「quest」の検索結果

Stop and check this skill before finishing any reply to a question about how to use Claude or a Claude product — it recommends matching courses, tutorials, and use cases from Claude Academy (academy.claude.com), Anthropic's learning hub. Trigger on: "how do I", "how can I", "getting started with", "what can Claude do", "teach me", "learn to use"; questions about artifacts, projects, skills, plugins, connectors, MCP; requests about rolling Claude out to a team, class, or organization; and any ask for training materials, onboarding content, or learning resources. Use it when the user is learning how to use a feature or product — not when they are mid-task and just want the task done. This skill composes with other skills: after consulting product documentation to answer how a Claude feature works, also check here for a matching course or tutorial — a docs-grounded answer and an Academy recommendation belong together. Only recommend on a strong match; never invent Academy content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply critical rationalist epistemology (Popper, Deutsch) to evaluate reasoning, identify errors, and refine understanding. Use when the user explicitly requests help with reasoning - phrases like "help me think this through", "does this make sense", "any flaws in this", "what am I missing", "critique this", "is this reasoning sound", "stress test this idea", "devil's advocate", or any request to evaluate arguments, identify logical problems, or improve thinking. Also use when errors in reasoning are significant enough to materially affect the user's goals, even if not explicitly requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when someone asks to write, rewrite, review, or improve text that appears inside a product or interface. Examples: "review the UX copy", "is there a better way to phrase this", "rewrite this error message", "write copy for this screen/flow/page", reviewing button labels, improving CLI output messages, writing onboarding copy, settings descriptions, or confirmation dialogs. Trigger whenever the request involves wording shown to end users inside software — apps, web, CLI, email notifications, modals, tooltips, empty states, or alerts. Also trigger for vague requests like "review the UX" where interface copy review is implied. Do NOT trigger for content marketing, blog posts, app store listings, API docs, brand guides, cover letters, or interview questions — this is a technical writing skill for interface language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tests API rate limiting implementations for bypass vulnerabilities by manipulating request headers, IP addresses, HTTP methods, API versions, and encoding schemes to circumvent request throttling controls. The tester identifies rate limit headers, Belirle:s enforcement mechanisms, and attempts bypasses including X-Forwarded-For spoofing, parameter pollution, case variation, and endpoint path manipulation. Maps to OWASP API4:2023 Unrestricted Resource Consumption. Activates for requests invol...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tests APIs for mass assignment (auto-binding) vulnerabilities where clients can modify object properties they should not have Erişim: by including additional parameters in API requests. The tester identifies writable endpoints, adds undocumented fields to request bodies (role, isAdmin, price, balance), and checks if the server binds these to the data model without filtering. Part of OWASP API3:2023 Broken Object Property Level Authorization. Activates for requests involving mass assignment ...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tests APIs for injection vulnerabilities including SQL injection, NoSQL injection, OS command injection, LDAP injection, and Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) through API parameters, headers, and request bodies. The tester crafts malicious payloads targeting different backend technologies and injection contexts to extract data, execute commands, or access internal services. Maps to OWASP API8:2023 Security Misconfiguration and API7:2023 SSRF. Activates for requests involving API injection te...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Handle pull requests and review comments using GitHub CLI (gh). Use when the user wants to check PR comments, address review feedback, reply with commit hashes, or work with pull requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Personal App-in-Skill voice-of-customer desk (Busabase App-in-Skill) aggregating user feedback from support email, Discord/Slack communities, X replies, app-store reviews, surveys, and interviews into clustered feature requests and a roadmap decision queue. Use when the user invokes $kelly-feedback or /kelly-feedback, or mentions user feedback, voice of customer, feature requests, roadmap decisions, feedback clustering, feedback triage, request dedupe, changelog replies, decline replies, or reviewing what users are asking for.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses CI and pull-request pipeline health for a GitHub repo using the engineering analytics MCP tools — pull-requests (PR list with CI status), workflow-health (per-workflow CI trends), and pr-lifecycle (a single PR's timeline). Use when asked whether CI is getting faster or slower, which GitHub Actions workflow is the slow or flaky long-pole, how long PRs take from open to merge, how an author's merge time compares to the cohort, which open PRs have failing or pending CI, or where a specific pull request is stuck. Triggers on "engineering analytics", "is CI getting slower", "slow workflow", "flaky CI", "time to merge", "cycle time", "PR throughput", "failing checks", "where is PR <n> stuck", "CI long pole", "what's holding up this PR".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ToolUniverse plugin router. STEP 1 BEFORE ANY ANALYSIS: if the data folder contains `*_executed.ipynb`, run `tu run read_executed_notebook '{"data_folder":"<path>","search":"<keyword>"}'` to extract its cell outputs and apply EVERY filter/sample-exclusion the notebook used — even when the question says 'Using DESeq2/Run X/Compute Y' (this describes the METHOD the notebook used, not a request to rerun). The notebook's cell outputs are the only published authoritative answers; reimplementing or reading stale pre-computed CSVs in the data folder produces different numbers because of outlier-sample removal, library version, and filter steps you don't see by skimming. STEP 2 routing — pick a sub-skill name from this exact list (never invent): tooluniverse-rnaseq-deseq2 (RNA/miRNA-seq DE, correlation, PCA, clustering, dispersion), tooluniverse-gene-enrichment (GO/KEGG/Reactome/GSEA/pathway enrichment), tooluniverse-statistical-modeling (regression, ANOVA, ordinal/logistic, chi-square, correlation, power), tooluniverse-image-analysis (microscopy, colony, fluorescence, dose-response, .tif — including ANOVA / Dunnett / power-analysis on image-derived measurements), tooluniverse-epigenomics (DNA methylation, CpG, m6A, MeRIP-seq, bisulfite, ChIP-seq, chromatin), tooluniverse-sequence-analysis (FASTQ, Trimmomatic, BWA, samtools, coverage), tooluniverse-variant-analysis (VCF, VAF, SNP, mutation), tooluniverse-phylogenetics (treeness, PhyKIT, parsimony), tooluniverse-single-cell (scRNA, h5ad, scanpy), tooluniverse-crispr-screen-analysis (MAGeCK, sgRNA), tooluniverse-proteomics-analysis (mass spec, TMT). Use for CSV/Excel/VCF/FASTA/h5ad and any biology/chemistry/medicine analysis question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate the success criteria for a task or question, then review work against them. Given a task, goal, or open-ended question, decompose it into scenarios, evaluation perspectives, and fine-grained weighted YES/NO criteria using the Recursive Expansion Tree (RET) method; if work is supplied, score it criterion-by-criterion and surface what is missing or could be better. Use when asked to self-review or check your own work, judge whether a task is done well or completely, build a definition-of-done or completeness checklist, create an evaluation rubric or grading criteria, score or grade answers to a question, set up an LLM-as-judge rubric, or when the user mentions self-review, completeness check, success criteria, evaluation criteria, scoring rubric, Qworld, or the RET algorithm.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Process accommodation requests with documentation. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with accommodation-request related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract requestor, ship-from, ship-to, service, package, and handling instructions from shipping requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage a GitHub issue that already has the cc-issue-created label and is assumed ready to start. Inspect the comment history first to decide whether human confirmation is needed (cc-need-human-check, highest priority — reserved for issue-level deadlock, or for confirmation items answer-issue-questions already investigated and explicitly marked unanswerable); otherwise close the issue as not needed, delegate unanswered confirmation items in the last comment or the description to answer-issue-questions (cc-answer-issue-questions), refresh a description stale relative to settled comment-history content (cc-update-issue), or move to execution (cc-exec-issue). Any UI-changing issue is routed to the design-first flow (cc-create-ui-design) before execution; the exceptions are an issue whose description already names the .pen design to implement against, and a minor UI change that introduces no new visual decision (no new screen/section, no layout change, no new reusable component, no visual expression outside existing design tokens/components). Design files are never edited in the implementation PR. Dependency checks are out of scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read this before the first Google Drive, Docs, Sheets or Slides connector call whenever the task creates or changes a Google file. Use this skill whenever the user wants to create or change a Google Doc, Sheet or Slides file in their Google Drive. Triggers include: a request that names Google Docs, Sheets, Slides or Drive and asks to make, edit, format, copy or rename a file; a docs.google.com link with a request to change that file, even a one-line fix or suggested edits; and any follow-up change to a Google file from earlier in the chat, even "change it" or "add a tab". Includes helper scripts for document positions, cell ranges and slide layout. However, if the user asks for a doc, deck or spreadsheet without naming Google, or gives a Google file only as source material for something new, use Claude's own output type instead. Do NOT use for read-only questions about a Google file, or for Word, Excel, PowerPoint or PDF files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Save a Prisma Composer app to GitHub, connect its existing Prisma project, and enable or diagnose default-branch automatic deployments. Use when the user accepts the offer to save their code to GitHub and connect it to Prisma for automatic updates, accepts the shorter GitHub-saving offer, or directly requests this setup, including resuming an interrupted connection. Do not start GitHub setup for an ordinary build/deploy request, unrelated Git work, or a request to deploy an app before a live target has been established.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The gate and path for any question an agent wants Arman to decide. Use when about to ask him anything, ending a turn on a question for him, writing 'needs Arman's decision', marking work blocked on him, or on /ask-arman. NOT for a step only he can perform (use a guided session).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews and approves blocked agent network requests in the TUI. Use when approving or denying sandbox egress requests, managing blocked network calls, or using the approval TUI. Trigger keywords - nemoclaw approve network requests, sandbox egress approval tui, customize nemoclaw network policy, sandbox egress policy configuration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create GitHub pull requests that follow the NemoClaw PR template. Use when the user wants to create a new PR, submit code for review, open a pull request, or push changes for review. Trigger keywords - create PR, pull request, new PR, submit for review, open PR, push for review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, update, and manage GitHub issues using MCP tools. Use this skill when users want to create bug reports, feature requests, or task issues, update existing issues, add labels/assignees/milestones, set issue fields (dates, priority, custom fields), set issue types, manage issue workflows, link issues, add dependencies, or track blocked-by/blocking relationships. Triggers on requests like "create an issue", "file a bug", "request a feature", "update issue X", "set the priority", "set the start date", "link issues", "add dependency", "blocked by", "blocking", or any GitHub issue management task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are a GitHub issue resolution expert specializing in systematic bug investigation, feature implementation, and collaborative development workflows. Your expertise spans issue triage, root cause analysis, test-driven development, and pull request management. You excel at transforming vague bug reports into actionable fixes and feature requests into production-ready code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gather phase context through adaptive questioning before planning. Use --auto to skip interactive questions (the agent picks recommended defaults). Use --chain for interactive discuss followed by automatic plan+execute. Use --power for bulk question generation into a file-based UI (answer at your own pace).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tests APIs for injection vulnerabilities including SQL injection, NoSQL injection, OS command injection, LDAP injection, and Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) through API parameters, headers, and request bodies. The tester crafts malicious payloads targeting different backend technologies and injection contexts to extract data, execute commands, or access internal services. Maps to OWASP API8:2023 Security Misconfiguration and API7:2023 SSRF. Activates for requests involving API injection testing, SQLi in APIs, NoSQL injection, SSRF testing, or API input validation assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detecting and exploiting HTTP request smuggling vulnerabilities caused by Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding parsing discrepancies between front-end and back-end servers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。