「nest」の検索結果

Makes working code easier to read and change without altering what it does, and proves the behaviour stayed the same. Use when someone says "simplify this", "clean up this function", "this file is a mess", "reduce the complexity", "refactor for readability", "tidy my diff before the PR", or when a linter reports high cyclomatic complexity or deep nesting. Covers pinning current behaviour with characterization tests, measuring complexity, choosing a named refactoring, applying it in small verified steps, and reporting suspected bugs found on the way instead of fixing them silently.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans, researches and writes comparison pages: "[rival] alternatives", "[product] vs [rival]", "[rival A] vs [rival B]" and switching guides. Builds each page from a ledger of sourced, dated facts and ends with an honest verdict on who should choose which product. Use when someone asks for an "alternative page", a "vs page", a "competitor comparison", "comparison landing pages", "why us instead of them", or wants existing comparison pages checked for outdated prices and claims that cannot be backed up.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

I am a veteran print production specialist with 15+ years in tabletop game manufacturing. I've shepherded hundreds of games from digital files to retail-ready products, working with manufacturers from The Game Crafter to Panda GM to Cartamundi. My expertise spans the entire production pipeline: color management, dieline creation, paper selection, finishing techniques, component nesting, insert design, and the critical art of the unboxing experience. I've learned the hard way about RGB-to-CMYK disasters, registration drift, humidity warp, and minimum font sizes that become illegible smudges. I know the difference between 280gsm blue-core and 320gsm black-core card stock by feel. I can tell you why your rich black needs to be C60-M40-Y40-K100, not just K100. I understand why your box needs 15mm clearance on each dimension, and why that gorgeous neon green in your design will become a muddy olive in print. Use when "print my game, packaging design, prepare files for print, dieline, print specifications, board game manufacturing, card game printing, box design, bleed and safe area, CMYK conversion, paper stock, card finish, foil stamping, embossing, unboxing experience, thermoform insert, punchboard design, component manufacturing, Panda GM, Game Crafter, Cartamundi, print-production, packaging, manufacturing, board-games, card-games, cmyk, dieline, die-cutting, offset-printing, tabletop" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

What makes founders succeed? Paul Graham has observed thousands of founders and distilled patterns. Relentlessly resourceful. Fierce nerds. Earnest. These traits matter more than credentials or connections. This skill synthesizes PG's essays on founder character into actionable guidance for developing the traits that predict success. Use when "keywords, contexts, " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Challenges a recommendation, design, large change, or any artifact submitted for hard review (spec, proposal, policy, plan) across 5 dimensions (consistency, completeness, actionability, alignment, risk), from the standards of a named senior expert in the artifact's domain and ideally from a fresh context or a different model. Searches assuming defects exist and reports only those that survive evidence. Panel mode runs several independent lenses in parallel on a release candidate, verifies every finding against the current head, and routes confirmed ones to file owners. Use before shipping a significant recommendation, design, large branch, or multi-agent release, or when asked to tear something apart, be brutally honest, or poke holes in it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether a paper's EVALUATION DESIGN actually measures what it claims and whether its reporting is complete — the validity layer family D (experiment-forensics) cannot reach. Three patterns: train/test leakage means the reported score may not measure generalization (HP-EVAL-LEAKAGE — adopts the Kapoor & Narayanan 8-type / 3-category leakage taxonomy; the illegitimate-proxy / sampling-bias / pretraining-contamination subtypes hand off as needs_external_check, naming but NEVER running Oren-2023 exchangeability / Shi-2023 Min-K% / Golchin-2023 Time-Travel / BIG-bench canary); a load-bearing LLM judge is conflicted (same model/family as a compared system) or unvalidated (no human-agreement, no bias control) (HP-JUDGE-VALIDITY); a declared condition/metric is dropped or switched to favor the method, or 'best' is chosen with no held-out set (HP-SELECTIVE-REPORTING). Verdict-bearing at L0/L1 from the DESCRIBED protocol — NOT repo-gated like experiment-forensics; L2 only CONFIRMS against split/preprocessing/result files. A fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per pass) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Leakage and under-reporting are usually HONEST methodological errors — every finding describes a discrepancy to CHECK, never an accusation. An LLM generating GROUND-TRUTH labels is HP-FAKE-GT (experiment-forensics) — routed there, not here. Emits eval-design-forensics.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "eval design audit", "evaluation validity", "train/test leakage", "data leakage", "is the score measuring generalization", "LLM judge bias", "is the judge validated", "selective reporting", "cherry-picked results", "评估设计审计", "评测有效性", "数据泄漏", "训练测试集泄漏", "裁判模型有没有验证", "选择性报告".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesize the single strongest EVIDENCE-BOUND reviewer case to reject a paper, built ONLY from the evidence ledger (claims.json) + the other auditors' confirmed findings — never free-floating LLM critique. Two fresh cross-model codex threads: an attack writes the ~200-word rejection paragraph (every accusation tagged to an existing claim_id/finding_id), a defense decomposes it and rules each point against the anchored evidence. MEMO-ONLY: emits adversarial-case-builder.memo.md (fed to the adjudicator via --memo) and carries NO verdict weight — tools/adjudicate_findings.py lists it in ZERO_WEIGHT_SKILLS and caps it at info. Honest-null allowed (the paper may survive). Run LAST. Detect-only. Adapted from ARIS kill-argument. Triggers: "adversarial case", "strongest objection", "rejection memo", "kill argument", "最强拒稿点".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

产品营销 (PMM, Product Marketing) — 拥有「产品如何被定位 / 表达 / 发布 / 卖进市场」的从业者认知操作系统: 是产品 / 销售 / 市场 / 客户之间的连接组织, 负责把产品能力翻译成市场价值, 并把市场声音带回产品。覆盖 (a) 定位与差异化 (April Dunford 「刻意选择语境」框架 + 竞争性替代方案 + 卖价值不卖功能 + 选择「让你优势成立的市场参照系」, 对照 Ries & Trout 经典「定位是占领心智」), (b) 信息传递与叙事 (messaging 层级 / 信息屋 + 价值主张 + 收益导向 vs 战略叙事「换框架」Andy Raskin + 表达清晰度 Emma Stratton / Punchy + 初创 homepage 定位 FletchPMM), (c) 进入市场 (GTM) 策略与产品发布 (发布分级 T1/T2/T3 + 发布流程与跨职能编排 + GTM 打法 PLG vs SLG vs 混合 + 滩头细分选择), (d) 市场与竞争情报 (竞品分析 + battlecard 战卡 + 输赢分析 win/loss + 竞争赋能 Klue/Crayon/Clozd), (e) 买家与客户研究 (ICP 理想客户画像 + 买家 / 用户 persona + Jobs-to-be-Done 任务理论 Christensen/Moesta/Ulwick ODI + 客户之声 VoC + 用真实买家测信息 Wynter/Peep Laja), (f) 销售赋能 (战卡 + pitch / 销售 deck + 一页纸 + demo 叙事 + 异议处理 + 销售培训 + 内容采用率 — 你的产出只值销售实际用到的那部分), (g) 定价与打包 (价值定价 + 打包分层 + 《Monetizing Innovation》Ramanujam/Simon-Kucher + PLG 定价 — 常与产品 / 财务共担), (h) 细分与品类 (市场细分 + TAM/SAM/SOM + 技术采用生命周期与跨越鸿沟 Geoffrey Moore + 品类设计与叙事 Play Bigger / Christopher Lochhead — 稀有且昂贵, 不是默认选项), (i) 需求生成与内容协同 (campaign 信息 + 思想领导力 + 漏斗内容 TOFU/MOFU/BOFU + ABM 基于客户营销), (j) 分析师与影响者关系 (Gartner 魔力象限 + Forrester Wave + 分析师 briefing — To B 场景, 对 pay-to-play 影响诚实标注), (k) 客户营销与倡导 (参考客户 + case study + 评测站 G2/TrustRadius/Capterra 运营 + 社区), (l) PMM 运营与度量 (影响管道 + 赢率 + 发布采用率 + 信息穿透率 + 角色汇报线「向产品还是向市场」之争 + PMM 作为战略职能 vs 接单工具人陷阱); 跨 B2B SaaS (该学科重心) / B2C 消费 / 开发者 PLG / 平台产品。不含 产品管理 (PM 造产品 / 拥有 roadmap, PMM 拥有市场 — 相邻且极易混淆) / 增长 / 效果营销 / 付费投放 (平行学科) / 品牌 / 企业传播 / 公关为终点 / 需求生成为终点 (PMM 与之协同但不等同) / 平面设计 /「做 slide 和周边的团队」(PMM 抗争的接单工具人窄化) / 泛泛「市场营销」。 (Product Marketing (PMM) — the cognitive operating system of practitioners who own how a product is positioned, messaged, launched, and sold into a market: the connective tissue between product, sales, marketing, and customers, responsible for translating product capability into market value and bringing the voice of the market back into product. Covers (a) positioning & differentiation (April Dunford's deliberate-context framing, competitive alternatives, value-not-features, framing the market in which your strengths matter — vs Ries & Trout classic perception-in-the-mind positioning), (b) messaging & narrative (messaging hierarchy / house, value proposition, benefit-led vs strategic-narrative / change-the-frame messaging Andy Raskin, clarity craft Emma Stratton/Punchy, homepage & startup positioning FletchPMM), (c) go-to-market (GTM) strategy & product launches (launch tiers T1/T2/T3, launch process & cross-functional orchestration, GTM motion PLG vs SLG vs hybrid, beachhead segment selection), (d) market & competitive intelligence (competitive analysis, battlecards, win/loss analysis, competitive enablement Klue/Crayon/Clozd), (e) buyer & customer research (ICP ideal customer profile, buyer & user personas, Jobs-to-be-Done Christensen/Moesta/Ulwick ODI, voice of customer, message testing with real buyers Wynter/Peep Laja), (f) sales enablement (battlecards, pitch & sales decks, one-pagers, demo narratives, objection handling, sales training, content adoption — output is only as good as what sales actually uses), (g) pricing & packaging (value-based pricing, packaging & tiering, Monetizing Innovation Ramanujam/Simon-Kucher, PLG pricing — often shared with product/finance), (h) segmentation & category (market segmentation, TAM/SAM/SOM, technology adoption lifecycle & crossing the chasm Geoffrey Moore, category design & narrative Play Bigger / Christopher Lochhead — rare and expensive, not a default), (i) demand-gen & content partnership (campaign messaging, thought leadership, funnel content TOFU/MOFU/BOFU, ABM account-based marketing), (j) analyst & influencer relations (Gartner Magic Quadrant, Forrester Wave, analyst briefings — for B2B, with honest read on pay-to-play perception), (k) customer marketing & advocacy (references, case studies, reviews G2/TrustRadius/Capterra presence, community), (l) PMM operations & metrics (influenced pipeline, win rate, launch adoption, message pull-through, the role's reporting line product-vs-mark

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

健身私教 — 为客户设计、指导和推进个性化训练方案的专业工艺, 有别于团课教练、物理治疗师或运动队教练: (a) 训练方案设计与周期化 (线性 / 波动 / 板块周期化 Bompa & Haff; NSCA《力量训练与体能训练精要》行业圣经; Schoenfeld 肌肥大机制; Helms/Valdez/Morgan 肌肉与力量金字塔; 共轭训练法 Simmons/Westside; Starting Strength 线性渐进 Rippetoe; Renaissance Periodization 训练量地标 Israetel); (b) 动作评估与筛查 (FMS 功能性动作筛查 Gray Cook; NASM CEx 纠正性训练连续体 抑制-拉伸-激活-整合; 关节逐级方法 Cook/Boyle; 姿势与代偿模式识别; PAR-Q+ 与 ACSM 运动前筛查指南); (c) 教学与指令 (外部 vs 内部注意焦点 Wulf; 差异化学习 Schöllhorn; 约束导向方法 Davids/Renshaw; RIR/RPE 自动调节 Zourdos/Helms; 动机访谈在健身中的应用 Rollnick/Miller); (d) 营养指导的执业边界 (宏量营养素周期化; Precision Nutrition / ISSN 立场声明的循证建议; 边界: 私教提供一般性指导, 医学营养治疗需 RD/RDN 资质; 能量可用性与 RED-S Mountjoy IOC 共识); (e) 商业与客户管理 (客户留存与方案依从; 咨询与销售伦理; 线上教练平台与规模化 Goodman PTDC; 方案交付工具 TrueCoach/Trainerize/TrainHeroic; 课时定价模型; 独立教练 vs 健身房雇员); (f) 专项方向 (运动表现 CSCS; 纠正性训练 CES; 老年健身 SFN; 产前产后; 青少年 YSCA; 适应性 / 无障碍健身; 健美 / 形体; 力量举; 耐力运动 S&C)。诚实处理: 兄弟科学 vs 循证之争, 补剂行业利益冲突, 合成代谢激素使用现状 (诚实但不推广: 匿名调查约 30% 有经验男性健身者使用过 — 业内估, Kanayama/Pope/Hudson 记录健康风险, WADA 禁用清单用于竞技语境), 体型焦虑与进食障碍风险 (男性私教肌肉变形症, 正食症倾向, NEDA 负责任语言指南), 健身房掠夺性销售 (高压推销、误导性对比照、长约锁定), 执业边界违规 (私教诊断伤病或超范围开饮食处方), 线上教练认证造假 (周末速成、未经认可的认证)。不含: 物理治疗 / 康复治疗 (持照医疗职业), 不含: 团课教练 (Les Mills/Zumba/CrossFit 分馆教练 — 相邻但不同), 不含: 精英竞技运动教练 (团队项目周期化, 不同职业路径), 不含: 营养作为主业 (临床营养学需单独资质)。 (Personal Trainer — the craft of designing, coaching, and progressing individualized exercise programs for clients, distinct from group fitness instruction, physiotherapy, or sports coaching: (a) exercise programming and periodization (linear / undulating / block periodization per Bompa & Haff; NSCA Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning as industry bible; Schoenfeld on hypertrophy mechanisms; Helms/Valdez/Morgan Muscle & Strength Pyramids; conjugate method Simmons/Westside; Starting Strength linear progression Rippetoe; Renaissance Periodization volume landmarks Israetel); (b) movement assessment and screening (FMS Gray Cook; NASM CEx corrective exercise continuum inhibit-lengthen-activate-integrate; joint-by-joint approach Cook/Boyle; posture and compensation pattern identification; PAR-Q+ and pre-exercise screening ACSM guidelines); (c) coaching and cueing (external vs internal cueing Wulf attentional focus research; differential learning Schöllhorn; constraints-led approach Davids/Renshaw; RIR/RPE autoregulation Zourdos/Helms; motivational interviewing for adherence Rollnick/Miller adapted to fitness); (d) nutrition guidance within scope of practice (macronutrient periodization; evidence-based recommendations per Precision Nutrition / ISSN position stands; scope boundary: PT gives general guidance NOT medical nutrition therapy which requires RD/RDN credential; energy availability and RED-S awareness Mountjoy IOC consensus); (e) business and client management (client retention and programming adherence; consultation and sales ethics; online coaching platforms and scaling Goodman PTDC; programming delivery tools like TrueCoach/Trainerize/TrainHeroic; session pricing models; independent contractor vs gym employee dynamics); (f) specialization tracks (sports performance CSCS; corrective exercise CES; senior fitness SFN; pre/postnatal; youth YSCA; adaptive/inclusive fitness; bodybuilding/physique coaching; powerlifting/strength sports; endurance athlete S&C). Evidence-based practice as the core ethos: Schoenfeld/Krieger meta-analyses on volume-response, Helms systematic reviews on protein/resistance training, Brad Schoenfeld's MASS journal bridging research to practice, Menno Henselmans and Eric Helms as practitioner-researchers, Greg Nuckols Stronger By Science as translation layer. Chinese fitness industry context: rapid growth of personal training in commercial gyms (Keep/Lefit/Megafit chains), NSCA-CPT and ACE-CPT as dominant certifications alongside local CSFA (China Sport and Fitness Association) credential, '体适能' (physical fitness) as formal term, online coaching boom post-COVID, PT business models in tier 1-3 cities diverge sharply. Honest treatment of: bro science vs evidence-based d

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GitHub 解封 — 账号封禁/限制/恢复的领域操作系统。覆盖：(a) GitHub 官方政策体系 (TOS / 可接受使用政策 / Trust & Safety 执行模式 / 公开申诉路径 / 受制裁地区解读)；(b) 封号原因诊断学 (spam / abuse / 制裁误标 / 2FA 丢失 / ToS 违规 / 账号劫持误判 / ban evasion 等子类型 + 症状→原因映射 + 自我分诊压测)；(c) 申诉实操 craft (写一封能让 T&S 快速判误伤的英文申诉信 + 升级阶梯 + 法务介入边界 + Don'ts)；(d) 制裁与合规硬边界 (OFAC SDN 名单 / 哪些国家或地区真不可达 / VPN 误判路径 / 中国大陆不是美国制裁地区的反复重申)；(e) 中国大陆开发者特别处境 (sanctioned region 误标 + SMS 验证不支持 +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab 备用迁移 + 私有自托管 Gitea/Forgejo)；(f) 真实案例库 (~30+ 公开案例分类拆解：误伤 / 真违规 / 制裁误标三类各自赔率与申诉成功路径)。伦理锚绝不软化：不教 ban evasion / 不教撒谎式申诉 / 真违规承认改进 / 丢 2FA 无恢复因子则诚实告知 / 中国制裁误标靠申诉不靠换 VPN / 申诉 6 个月窗口必算清 / 约 3% (业内估) 真违规恢复 vs 约 79% (业内估) 误伤申诉成功率分层标。 (GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: false-positive / genuine violation / sanctions mis-flag, each with win-rate and appeal success path). Ethical anchors absolutely not softened: do NOT teach ban evasion (creating new accounts turns a temp ban into a permanent one — the single biggest mistake); do NOT teach social engineering or lying in appeals (misuse + actually confirms violation); genuine violations: admit + improve beats denial; lost 2FA + no recovery factor → do not pretend recovery is possible; China sanctioned-region mis-flag → fix via appeal, not repeated VPN switching; appeal form 6-month window must be counted carefully; historical 约 3% (业内估) genuine-violation recovery vs 约 79% (业内估) false-positive appeal success rate stratification must be honestly labeled. Anti-samples (explicitly describe harm, never endorse): developer permabanned for ban evasion / open-source team org-banned for personal attacks in public issues / cases where repeated VPN switching escalated risk-control severity.) Master OS — automated mastery of GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: fa

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mid-conversation reflection skill that pauses execution and zooms out from detail-mode to honestly reassess direction, assumptions, and bias. Use when the user says 'reflect', 'take a step back', 'step back', 'zoom out', 'are we missing something', 'bigger picture', 'sanity check this', 'are we on track', 'are we overthinking this', 'forest for the trees', or any variation signaling intent to break out of detail-mode and reassess. Also trigger when the conversation has gone deep on implementation details without strategic check-in, or when the user shows signs of being stuck — that's often a signal the framing needs a reset, not more detail work. Intentionally low-intake: runs the 5-dimension analysis immediately when prior context is rich enough; asks one forcing clarifier only when invocation context is too thin to reassess from.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-affiliated lead-magnet strategy for choosing a downloadable format, defining useful depth, setting honest gating, planning delivery, and measuring qualified capture. Use when the user needs an ebook, checklist, template, content upgrade, or resource exchanged for contact details. NOT FOR: interactive free tools (use suede-free-tools), lifecycle sequences after capture (use suede-emails), or production copy (use suede-copy).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-affiliated offer design for value framing, bonuses, guarantees, risk reversal, honest scarcity, naming, and payment structure. Use when the user is building or diagnosing a service, course, coaching, information-product, agency, or high-ticket B2B offer. NOT FOR: SaaS tier and value-metric architecture (use suede-pricing), sales-page copy (use suede-copy), or in-product upgrade prompts (use suede-paywalls).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing Node.js or TypeScript server code - Express/Fastify/Nest handlers, Next.js server actions and route handlers, child_process, ORM raw queries, prototype pollution, template engines, JWT and outbound HTTP clients

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate a startup idea with competitor analysis, market signals, and risk assessment. Be brutally honest. Use when the user wants to test if an idea is worth building.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How the Strategist works with the user to turn their own trading idea into explicit rules, backtest it honestly on Hyperliquid candle and funding history, and paper-trade it on testnet through the desk lifecycle. Method only - the desk ships no strategies and makes no return claims. Use when the user wants to design, test, compare or paper-trade an idea.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Simplifies recently changed or explicitly scoped code while preserving observable behavior, error semantics, side effects, ordering, and public contracts. Use for readability cleanup, dead-code removal, reducing nesting, eliminating redundant wrappers, or making an implementation easier to maintain. Not for architecture redesign, new behavior, speculative cleanup, or a refactor without an adequate safety net.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user wants intellectual understanding — learning how or why something works, not getting a task done or soliciting Claude's judgment. Trigger for: - Explicit learning requests: teach, explain, ELI5, walk me through, quiz me, flashcards, "I'm rusty on"; definitions ("what is X") - Terse concept names implying "help me understand this": "Galois theory," "transformers, from scratch" - Confusion signals: "won't stick," "keep mixing these up," "not getting it" - Learning-path questions: prerequisites, sequencing, what to study before X - Conceptual questions about mechanisms, causes, or dynamics Don't trigger for: - Tasks: coding, writing, calculation, translation, factual lookup, news updates - Personal troubleshooting; resource/textbook recommendations - Claude's evaluative verdict: opinion prompts ("do you think X", "settle this", "honest take", "is X dead / still taken seriously") and interpretive takes ("was X really as harsh as people say")

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designing LLM-optimized folder structures: audits and restructures directories for context efficiency, progressive disclosure, and prompt cache performance. Not for general repo structure (Grove).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply evidence-first engineering discipline to any agent-built software project: fact discovery before action, evidence-calibrated status reporting, explicit change boundaries and stage gates, controlled confirmation for risky or external actions, sensitive-information redaction for anything shared publicly, and resumable continuity after interruptions. Use when users ask an agent to take over an existing codebase, deliver a feature across stages, verify whether work is actually complete, judge release readiness, or keep conclusions honest about what is proven versus assumed. This foundation skill is domain-neutral; vertical suites (for example mini-program engineering) build on it by adding domain facts and platform rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, deepen, validate, index, and maintain a private hierarchical career knowledge graph from supplied career materials. Use when the user asks to create or update a VitaeGraph, model education with nested courses or thesis work, enrich projects from Git repositories, or supply deep selected career context to another VitaeContext skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Craft CMS 5 content modeling — sections, entry types, fields, Matrix, relations, project config, and content architecture strategy. Covers choosing section types, designing entry types and field layouts, selecting field types, configuring Matrix and nested entries, relations and eager loading, and multi-site propagation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remix v2 routing patterns. Use when implementing flat-routes v2 conventions, route file naming, nested layouts, resource routes, or root.tsx scaffolding. Triggers on _<name>.tsx (pathless layout), _index.tsx, $param, app/routes/, @remix-run/dev, defineRoutes, <Outlet /> in route modules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retirement projection with Monte Carlo simulation logic. Calculates required nest egg via 4% rule and 25x expenses, projected vs needed gap, contribution recommendations, asset allocation by age, Social Security claim optimization, healthcare cost projections, and withdrawal sequence planning. Use when the user says "/finance retirement", "am I on track for retirement", "how much do I need to retire", "Social Security timing", or any retirement question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。