532 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
The **Coherence Composer** is an epistemological skill that validates structural consistency and explores counterfactual worlds while respecting constraints from both **Commitment Tracker** (ontology) and **Opacity Detector** (epistemology).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Access AlphaFold's 200M+ AI-predicted protein structures. Retrieve structures by UniProt ID, download PDB/mmCIF files, analyze confidence metrics (pLDDT, PAE), for drug discovery and structural biology.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess and refactor oversized or multi-domain skills. First determines whether splitting or references/ extraction is appropriate — then executes the correct action. Use when a skill exceeds token thresholds (SK006/SK007) or covers multiple independent domains. Performs candidate assessment before any structural changes; cohesive single-intent skills are redirected to references/ extraction instead of splitting. When splitting is warranted — domain analysis gate, split plan, new SKILL.md generation, validation, and backwards-compatible facade conversion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analysis criteria, transformation patterns, output format, and validation checklist for refactoring Claude Code agent prompt files. Load this skill when preparing to run the subagent-refactorer agent or when reviewing agent prompt files for structural, model optimization, or instruction quality improvements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when checking skill quality, validating frontmatter before commit, or diagnosing validator warnings. Runs the plugin validator on a skill, agent, or plugin directory — reports token complexity, broken links, frontmatter issues, and structural problems. Pass the path as an argument.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate a single skill's quality against its stated purpose. Classifies the skill's purpose type, then scores applicable quality categories — universal dimensions always apply; structural dimensions (scripts, references, assets) are scored only when warranted by the skill's purpose. A focused 20-line behavioral skill with no bundled resources scores fully on all applicable categories. Use when auditing skill quality, checking marketplace readiness, evaluating skill completeness, performing pre-publication evaluation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute large-scale automated code transformations safely and idempotently. Use when renaming symbols across a codebase, migrating API call-sites, enforcing new patterns at scale, or applying structural edits to many files at once. Triggers on: 'codemod', 'mass rename', 'migrate all usages', 'transform codebase', 'apply pattern at scale', AST-based refactoring, or any task requiring consistent edits across 10 or more files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dasel v3 query patterns for InstallAnywhere .iap_xml installer definitions — use when querying action sequences, discovering variables, resolving platform conditions, navigating panels, or comparing installer variants. Files are 2.5+ MB, 65,000+ lines — too large for context reads, requires structural dasel queries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate research entry lifecycle in ./research/ — create, batch-import, refresh stale entries, and validate structure. Use when asked to add a tool, research a URL, document a library, refresh research, validate entries, or given any tool or library URL. Supports --batch (parallel multi-URL), --rerun (refresh one or all entries), and --validate (structural check with auto-fix of error-severity issues).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review an Incan RFC document for formatting, structural, and content issues before GitHub submission. Use when the user asks to review an RFC, check an RFC for problems, prepare an RFC for submission, or says /review-rfc.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-landing PR review. Analyzes diff against the base branch for SQL safety, LLM trust boundary violations, conditional side effects, and other structural issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess a public HTTP(S) page before building browser automation, extraction, or an integration. Use this skill to collect bounded structural evidence, readiness signals, risk flags, acceptance tests, and remediation priorities without sending credentials or accessing private targets.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use ast-grep (sg) to search, lint, and rewrite code across large codebases using AST pattern matching. A blazing-fast alternative to regex-based code transformations that understands syntax structure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rewrite recurring code patterns with syntax-aware matching so agents can run migration codemods more safely than plain regex search and replace.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Give a coding agent symbol-aware lookup, cross-file rename, and structural edit tools before it starts making brittle text-only changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Develop evidence-backed structural and architectural security hardening proposals from vulnerability disclosures, supplied findings, incident or assessment documents, source code, or a completed Codex Security scan. Use when a user asks for systemic improvements, alternatives beyond per-finding patches, before-and-after security architecture views, engineering tradeoff analysis, or an implementation-ready plan for a selected hardening option. Also use automatically after a Codex Security scan with reportable findings when the top-level scan workflow requests final-report hardening guidance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when Codex must make a high-quality judgment on any complex problem, not only technical problems. Trigger when a question has high complexity, uncertainty, cost of being wrong, long-term impact, value tradeoffs, possible structural causes, or when the user asks for 全面思考, 深度理解, 系统性分析, 帮我想清楚, 从根上看, 这件事到底怎么看, 方法论, 复杂问题拆解, 系统方案, 架构判断, 策略判断, or 根因分析. Also trigger for project and engineering high-risk scenarios such as multi-module, multi-environment, multi-data-source, multi-state, financial truth, live trading, ledger, revenue, customer assets, order governance, broker interfaces, online availability, major solution selection, and system closure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asking whether something in imp is actually finished - hunting stubs, placeholders, request fields that are parsed and then ignored, code paths or kernels that never run, gate-based features that silently no-op, tests that assert nothing. Triggers on "is this implemented", "unfinished", "stub", "placeholder", "dead path", "does this flag do anything", "accepted but ignored", "kernel never launched", "test asserts nothing", "neutral A/B on a gated feature". Do NOT use for structural debt / god files / duplication (codebase-audit) or for who-calls-what (code-graph).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when keeping imp's docs and config examples coherent after a change - updating docs/internals/ARCHITECTURE.md / README / docs/GOAL.md / docs/MODELS.md / docs/roadmap.md / imp.conf.example / CHANGELOG / MISSION_JOURNAL, or "is this doc stale", "document this change", "the example config is out of date", "the README says X but the code does Y", "add a roadmap ledger row". Do NOT use for layer/frontmatter/lint questions (docs-layers), structural code audits (codebase-audit), measuring perf or refreshing the perf baseline (benchmark-cuda), or the agent's private memory (MEMORY.md).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing the imp codebase for structural debt, dead code, god-objects/files, duplication, flag sprawl, or deciding whether a cleanup is worth shipping - "structure audit", "tech debt", "is this still used", "dead code", "refactor for clarity", "should we split this file", "remove this flag", "file size gate red", "alloc sites gate red". Do NOT use for build/test mechanics (building-and-testing), perf/kernel work (benchmark-cuda / sm120-cuda-expert), or output quality (check-degeneration).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds default probability and recovery rate models with industry data, structural analysis, and loss-given-default estimation. Use when modeling credit losses, estimating recovery values, or analyzing default scenarios.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when analyzing published content (blog posts, social media, newsletters) for sentiment, structural quality, hook effectiveness, readability, topic classification, and engagement correlation. Invoke for daily post analysis, content audits, or engagement driver identification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use ast-grep for AST-based code pattern matching.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deeply analyzes Agent Studio framework structural health: catching phantom require() references, wrong module depth paths, missing skill/agent dependencies, bloated configurations, archived references in active code, stale catalog counts, and empty tool/skill directories.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。