「regress」の検索結果

End-to-end methodology for reproducing AND patching publicly disclosed, already-fixed vulnerabilities: sourcing the advisory and the fix commit, reading the patch diff, rebuilding a pinned offline lab, building a vulnerable-vs-patched contrast harness with proper controls, minimizing the trigger, designing and validating the fix, and writing it up as a blog post or whitepaper. Use this skill whenever the user wants to reproduce, demonstrate, understand, teach, or write about a known vulnerability or security incident: "reproduce this CVE", "build a repro for", "how did EchoLeak / Log4Shell / the postmark-mcp package actually work", "show me how this exploit worked", "write a blog post about this vulnerability", "set up a lab for CVE-XXXX", "pull the NVD/CVE/OSV details", or "make a PoC I can publish". Use it just as eagerly for the patching half: "how should this be fixed", "is this patch correct", "what would have caught this", "review this security fix", "write a regression test for this CVE", "how do I backport this", or "what's the right fix for this bug class" - even when the user never says the word "reproduce". Reach for it on vague asks like "help me understand this security advisory", "I want to write about this incident", or "can we test whether we were vulnerable" when a disclosed vulnerability is in play. This skill only handles ALREADY-PATCHED, publicly disclosed issues and refuses zero-day discovery, live targets, and weaponization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drives implementation by writing a failing test first, then the smallest code that passes it. Use this before writing implementation code for any feature or bugfix, when a bug needs a regression test, when existing code is hard to change safely, or when someone asks whether a change is covered. Also use to decide what is worth testing and what is not.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answers a business question with data without fooling yourself — framing the question so an answer would change something, choosing the right comparison, checking the data before trusting it, recognizing the traps that produce confident wrong answers (aggregation reversals, survivorship, regression to the mean, multiple comparisons), and reporting uncertainty honestly. Use this to run an analysis, review one before acting on it, or work out why two people looking at the same data reached opposite conclusions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive security and correctness audit of a branch's changes. Use for thermo nuclear, thermonuclear, or deep review requests, or branch/PR diff audits focused on bugs, breaking changes, security issues, devex regressions, and feature-gate leaks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for 'why does X work this way', 'why we picked Y', design rationale, regressions, postmortems, or data-backed thresholds. Discovers available MCPs and queries each evidence category (source control, issue tracker, long-form docs, real-time chat, infrastructure observability, error tracking, product analytics warehouse) in parallel, then returns a cited read on decisions and tradeoffs. Use how for runtime behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only when the user explicitly asks for TDD, a failing test, or a regression test, OR when the bug has an obvious cheap local test target. Skip when the test path is unclear, expensive, integration-heavy, or not requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply before you trust, report, or act on a number you measured: a speedup, a regression, a throughput, a latency, or an eval result. Find what limits it, and rule out that it measured something other than the work you think.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Vet a perf measurement (limiter, tuning, limits, errors, repeatability, relevance, and whether the work happened) before you report or act on it. Use when you run a benchmark or report a speedup or regression you measured.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect and correct for horizontal pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization analyses using MR-PRESSO for outlier removal, MR-Egger regression for directional pleiotropy, and Steiger filtering for variant directionality. Use when validating MR results, detecting pleiotropic instrum...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates complete NHANES-style cross-sectional epidemiology + retrospective clinical validation research designs from a user-provided disease and biomarker direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or build a population-level biomarker association study using NHANES or similar survey datasets, especially when the article logic includes disease definition, biomarker formula derivation, multivariable logistic regression, restricted cubic spline analysis, subgroup stability testing, and a secondary hospital-based retrospective validation cohort. Covers five study patterns (cross-sectional association, dose-response / RCS, subgroup-stability, NHANES + retrospective validation, preliminary screening-performance) and always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building XGBoost models on tabular data and returning feature importance ranking outputs. Supports binary classification and regression with automatic task detection, train-test split, performance tables, feature importance ranking tables, and PNG importance plots.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need a standardized R CLI workflow to run two-class SVM-RFE feature ranking on an expression-like matrix, choose an informative feature count from cross-validated error, and generate reproducible ranking and error plots. NOT for regression, multi-class classification, missing-value imputation, or remote data fetching.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evaluating diagnostic biomarker performance from case-control expression data with logistic regression and ROC curves, exporting coefficient and AUC tables together with a ROC PDF. NOT for: survival analysis, time-to-event outcomes, multiclass classification, calibration curves, decision-curve analysis, or nomogram construction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need a standardized R CLI workflow to train a two-class random forest model from an expression-like feature matrix, rank variable importance, and generate reproducible error and importance plots. NOT for regression tasks, multi-class classification, missing-value imputation, preprocessing, or remote data fetching.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when running prognostic survival analysis on a clinical cohort with time-to-event data to estimate univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, export result tables, and generate forest plots. NOT for: nomogram construction, calibration curves, time-dependent ROC analysis, or model training/feature selection beyond the built-in univariate screening rule.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building a decision tree model in R and generating feature importance ranking outputs. Supports classification and regression, automatic task detection, parameter validation, model evaluation summaries, and exports of feature-importance tables and figures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when selecting predictive genes or other molecular features from bulk expression matrices for binary case-vs-control classification with elastic net logistic regression, including coefficient path and cross-validation plots. Trigger keywords: elastic net, glmnet, feature selection, binary classification, lambda.min, lambda.1se. NOT for: survival/Cox modeling, multiclass outcomes, single-cell data, or non-expression tables.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when running performance benchmarks, establishing baselines, or validating regressions with sequential runs. Enforces 60s minimum runs (30s only for binary search) and no parallel benchmarks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Findings-first code review workflow for AI coding agents. Use when the user asks to review uncommitted changes, commits in a date range, or a branch compared to the main branch / PR-style diff. Focuses on bugs, regressions, correctness risks, missing tests, security/data-safety issues, and other behavior-changing defects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain and extend the open-websearch MCP server. Trigger when changing search engines, proxy or TLS behavior, tool registration, live parsing behavior, or compatibility and regression behavior inside this repository.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluation harness for testing agent and skill quality through structured benchmarks, regression tests, and quality scoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for 'why does X work this way', 'why we picked Y', design rationale, regressions, postmortems, or data-backed thresholds. Discovers available MCPs and queries each evidence category (source control, issue tracker, long-form docs, real-time chat, infrastructure observability, error tracking, product analytics warehouse) in parallel, then returns a cited read on decisions and tradeoffs. Use how for runtime behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Vet a perf measurement (limiter, tuning, limits, errors, repeatability, relevance, and whether the work happened) before you report or act on it. Use when you run a benchmark or report a speedup or regression you measured.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply before you trust, report, or act on a number you measured: a speedup, a regression, a throughput, a latency, or an eval result. Find what limits it, and rule out that it measured something other than the work you think.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。