「literature」の検索結果

Run Tavily's multi-source research workflow for comparisons, market analysis, literature-oriented exploration, or detailed cited reports. Use only when bounded search and extraction are insufficient.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This is the core skill for the deep research and writing tool—combining AI-driven deep research with well-formatted written outputs. Every document produced is backed by comprehensive literature search and verified citations through the research-lookup skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dereplicate a putative natural product and assign its chemical taxonomy. Use to answer "is [compound] a known natural product", "what microbe/organism produces [compound]", "what chemical class is [compound]", "dereplicate this metabolite (by formula/exact mass/InChIKey/SMILES)", or "classify this molecule into ChemOnt". Searches NPAtlas for known microbial natural products (producing organism + literature reference), assigns the ChemOnt kingdom→superclass→class→subclass hierarchy via ClassyFire, resolves systematic IUPAC names to structure via OPSIN, and cross-references identity in PubChem. NOT for general drug/compound identity or ADMET (use tooluniverse-chemical-compound-retrieval / tooluniverse-small-molecule-discovery) and NOT for metabolomics pathway/enrichment analysis (use tooluniverse-metabolomics skills).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automated LLM-driven hypothesis generation and testing on tabular datasets. Use when you want to systematically explore hypotheses about patterns in empirical data (e.g., deception detection, content analysis). Combines literature insights with data-driven hypothesis testing. For manual hypothesis formulation use hypothesis-generation; for creative ideation use scientific-brainstorming.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user's prompt requires (1) researching a topic across multiple sources, comparing options or alternatives, analyzing trends or history, understanding markets or industries, or reviewing literature or studies and (2) synthesizing that research into a comprehensive, narrative report. If you're planning to search the web or internal knowledge bases, consider using this skill. This skill coordinates research subagents, so use it only when you have a tool for spawning subagents (the Agent or Task tool); otherwise, research the question directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when deriving EcoSIM plant trait parameter recommendations for a named plant from web and online literature evidence, using a read-only `plant_trait.*.desc` file and the `ndlf43` tree block or `gr3s43` grass block as the starting archetype. Never edit or replace the `.desc` file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user requests to review, analyze, critique, or summarize academic papers, research articles, preprints, or scientific publications. Supports comprehensive structured reviews covering methodology assessment, contribution evaluation, literature positioning, and constructive feedback generation. Trigger on queries involving paper URLs, uploaded PDFs, arXiv links, or requests like "review this paper", "analyze this research", "summarize this study", or "write a peer review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Academic paper search across 14+ scholarly platforms including arXiv, PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Semantic Scholar, Sci-Hub, and more. Use for literature review, research discovery, and citation management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create comprehensive academic research notes with deep literature coverage. Auto-detects language (EN prompt→EN output, TR prompt→TR output). Supports Obsidian markdown and PDF. Performs 8-15 iterative search cycles with 25-50+ sources for comprehensive coverage. Uses footnote citations and visual overviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transparent, rigorous research with full methodology — not a black-box API wrapper. Conducts exhaustive investigation through mandated 2-cycle research per theme, APA 7th citations, evidence hierarchy, and 3 user checkpoints. Self-contained using native OpenClaw tools (web_search, web_fetch, sessions_spawn). Use for literature reviews, competitive intelligence, or any research requiring academic rigor and reproducibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write academic research documents following academic guidelines with peer-reviewed sources from Google Scholar and other academic databases. Always verify source credibility and generate IEEE standard references. Use for research papers, literature reviews, technical reports, theses, dissertations, conference papers, and academic proposals requiring proper citations and scholarly rigor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user requests to review, analyze, critique, or summarize academic papers, research articles, preprints, or scientific publications. Supports comprehensive structured reviews covering methodology assessment, contribution evaluation, literature positioning, and constructive feedback generation. Trigger on queries involving paper URLs, uploaded PDFs, arXiv links, or requests like "review this paper", "analyze this research", "summarize this study", or "write a peer review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are a professional business analyst, skilled in writing various industry research reports, business insights, consulting analyses, company research reports, competitive analysis, user research, market analysis, and more.## General InstructionsYou must use references and sources to support your arguments, but all cited literature or materials must appear in logically relevant parts of the te...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a single academic paper, preprint, DOI, arXiv link, or user-provided PDF/text with source-grounded critique. Use for paper summaries, methodology review, novelty checks, reproducibility concerns, or "review this paper" requests; do not use for multi-paper surveys, systematic literature reviews, citation management, or implementation from a paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when choosing or configuring MCP servers for research work, when a literature, reference manager, or scholarly search server needs a trust check before installation, or when an existing research tool stack needs a data flow and permission audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a researcher asks where to start, which project skill fits the current stage of a study, or in what order literature scoping, source access, vault upkeep, drafting, citation verification, disclosure, and review response should run.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform AI-powered web searches with real-time information using Perplexity models via LiteLLM and OpenRouter. This skill should be used when conducting web searches for current information, finding recent scientific literature, getting grounded answers with source citations, or accessing information beyond the model knowledge cutoff. Provides access to multiple Perplexity models including Sonar Pro, Sonar Pro Search (advanced agentic search), and Sonar Reasoning Pro through a single OpenRouter API key.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct comprehensive AI-powered research with citations via the Tavily CLI. Use this skill when the user wants deep research, a detailed report, a comparison, market analysis, literature review, or says "research", "investigate", "analyze in depth", "compare X vs Y", "what does the market look like for", or needs multi-source synthesis with explicit citations. Returns a structured report grounded in web sources. Takes 30-120 seconds. For quick fact-finding, use tavily-search instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refute-before-prove research discipline: automated counterexample sweeps before any formalization, meter-integrity audits for information-bound experiments, mutation-tested model checkers, pre-registered commit-or-cut gates for speculative directions, wrong-turn reporting, and numeric-claim provenance. Use when validating any new theorem, bound, equilibrium, or security claim; when building or trusting a checker, simulator, or experiment; or when deciding whether a speculative research direction lives or dies. NOT for exploratory brainstorming, product prioritization, writing style, or literature review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。