「instrument」の検索結果

Animation, morphing, and shader best practices for Liquid Glass and SwiftUI motion on iOS 26+/macOS 26+ through iOS 27. Use when animating glass or building UI motion: glassEffectID, @Namespace morphing, GlassEffectContainer spacing, glassEffectUnion, glassEffectTransition (.matchedGeometry/.materialize), withAnimation, springs, UnitCurve, PhaseAnimator, KeyframeAnimator, @Animatable, matchedTransitionSource, navigationTransition zoom, scrollTransition, visualEffect, Metal shaders (colorEffect, distortionEffect, layerEffect, [[stitchable]]), accessibilityReduceMotion gating, Instruments/xctrace profiling of hangs and animation hitches. Also fires on symptoms: glass morph not animating, view pops in instead of morphing, glass fades instead of materializing, morph flickers with Reduce Motion, menu glass morphs as a rectangle, animation runs on insert but not removal, PhaseAnimator loops forever or fires once, shader shows clipped edges (maxSampleOffset), animation hitches or main-thread hangs while scrolling glass chrome. For static glass, availability gating, toolbars, UIKit/AppKit glass, or accessibility of the material itself use the liquid-glass skill first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pixel-based motion and UI change analysis from frame sequences or screenshots using computer vision and visual comparison. Use when `.transition` or visual effects are not observable via MotionEyes logs, when you only have screenshots/video, when you need regression diffs across builds, or when you need to summarize on-screen changes without instrumentation. Do not use when MotionEyes traces are available and you need precise timing/values; use `motioneyes-animation-debug` instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and improve SwiftUI runtime performance. Use when diagnosing slow rendering, janky scrolling, high CPU, memory usage, excessive view updates, layout thrash, body evaluation cost, identity churn, view lifetime issues, lazy loading, Instruments profiling guidance, and performance audit requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and improve SwiftUI runtime performance from code review and architecture. Use for requests to diagnose slow rendering, janky scrolling, high CPU/memory usage, excessive view updates, or layout thrash in SwiftUI apps, and to provide guidance for user-run Instruments profiling when code review alone is insufficient.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Memory management, profiling, optimization techniques, and Instruments usage for high-performance iOS apps

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure Monitor OpenTelemetry Distro for Python. Use for one-line Application Insights setup with auto-instrumentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auto-instrument Node.js applications with distributed tracing, metrics, and logs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Android APK reverse engineering — apktool, jadx, Frida dynamic instrumentation, native .so analizi, root/SSL bypass

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Disciplined diagnosis workflow for hard, intermittent, or multi-component bugs and performance regressions: inspect logs and existing evidence, build a feedback loop, test falsifiable hypotheses, instrument gaps, and verify the outcome. Use when the root cause is unclear, reproduction is unreliable, several causes or components are plausible, or performance has regressed. Do NOT use for obvious single-cause errors, straightforward configuration or syntax fixes, planned feature work, or broad architecture review. Diagnosis-only requests stop after reporting the root cause and evidence; apply a fix only when the user requested one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects and analyzes malicious behavior in mobile applications through behavioral analysis, permission abuse detection, network traffic monitoring, and dynamic instrumentation. Use when analyzing suspicious mobile applications for data exfiltration, command-and-control communication, credential stealing, SMS interception, or other malware indicators. Activates for requests involving mobile malware analysis, app behavior monitoring, trojan detection, or suspicious app investigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add PostHog SDK integration to your application. Use when setting up PostHog for the first time or reviewing PRs that need PostHog initialization. Covers SDK installation, provider setup, and basic configuration for any framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add PostHog log capture to track application logs. Use after implementing features or reviewing PRs to ensure meaningful log events are captured with structured properties. Also handles initial OTLP exporter setup if not yet configured.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add PostHog product analytics events to track user behavior. Use after implementing new features or reviewing PRs to ensure meaningful user actions are captured. Also handles initial PostHog SDK setup if not yet installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add PostHog LLM analytics to trace AI model usage. Use after implementing LLM features or reviewing PRs to ensure all generations are captured with token counts, latency, and costs. Also handles initial PostHog SDK setup if not yet installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add PostHog feature flags to gate new functionality. Use after implementing features or reviewing PRs to ensure safe rollouts with feature flag controls. Also handles initial PostHog SDK setup if not yet installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add PostHog error tracking to capture and monitor exceptions. Use after implementing features or reviewing PRs to ensure errors are tracked with stack traces and source maps. Also handles initial PostHog SDK setup if not yet installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build forest plots (HR, OR, RR, beta-coefficient summaries with CIs) and funnel plots (meta-analysis publication-bias diagnostics) using forestplot, metafor, ggforest, and MendelianRandomization with proper axis-scaling, summary-diamond placement, subgroup nesting, and Egger / trim-and-fill asymmetry tests. Use when summarizing effects across subgroups, trials, or instruments — meta-analysis, Mendelian randomization, subgroup HRs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and validates quantitative targeted metabolomics assays (MRM/SRM on triple-quadrupole, PRM on high-resolution instruments) to report absolute concentrations. Covers the internal-standard strategy (external cal -> global IS -> standard addition -> stable-isotope-labeled IS), weighted calibration judged by back-calculated %RE not R-squared, ion-ratio quantifier/qualifier confirmation, matrix-effect/recovery characterization, and ICH M10 method validation. Use when quantifying a closed panel of known metabolites with units, building or validating an LC-MS/MS assay, choosing an IS or calibration weighting, or judging whether a reported concentration is trustworthy. For untargeted feature detection see metabolomics/xcms-preprocessing; for group statistics see metabolomics/statistical-analysis; for flux/MID/tracing see metabolomics/isotope-tracing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bead-based signal normalization and cross-batch harmonization for CyTOF and high-parameter cytometry - EQ four-element bead normalization of instrument sensitivity drift (CATALYST normCytof, premessa), and reference-anchor cross-batch normalization (CytoNorm, per-cluster quantile splines). Covers the distinction between within-run drift correction and between-batch correction, the mandatory anchor/reference sample, why normalization is per-cluster with many quantiles, and the over-correction risk. Use when correcting CyTOF signal drift, harmonizing multi-batch or multi-site studies, or deciding whether to normalize data versus model batch in the design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality control for flow, spectral, and mass cytometry - time-based anomaly cleaning (flowAI, flowCut, PeacoQC, flowClean), margin/boundary event removal, signal-drift detection, dead-cell exclusion, CyTOF Gaussian/DNA/event-length checks, instrument calibration/standardization (MESF, CS&T, peak-2), and batch-level outlier flagging. Use when assessing acquisition quality, choosing a cleaning tool, ordering QC relative to compensation, deciding margin removal before density-based steps, or flagging problematic samples before clustering or differential analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build forest plots (HR, OR, RR, beta-coefficient summaries with CIs) and funnel plots (meta-analysis publication-bias diagnostics) using forestplot, metafor, ggforest, and MendelianRandomization with proper axis-scaling, summary-diamond placement, subgroup nesting, and Egger / trim-and-fill asymmetry tests. Use when summarizing effects across subgroups, trials, or instruments — meta-analysis, Mendelian randomization, subgroup HRs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Estimate causal effects of an exposure on an outcome from GWAS summary statistics using genetic instruments. Implements IVW (fixed/random), MR-Egger, weighted median/mode, MR-RAPS, CAUSE, GSMR-HEIDI, MR-PRESSO, MVMR, MR-Clust, LCV, and LHC-MR via TwoSampleMR, MendelianRandomization, MR-PRESSO, cause, and lhcMR. Use when testing causal direction between traits, evaluating drug-target effects via cis-pQTL/cis-eQTL, performing multivariable mediation MR, distinguishing causation from correlated horizontal pleiotropy, or producing STROBE-MR-compliant sensitivity batteries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs cis-pQTL Mendelian randomization for drug-target validation using UKB-PPP (Olink), deCODE (SomaScan), Fenland, INTERVAL, ARIC, and FinnGen-PPP proteomes plus colocalization triangulation, phenome-wide on-target adverse-effect scans, cross-platform Olink/SomaScan replication, and PAV (protein-altering variant) sensitivity. Use when nominating or de-risking a drug target from plasma-proteome GWAS, mimicking pharmacological inhibition via cis-pQTL instruments, separating shared-causal from LD-confounded signal under the Schmidt 2020 cis-MR framework, screening on-target adverse phenotypes pheWAS-style, or producing publication-grade STROBE-MR plus PP.H4 evidence for a target gene.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect and adjust for horizontal pleiotropy in two-sample Mendelian randomization by distinguishing uncorrelated (UHP) from correlated (CHP) pleiotropy and choosing among Egger, MR-PRESSO, MR-RAPS, CAUSE, LHC-MR, LCV, MR-Clust, MR-Mix, and contamination-mixture methods. Use when validating an MR causal claim, running the STROBE-MR sensitivity battery, suspecting a shared heritable confounder, working under weak-instrument or polygenic-exposure regimes, or reconciling discordant estimates across robust methods.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。