「logic」の検索結果

Enhanced dashboard panel component with robust error handling, retry logic, localStorage persistence, and co-located inline helper functions (e.g. timeAgo, statusIcon) for self-contained, import-light panel implementations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Unified dashboard panel component with robust error handling, retry logic, state persistence, and vanilla TypeScript implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enhanced dashboard panel component with robust error handling, retry logic, and localStorage persistence for state management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dashboard panel components (class-based, self-fetching) and push-update sidebar modules (functional, externally-driven) using vanilla TypeScript DOM API, with retry logic, localStorage persistence, and guarded CSS injection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Unified dashboard panel pattern combining circuit breaker resilience with enhanced UI features like retry logic, state persistence, and detailed error handling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a dashboard panel component with advanced dynamic content updates and robust error handling, including retry logic and state management, using vanilla TypeScript DOM API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic Python debugging workflow for spreadsheet tasks to isolate environment issues from script logic

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iteratively debug Excel structure with exploratory scripts before writing extraction logic

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunts for the other instances of a bug already found — the variants of one root cause across a codebase. Use immediately after a vulnerability, logic bug, or bad pattern turns up in a specific file and the question becomes where else it occurs, including the bare conversational form ("are there others like this?", "is this the same bug?"). Also for generalizing one known instance into a CodeQL or Semgrep query for its whole pattern family, and for triaging a set of look-alike candidates against a known root cause. Not for initial discovery with no bug in hand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cloud security attack methodology covering AWS, Azure, and GCP. Includes credential harvesting (IMDS, ~/.aws, env vars, leaked CI secrets, instance roles), enumeration with cloud-specific tools (pacu, ScoutSuite, Prowler, ROADtools, gcp_enum), privilege escalation paths (IAM PassRole, AssumeRole chains, Lambda/Functions privilege flips, Azure Owner-on-self, GCP serviceAccountTokenCreator), persistence techniques (IAM user/key creation, AAD app registration, GCP svc account key creation, EventBridge/Logic Apps backdoors), data exfiltration (S3/Blob/GCS, snapshot share, RDS/CosmosDB/Cloud SQL exfil), cloud-native lateral movement (cross-account assume, Azure AD multi-tenant, GCP project hierarchy), serverless attacks (Lambda env vars, layer hijack, Step Functions), Kubernetes-on-cloud (EKS/AKS/GKE-specific paths to node and AWS metadata), and CSPM evasion (CloudTrail blind spots, GuardDuty mute, Sentinel rule shaping). Use when the engagement scope is cloud accounts, when you've stolen cloud credentials, or when assessing cloud posture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Insecure deserialization exploitation across Java, PHP, .NET, Python, Node.js, and Ruby. Covers gadget chain construction with ysoserial/phpggc/ysoserial.net, ObjectInputStream and BinaryFormatter sink identification, pickle __reduce__ RCE, phar:// wrapper abuse, Jackson polymorphic typing, Json.NET TypeNameHandling, ViewState tampering, node-serialize IIFE injection, Ruby Marshal.load and YAML.load gadgets, framework-specific chains for Spring/Hibernate/Laravel/Symfony, modern attack surfaces including Kubernetes admission webhooks and message queue consumers, WAF bypass through encoding layers and content-type manipulation, and serialVersionUID/JMX/RMI vectors. Activate when the engagement involves deserialization sinks, serialized data in cookies or request bodies, gadget chain development, magic method abuse, ysoserial payload generation, or any review of marshalling and unmarshalling logic in target applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Social engineering attack techniques beyond email phishing for authorized red team and physical penetration testing engagements. Covers pretexting methodology (persona creation, authority and urgency psychological triggers, rapport building), vishing (voice phishing via caller ID spoofing, IVR system exploitation, VoIP infrastructure setup with Twilio/Asterisk), smishing (SMS-based phishing, carrier gateway abuse, short code impersonation), physical social engineering (tailgating and piggybacking, RFID badge cloning with Proxmark3, lock picking and bypass, dumpster diving for sensitive documents), USB drop attacks (Rubber Ducky keystroke injection, Bash Bunny multi-vector payloads, O.MG cable covert implants, BadUSB firmware attacks), watering hole attack planning and execution, and OSINT-driven targeting (LinkedIn harvesting, organizational chart reconstruction, employee pattern analysis). Integrates with the Social Engineering Toolkit for attack automation, Proxmark3 for RFID/NFC cloning, USB Rubber Ducky and Bash Bunny for physical payload delivery, and BeEF for browser exploitation. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1598 (Phishing for Information), T1566 (Phishing), T1091 (Replication Through Removable Media), and T1189 (Drive-by Compromise). All techniques require explicit written authorization and defined rules of engagement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing, reviewing, or debugging how an agent's context window gets filled, pruned, or shared — choosing what loads at boot versus on demand, sizing an install or an always-loaded file, fixing an agent that drifts, repeats itself, or forgets constraints mid-task, planning compaction or summarization, deciding single-agent versus subagents, engineering handoffs between agents, or picking a tool loadout. NOT for rewording a prompt's tone, choosing which model to pin, or debugging business logic — those are adjacent moments this skill does not serve. Historical 2024–2025 snapshot; not normative for present-day frontier models — see the Status section.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze political, economic, social, technological, environmental, and legal forces. Use when external market shifts could materially affect a product, roadmap, or strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces distinctive production UI and screenshot-grounded visual polish. Use when building or restyling pages, components, or typography. Not for backend logic or data pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Groups existing components into logical business domains to plan service-based architecture. Use when asking "which components belong together?", "group these into services", "organize by domain", "component-to-domain mapping", or planning service extraction from an existing codebase. Do NOT use for identifying new domains from scratch (use domain-analysis) or analyzing coupling (use coupling-analysis).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a sequenced monolith-to-modular pipeline that sizes and inventories components, finds shared domain duplication, addresses flattening and hierarchy issues, analyzes coupling, then groups components into candidate domain-aligned units, with optional embedded DDD strategic analysis for bounded contexts. Use when asking how to split a monolith, size components before extraction, find duplicated domain logic, clean up module hierarchy, measure coupling between modules, or group components into services. Do NOT use for phased extraction roadmaps or prioritization without the prior analysis steps (use decomposition-planning-roadmap after this pipeline), end-to-end legacy migration strategy writeups (use legacy-migration-planner), pure infrastructure capacity sizing, or when you only need DDD without the structural pipeline (install domain-analysis standalone).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI frontend specialist and design consultant that guides users through a structured discovery process before generating any code. Collects visual references, design tokens, typography, icons, layout preferences, and brand guidelines to ensure the final output matches the user's vision with high fidelity. Use when the user asks to build, design, create, or improve any frontend interface — websites, landing pages, dashboards, components, apps, emails, forms, modals, or any UI element. Also triggers on "build me a UI", "design a page", "create a component", "improve this layout", "make this look better", "frontend", "interface", "redesign", or when the user provides mockups, screenshots, or design references. Do NOT use for backend logic, API design, database schemas, or non-visual code tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write JavaScript code in n8n Code nodes. Use when writing JavaScript in n8n, using $input/$json/$node syntax, making HTTP requests with this.helpers / the $helpers global, working with dates using DateTime, troubleshooting Code node errors, choosing between Code node modes, or doing any custom data transformation in n8n. Always use this skill when a workflow needs a Code node — whether for data aggregation, filtering, API calls, format conversion, batch processing logic, or any custom JavaScript. Covers SplitInBatches loop patterns, cross-iteration data, pairedItem, and real-world production patterns. Also use when asked why a Code node or workflow is slow, which execution mode is faster, or how to cut per-item overhead on large datasets. EXCEPTION — for the AI-agent-callable Custom Code Tool (@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.toolCode, a tool attached to an AI Agent), use the n8n-code-tool skill instead; it has a different runtime contract.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before substantial DeepChat code, configuration, documentation, test, build, feature, issue, refactor, or architecture changes that need a durable RFC and an explicit execution path. Skip trivial style fixes, small localized logic changes, routine docs edits, and simple bugs unless the developer asks for SDD. Use plan.md as the only separate tracker when needed, default to implementation-first validation, and ask before optional GitHub issue sync unless the developer explicitly requested sync.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits existing tests in any language using formal, research-backed test smell names and the testsmells.org 19-smell academic taxonomy. Use when the caller asks for an academic or citable test-smell review, named smell categories, or a formal severity-ranked smell assessment. Covers Assertion Roulette, Conditional Test Logic, Mystery Guest, Eager Test, Sleepy Test, Unknown Test, Sensitive Equality, and the rest of the catalog across .NET, Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Go, Ruby, Rust, Swift, Kotlin, PowerShell, and C++. DO NOT USE FOR a quick pragmatic test review (use test-anti-patterns), writing or running tests, framework migration, coverage, or assertion-diversity metrics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a test file or suite; produce a severity-ranked diagnostic report. ALWAYS USE for tests that verify nothing, missing/tautological assertions, swallowed/broad exceptions, flaky/order-dependent tests, duplication, or magic values. Polyglot. DO NOT USE for direct edits: writing-mstest-tests owns supplied MSTest assertions/attributes/lifecycle; code-testing owns new tests. Exclude running tests, migration, assertion metrics (assertion-quality), raw .NET coverage collection (run-tests), non-.NET coverage collection/analysis (native tooling), project-wide .NET coverage/CRAP (coverage-analysis), named-target .NET CRAP (crap-score), behavioral/pseudo-mutation gaps (test-gap-analysis), test-mix/ happy-vs-error classification and trait distributions (test-tagging), or the testsmells.org catalog (test-smell-detection).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Defensive CI/CD patterns: semver validation, token checks, retry logic, draft detection — earned from v0.8.22

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Normalize SKILL.md artifacts into Scheduling-Structural-Logical (SSL) JSON representations using a conservative multi-pass extraction pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。