「reviews」の検索結果

Reviews all your Google Ads extensions — sitelinks, callouts, structured snippets, call extensions, image extensions, price extensions — across every campaign. Flags what's missing, what's underperforming, what's outdated, and writes replacements based on your best performing ads and landing pages. Platform: Google.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews your landing pages against the ads driving traffic to them. Checks for message match between ad copy and page content, CTA clarity, above-the-fold alignment, form friction, and flags any disconnects between what the ad promises and what the page delivers. Platform: Google and Meta.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OWASP compliance, vulnerability scanning, and adversarial red team testing — use for security reviews

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Fable and GPT reviews, then combine their findings for the user's approval. Use only when the user explicitly invokes /total-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review of a PR, branch, or your own uncommitted work across eight dimensions — security, correctness, test coverage, API/compatibility, usability, documentation, code quality, performance. Sizes the diff, reviews inline or fans out reviewers off a shared brief, verifies findings against code, reports a grouped list with a shape verdict, fixes on approval. Use for "review this PR", "/pr-review 3011", or a pre-flight self-review before submitting; add "thorough" for adversarial verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive code review workflow - parallel specialized reviews → synthesis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

International / multilingual SEO audit focused on hreflang correctness: missing or broken return tags, wrong language/region codes, missing x-default, self-referencing errors, hreflang vs canonical conflicts, and inconsistent signals across HTML head, HTTP headers and XML sitemap. Also reviews URL structure (ccTLD vs subdirectory vs subdomain), language targeting and geo signals. Use whenever the user runs a multi-language or multi-region site and asks about hreflang, international or multilingual SEO, the wrong-language page showing in search, or duplicate content across country versions. Trigger on: "hreflang", "international SEO", "multilingual SEO", "multi-region", "wrong language in Google", "x-default", "ccTLD vs subdirectory", "geo targeting", "language targeting", "my English page shows for Thai users", "th/en page ranking in the wrong country", or any cross-language/cross-country ranking question. For full-site audits use /seo-analysis; for a single URL use /seo-page.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and review ChatGPT Ads experiments without assuming ad inventory, account access, or platform capabilities. Use for ChatGPT advertising, OpenAI ads, conversational ad concepts, ChatGPT campaign plans, or performance reviews from a verified export.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

XML sitemap audit — find and fix the sitemap problems that quietly waste crawl budget and slow indexing. Discovers the sitemap (robots.txt, /sitemap.xml, sitemap index), validates structure and size limits, and cross-checks the URLs it lists against reality: non-200 / redirected / noindex / canonicalized-away URLs that shouldn't be in a sitemap, plus indexable pages that are missing from it. Reviews lastmod accuracy, sitemap-index organization, and robots.txt reference. Use this skill whenever the user asks about sitemaps, sitemap errors in Search Console, "sitemap couldn't fetch / has errors", crawl budget, pages not getting indexed, or whether their sitemap is clean. Trigger on: "sitemap", "sitemap.xml", "XML sitemap", "sitemap errors", "sitemap audit", "couldn't fetch sitemap", "crawl budget", "pages not indexed sitemap", "sitemap index", "lastmod", "robots.txt sitemap", or any sitemap/crawl-coverage question. For a full-site SEO audit use /seo-analysis; for broken links use /broken-link-checker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch PR review comments, verify each against real code/docs, fix valid issues, commit and push

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit, design, write, materially revise, or remove Tutti tests. Use whenever Codex changes or reviews unit, component, conformance, integration, regression, platform, or repository tests; enforce a protected product contract, credible failure, correct owning boundary, negative-control evidence, overlap review, deterministic setup, and an executing CI lane.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Competitor research and intelligence skill. Takes a user's company (with optional seed competitor URLs), auto-discovers additional competitors via Browserbase Search API, deeply researches each using a 4-lane pattern (marketing surface, external signal, public benchmarks, strategic diff vs the user's company), and compiles the results into an HTML report with four views: overview, per-competitor deep dive, side-by-side feature/pricing matrix, and a chronological mentions feed (news, reviews, social, comparison pages, and public benchmarks). Use when the user wants to: (1) analyze competitors, (2) build a competitive matrix, (3) extract competitor pricing / features, (4) find comparison pages and online mentions of competitors, (5) surface public benchmarks. Triggers: "competitor analysis", "analyze competitors", "competitive intel", "competitor research", "competitor pricing", "feature comparison", "price comparison", "find comparisons", "who's comparing us", "competitor mentions", "competitor benchmarks".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform language and framework specific security best-practice reviews and suggest improvements. Trigger only when the user explicitly requests security best practices guidance, a security review/report, or secure-by-default coding help. Trigger only for supported languages (python, javascript/typescript, go). Do not trigger for general code review, debugging, or non-security tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Codex-local role pack for dialectic multi-agent reviews, designed to be compatible with the local vibe skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch financial and market data with the yfinance Python library (Yahoo Finance). Use this skill whenever the user wants stock data: current quotes and price history, financial statements (income statement, balance sheet, cash flow), options chains, dividends and splits, earnings and analyst estimates, price targets and ratings, institutional and insider holdings, news, multi-ticker comparisons, stock screens, or sector and industry data. Use it even when the user gives only a ticker symbol (AAPL, MSFT, TSLA) and the intent has to be inferred. For earnings previews or recaps, estimate revisions, valuation, correlation, liquidity, or ETF premium analysis, prefer the dedicated skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Turn repeated lessons into written rules: extract repeated principles from skills, prompts, traces, reviews, and failures into reviewed rule candidates without auto-mutating guidance. Use when the user says: rules-distill, rules distill, distill rules, rule distillation, principle distill, skill principles, extract agent rules, turn traces into rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch GitHub issues, spawn sub-agents to implement fixes and open PRs, then monitor and address PR review comments. Usage: /gh-issues [owner/repo] [--label bug] [--limit 5] [--milestone v1.0] [--assignee @me] [--fork user/repo] [--watch] [--interval 5] [--reviews-only] [--cron] [--dry-run] [--model glm-5] [--notify-channel -1002381931352]

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to process, triage, fetch, view, count, list, or resolve review feedback in a GitHub PR. Supports both CodeRabbit and Codex review workflows. In this workflow, “real review feedback” is strictly defined as actionable inline comments; for CodeRabbit, exclude review summaries and nitpicks, and for Codex, exclude review summary cards and use PR main-thread reactions only as status signals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analytical thinking patterns for comprehensive evaluation, code audits, security analysis, and performance reviews. Provides structured templates for thorough investigation with extended thinking support.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform the agent into a Cloud Solution Architect following Azure Architecture Center best practices. Use when designing cloud architectures, reviewing system designs, selecting architecture styles, applying cloud design patterns, making technology choices, or conducting Well-Architected Framework reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search scientific papers and retrieve structured experimental data extracted from full-text studies via the BGPT MCP server. Returns 25+ fields per paper including methods, results, sample sizes, quality scores, and conclusions. Use for literature reviews, evidence synthesis, and finding experimental details not available in abstracts alone.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run or troubleshoot Wrangler CLI commands in projects that have a wrangler.jsonc, wrangler.json, or wrangler.toml file, including local development, Previews, deployment, and resource management. For new projects and projects without a Wrangler configuration file, use the cf CLI instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。