397 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Add, change, or debug external API integrations, vendor SDK adapters, and bridges to legacy business workflows. Use when an Action or domain service needs an outer technical dependency.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when creating cost estimates and quotations for software development projects. Use this skill when you have an RFQ (Request for Quotation), project requirements, or a project description and need to create a comprehensive estimate with WBS, effort calculations, cost breakdowns, and ROI analysis. Supports Japanese (default) and English, with systematic work breakdown, effort estimation, and markdown-formatted estimate documents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate formal IT/hardware purchase request documents from informal requirements. Use when creating purchase justifications, cost-benefit analyses, ROI calculations, vendor comparisons, or MARP presentation slides for management approval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Professional contract review skill for business agreements including NDAs, MSAs, SLAs, SOWs, and software license agreements. Provides systematic clause-by-clause analysis, risk assessment with quantified scoring, red flag detection, and negotiation guidance. Use this skill when reviewing vendor contracts, partnership agreements, service agreements, or any business contract requiring risk evaluation and negotiation preparation. Triggers include "review this contract", "analyze this NDA", "check this agreement for risks", "prepare for contract negotiation", or when evaluating terms and conditions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search the live web via Perplexity Search API. Use when you need current documentation, release notes, vendor pages, news, domain-constrained web search, or date/recency filtering. Not for local codebase search or stable docs already in context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the SD-22 DMSMS Guidebook (DSPO, FY24 working draft). Use for managing Diminished Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) and obsolescence across a long-lived system's life cycle: the five-step process (Prepare, Identify, Assess, Analyze, Implement) plus the Strategize overlay; standing up a DMSMS Management Team (DMT) and Management Plan (DMP); risk-based monitoring and surveillance (the risk cube, predictive tools, vendor surveys, GIDEP/DLA PDNs, critical-materials analysis); health assessments and resolution timing; costing and selecting resolutions (life-of-need buys, substitutes, redesign, technology refreshment) by AoA/BCA; and budgeting/executing resolutions through modification funding and the ECP process. Defense-sustainment / DoD-acquisition framing throughout. Does NOT teach general systems engineering, parts-management standards, or contracting law in depth, and does not reproduce DoD policy text or the source's tables and figures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sweeps a named list of news sources and blogs for items relevant to the user's role and returns a dated digest of 5 to 8 items, each with a one-line so-what, a source URL and a publication date, as a Markdown document or a ready-to-paste email. Use when the user asks to "run my news digest", "do my news sweep", "draft my morning news flash", "what happened in industry news this week" or to monitor vendor or industry news for their role. Do not use for the user's own inbox, calendar and mentions brief, use custom-daily-brief instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts answers to the questions in a received RFP, RFQ or tender from the organisation's past responses, answer library, case studies, policies and other documents provided: one row per buyer question with a draft answer marked Reused, Adapted or Missing, its source and date, and a legal or pricing review flag on every answer touching terms, liability, warranties, insurance, data protection or price. Use when the user asks to "draft our RFP response", "answer this tender from our past proposals", "pre-fill the bid questions", "first pass at the RFQ answers" or "reuse our previous bid content". Do not use for writing the buyer's own RFP or requirements, use rfp-requirements-pack instead; for security or due diligence questionnaires use vendor-security-questionnaire-prefill; for scoring received supplier responses use rfp-comparison-pack. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reads a purchase order extract (spreadsheet, CSV or pasted table) and returns a DRAFT question sheet for the buyer: possible split orders, round amounts, amounts just under an approval threshold, first-seen or near-duplicate vendors, duplicate orders and missing or self approvals, each a neutral question naming the PO numbers, never a finding. Use when the user asks to "review these purchase orders", "screen the PO log", "spot anomalies in this spend extract", "sanity-check the PO register" or "prepare buyer questions before the audit". Do not use for an expense claim or travel request checked against policy, use expense-policy-precheck instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds a one-page meeting preparation brief from the calendar invite, recent mail threads with the attendees, chat messages and shared files: purpose, what each attendee likely wants, open threads, key files, talking points and risks. Returns it in the chat as a DRAFT Markdown document capped at 450 words. Use when the user asks to "prep me for my next meeting", "what do I need to know before the vendor call", "one-pager for tomorrow's steering meeting" or "brief me on my 2pm". Do not use for minutes or action items after a meeting, use meeting-minutes-writer or transcript-to-actions instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews a proposal, business case, deck, plan or contract summary in character as a General Counsel archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings that cite the exact passage or clause, legal risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Meeting preparation, not legal advice. Use when the user asks to "run a general counsel review", "what would legal say about this", "pressure-test the legal exposure in this deal" or "prepare me for the deal committee". Do not use for price, term, renewal or vendor leverage, use procurement-reviewer instead; for lawful basis and data flows, use cdo-reviewer; for security controls, use ciso-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Financial Officer archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings that cite the exact passage, finance risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a CFO review", "pressure-test the numbers in this business case", "what would a CFO say about this", "challenge the payback and run costs" or "prepare this for the investment committee". Do not use for delivery or capacity questions, use coo-reviewer instead; for architecture or vendor questions, use cto-reviewer; for positioning or demand, use cmo-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reads an accounts payable exception list (mismatches, possible duplicates, missing or exhausted purchase orders, missing receipts, vendor or bank detail differences) with any invoice, purchase order and receipt data supplied, and returns a DRAFT action sheet: per line, the exception as stated, the facts as read, the difference where both sides exist, one proposed next action for the accounts payable clerk to perform, who or what it needs, and a draft query, with UNKNOWN wherever the data is silent. Use when the user asks to "review these invoice exceptions", "work through the AP exception queue", "what should I do with these blocked invoices", "propose next steps for the three-way match failures" or "sort out the duplicate and missing PO invoices". Do not use for a purchase order log screened for anomalies, use purchase-order-anomaly-review instead; for an expense claim against policy, use expense-policy-precheck. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Technology Officer archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings cited to the exact passage, technology risks (architecture, build versus buy, vendor lock-in, security of design, engineering capacity), what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a CTO review", "pressure-test the technical side of this plan", "what would a CTO ask about this" or "rehearse the technology seat before the review". Do not use for cash, payback or budget questions, use cfo-reviewer instead; for capacity and timeline questions, use coo-reviewer; for security controls, privacy or compliance, use ciso-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Operating Officer archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings cited to specific sections, delivery and operational risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a COO review", "pressure-test the delivery plan", "what would our COO say about this", "check the timeline and capacity" or "find the execution gaps before the steering committee". Do not use for financial questions, use cfo-reviewer instead; for architecture or vendor questions, use cto-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Embedded firmware setup: STM32, ESP32, AVR, RP2040, Nordic nRF, Zephyr/RTOS, vendor SDKs, CMake/CMakePresets, VS Code/clangd, cross toolchains, flash/debug, Docker/CI. Use for MCU scaffolds, existing firmware modernization, BSPs, linker/startup files, SDK package selection, and embedded CI; prefer cpp-project-setup for host-side C++.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quality gate immediately after building: prove that what was just built actually works, while the context is still hot. Six steps: scope what changed, run live on real data, break it on purpose, show a counter or log proving it ran, root-cause any failure and re-run, then a verdict with evidence. Only a green verdict earns the word done. Supports an external multi-vendor review panel as a mid-step. Triggers: "/tt", "/test", "prove it works", "test what we built".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
- Entry point for open-source intelligence, investigation and verification work. Use when asked to investigate, research, verify, vet, check out, look up, background-check, trace, attribute or find someone or something; when a request involves due diligence, KYC or KYB, counterparty or vendor risk, sanctions and PEP screening, AML, fraud, business email compromise
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Get a second opinion from an external LLM at three checkpoints: T1 is the plan valid, T2 which path at a fork, T3 finish plus a QA breaker that tries to break the result. One structured move per exchange (PROPOSE, COUNTER, VERIFY, ACCEPT, BLOCK) with memory across turns, and every exchange mirrored into a human-visible channel. Supports a multi-vendor panel instead of a single reviewer. Triggers: "/secondop", "get a second opinion", "run the review panel".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use Gemini as a third external reviewer alongside two other vendors: diff review with an APPROVE or REQUEST_CHANGES verdict, and QA-breaker duty in the post-build test ritual. Headless over REST with a CLI fallback, and verdicts go to a shared usage journal. Triggers: "/gemini review", "gemini opinion on this diff".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Get external links to your repos through other people's curated surfaces: awesome-lists, tool catalogs and vendor showcases. Measures each list's merge queue before submitting, so nothing goes into a dead queue. Triggers: /borrowed-audience, /ba, borrowed audience, get external links, submit to awesome lists.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hand a task to whichever LLM is alive, not only Claude: the prompt goes to Codex, Grok, Gemini and Claude CLIs at the same time and the first valid answer wins. Use when Claude's quota is exhausted, a vendor is down, or you want a quick parallel answer from other models. Triggers: /ask-any, ask anyone, give this to another LLM, quota empty, ask in parallel, race the rails.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Customize WooCommerce transactional emails the classic PHP-template way (NOT the block email editor) — extend WC_Email, declare $id / $title / $template_html / $template_plain / $placeholders, hook trigger() to a woocommerce_order_status_*_notification action, register via the woocommerce_email_classes filter. Plus the canonical template-override pattern (copy templates/emails/*.php to your theme's /woocommerce/emails/ folder; wc_get_template resolves them automatically), and the get_default_subject / get_default_heading override pattern for admin-customizable strings. Use when adding a new transactional email (custom shipped notification, vendor split, internal alert), overriding an existing template, or customizing strings that the admin Settings cannot reach. Triggers on WC_Email, woocommerce_email_classes, woocommerce_order_status_*_notification, wc_get_template_html, template_html / template_plain in WC context, "transactional email" / "send WooCommerce email programmatically".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "set up my founder social-selling routine", "build a daily engagement block for target accounts", or "turn funding / hiring signals into selling plays"; produces the founder/seller daily operating block — a time-boxed engagement-block spec (substantive value-add comments on target-account posts, never a pitch), warm-touch-before-ask cadence rules, trigger-response plays consuming the social-pulse-monitor B2B trigger watchlist (funding / hiring / launch signals), and a quarterly diagnostic that reads LinkedIn SSI as an input diagnostic only (Estimated, vendor-defined — never a target metric). All volume norms are Estimated/community-derived; all execution is human — zero mass-DM, zero connection-request automation, zero engagement automation (LinkedIn UA §8.2 red line); 1:1 pitch and DM mechanics route to outreach-manager. Not for cold email sequences — use cold-outbound-sequencer. 社交销售/创始人日常互动块/热身触达节奏/触发信号剧本
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。