「validation」の検索結果

Use when you need to design, review, or improve REST APIs with Quarkus REST (Jakarta REST) — including resource classes, HTTP methods, status codes, request/response DTOs, Bean Validation, exception mappers, optional runtime OpenAPI exposure (SmallRye), contract-first generation from OpenAPI, content negotiation, pagination, sorting and filtering, API versioning, idempotency (Idempotency-Key), optimistic concurrency (ETag / If-Match), HTTP caching (Cache-Control), API deprecation (Sunset / Deprecation headers), RFC 7807 Problem Details, ISO-8601 for time in contracts, and security-aware boundaries. This should trigger for requests such as Review or improve JAX-RS resources in a Quarkus project; Design HTTP APIs with validation and error handling on Quarkus; Add API versioning, idempotency, ETag concurrency, or deprecation headers; Implement pagination, sorting, or RFC 7807 Problem Details error responses. Part of cursor-rules-java project

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security-Scanner Agent fuer fabrikIQ und andere Projekte. Fuehrt umfassende Sicherheitspruefungen durch. Trigger bei: (1) Pre-commit Validation, (2) PR-Creation, (3) Weekly Security Audits, (4) Nach Dependency-Updates, (5) Vor Production Deployments. <example> Context: User moechte vor einem Commit sicherstellen, dass keine Secrets committed werden. user: "Ich will gleich committen. Pruefe mal auf Secrets." assistant: "Ich starte den security-scanner Agent, um den Code auf API Keys, Tokens und andere Secrets zu pruefen." <Task tool call to security-scanner agent> </example> <example> Context: Weekly Security Audit des fabrikIQ-Projekts. user: "Fuehre den woechentlichen Security-Scan durch." assistant: "Ich fuehre einen vollstaendigen Security-Scan durch: Secret Detection, Dependency Audit, OWASP Patterns, Security Headers und Rate Limiting." <Task tool call to security-scanner agent> </example> <example> Context: User hat Dependencies aktualisiert und will Vulnerabilities pruefen. user: "Ich habe npm update und pip install -U gemacht. Gibt es Sicherheitsprobleme?" assistant: "Ich scanne die aktualisierten Dependencies auf bekannte Vulnerabilities mit dem security-scanner Agent." <Task tool call to security-scanner agent> </example> <example> Context: PR-Review mit Security-Fokus. user: "Review den PR #42 auf Security-Probleme." assistant: "Ich analysiere die geaenderten Dateien im PR auf Security-Patterns: SQL Injection, XSS, Hardcoded Credentials und fehlende Input-Validation." <Task tool call to security-scanner agent> </example>

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies differential m6A methylation between conditions from MeRIP-seq paired IP/input data using exomePeak2 with `bam_ip` + `bam_input` (control arm) and `bam_treated_ip` + `bam_treated_input` (treatment arm) for integrated GC-bias-aware differential calling (Liu 2022 *NAR Genom Bioinform* 4:lqac046), QNB beta-binomial test (Liu 2017 *BMC Bioinformatics* 18:387), MeTDiff HMM-based differential bundled with MeTPeak, RADAR (Zhang 2019 *Genome Biol* 20:294) with its `filterBins -> diffIP -> reportResult` workflow, and the defensible paired-symmetric case of edgeR / DESeq2 on featureCounts-on-peaks matrices when batch / lot covariates need explicit fixed-effect handling (exomePeak2's top-level API does NOT accept arbitrary covariates). Covers paired vs unpaired vs interaction designs, batch confounding (antibody lot, RNA prep, sequencing run) and the per-lot meta-analysis strategy when exomePeak2 is the primary caller, the stoichiometry-vs-expression-vs-IP-efficiency confound that all MeRIP differential methods inherit, normalisation choice (size factor on IP, on input, on per-sample IP/input ratio), the McIntyre 2020 reproducibility caveat, effect-size filtering as a guardrail against under-powered N=2 designs, and orthogonal-validation routes for absolute stoichiometry (GLORI / SAC-seq / m6Anet `mod_ratio`). Use when comparing m6A levels across two or more conditions, choosing between exomePeak2 / QNB / RADAR / MeTDiff for a given design, handling batch confounding when exomePeak2's API is too rigid, normalising against input properly, distinguishing real hyper- / hypo-methylation from expression-level shifts, applying effect-size thresholds, interpreting volcano plots of differential peaks, or planning a follow-up orthogonal stoichiometry validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for when to use and when not to use return validators in Convex functions. Use this skill whenever the user is writing Convex queries, mutations, or actions and needs guidance on return value validation. Also trigger when the user asks about Convex type safety, runtime validation, AI-generated Convex code, Convex AI rules, Convex security best practices, or when they're debugging return type issues in Convex functions. Trigger this skill when users mention "validators", "returns", "return type", or "exact types" in the context of Convex development. Also trigger when writing or reviewing Convex AI rules or prompts that instruct LLMs how to write Convex code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies differential m6A methylation between conditions from MeRIP-seq paired IP/input data using exomePeak2 with `bam_ip` + `bam_input` (control arm) and `bam_treated_ip` + `bam_treated_input` (treatment arm) for integrated GC-bias-aware differential calling (Liu 2022 *NAR Genom Bioinform* 4:lqac046), QNB beta-binomial test (Liu 2017 *BMC Bioinformatics* 18:387), MeTDiff HMM-based differential bundled with MeTPeak, RADAR (Zhang 2019 *Genome Biol* 20:294) with its `filterBins -> diffIP -> reportResult` workflow, and the defensible paired-symmetric case of edgeR / DESeq2 on featureCounts-on-peaks matrices when batch / lot covariates need explicit fixed-effect handling (exomePeak2's top-level API does NOT accept arbitrary covariates). Covers paired vs unpaired vs interaction designs, batch confounding (antibody lot, RNA prep, sequencing run) and the per-lot meta-analysis strategy when exomePeak2 is the primary caller, the stoichiometry-vs-expression-vs-IP-efficiency confound that all MeRIP differential methods inherit, normalisation choice (size factor on IP, on input, on per-sample IP/input ratio), the McIntyre 2020 reproducibility caveat, effect-size filtering as a guardrail against under-powered N=2 designs, and orthogonal-validation routes for absolute stoichiometry (GLORI / SAC-seq / m6Anet `mod_ratio`). Use when comparing m6A levels across two or more conditions, choosing between exomePeak2 / QNB / RADAR / MeTDiff for a given design, handling batch confounding when exomePeak2's API is too rigid, normalising against input properly, distinguishing real hyper- / hypo-methylation from expression-level shifts, applying effect-size thresholds, interpreting volcano plots of differential peaks, or planning a follow-up orthogonal stoichiometry validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for when to use and when not to use return validators in Convex functions. Use this skill whenever the user is writing Convex queries, mutations, or actions and needs guidance on return value validation. Also trigger when the user asks about Convex type safety, runtime validation, AI-generated Convex code, Convex AI rules, Convex security best practices, or when they're debugging return type issues in Convex functions. Trigger this skill when users mention "validators", "returns", "return type", or "exact types" in the context of Convex development. Also trigger when writing or reviewing Convex AI rules or prompts that instruct LLMs how to write Convex code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs comprehensive preflight validation of Bicep deployments to Azure, including template syntax validation, what-if analysis, and permission checks. Use this skill before any deployment to Azure to preview changes, identify potential issues, and ensure the deployment will succeed. Activate when users mention deploying to Azure, validating Bicep files, checking deployment permissions, previewing infrastructure changes, running what-if, or preparing for azd provision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract structured data from LLM responses with Pydantic validation, retry failed extractions automatically, parse complex JSON with type safety, and stream partial results with Instructor - battle-tested structured output library

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rigorous visual validation expert specializing in UI testing, design system compliance, and accessibility verification. Masters screenshot analysis, visual regression testing, and component validation. Use PROACTIVELY to verify UI modifications have achieved their intended goals through comprehensive visual analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialized skill for handling complex object comparison and deep validation. Use when you need to compare deep objects, exclude specific properties, handle circular references, or validate DTOs/Entities. Covers BeEquivalentTo, Excluding, Including, custom comparison rules, etc. Keywords: object comparison, deep comparison, BeEquivalentTo, DTO comparison, Entity validation, excluding properties, circular reference, Excluding, Including, ExcludingNestedObjects, RespectingRuntimeTypes, WithStrictOrdering, ignore timestamp, exclude timestamp

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete guide for ASP.NET Core Web API integration testing. Use when performing integration testing on Web API endpoints or validating ProblemDetails error format. Covers WebApplicationFactory, IExceptionHandler, Testcontainers multi-container orchestration, Flurl URL construction, and AwesomeAssertions HTTP validation. Keywords: webapi integration testing, WebApplicationFactory, asp.net core integration test, webapi integration test, IExceptionHandler, ProblemDetails, ValidationProblemDetails, AwesomeAssertions, Flurl, Respawn, Be201Created, Be400BadRequest, multi-container testing, Collection Fixture, global exception handling

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates environment variables in CI, prevents secret leaks, enforces masking, and provides fail-fast validation with clear documentation. Use for "secrets management", "env var validation", "credential security", or "secret masking".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hardens API security with rate limiting, input validation, authentication, and protection against common attacks. Use when users request "API security", "secure API", "rate limiting", "input validation", or "API protection".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs multi-layer caching strategy with edge CDN, server-side caching, cache invalidation, and CDN configuration. Use for "caching strategy", "CDN setup", "cache invalidation", or "performance optimization".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates CRUD REST API endpoints with request validation, TypeScript types, consistent response formats, error handling, and documentation. Includes route handlers, validation schemas (Zod/Joi), typed responses, and usage examples. Use when building "REST API", "CRUD endpoints", "API routes", or "backend endpoints".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

WPA/WPA2/WPA3-Enterprise (802.1X / EAP) attack methodology — EAP method identification (PEAP-MSCHAPv2, EAP-TTLS, EAP-TLS, EAP-GTC, EAP-PWD, EAP-FAST), evil-twin RADIUS attacks with eaphammer for credential capture, MSCHAPv2 challenge-response cracking, EAP-TLS client certificate theft paths (DPAPI, NDES, AD CS auto-enrollment), supplicant validation bypass (missing server cert validation, missing CN pinning, BYOD misconfigurations), and post-capture pivots into AD via cracked domain credentials. Use for corporate Wi-Fi engagements where the network is 802.1X authenticated.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt Session Management vulnerabilities — session fixation (no regeneration on login), insufficient invalidation on logout / password-change / email-change, predictable or low-entropy session IDs, JWT-as-session with no exp/revocation, refresh-token rotation/reuse-detection gaps, OAuth/SSO session linkage, device-bound-session (DBSC) downgrade, and cookie attribute issues (Secure/HttpOnly/SameSite/__Host-). Validate with TWO real sessions (attacker A + victim B), body-diff every 200, and OOB confirmation for theft chains. Medium to Critical (fixation→admin hijack, no-invalidation→persistent ATO).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finding validation before writing any report — 7-Question Gate (all 7 questions), 4 pre-submission gates, always-rejected list, conditionally valid with chain table, CVSS 3.1 quick reference, severity decision guide, report title formula, 60-second pre-submit checklist. Use BEFORE writing any report. One wrong answer = kill the finding and move on. Saves N/A ratio.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bug bounty report writing for H1/Bugcrowd/Intigriti/Immunefi — report templates, human tone guidelines, impact-first writing, CVSS 3.1 scoring, title formula, impact statement formula, severity decision guide, downgrade counters, pre-submit checklist. Validation gates and the submittability/always-rejected decision are owned by triage-validation; this skill owns the written report itself (templates, tone, formulas). Use after validating a finding and before submitting. Never use 'could potentially' — prove it or don't report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive methodology for auditing and exploiting TLS/SSL implementations and misconfigurations across network services and mobile applications. Covers protocol downgrade attacks including POODLE (CVE-2014-3566) against SSLv3 CBC padding, DROWN (CVE-2016-0800) cross-protocol attack leveraging SSLv2 export ciphers to decrypt TLS sessions, and FREAK (CVE-2015-0204) forcing RSA export-grade key exchange. Addresses BEAST (CVE-2011-3389) exploiting CBC IV predictability in TLS 1.0, CRIME (CVE-2012-4929) and BREACH targeting TLS-level and HTTP-level compression oracles respectively, and Heartbleed (CVE-2014-0160) for OpenSSL memory disclosure. Covers certificate validation bypass techniques for applications with improper hostname verification or chain validation, certificate pinning bypass using Frida and Objection for mobile application interception, HSTS bypass via NTP manipulation and subdomain exploitation, TLS 1.3 0-RTT replay attacks against non-idempotent endpoints, mutual TLS (mTLS) authentication a...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build autonomous AI agents with Claude Agent SDK. Structured outputs guarantee JSON schema validation, with plugins system and hooks for event-driven workflows. Prevents 14 documented errors. Use when: building coding agents, SRE systems, security auditors, or troubleshooting CLI not found, structured output validation, session forking errors, MCP config issues, subagent cleanup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design resilient React error handling with Error Boundaries, Sentry integration, recovery UI, retry patterns, and graceful degradation. Activate on: error boundary, crash recovery, Sentry, error fallback UI, retry logic, unhandled exceptions. NOT for: form validation errors (use form-validation-architect), API error codes (use api-architect).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Great Expectations, dbt tests, anomaly detection, and data contracts for data quality. Activate on: data quality, data validation, Great Expectations, data contract, anomaly detection, SLA, freshness check, schema validation. NOT for: dbt model structure (use dbt-analytics-engineer), schema evolution (use schema-evolution-manager).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architect data fetching with TanStack Query v5, SWR, optimistic updates, prefetching, and cache invalidation strategies. Activate on: React Query, SWR, optimistic updates, cache invalidation, prefetching, stale-while-revalidate, infinite queries. NOT for: REST API design (use api-architect), database queries (use database skills), GraphQL schema (use graphql-expert).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。