「viewer」の検索結果

Use when a reviewer, CI bot, or another AI leaves feedback to address

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review of a PR, branch, or your own uncommitted work across eight dimensions — security, correctness, test coverage, API/compatibility, usability, documentation, code quality, performance. Sizes the diff, reviews inline or fans out reviewers off a shared brief, verifies findings against code, reports a grouped list with a shape verdict, fixes on approval. Use for "review this PR", "/pr-review 3011", or a pre-flight self-review before submitting; add "thorough" for adversarial verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Queue open microsoft/apm pull requests (community fixes, PRs without an issue, or PRs that close an issue) and fan them out through an isolated pool (default 2) of autopilot-pr-triage-worker sessions. Advisory only. Never merges, never assigns, never requests reviewers, never runs autopilot-pr-review-worker. Activate on a mixed PR list or queue-open when the job is PR triage. Works in a local session, Copilot App automation, Cloud Agent, Remote Agent, or Agentic Workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to run a four-panel adversarial advisory review on any pull request that touches the OpenAPM specification artifact (docs/src/content/docs/specs/openapm-*.md), its inline / sidecar JSON Schemas (docs/src/content/docs/specs/schemas/*.schema.json), or the conformance fixture seed (tests/fixtures/spec-conformance/**). The panel fans out to four spec-ecosystem reviewers (swagger-openapi-editor, oci-distribution-editor, pkgmgr-registry-contract-editor, w3c-tag-architect), each running in its own agent thread, and a spec-editor synthesizer that produces a fold-now / defer-v0.1.1 / defer-v0.2 / reject list plus a ship decision keyed off a 1..10 shocked_meter scale. The orchestrator is the sole writer to the PR: ONE consolidated comment, no verdict labels, no merge gating. The panel is advisory -- it surfaces findings, prioritizes folds, and renders a ship recommendation that the maintainer weighs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Queue open microsoft/apm issues and fan them out through an isolated pool (default 2) of autopilot-issue-triage-worker sessions. Advisory only. Never implements, never assigns, never requests reviewers. Activate on a mixed issue list or queue-all when the job is triage. Works in a local session, Copilot App automation, Cloud Agent, Remote Agent, or Agentic Workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to post or patch ONE GitHub comment for a microsoft/apm autopilot run. It owns public vs debug body assembly and the AI disclaimer footer. Never labels, assigns, requests reviewers, or merges. Autopilot skills that write comments must load this skill and must not call gh comment APIs themselves.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement a fully specified request for a GCP IAM resource grant or Cloud Run IAP viewer in marin-iac.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract and analyze writing improvements from GitHub PR review comments. Use when asked to show review feedback, style changes, or editorial improvements from a GitHub pull request URL. Handles both explicit suggestions and plain text feedback. Produces structured output comparing original phrasing with reviewer suggestions to help refine future writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ACTIVATES ONLY on an explicit user request for the ulw-plan workflow: the user themselves saying ulw-plan, ulw plan, /skill:ulw-plan, or asking in their own words for a work plan before coding. NEVER self-activates: a bare ulw/ultrawork run, an agent-side routing decision, or reading this file is not a request, and the plan-gated reviewers (metis/momus) stay locked without a user request plus a written .omo/plans plan file. Explore-first planning consultant (Prometheus) that grounds in the codebase, asks only the forks exploration cannot resolve - or researches them to best practice when the intent is fuzzy - waits for explicit approval, then writes ONE decision-complete work plan a worker executes with zero further interview. Triggers: ulw-plan, ulw plan, plan this, make a plan, plan before coding, interview me, break this down, start planning, plan mode.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-implementation gate review: run manual QA on the real surface yourself, then launch ONE gate reviewer (never a panel) to audit goal, constraints, code quality, security, missed context, and QA evidence. Use before a PR handoff or when the user explicitly asks to review completed work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare and request a code review after implementation or before merge by assembling scope, requirements, git range, and reviewer instructions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review-feedback handling route for CodeRabbit, GitHub, PR, or human reviewer comments. Use before implementing suggestions to verify each finding. Do not use for a fresh code review, security audit, TDD, or final completion evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Default code-quality route for broad code review, PR review, maintainability, correctness, and regression-risk checks. Do not use as the primary route for dedicated OWASP/security audits, review-feedback handling, completion verification, AI-code cleanup, or TDD/test-first work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Split a PR into multiple PRs to reduce the number of required CODEOWNERS reviewer groups.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Submit one node result to the assigned Reviewer and finish only after a bounded pass/rework chain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create text-driven visuals in Markdown: charts, diagrams, cards, architecture and page layouts. Charts and analytical views (bar, line, pie, heatmap, correlation, regression); reliability and operations (latency, incident, throughput, cycle time, OKR, standup, on-call); product and finance (funnel, retention, revenue, budget); process and workflow (approval, BPMN); software design and behaviour (class, state machine, sequence, C4); dependencies and impact (dependency graph, ER, causality); system architecture as HTML (layer stack, wings, zones, topology, service catalogue, request paths); infrastructure (cloud, Kubernetes, ETL, network, security, IAM, compliance); governance and people (ArchiMate, org chart, hiring); knowledge and planning (mind map, roadmap, Gantt, migration); documents (comparison, SWOT, memo, policy, catalogue, case study). Use when a document needs a diagram, chart or card. Figures render live. Not for slide decks or math notation. Not recommended: mermaid / canvas / drawio / dot.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run PR-grade real Codex E2E validation through claude-tap, including resume turns, multiple tool calls, optional image input, viewer verification, and screenshot evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate demo assets (GIF/MP4) from real tmux E2E runs and viewer screenshots using asciinema and Playwright

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to review a PR, run a code review loop, or invoke the ralph reviewer against a pull request number or GitHub URL

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Skill that analyzes 18-month scenarios from a news headline. Runs the primary analysis with the scenario-analyst agent and obtains a second opinion with the strategy-reviewer agent. Generates a comprehensive English report covering 1st/2nd/3rd-order impacts, recommended stocks, and a critical review. Example: /scenario-analyzer "Fed raises rates by 50bp" Triggers: news analysis, scenario analysis, 18-month outlook, medium-to-long-term investment strategy

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Critically review strategy drafts from edge-strategy-designer for edge plausibility, overfitting risk, sample size adequacy, and execution realism. Use when strategy_drafts/*.yaml exists and needs quality gate before pipeline export. Outputs PASS/REVISE/REJECT verdicts with confidence scores.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review skills in any project using a dual-axis method: (1) deterministic code-based checks (structure, scripts, tests, execution safety) and (2) LLM deep review findings. Use when you need reproducible quality scoring for `skills/*/SKILL.md`, want to gate merges with a score threshold (for example 90+), or need concrete improvement items for low-scoring skills. Works across projects via --project-root.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Have Codex independently review an existing implementation plan while Claude coordinates a bounded revision loop. For automatic reviewer selection from either host, use claudex-loop with mode=review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Have Codex implement a concrete work order and have Claude independently inspect the final changes. Preserves the explicit Codex builder choice; use claudex-loop for host-based planning and automatic reviewer selection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。