「usp」の検索結果

Use when a task needs the judgment of an allergist/immunologist — interpreting a skin-prick or specific-IgE result against pretest probability, working up a "penicillin allergy" label for delabeling before a needed antibiotic, managing anaphylaxis and biphasic-reaction risk, stepping asthma therapy up or down, or evaluating suspected primary immunodeficiency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a licensed acupuncturist — building a TCM pattern-differentiation-based treatment plan, choosing point combinations and needling technique for a presenting complaint, triaging a safety red flag (fainting, suspected pneumothorax, herb-drug interaction), or writing a SOAP note that justifies medical necessity for insurance. US scope-of-practice default (NCCAOM/state licensure). A reasoning aid, not medical advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conventions for writing justfile recipes in Nix-based projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code for quality, simplicity, and common mistakes before declaring work complete.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iteratively study and apply elegant coding patterns. Each iteration - understand the code, research what simple and elegant code looks like, apply learnings, verify with CI. Use as a standalone refactoring pass or when the user asks to make code more elegant, simple, or idiomatic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit code for correctness and rigor — logic errors, silent error swallowing, wishful thinking, and unjustified fallbacks. This is not a style review; it's a logic review. Use when you want a focused correctness audit separate from the full code-police pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate architecture and module boundaries for volatility-based decomposition using Juval Lowy's framework (from "Righting Software", building on Parnas 1972). Use when reviewing module splits, service boundaries, new abstractions, or any decomposition decision. Trigger on phrases like "where should this boundary be", "how to split this", "module boundaries", "encapsulate change", "volatility", or references to Lowy, Parnas, or "Righting Software". Complements /hickey (interleaved concerns) with a different lens (change encapsulation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write engaging PR titles and descriptions for any forge (GitHub today; Bitbucket planned). Use when creating or updating PRs. Leads with narrative paragraphs and reaches for lists, tables, and diagrams when content is genuinely structured.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications (examples include websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML/CSS layouts, or when styling/beautifying any web UI). Generates creative, polished code and UI design that avoids generic AI aesthetics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate code (especially LLM-generated) for structural simplicity using Rich Hickey's "Simple Made Easy" framework. Use this skill whenever reviewing a PR, diff, or code snippet for accidental complexity — particularly when the code was generated by an AI coding assistant and line-by-line review isn't feasible. Also use when the user asks about complecting, simplicity vs. easiness, structural coupling, or concept deduplication. Trigger on phrases like "is this simple", "does this complect", "review for complexity", "structural analysis", or any reference to Hickey, Simple Made Easy, or grey-box review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Do a task end-to-end — implement, PR, CI loop, ship. ONLY invoke when the user explicitly types `/do` or `$do`; never auto-select from a natural-language request, even one that sounds like an end-to-end task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iterative measurement-driven improvement loop. Measure, profile, mutate, re-measure, commit. Works for performance, bundle size, complexity, test coverage — anything quantifiable. Use when the user wants to systematically improve a metric through repeated cycles of profiling and targeted changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this when writing or reviewing Haskell code. Covers error handling, type safety, idiomatic patterns, HLint compliance, Aeson usage, and testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enter talk mode — conversation and research, no repo changes. ONLY invoke when the user explicitly types `/talk` or `$talk`; never auto-select from a natural-language question or design discussion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Vira's design system — TailwindCSS conventions, color palette, typography, spacing, components, and accessibility rules. Use when working on UI components, styling, or layout in this project (Lucid HTML in Haskell sources under packages/vira).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-carrier shipping rate comparison and label-generation pipeline — real-time quotes from USPS, UPS, FedEx, DHL via direct carrier APIs OR aggregators (Shippo / EasyPost / ShipStation / Pirate Ship)..

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit shipping costs and identify savings across carriers, zones, and modes. Triggers: you need to compare UPS/FedEx/USPS/DHL rates, analyze zone-skip and zone-reduction opportunities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit financial reconciliation workflows -- evaluate automated transaction matching engines, intercompany balance reconciliation, suspense and clearing account health, variance root-cause investigation, and close calendar integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, mock up, build and review terminal UIs — full-screen TUIs, interactive CLIs and pickers, and plugin panels or popups inside a host (herdr, tmux, Neovim, k9s, lazygit). Use when designing, reviewing (from code, a live capture or a screenshot) or redesigning a TUI's layout, keybindings, states or colors, including requests that name a known TUI (lazygit, k9s, btop, yazi, helix, fzf); writing terminal mockups; building or fixing one in Ink, Textual, Bubble Tea, Ratatui or gum; mapping a color scheme (Catppuccin, Dracula, Nord, Gruvbox, Tokyo Night, Rosé Pine…) onto a TUI's theme; fixing misaligned glyphs, flicker, NO_COLOR, exit codes, signals, pipes or a broken terminal after exit; suspend or $EDITOR handoff; or profiling a slow TUI. Not for web or native GUIs, terminal-emulator, editor or shell-prompt themes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ward the codebase — an ad-hoc test-gap audit that reveals unguarded code (untested functions, uncovered edge cases, missing error-handling and integration tests) and conjures ready-to-paste test skeletons as protective wards against regression, surfaced inline in the session. Scoped to your current diff by default, or to a path/area you name. Use before merging risky changes or when you suspect thin coverage. Replaces the old always-on `testgaps` daemon worker (alias: /test-gaps).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Curate .unikit/MCP-RECHECK-NOTES.md — the project's log of findings about the configured engine MCP server. Four jobs: re-stamp (the server moved, so every entry is suspect), replay (reproduce a `replay: safe` finding inside a disposable sandbox to see whether it still holds), retire (offer to drop what was fixed or went upstream), and upstream (print a ready diff for the packaged INDEX.md). Use for "audit the MCP notes", "are these findings still true", "recheck the MCP traps", "clean up MCP-RECHECK-NOTES", "the server was updated — revisit the notes". Replaying mutates a live editor, so it starts by telling you how to prepare it — save your scene, open an empty one — and asks once before touching anything. Everything it creates lives under a single UNIKIT_AUDIT_<runid> prefix, is deleted in one action, and the scene is never saved. To record a NEW finding use /unikit-mcp-trap instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proactive bug-hunting workflow. Assesses codebase risk through complexity, coverage, and structural analysis, then spawns focused investigators that write reproducing tests to validate suspected bugs. Thoroughness over speed. Advisory only — produces findings and proposes tickets; does not implement fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check that the scheduled data work behind the reports actually ran and produced something sensible: the daily reshaping scripts, the API pulls, the tables the reports read from. Use each morning before anyone opens a report, when a report looks wrong and nobody knows whether it is the data or the query, after a schema or API change, when a new audience or source is added to the pipeline, or when a scheduled job failed or finished suspiciously fast.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Vue 3 Composition API, script setup macros, reactivity system, and built-in components. Use when writing Vue SFCs, defineProps/defineEmits/defineModel, watchers, or using Transition/Teleport/Suspense/KeepAlive.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。