", "search x for", "search twitter for", "what are people saying about", "what's twitter saying", "check x for", "x search", "/x-research", (2) user is working on something where recent X discourse would provide useful context (new library releases, API changes, product launches, cultural events, industry drama), (3) user wants to find what devs/experts/community thinks about a topic. NOT for: posting tweets or account management. Note: currently uses recent search (last 7 days). Full-archive search is available on the same pay-per-use X API plan but not yet implemented in this skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Infer or annotate TCR antigen specificity by unsupervised clustering (TCRdist/tcrdist3, GLIPH2, clusTCR, GIANA) and database lookup (VDJdb, IEDB, McPAS-TCR), and rank candidates with supervised predictors (ERGO-II, NetTCR-2.x, pMTnet) under explicit caveats. Encodes the central truth that general TCR-epitope prediction for UNSEEN epitopes essentially does not work (collapses to near-random; IMMREP22, Grazioli 2022) because labeled data is dominated by a few immunodominant epitopes and there is no true negative set — so clustering for discovery is the honest task and de-novo binding needs wet-lab validation. Use when annotating TCR specificity or grouping a repertoire. Epitope/MHC context lives in mhc-binding-prediction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Infer gene regulatory networks from bulk or general expression data with mutual-information (ARACNe) and tree-ensemble (GENIE3, GRNBoost2) methods, and infer transcription-factor protein activity from regulons with VIPER and msVIPER. Covers the activity-not-edges paradigm, the undirected-association caveat, the DREAM5 wisdom-of-crowds and method-complementarity result, AUPRC-over-AUROC evaluation, and gold-standard incompleteness. Use when inferring a regulatory network from a bulk expression matrix, finding master regulators, or scoring TF activity from a signature. For single-cell motif-pruned regulons see scenic-regulons; for co-expression modules see coexpression-networks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates sashimi-style plots showing RNA-seq read coverage and splice junction counts using ggsashimi (general-purpose, condition-grouped overlays), rmats2sashimiplot (rMATS-output-aware), MAJIQ-VOILA (LSV posteriors interactive HTML), leafviz (leafcutter clusters Shiny), Jutils (tool-agnostic heatmaps and sashimi for rMATS/leafcutter/MntJULiP/MAJIQ output), or pyGenomeTracks (multi-track publication figures). Tool choice depends on the upstream differential-splicing tool's output format and the publication vs interactive use case. Use when visualizing specific splicing events, validating differential splicing calls, or producing publication-quality figures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Support automatic audio switching for paired third-party Bluetooth headphones or earbuds with AudioAccessoryKit. Use when a companion app registers an audio accessory, an app extension reports worn/removed placement or connected source-device changes, or AccessoryControlDevice capabilities and errors need handling. Do not use for general AVAudioSession routing, Bluetooth transport, or initial accessory pairing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。